Donald Trump sees Iran's threat against 35 US targets and raises them by vowing to strike 52 Iranian sites - as Islamic Republic unfurls its red flag of war and White House expects retaliation 'within weeks'

UK Daily Mail

Iran raised blood red 'flags of revenge' over the minarets at the
 revered Jamkaran Mosque in the holy city of Qom on Saturday

"President Donald Trump has threatened to hit 52 critical targets in Iran in retaliation if Tehran strikes any American interests in the region, upping the stakes after Iran said it had identified 35 targets for potential strikes and raised the red 'flags of revenge' over a key mosque..

" 'Let this serve as a WARNING that if Iran strikes any Americans, or American assets, we have targeted 52 Iranian sites (representing the 52 American hostages taken by Iran many years ago), some at a very high level & important to Iran & the Iranian culture, and those targets, and Iran itself, WILL BE HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD. The USA wants no more threats!' Trump tweeted on Saturday from Mar-a-Lago, after spending the day at his nearby golf course.
" 'Iran is talking very boldly about targeting certain USA assets as revenge for our ridding the world of their terrorist leader who had just killed an American, & badly wounded many others, not to mention all of the people he had killed over his lifetime, including recently hundreds of Iranian protesters,' Trump said.
" 'He was already attacking our Embassy, and preparing for additional hits in other locations. Iran has been nothing but problems for many years,' he continued.
"Trump's threat referenced the Iran hostage crisis of 1979-1981, in which 52 U.S. diplomats and citizens were held hostage by student revolutionaries in Iran. His threat to target sites important to 'Iranian culture' drew many accusations from critics that he was threatening to commit 'war crimes'. 
"A White House spokesman did not immediately respond to an inquiry about the list of U.S. targets from DailyMail.com on Saturday evening.
"The U.S. military confirmed two rocket attacks near American facilities in Iraq on Saturday, saying that no U.S. personnel or allies were injured. The attacks took place near the Green Zone in Baghdad and Balad Air Base in northern Iraq.
"Earlier on Saturday, an Iranian official said at least 35 U.S. targets, including warships and Tel Aviv, have been identified for retaliatory strikes." . . .

Terry Gilliam faces backlash after labeling #MeToo a 'witch-hunt'

Terry Gilliam

The Guardian  . . . The website PinkNews offered swift condemnation, calling the 79-year-old’s comments “a feeble attempt to prove that white men are the real victims”.

"The Time Bandits director and Monty Python cast member, who first described himself as a black lesbian in interviews last year, made his latest comments to the Independent while promoting his film The Man Who Killed Don Quixote, released later this month.
. . . "Gilliam was essentially repeating comments he made in 2018, at a film festival in the Czech Republic. Then, he said: “I no longer want to be a white male, I don’t want to be blamed for everything wrong in the world: I tell the world now I’m a black lesbian … My name is Loretta and I’m a BLT, a black lesbian in transition.”
"Speaking to the Independent, he said: “You can hate what I just said. That’s fine! No problem. I mean, you can believe whatever you want to believe, but fundamentalism always ends up being, ‘You have to attack other people who are not like you,’ and that’s what makes me crazy.' ”

 Monty Pythons Jailer Sketch 2

This sketch really shows the brilliance of Terry Gilliam, the animated cartoonist for the Monty Python gang. I'd like to show you the 'Jailer scene' from 'The Life of Brian' Gilliam is the jailer who stands behind Michael Palin the organizer and plays dumb with Eric Idle brilliantly - it always has me rolling in the isles - enjoy

Kaepernick Sparks Outrage With Unbelievable Remark After Killing of Top Iranian General

Moreover, Kaepernick alleges the airstrike was race related, stating that America is targeting attacks against “Black and Brown people for the expansion of American imperialism.”

Analyzing America  "Failed NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who is endorsed by NIKE, sunk to a new low following the U.S. airstrike that killed the world’s top terrorist, Qassem Soleimani.

