Parkland Survivor Writes DNC Fundraising Letter. Perhaps they should consult with Condoleeza Rice on that

Brandon Minoff

Parkland High School Student: Media Politicizing Tragedy To Push Gun Control, Not Focusing On Students  . . . " 'It pains me to see that knowing that 17 of my classmates are dead and they just want to talk about gun control," he continued. "Students have opinions, they say stuff that they’re against guns, and that gun control is necessary, but they’re making it bigger than it needs to be at this moment.' " . . .
"Minoff said that he "definitely" thinks that schools should have armed security guards, a comment he made while discussing football coach and security guard Aaron Feis, who was killed as he shielded students from the shooter.
" 'If coach Feis would have had a gun or any of the other security guards would have had a gun it definitely would have been less fatal," he said. "[The shooter] and coach Feis were face-to-face and he just shielded kids instead of having the ability to kill the shooter.' " . . .

But the Democrat press has got to this young lady: Daily Caller  "One Parkland shooting survivor is now using the mass shooting to fundraise for the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

"In the letter, which the DNC blasted out via email on Friday, Marjory Stoneman Douglas senior Sara Imam cited her classmate’s deaths as reason to support Democrats in the 2018 midterm elections.

“ 'If you’re with me and other Stoneman Douglas survivors, add your name to commit to vote this fall — it’s the only way we’ll do something about gun violence in our country,” Imam writes, urging people to “Help elect Democrats who will take action on gun violence.' ” . . .

The topic of gun violence should be a bipartisan discussion, but it is far from it.  . . . "As some of these students delve deeper into the political world, they are going to face more and more criticism, criticism that the left says is unwarranted. But these students are starting to become significant political actors, and if the DNC is going to use these young adults to further an agenda anathema to conservatism and the Constitution, it will have to expect pushback.
"The young woman is now a legal adult and is, without question, eligible to vote. Without Sara Imam’s permission, this DNC email would not be going out, and while this email is something from Imam herself, one can’t help but be disappointed in the fact that the DNC is capitalizing on the tragedy to generate enthusiasm and hopefully increase voter turn out." . . .

Condoleeza Rice on The View: My Father Used Guns to Repel KKK

“And I’m sure if Bull Connor had known where those guns were he would have rounded them up.”

"Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice reminded the ladies on The View of the importance of the Second Amendment. Her father and neighbors used guns to protect themselves against the KKK and racists while growing up in the deep south. From The Blaze:

Bull Connor's deputies

“I was a little girl growing up in Birmingham, Alabama, in the late fifties, early sixties,” she explained. “There was no way that Bull Connor and the Birmingham Police were going to protect you.”

“And so when White Knight Riders would come through our neighborhood,” she said, “my father and his friends would take their guns and they’d go to the head of the neighborhood, it’s a little cul-de-sac and they would fire in the air, if anybody came through.”

“I don’t think they actually ever hit anybody,” she continued. “But they protected the neighborhood. And I’m sure if Bull Connor had known where those guns were he would have rounded them up.”

“And so, I don’t favor some things like gun registration,” she said to a suddenly silent crowd.

“That said, it’s time to have a national conversation about how we can deal with the problems we have. It’s not going to be any single fix to the terrible events at Parkland,” she concluded.  . . .  

Know why a conservative will always come out second on a TV talk show?

What shows have applause signs?  "Like Dr. Phil, for example. Is there an applause sign or are people actually clapping in agreement with what he says? Same with Oprah?"


 "Best Answer from Gonzo:  all of them. audience members are expected to be robots.

"Every show that has a LIVE audience has an applause sign. Yes, Dr. Phil, Oprah, the View, Regis & Kelly, Rachel Ray, etc.
My friend Julie & her Mom went to see Oprah in Chicago about 2 years ago. It took them about 6 months to get tickets.

"Game shows, talk shows, sitcoms..they either have "laugh, clap, Ahhh and booing, cheer" signs or actually pay someone to stand by the stage to coach the audience.

Studio Audience participation
Awww

• For a close-up of a cute baby, a basket of little puppies, a tender moment between two characters, and other golden moments.
• Some shows have specific audience responses:
• "Jerry! Jerry!" from Jerry Springer.
• Trouble Brewing (Oooh)
  • Not common, but it occurs in sitcoms when one character challenges another, and the second character takes up the gauntlet.
  • Common on talk shows where the subject matter is really lowbrow. The good-for-nothing boyfriend accuses the skanky girlfriend of sleeping around and she makes a bombshell confession: It was his best friend who knocked her up! Cue the indignant crowd.
  • Also happens whenever something offensive is said. This is usually followed up with something else that makes the whole thing funny in retrospect, cuing laughter or applause.
  Full article.

