No Amnesty Is a Good Amnesty

President Trump is the last president who will ever have a chance to make the right decision on immigration. After this, it's over. The boat will have sailed. 
If he succeeds, all the p@ssy-grabbing and Russia nonsense will burn off like a morning fog. He will be the president who saved the American nation, its character, its sovereignty, its core identity. But if he fails, Donald Trump will go down in history as the man who killed America. 

Ann Coulter  "Donald Trump is being told that amnesty for "Dreamers," or DACA recipients, will only apply to a small, narrowly defined group of totally innocent, eminently deserving illegal immigrants, who were brought to this country "through no fault of their own" as "children." (Children who are up to 36 years old.) 
"Every syllable of that claim is a lie, and I can prove it. 
"To see how DACA will actually work, let's look at another extremely limited amnesty that was passed in 1986. 
"Farmers wanted temporary guest-worker permits for their cheap labor, so that they could continue pretending that the Industrial Revolution never happened and refuse to mechanize. (And, boy, did that work! We haven't heard a peep about "crops rotting in the fields" since then.) 
"The agricultural amnesty was supposed to apply to -- at most -- 350,000 illegal aliens. It would be available only to illegals who were currently in the country doing the back-breaking farm work that no American would do. Without them, crops would wither on the vine. They were saving us from starvation! 
"Talk about deserving. Are any Dreamers saving us from starvation? 
"But instead of guest-worker permits, then-Rep. Charles Schumer -- from the lush farmland of Brooklyn -- decided to grant full amnesty to any illegals who had done farm work for at least 90 days in the previous year. 
"That's pretty restrictive, isn't it? 
"In the end, "up to 350,000 farm workers" turned into 1.3 million. 
"Oh well, what are you going to do? No use worrying -- let's just move forward and get all these people voter registration cards! 
"This innocent little amnesty for a small, clearly defined group of illegals quickly became amnesty for anyone who applied. The same thing will happen with any other amnesty, no matter how strictly the law is written. (And it won't be written strictly.)" . . .

"Hillary’s Infinite Jest" among other opinions.

National Review  . . . "Through Hillary’s lens, Elizabeth Warren’s problem isn’t that she’s a kooky socialist who could single-handedly send the economy careening off the cliff. It’s that she’s seen as a “shrill woman.” Most of Hillary’s problems were completely self-made, and yet here she is, explaining away: “The Puritan witch hunts might be long over, but something fanatical about unruly women still lurks in our national subconscious.” Well, it lurks in someone’s subconscious, certainly."

What Kind of History Did Hillary Clinton Make?  . . . “Hillary made history by winning the nomination” is another way of saying “Hillary made history by managing to not lose the nomination with institutional advantages that no other candidate is likely to enjoy for the next few decades.” . . . Read more 

Silvio Canto, Jr.: 'La Hillary' is back, and most say 'no más'  . . . "So the Clinton explanation tour goes on now with a new book, incredibly titled What Happened.

"I heard today that most people just want her to retire.  And do what?  Chat with Bill by the fireplace?

"Frankly, it's sad to watch, even for those of us who find the Clintons despicable.

This next is just another sexist, misogynist...er, wait. This is written by Doris O'Brien who is - apparently - a woman:

Hillary's new book: 'It Takes a Pillage'   . . . "Yet how could such a thing be happening? How could Hillary Clinton – for many years considered one of the world's most admired women – suddenly lose all perspective and angrily "take on" just about everyone, including the Democratic Party?  How, in a nutshell, could a shrewd operator like Mrs. Clinton "lose it"?" . . .

Apparently, her pals in Hollywood and Silicon Valley are infuriated by What Happened. 

Clinton: 'I Am Not Someone Who Will Say Things That Aren't True'  . . . 'Clinton criticized the news media for offering broad advantages to her opponents during 2016’s presidential campaign season. Democrats, she said, experience a “very difficult media environment.' ” . . .