"Kaepernick wrote on Twitter, “There is nothing new about American terrorist attacks against Black and Brown people for the expansion of American imperialism.”
“ 'America has always sanctioned and besieged Black and Brown bodies both at home and abroad,” Kaepernick added."
. . . Now on to the comments about his words...

But he is a role model for those on the US women's soccer team that many consider to be "ugly Americans".

Right After Trump Kills Top Terrorist, Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar Says The Unthinkable  . . . "Cruz had asked why congressional Democrats are outraged by the killing of Soleimani, considering that even according to the Obama Dept. of Defense, soleimani was a terrorist directly responsible for the murder of over 500 US service men & women.

"Omar agreed that she is outraged and referred to the terrorist as a “foreign official.' ”

Will Dems Impeach Trump For Killing Soleimani, Too?

Issues & Insights  "Shortly after the news broke that U.S. forces had killed Qassem Soleimani with a precision drone strike, Rep. Ilhan Omar tweeted that “Trump wants war, knows this leads to war and needs the distraction.”
"That’s a pretty serious charge, since she’s saying that Trump is taking the country to war for personal political gain. Doesn’t that constitute a high crime?
"Omar wasn’t the only Democrat making such claims. New Mexico Sen. Tom Udall accused Trump of taking the country “to the brink of an illegal war with Iran.”
"Rep. Tulsi Gabbard – who voted present on the two Trump impeachment charges – said Friday that “This was very clearly an act of war by this president without any kind of authorization or declaration of war from Congress, clearly violating the Constitution.” 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the assassination was conducted “without an Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iran.”  Over at the conservative-leaning Washington Examiner, Jack Hunter says, apparently in all seriousness, that “Trump’s Iran general strike is the kind of thing you should actually impeach him over.” Waging war unconstitutionally “is a textbook example of executive overreach and abuse of power.”
"Hunter doesn’t think Democrats would dare impeach Trump for this. But why is he so confident of that? They wanted to impeach Trump for comments he made at a summit in Helsinki in 2018 and for owning a hotel in Washington, D.C." . . .

Trump causes the American left to quake in their boots

Feckless: why I like using the word for the American left

. . . The “feck” in feckless began as a short form of effect used in the Scots dialect. So feckless essentially means "ineffective," but is also used to describe someone who is irresponsible, incompetent, inept, or without purpose in life.

Tony Branco

Everyone Has A Different Take On Soleimani And Iran, But There’s Only One That Trump Should Listen To   "Not everything is black and white. Take, for example, the killing of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani near a Baghdad airport on Thursday, an event that drew mixed reactions from all sides of the political spectrum. There were, of course, the usual suspects always looking for an excuse to attack or question President Trump. Democrats and media figures on the left, like Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar, MSNBC contributor Joyce Alene, CNN commentator Karen Finney, and many more accused him of ordering the strike to create a “distraction” from domestic issues. Former Obama staffer Ben Rhodes wondered if Trump “is equipped to handle a complex, enduring, international crisis that could play out in many countries and demand expertise, rigorous process, and judicious decision-making?” Among countless others to question the president’s ability to handle the situation included Vox founder Ezra Klein, Harvard professor Samantha Power, and Washington Post columnist Brian Klaas." . . .
How's this for a feckless Hollywoodite?:

And then there was Hollywood actress Rose McGowan, who, believe it or not, actually apologized to Iran for his death. “We are being held hostage by a terrorist regime,” she wrote. “We do not know how to escape. Please do not kill us.”

. . .
 Bernie Sanders out to knock the legs out from under Trump's victory on terror

Instead of just whining about the beast's demise alongside the Hollywood elites, this pair, Sanders and Khanna, who serves as his campaign co-chairman, are now attempting to block funds from President Trump to keep him from hosing the terrorist hellhole out and getting the job done. They don't want that. They know it's 'winning' and they abhor it.

