Wednesday, December 13, 2023

Obama's clueless foreign policy left behind the chaos we face today

  NY Post

"The structures that bind the nations of the world together are breaking down before our eyes.

Two savage wars are raging in volatile regions, either of which might at any moment blow up to involve additional belligerents and the potential use of nuclear weapons.

The UN, established to prevent such disasters, has become a plaything of dictators: Iran, one of the bloodiest regimes on earth and a proud sponsor of terrorism, has just assumed the chair of the UN’s Human Rights Council.

China has greatly accelerated production of nuclear warheads — and the Chinese media has begun to issue threats about “war on a global scale.”

The erratic Kim regime in North Korea has the bomb and the aforementioned Iranians, who have promised to annihilate Israel, are about to get theirs.

The Venezuelans are threatening to invade Guyana, which would disrupt the energy markets.

'Under the Taliban, Afghanistan is once again a potential staging area for terrorist attacks; but many additional locations are on offer — Yemen, Syria, Libya, Pakistan, whole swaths of the Sahel.

" 'Meanwhile, waves of escapees from impoverished and conflict-ridden nations batter democratic societies and roil democratic politics.

"This global implosion is a consequence of the failure of American leadership, most particularly in the Obama-Biden years.

"This is not to let their predecessors off the hook." . . .


The West Must Stand Up or Be Destroyed –

  PJ Media

Take the most recent United Nations resolution, which calls for an immediate cease-fire — an action that would surely lead to a repeat of October 7 by allowing Hamas to regroup and reorganize. Even Hamas leadership has claimed that they will repeat that horrific day again and again until Israel is destroyed.


"Trying to play both sides in a fight is always dangerous. This is especially true when the lines between sides are clearly delineated. Now is the time for every individual, every organization, and every country to take a stand in the war against the evil of Hamas, terrorism, and hate.  Do we side with Israel, whose IDF has correctly been called “the most moral army in the history of the world” and who has for over 70 years attempted to make “land for peace” deals to bring lasting peace to the Middle East? Or do we side with Hamas, a terrorist organization that in its own charter of 1988 calls for the obliteration of every Jew worldwide and publicly claims in that charter that the only reason to sit at peace negotiations is for subterfuge to weaken its enemy? Do we side with an organization that committed the heinous depravities of October 7, where its members beheaded babies, kidnapped and raped women, and tortured and killed civilians?

"The choice really is that simple. Civilization or barbarism? Hope or hate? Life or death?

"But for many of the Western world leaders, it seems that rather than take a stand for morality, they'd prefer to waffle and try to play both sides.

"Take the most recent United Nations resolution, which calls for an immediate cease-fire — an action that would surely lead to a repeat of October 7 by allowing Hamas to regroup and reorganize. Even Hamas leadership has claimed that they will repeat that horrific day again and again until Israel is destroyed. While the UN condemns Israel, this same resolution makes no mention of the horrors that Hamas perpetrates. It is simply another UN resolution against Israel. It’s not a surprise, given that from 2015-2022, the UN had 140 resolutions against Israel, while it had just 68 resolutions against all other countries combined over the same period. According to the UN, Israel has committed more than twice as many human rights violations as every other nation (Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, et. al.) on the planet. The U.N.’s Jew-hatred is visible and virulent. 

"But Australia, Canada, and Japan, all of which have claimed to support Israel and previously condemned Hamas, all voted for this resolution. Britain and Germany, which have both claimed that they want to crack down on terrorism and destroy Hamas, abstained. Only ten countries, including the United States, voted against the resolution, which is a manifest support of Hamas and their depravities." . . .

Trump is Right: Biden Is a Threat to Democracy

  American Greatness   

The likes of Jack Smith, Tanya Chutkan, Letitia James, and Arthur Engoron – Democrats all – have shown they will stop at nothing to destroy Biden’s chief electoral opponent, democracy be damned.

"Weeks before the 2022 midterms, Joe Biden gave a memorable speech in front of Independence Hall. The setting could not have been a more ironic – or disturbing – choice for the content of Biden’s unusually authoritarian remarks. Trump and his movement, he said, represent a threat to “the very foundations of our Republic.” The visuals were likewise ominous: this was a campaign speech, but Biden was flanked by U.S. Marines as he thundered against his political opponents as if they were a foreign enemy.

"Since that speech, Biden’s approval ratings have not improved, and he has only grown more reliant on sweeping, demagogic themes. His feeble efforts to sell the country on “Bidenomics” are not working. Americans know that they are not prospering. They see the world is growing more unstable. Biden can’t run for re-election on what he has done; he has no alternative but to rile up fears of Donald Trump.