The great conservative cartoonist Ben Garrison just put out another masterpiece.  And commenting thus:

Hillary just won’t go away. Now she’s subjecting us to her mewling about how unfair things were and how deplorable people were to her. She tells us that she didn’t even bother writing her concession speech. As if she ever wrote anything. She pays scriptwriters for that. Now another writer has ghostwritten her latest book in which she blames everyone but herself. She even blames Bernie Sanders, from whom she stole the primaries. Sanders, being the politically correct wimp that he is, even supported the thieving witch, but Hillary blamed him regardless.She blamed Trump for annoying her at one of the debates. He came too close to Her Majesty and she wished she had told him to ‘Back up, you creep!’ She probably wanted to say worse—and she did say worse to the Secret Service agents who protected her. What an inconvenience it must have been for her to actually have to spend her valuable time to debate Trump. Oh sure, she made sure she got the questions provided to her in advance, but she still had to go through the motions and debate Trump. What an aggravation! Apparently she wanted the Presidency handed to her by default. She said she was ‘gobsmacked’ when Americans had the nerve to reject her. The problem is, she won’t shut her gob now.

Clinton State Dept SILENCED Them on Benghazi Security Lapses, Contractors Say

Catherine Herridge, Pamela K. Browne, Cyd Upson   . . . They spoke exclusively with Fox News for “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” revealing new information that undermines the State Department's account of the 2012 terror attack in Benghazi, where Islamic militants launched a 13-hour assault from Sept. 11-12 that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, foreign service officer Sean Smith and former Navy SEALS Ty Woods and Glenn Doherty.

"Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions provides security for U.S. embassy and consulate personnel around the world in some of the most dangerous locations spanning Africa, the Middle East and South America, according to the firm.  

"Jerry Torres remains haunted by the fact specific bureaucrats and policies remain in the State Department after the Benghazi attack despite the change in administrations. "A U.S. ambassador is dead and nobody is held accountable for it. And three guys … all died trying to defend him," said Torres, the company’s CEO and a former Green Beret.

"Asked if there was a specific effort by a senior State Department contracting officer to silence them, Torres said, "Absolutely, absolutely." . . .

Security firm hired by State Department says bureaucrat silenced it about lapses in Benghazi   . . . "But was it her incompetence or that of her superiors?  Sending unarmed guards into a city like Benghazi that resembled old Dodge City on a Saturday night would be incomprehensible except that the policy was perfectly aligned to the mindset of State Department officials.  These are the same people who refused to send help to the compound because they feared a backlash against the new U.S.-created Libyan government – a backlash that would have been caused by U.S. boots on the ground.  Also, the compound was supposedly being additionally guarded by a local militia, who ended up standing aside once the assault began.

"Before Ambassador Stevens's body was cold, the State Department was planning the whitewash.  None of what Mr. Torres told Fox News is surprising – just further confirmation of how badly botched the entire incident was.  And the finger points right at Secretary of State Clinton."    Rick Moran

ESPN Host Gets Slap on the Wrist After Calling President Trump a White Supremacist

CDN  "Cable sports network ESPN has been slowly morphing into a leftist propaganda organ instead of focusing on the games and providing the content that built it into the powerhouse that it is today.

"It’s now almost impossible to tune into ESPN without being subjected to some raving leftist nutcase (and more than a few racists) popping off about politics and taking pot shots at President Donald Trump.

"Despite the network having lost millions of subscribers and conducting a minor house cleaning, the politics continue and are getting worse as bitter Colin Kaepernick defenders are given spots to spew their thinly disguised anti-white bigotry.

"But this week, African-American female Sportscenter host Jemele Hill took the racial venom to a new level when she went on a deranged Twitter rant during which she accused President Donald Trump of being a white supremacist." . . .

Also this:  ESPN Determined to Kill its Brand With Left Wing Politics

Why the Democrats Oppose Economic Freedom

E. Jeffrey Ludwig   "The seeds of the modern bureaucratic or administrative state go back to the Progressive Era of American history in the early 20th century. But progressive regulation morphed into the hyper-control of our present federal government during the New Deal. Modern students, whose history education has been directed by teachers who “accept” the reality of a federal leviathan, are often unaware of the fact that before 1916 there was no income tax in the United States, and that federal revenues were primarily through import duties. The income tax was justified by the need to support the ever-expanding regulatory environment being promoted by Democrats, with a small amount of crossover by Republicans."