Wrong president and wrong year, Ayatollah  You shoulda picked on a Democrat you knew CNN liked.
. . . "Khameini got the year and the president wrong. This wasn’t 1979 and Jimmy Carter, or 2015 and Barack Obama. After a couple days Trump airmailed his response – a seeing-eye missile that took out Quds Force commander General Qassem Soleimani along with other generals and some colonels." . . .
. . . "While CNN is spending hours covering “mourners” in Baghdad demonstrating over the raid that killed Soleimani,  less attention is being paid to the crowds celebrating his death, such as this celebration in Syria: . . .

Likud Herut UK  "Here is a gentle reminder of the terror empire Qassem #Soleimani built and controlled across the Middle East. This man truly was evil personified. In #Syria alone, his terror groups assisted #Assad in the murder of 500,000 of his own people, 125,000 of them children."

 Arsen Ostrovskyposted:    To all those condemning President @realDonaldTrump and the U.S. for taking out arch Iranian terrorist Qasem #Soleimani, I am reminded of this timely quote by Winston Churchill: “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last.“ 

Placing American lives above politics  "I awoke around 7:30am, turned on the TV and flipped through channels. I briefly stopped on CNN and MSNBC. True to form, both fake news outlets were lying. They were selling the lie that by killing Iran's top general, Qasem Soleimani, Trump had recklessly put the U.S. in danger. While I realize that fake news medias' mission is to spin everything to make Trump look mean, incompetent, and insane, it is amazing that they never take a break; laser-focused on destroying Trump 24/7.

"Ninety-two percent of media coverage of Trump is negative, designed to have him removed from office." . . .

How's this for feckless?  Attacked By The Left For Calling Soleimani A Murderer, Elizabeth Warren Releases New Statement  "Last night, Elizabeth Warren tweeted a response to the airstrike on Soleimani which began “Soleimani was a murderer, responsible for the deaths of thousands, including hundreds of Americans.” That is all completely accurate, but it was too much for the far left of the party which began attacking Warren as a warmonger:: . . .

Soleimani, Abu Bakr, the Dem Washington Gnats, and the Corrupt Journalist Corps Ring in the Year

The American Spectator   "When Obama got word that Bin Laden was in our sights, he gave the OK to send in Seal Team Six and dispatch Bin Laden to eternal damnation. The Democrats cheered Obama, as though he somehow had done something mighty or brave. I never understood that. What President, other than a Bernie Sanders or an Elizabeth Warren, would not have given the OK? Where was the courage, the guts, the greatness?
"What was the risk in OK’ing taking out Bin Laden? That our intelligence might have been wrong? The cost-benefit equation was so one-sided. If that was the intelligence the President was given, then that was an incredibly easy call. Even fair-minded Obama opponents would have recognized that, given the intelligence, it still would have made a positive statement even if Bin Laden had not been hiding in the reported compound: that we will get the guy, one way or another, sooner or later. In any event, it was a wonderful American moment, and Republican conservatives greeted the Bin Laden wack with joy, even as Democrats were delirious with glee. No Dem complained that Congress had not declared war or that the President had overstepped his Constitutional authority. He is the commander-in-chief, period. Bin Laden was evil and needed to be wacked. The moment presented itself. All fair-minded Americans understood this.
"Recently, Trump did something amazingly courageous when he authorized taking out Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the Jeffrey Epstein of the Middle East, who raped dozens of young girls, headed ISIS and authorized their horrible terrors, and predictably was mourned in the corrupt Washington Post’s obituary as an “austere religious scholar.” Trump’s risk was that he had a Democrat Congress actively politically gunning for him, and any mistake in the intelligence would get him personally into a world of negative outrage from the hypocritical left. The intelligence was pretty good but not as solid as with Bin Laden. The location, rather than in the relatively accessible Pakistan urban area where Bin Laden lived, was in the middle of a Syrian wasteland, with Abu Bakr changing locations almost nightly. But Trump gave the approval, and our Special Ops team took him down, as he died like a dog, like a coward, whimpering, crying, screaming all the way, dead as a doornail.
"Given the incredible evil that Abu Bakr represented — who could dispute what ISIS is? — the Democrats were muted in their approval." . . .