Justice Department reviewing Oakland mayor's tipoff of immigration raids, which led to 232 arrests

LA Times  "The White House on Thursday said the Department of Justice was reviewing the actions of Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf, who last weekend alerted residents in advance of an Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid in Northern California.

" 'I think it's outrageous that a mayor would circumvent federal authorities and certainly put them in danger by making a move such as that," White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters.

"She said Schaaf's actions were under "review" but would not be more specific.

"Justin Berton, a spokesman for Schaaf, said the mayor's office is unaware of any review and declined to comment further. A Justice Department spokesman in the Bay Area also declined to comment.

"Schaaf has defended her statement, saying she felt it was her duty to warn residents of the ICE action." . . .

Obama's Scandal-Free Delusion

David Limbaugh  "Upon hearing that former President Barack Obama recently boasted that he had a scandal-free administration, my first thought after regaining my faculties was: How can I possibly cram all the evidence refuting this in a little bitty column?

"Then I read that what he actually said was, "We didn't have a scandal that embarrassed us." At first blush, that sounds better, right? Because I assume he doesn't mean he's incapable of being embarrassed. After a little more thought, though, it occurred to me that this construction just highlights the real reason he has apparently deluded himself into thinking he served eight honorable years: The liberal media had his back the entire time, even when he treated them like dirt.

"In fact, Obama was a perpetual power-abusing machine. He was so routinely high-handed and selectively contemptuous of the rule of law that people were beginning to think presidential authoritarianism was the new normal. How ironic that so many of Obama's enablers are now projecting these sins onto President Trump, who -- to this point, at least - hasn't actually crossed the line into flouting the Constitution. The left believes -- and acts on the belief -- that the ends justify the means, and so, it naturally assumes we will do the same. Obama was hell-bent on fundamentally transforming America as founded, and he was willing to scratch, bite, kick, steal and flush the rule of law to accomplish it -- and he did, like no president before him. In other words, Obama's lies were OK because lies are sometimes necessary for the greater good.

"For your review, let me just give you a list of examples, many of them snatched from my two Obama books, which chronicled his two disgraceful terms. Not all technically qualify as scandals, but enough do." . . .  Full article.

When nerf guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have nerf guns

First shock, then remorse, followed by anger, protest, demagoguing, and then silliness. TD

Walmart dances with insanity and bans toy guns  "Walmart, not to be outdone by Dick’s Sporting Goods, has jumped aboard the gun ban trade and sent out a corporate letter that makes clear its own stores would be restricting sales of firearms and ammunition to those above age 21.

Weasel Zippers photo

"And with a sort of “oh yeah, how ‘bout this” flip of the ace card, Walmart also announced it was barring sales of toy guns, too.

"Toy guns. Really now, is this where we are as a society?" . . .

New Jersey high school mulls cancellation of Nerf 
gun tournament over shooting fears  . . . “ 'Although students use Nerf guns during these games, the strategies employed by students to target other teams may be misinterpreted in today's climate,' ” 
"The Nerf gun tournament, known at the school as Dart Wars, has been conducted for more than 10 years, according to NorthJersey.com.
"The tournament normally runs from March to June and is conducted during off hours. The toys are not allowed on campus." . . .

Democrat Senator Proposes Restricting Gun That Does Not Exist, saying, . .  "Certainly somebody who’s 18, 19, 20 years old shouldn’t be able to purchase an assault rifle, an AR-15 or other gas-assisted receiver firearms when they can’t buy a simple handgun, so that should be changed.
. . . "Washington Free Beacon gun expert Stephen Gutowski assessed the matter on Twitter:

He might have had in mind the WW2 M-1 Garand, which was described as "gas-operated, clip-fed . . ."

Understanding the strategy behind President Trump's twitter slam of AG Sessions?

. . .  "but President Trump could have fired him anytime he wishes.  And he would have, if he really thought the prosecutions of his mortal enemies are going nowhere.

Thomas Lifson  "I have a strong suspicion that the current kerfuffle between President Trump and Jeff Sessions is part of a strategy, not merely – as the left has it – a rogue president shockingly, immaturely, and inappropriately attacking his attorney general on Twitter.

"By now, you have probably seen the tweet in question:

Why is A.G. Jeff Sessions asking the Inspector General to investigate potentially massive FISA abuse. Will take forever, has no prosecutorial power and already late with reports on Comey etc. Isn’t the I.G. an Obama guy? Why not use Justice Department lawyers? DISGRACEFUL!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 28, 2018

"Occam's Razor suggests that the president means it and that he really wants DOJ prosecutors charged with going after Comey and is genuinely angry at Sessions.  But I always see Donald Trump as a master of the video narrative, an expert crafter of story arcs that work to his advantage, and which often lure his opponents into positions that redound to his benefit once all the facts and drama have played themselves out before the nation's eyes.  Never forget that Donald Trump is the most successful reality television producer in the history of the medium.  And never forget that he played the media like a Stradivarius violin during the campaign, exploiting their predictable outrage." . . .

