Monday, February 15, 2016

Socialism Is Coming to America


Independent Sentinel
Freedoms-Battle-sm
Cartoon is via Antonio Branco at Comically Incorrect
"Yoav Frommer, a leftist who teaches American history in Israel, argues in the Washington Post that Bernie Sanders’ democratic socialism could become the view of the majority of the Democrat Party. Actually, some of us think it already is. Frommer says the Democrat party was built on socialism.

"In the near future, it is likely we will have a President Bernie Sanders and a socialist congress. If Bernie was young, handsome, witty, couldn’t you see him winning right now? What Democrat would rail against him and his views?

"Haven’t we watched the man on the street interviews where most can’t recognize a photo of the Vice President and who think New Hampshire is on Long Island?

"Europe has devolved into Socialism and PC. The U.S. stands alone but we are only a little behind Europe. The entire EU model is socialism on speed with technocrats under Angela Merkel running the show.

"Socialism is apparently very attractive. All those freebies, all that wealth for everyone, and all that we have to do is ask the rich to pay a little bit more. It hasn’t worked ever, anywhere in the world, but the dream continues. We mustn’t forget that those who want the freebies outnumber those of us who don’t." . . . 

Sanders voter, I'm sure.
. . . "But the truth is that when you take a close look at the “organizers”, the literature and the stated goals of this movement, you see socialism and communism everywhere.  As our economic system crumbles, an increasing number of Americans are coming out of the woodwork and are proudly declaring that they are socialists or communists.  An increasing number of Americans truly believe that the free enterprise system needs to be brought down and that the answer to our problems is to fully embrace socialism and/or communism.  Sadly, this puts Occupy Wall Street in direct opposition to what our founding fathers intended." . . .

The left doing what it does as only they can

Today’s “classy” Leftist Facebook post reacting to Scalia’s death
"It’s illuminating to have Leftist friends on Facebook. This showed up on my feed when another Leftist friend “liked” it:"

Leftist on Scalia's death
. . . "As I always say, as an old-time Democrat myself, I can envision situations in which I would support abortion.  However, whenever I read modern Leftists on the subject, I am so repulsed by their single-minded focus on killing that I want nothing to do with them or their belief system."
Conservatives, we must be better  than people like this.

Hillary Clinton's Dead-End Campaign

Victor Davis Hanson



"Hillary Clinton may yet win the Democratic nomination—if she is not indicted. After all, it is hard for a New England spread-the-wealth socialist like rival Bernie Sanders to appeal to working-class southern whites, minorities, or the wealthy Democratic establishment. It is still likely that the Democratic Party will find a way to aid an ailing and scandal-plagued Mrs. Clinton, rather than turn over its future to a 74-year-old scold, who for most of his voting life was not a Democrat and whose redistributionist agendas and Woodstock fables about the 1960s make Obama seem centrist in comparison.

"All that said, Mrs. Clinton’s campaign rhetoric is coming up empty—largely because it is at odds with the way she has lived her life and conducted her various careers over the last two decades. Voters, even younger ones, are now sorely aware of those flagrant contradictions." . . .  Via Lucianne

GOP Has A Duty To Reject Obama’s SCOTUS Pick

GOP Has A Duty To Reject Obama’s SCOTUS Pick

The Federalist, by David Harsanyi
Republicans should follow Sen. Barack Obama's advice and filibuster the president's SCOTUS nominee.
"Although nothing in his political history suggests magnanimity, Barack Obama may surprise us by nominating one of those moderate-consensus types who would provide some of that national healing he promised us eight years ago. But he’s certainly under no constitutional obligation to do so. He can nominate whomever he pleases in the wake of the vacancy left by Antonin Scalia. And Republicans have plenty of precedent for rejecting his choice.
"They, just like Sen. Obama, can hold nominees responsible for their philosophical positions and records. Sen. Obama unconditionally rejected every George W. Bush nomination to the SCOTUS out of hand because of their ideology. Here he is arguing for the Senate Democrats to filibuster the nomination of Justice Alito:". . .  Via Lucianne

obama, obama jokes, political, humor, cartoon, conservative, hope n' change, hope and change, stilton jarlsberg, scalia, holder, sharpton, supreme court
HopeNChange

John McCain threatens to subpoena U.S. sailors held by Iran if Obama administration doesn't hand over investigation findings by end of month

UK Mail
"US Republican Senator John McCain said on Sunday he would subpoena 10 US sailors to testify about their brief detention by Iran if the Obama administration does not provide the findings of an investigation into the incident by March 1.

Problem: US sailors (pictured) were detained by Iran on Friday after entering Iranian water due to what the US called a 'navigational problem.' They were freed the next day after intervention by US Secretary of State John Kerry

Why were they seen crying? 
Also notice the female sailor at the far right background wearing Islamic head covering.


Investigated: McCain says that if the Obama administration does not meet his deadline, he will subpoena the sailors - seen here being fed on Iranian TV - and hold a hearing to find out what happened

Code Trump: The Gallop Leftward Continues Lindsey Graham update!

Considering a Donald Trump - Bernie Sanders ticket?