"At a campaign rally in Cedar Rapids on Saturday, Trump hit Biden where it hurts. Biden and his allies “like to pose as defenders of democracy,” Trump said, referencing Biden’s notorious blood-red speech in Philadelphia. But the opposite is true: Biden is the “destroyer of American democracy,” Trump said. Like a “Third World communist tyrant,” Biden “has been weaponizing government against his political opponents.”

"The Biden campaign shrieked: “Donald Trump’s America in 2025 is one where the government is his personal weapon to lock up his political enemies.” . . .

‘I hope they boycott her’: Megyn Kelly slams into Taylor Swift over attendance of pro-Hamas event

 Kevin Haggerty (bizpacreview.com)   "Having remained silent on the slaughter, Megyn Kelly ripped into Taylor Swift’s attendance at an event “contributing to the demonization of Israel” with the hope for a financially impactful response from fans.

"' You clearly know nothing.”

"Marketing herself into a billionaire through pop music, the mega star’s influence that crowned her Time Magazine’s Person of the Year has remained undeniable. So, when Swift and her celebrity pals chose to attend a comedy show with proceeds getting funneled to Gaza, Kelly couldn’t help but hope the entertainer’s fans pressured her into recognizing the atrocities she was aligning herself with.

" 'Taylor Swift owes Israelis and Jewish Americans an apology,” said the podcast host Tuesday during a discussion with author and commentator Andrew Klavan." . . .

. . .“Taylor Swift, who has been out there tweeting about her support for the LGBTQ community– you know what they do to that community in Gaza, Taylor, that you now want to support?” asked the host rhetorically about the well-documented treatment of those practicing lifestyles considered deviant in the Middle East. “They’ll throw ’em off the top of a building. That’s what you’re contributing to.” . . .

"The left really, really hates Israel"

FOLLOW THE MONEY…and you’ll find the reason for the virulent anti-Semitism and anti-Israel hatred on college campuses (barenakedislam.com)

U.S. colleges and universities are swimming in pro-Hamas and anti-Israel money, to the tune of $5 BILLION over the past few years.

"Critics call it a direct result of the Boycott, Divestments, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel. 
"The group reportedly works closely with the Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP), which, according to the Washington Free Beacon, has received $650,000 since 2017 from the George Soros Open Society Foundations.
"Also, Soros has reportedly given California’s Tides Foundation at least $ 3.5 million to support student protests agaisnt Israel similar to a recent demonstration at San Francisco’s Balboa High School. “…giving instructions to high school students — what to chant and what to yell during the demonstration,” Ehrenfeld insisted.

Andrea Widberg - American Thinker   . . ."Second, the Harvard tyranny, like all tyrannies, doesn’t hold itself to any standards other than those that serve its immediate interests. There are rules, of course, but they are fluid (and you know how leftists love that fluidity). For people opposed to Harvard, the rules flex constantly to keep them in a one-down position. And for Harvard and its “allies”—another word leftists love—the rules’ fluidity operates in a way that always benefits them.  

"For those of us neither within Harvard nor trying to curry favor with the institution, Harvard doesn’t look powerful. Instead, it looks ridiculous: Hypocritical, hate-filled, narcissistic, and the antithesis of the knowledge it purports to impart.

"I’ll leave you with a very good video from Ben Shapiro, in which he discusses what universities were meant to be and how they devolved into leftist institutions that issue credentials to those who have accepted the statist mindset that governs them. He notes that they are in exactly the same position today as the universities were for the Nazis in the 1930s. I’ll add that the similarity extends right down to the genocidal antisemitism.

"The whole discussion about what’s happening in academia is good, but the history lesson starts at 17:30 or so if you want to skip ahead."

Harvard cancels congressman who mocked Harvard’s speech hypocrisy

 


Andrea Widburg - American Thinker   "Harvard was once a reputable institution. Now, though, it’s a joke, and, moving forward, any parent who pays for it or young person who goes into debt for it has inadvertently taken an IQ test and proved to be only in the double digits. The latest example of Harvard’s fall, not just from grace but from decency, is the fact that two days after its president, Claudine Gay, insisted that its devotion to free speech was so absolute that even genocidal rhetoric deserved its day, Harvard canceled a Democrat congressman who had spoken slightingly of Gay’s remarks.

"I’m sure you’re familiar by now with what Gay said. However, if you were without internet for the past week, she, along with the presidents of UPenn and MIT, stated that her institution would never simply ban offensive speech. Instead, “context” was everything. In the case of speech calling for genocide, context demanded that it become action (as in actual genocide) before Harvard would even think about shutting it down.

"For her brave stand, Gay earned the approval of both the Harvard faculty and board. Hundreds of the former signed a statement supporting her, and the latter just voted to keep her in her place." . . .