What if A.G. Sessions is already conducting serious investigations and has developed evidence that will result in indictments for misbehavior in the surveillance of the Trump campaign and in the FBI?  The very last thing Sessions (or Trump) would want is for Sessions to be seen as Trump's hit man, going after his political opponents.  Wouldn't it better, instead, for Sessions to be regarded by the mainstream media as someone sympathetic, because the POTUS has attacked him? This dispatch from Trump-hating CNN makes my point:

 Full article here.

On the other hand... NRO declares, "We’re with Jeff Sessions"

The president has a point in urging an investigation by Justice Department prosecutors, although nothing justifies his blunderbuss tweet and ongoing campaign of humiliation against Jeff Sessions.

School safety: Beyond gun control

Leftist progressive extremists push confiscation.  But since firearms and ammunition can be made in a basement with metalworking equipment, organized crime views gun confiscation as the biggest new business development opportunity since Prohibition.

Jeff Locke  "President Eisenhower was fond of saying that if you correctly define the problem, then you are 90% of the way toward finding the solution.

"The left defines the problem as weapons in the hands of civilians.  As always, leftists insist that the only solution is government (just pass a law, and the problem goes away).  The right defines the problem as mentally ill people having weapons (so keep them away from lunatics).  The correct definition of the problem is that society is threatened and vulnerable to many modern malevolent forces (insanity and Islamic extremism among them) intent on destruction via many weapon types.  The solution is a threat-solution matrix and an improved, layered defense, not a single solution like banning semi-automatic rifles or truncating magazines.

"One thing was apparent at the Florida school massacre: law enforcement failed us.  We learned that the FBI tip line was being managed not by James Comey or Christopher Wray, but by Inspector Clouseau from the Pink Panther movies.  If you think government or law enforcement alone is going to keep your school safe, think again, or you may die.

"It would behoove school boards, administrators, principals, and police to structure their thinking holistically, so that they have a robust security plan." . . .

Headlines most of the media don't want the public to see

"It is no wonder that Trump is around 50% approval in Rasmussen, which is around 7% higher than Obama at this point in his presidency.  And it is also no wonder that almost all the media ignore the Rasmussen poll while touting low numbers in Gallup and CNN polls" . . .

Jack Hellner  "I understand why most of the media are focusing on the fictional Russian collusion, Hope Hicks resigning, and rumors about Jared Kushner.  Since they hate Trump, they certainly wouldn't focus on how well the economy is doing, which shows up in the following articles on the Drudge Report on March 1.

• Jobless claims plunge to 49-year low...
• Incomes Up Most in Five Years...
• Manufacturing Expands at Fastest Pace Since '04...
• US crude oil output hits all-time high; Takes out 1970 record...
• Foreign Holdings of U.S. Securities Rise to Record $18 Trillion...

"I do find this article in the WSJ, also published on March 1, funny.  They state that foreign investors aren't buying as many government bonds, while the above bullet point says foreign investors hold a record number. 

"I also find the following funny: "Does Fed control Trump 2020 destiny?"

"Predictions about the  2020 election are absolutely nuts.  I will give the authors a clue.  If the economy continues to do so well that the Fed believes that it needs to continually raise rates, Trump will probably do pretty well against the leftists who want bigger government and who want more people to be dependent on government.  My guess is that the majority of people will be happier with better jobs, fewer regulations, and lower taxes, versus more food stamps, more regulations, and higher taxes. 

"Some other headlines that most of the media are virtually ignoring:" . . .

Related: Bloomberg reports Real Disposable Incomes in U.S. Increase Most Since 2015

UPDATED: Who's afraid of the little, bad Wolff?

"The media chose to go to war with Donald John Trump in 2017 rather than accept him as president. The media chose poorly."

Foreign press shames U.S. media for crying, "Wolff!"  "In January, the American media was all fire and fury in praising Michael Wolff's book which was touted as a tell-all expose of behind-the-scenes at the White House.
"A month later, even the Washington Post has thrown the towel in on the guy, with its Erik Wemple writing, "Michael Wolff should just apologize," after a BBC host called Wolff out.
"PolitiFact and others in the American press should apologize for promoting this fabulist's fairy tales." . . .