C. Edmund Wright  "Donald Trump is now officially the Code Pink Republican. Or maybe he’s the Daily Kos or Huffington Post Republican. How about the Debbie Wasserman Schultz Republican? I think that fits. Heck, we all saw it and we all heard it. Trump went full left loon on George W. Bush and 9/11, sounding like the most impassioned truther from the left. Did Maxine Waters do his debate prep?

"Trump snarked childishly that Bush did not keep us safe on 9/11. Apparently Mr. Trump is not intellectually very curious about history. If he were, he would know that 9/11 was dreamed up, contemplated, financed, planned, and practiced on Bill Clinton's watch. This planning and practicing continued during the days of the hanging chads in Florida. 
"And the truth is that the single biggest failure by the American intelligence community was foisted onto the CIA and the FBI by Clinton appointee Jamie Gorelick with her infamous "wall of separation" between the two agencies. They had their hands tied behind their backs -- thanks to a Clinton appointee.
"Seriously Donald, is a cheap shot at lowly Jeb worth the worst kind of leftist revisionist history that will no doubt harm the Republican nominee in the fall? Apparently it is. This was simply shameful, not to mention contextually not true."
. . . "If we cede that Bush was at fault for 9/11 -- and Trump just absolutely proclaimed it -- we cannot win. If we cede that it was Bush, and not Fannie and Freddie and not the EPA and not Chris Dodds and Barney Frank (and Jamie Gorelick) at fault, then we cannot win. Trump did this a few months ago, stating categorically that "I don't think the Democrats would have done that." 

"Uh... earth to Donald -- it was the Democrats who did that. How did this escape this supposedly macro-economically gifted mind?"

UPDATE: Trump walks back attack on George Bush.  Rather late, don't you think? You can't unring a bell.
. . . "They lied," Trump said during the debate. "They said there were weapons of mass destruction, there were none. And they knew there were none."
On Sunday, Trump said George W. Bush "thought there were weapons of mass destruction, maybe, or maybe he didn't." . . .
The preparations for 9-11 that happened on Clinton's watch, Mr. Trump    
Keep in mind:  William Jefferson Clinton, . .  .   served as the 42nd President of the United States from 1993 to 2001. 
"The idea for the attacks came from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who first presented it to Osama bin Laden in 1996. At that time, bin Laden and al-Qaeda were in a period of transition, having just relocated back to Afghanistan from Sudan. The 1998 African Embassy bombings and bin Laden's 1998 fatwā marked a turning point, as bin Laden became intent on attacking the United States.
In late 1998 or early 1999, bin Laden gave approval for Mohammed to go forward with organizing the plot. A series of meetings occurred in early 1999, involving Mohammed, bin Laden, and his deputy Mohammed Atef. Atef provided operational support for the plot, including target selections and helping arrange travel for the hijackers." . . . Emphases mine, TD

Update: BUSH LIED ABOUT WMDS? TRUMP’S OUTRAGEOUS ACCUSATION
. . . "What Trump said here is what we would expect from a left-wing blogger at the Daily Kos, not from the Republican front-runner for the White House.
""The idea that George W. Bush lied about WMDs is a ludicrous left-wing canard that should be on the ash-heap of history." . . .

Update: Lindsey Graham to “re-evaluate” his support for Donald Trump if he’s the nominee   "But after Saturday night’s debate, the Senator may be ready to defect."

Scalia the Bold Leader for Originalism

RIP

Mark. J. Fitzgibbons  . . . "He gave conservatives hope that the Constitution would not be lost for a lack of honesty or standing by principle, the shortage of which are trademarks of Washington and government.
"Scalia understood that American constitutional law is based in the morality that civil society should be structured such that we should do no harm to others. The “we” includes government. The Constitution is structured to limit government’s harm to individuals and our God-given rights. Scalia understood the need for judicial fidelity to that structure. . . Read more:

Who Benefits From A Brokered Convention?

Ben Shapiro


"The Republican race further descends into chaos, more and more commentators foresee the possibility of a brokered convention. The Republican primary process is designed for an establishment candidate – it breaks down when there is no true establishment candidate with the capacity to reach out to the base. The Republicans send 2,472 delegates to the convention. To win the nomination outright, the Republican candidate must have won 1,236 delegates. Only candidates who have won a majority of support in eight different states are eligible for the nomination. That last rule – the eight-state rule, Rule 40 – was designed in order to prevent Ron Paul from making a mess of the 2012 convention.
"This means that there is a high likelihood that there will only be three candidates with that many states. Remember, in 2012, Rick Santorum only won 11 states, while Newt Gingrich only won 2; Mitt Romney carried the rest, and won 1,462 delegates. In 2008, Mitt Romney won 11 states, and Mike Huckabee won 8; John McCain won 1,378 delegates. It’s difficult to imagine a scenario in which Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and John Kasich win 8 states, for example." . . . Full article here

NY Times Writer: White Men Propose Denying President His Constitutional Right To Name SCOTUS Nominee

Weasel Zippers    "Can anyone be this dumb?"
Screen Shot 2016-02-14 at 6.08.38 PM