BUSTED: Anchor Releases Audio Proving Michael Wolff Faked Earpiece Malfunction After Trump Affair Question

• FORDHAM: “You said during a TV interview last month that you are absolutely sure that Donald Trump is currently having an affair, while President, behind the back of the First Lady. I repeat, you said you were absolutely sure.”
• WOLFF: “Hold on, I can’t–”
• FORDHAM: “Last week, you backflipped and said, ‘I do not know if the President is having an affair.’ Do you owe the President and the First Lady an apology, Mr Wolff?”
• WOLFF: “I can’t hear you. Hello?”
• FORDHAM: “Just last month you said you were absolutely sure that the President was having an affair, and now you say he is not.”
• WOLFF: “I’m not getting anything.”
• FORDHAM: “You are not hearing me, Mr. Wolff? Mr. Wolff was hearing me before, but he’s not hearing me anymore. So the interview may be over.”

"Later, Fordham released the audio of what Wolff heard in his earpiece when the author claimed the anchor’s question wasn’t coming through."

Mika Brzezinski Kicks Michael Wolff Off Set for Pushing Trump Affair Rumor

. . . " 'When Wolff continued his denial, Brzezinski became frustrated: “Come on, are you kidding? You’re on the set of Morning Joe. We don’t BS here.”

"She then gave him the boot. “I’m sorry, this is awkward, you’re here on the set with us, but we’re done. Michael Wolff, thank you.” Mika told the camera, “We’re gonna go to break now. Bye, everyone,” and the show cut to commercial."

UPDATE:  Foreign press shames U.S. media for crying, "Wolff!"

. . . "His stories about the White House and President Trump were too good to be true.

"The American media failed to check it out.

"The Vanity Fair headline read:

“I Was the Most Non-threatening Person in the Trump Universe”: Michael Wolff Takes a Fire and Fury Victory Lap.

At a Manhattan house party, Wolff and his publisher recount the genesis of the book that rocked the White House.

"The story was a disappointing story about a cocktail party for the book. Do they still hold cocktail parties? I thought they died before disco.

"President Trump, however, tweeted, "I authorized Zero access to White House (actually turned him down many times) for author of phony book! I never spoke to him for book.' " . . .

Asks Ivanka About Her Dad’s ‘Sexual Misconduct’ – Ivanka Blasts Them For Their Bias

Clash Daily  "Did anyone ever ask this of Chelsea Clinton?

"Nope.
"And it’s unlikely that they ever will.
"Despite Chelsea’s campaigning for her mother in 2016, she wasn’t asked this one time.
"The Media (D) has even allowed Chelsea to run from answering questions about donations from Harvey Weinstein to the Clinton Slushfund Foundation — whose board she sits on — and didn’t bother to follow up when she turned tail and ran.
"But NBC has decided that it’s a completely fair question to ask Ivanka — because her father is Donald J. Trump.
"In a pretty disgusting segment of an interview with Ivanka on the Today Show, NBC’s Pete Alexander queried her on what she thought of the allegations of sexual harassment levelled against her father.
"(Ironic that it was the Today Show — Matt Lauer’s former stomping grounds.)

ALEXANDER: Do you believe your father’s accusers?IVANKA: I think it’s a pretty inappropriate question to ask a daughter if she believes the accusers of her father when he’s affirmatively stated that there’s no truth to it. I don’t think that’s a question you would ask many other daughters. I believe my father, I know my father, so I think I have that right as a daughter, to believe my father.” . . 

Hollywood Billboards Hijacked!

Truth Revolt: "The conservative street artist known as Sabo has struck again in Hollywood days before the Academy Awards broadcast. This time, he has covered three large billboards around town in Oscar-themed red tarps with stinging messages about the hypocrisy over the sex abuse scandals plaguing the film industry."   Go see.    Hat tip to iOTWreport

Atheists Raise Unholy Hell About Congress Honoring Billy Graham

When you saw Rev. Graham's coffin in the rotunda, didn't you know this was coming? 

Todd Starnes

"The Freedom From Religion Foundation and other anti-religious groups are infuriated that Billy Graham lies in honor in the rotunda of the U.S. Capitol – saying he was unworthy of such recognition.

" The Wisconsin-based atheist group wrote to Speaker Paul Ryan and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to “emphatically object to the U.S. Congress arranging to have a man known purely for his ministry (in his case, an evangelical Christian ministry)” lie in honor.

“ 'Our membership is also highly concerned at the possibility of taxpayer outlay for the costs of transporting and displaying Graham’s casket in the rotunda,” the notorious atheists wrote.

"The Freedom From Religion Foundation is a vicious bunch of atheists, agnostics and free-thinkers who are on a crusade to eradicate Christianity from the public marketplace. They typically bully small towns and school districts with threatening letters and lawsuits.

“ 'Billy Graham believed fervently in Christianity and people listened to him. But that is not worthy of praise or a spot in the U.S. Capitol, however temporary,” the atheists wrote. “Graham in his own way sought to undo the only sure way to guarantee freedom of religion: a government free from religion. Graham is on the wrong side of history. You will be, too, if you authorize this unearned honor.”