John Durham investigation intensifies focus on John Brennan

Washington Examiner  "U.S. Attorney John Durham’s review of the Russia investigation is putting increased scrutiny on former CIA Director John Brennan, searching for any undue influence he may have had during 2017’s intelligence community assessment of Russian interference.
"Durham, selected by Attorney General William Barr last year to lead this inquiry, drove to Washington, D.C., in March to ensure the investigation stayed on track during the coronavirus outbreak. The top Connecticut federal prosecutor is looking into highly sensitive issues, including whether Brennan took politicized actions to pressure the rest of the intelligence community to match his conclusions about Russian President Vladimir Putin’s motivations, according to sources cited by the Wall Street Journal.
"Officials said Durham has been interviewing CIA officials this year, zeroing in on those at the National Intelligence Council, a center within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence which oversaw the collaboration between the CIA, FBI, and National Security Agency in putting together the 2017 assessment, and looking at how the work product was finalized.
"The 2017 assessment concluded with "high confidence" that Putin “ordered an influence campaign in 2016” and Russia worked to “undermine public faith" in U.S. democracy, "denigrate" former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and "harm her electability and potential presidency,” and “developed a clear preference" for Trump. The NSA diverged on one aspect, expressing only “moderate confidence” that Putin actively tried to help Trump win and Clinton lose." . . .

Why would Russia want to hurt Clinton? She was their BFF!  . . . "As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

"The Foundation wasn’t the only beneficiary:

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

"The speech was approved by- you guessed it- the Clinton State Department." . . .

Our Garbage Media

Power Line  "Want to know how you can tell when the lockdown became a new great depression? It’s when the media starts experiencing large layoffs. Glenn Reynolds has a roundup of media layoffs currently under way that makes for the feel good story of the week for sure.

"The New York Times reports that “Roughly 33,000 workers at news companies in the U.S. have been laid off, been furloughed or had their pay reduced. Some publications that rely on ads have shut down.” And it seldom gets better than this:

NPR Warns of Major Cuts Due to Coronavirus

NPR will be instituting severe cost-cutting measures as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, according to a Wednesday internal memo, with a budget deficit looming as high as $25 million through fiscal 2021. . .

"I suppose this will just free up a lot of media people to volunteer full time for Democrats, though of course they’re doing that already, so how could we tell?" . . .

"And then naturally the Huffington Post can’t help itself, because of the left’s Ahab fixation:

The White Male Is the Greatest Risk in Spreading the Virus . . .

. . . This White Male Effect will also almost certainly have played a part in how slowly the UK and the US responded to the emerging pandemic. Both the Johnson and Trump administrations have also turned to older white male experts for how to manage this crisis. . .
"This White Male Effect is caused primarily by the education system and society as a whole, which encourages white men to believe in their own superiority." . . .

AOC’s Baseless Accusation That the U.S. Is a 'Brutal, Barbarian Society'

Charlemagne Institute  "According to democratic socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the COVID-19 pandemic is proving that the United States “is a brutal, barbarian society for the vast majority of working-class Americans.” As evidence of this, she claims that “40% of us couldn’t even afford a $400 emergency” before this crisis, and COVID-19 “is more than a $400 emergency.”

"However, her “40%–$400” statistic is false, and the facts that broadly inform this issue reveal that:

• government social programs, which AOC seeks to enlarge, depress workers’ savings, causing the very outcomes that she decries.
• the people of the U.S. lead the world in charity.
• middle- and low-income Americans are more financially capable of handling COVID-19 than the bulk of people in most developed countries, including those who live in more socialistic nations that AOC says the U.S. should emulate.

"AOC’s Allegations  "In a recent video, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–NY) declared: “This is supposed to be the richest society in the world, and I think what this crisis is showing us is that this is only a rich society for a very small amount of people, and it is a brutal, barbarian society for the vast majority of working-class Americans because 40% of us couldn’t even afford a $400 emergency before this thing started. This is more than a $400 emergency, and we’re really going to have to step up and completely change our approach to our public systems.” . . .

"Summary" 

"Contrary to AOC’s portrayal of the USA as “a brutal, barbarian society for the vast majority of working-class Americans,” the key facts that inform this matter show that:

• the lone statistic she used to support this allegation is false.
• personal savings – the subject of her statistic – are depressed by government social programs that she champions and seeks to expand.
• when it comes to charity, the people of the U.S. are the most generous in the world.
• middle- and even low-income Americans have more material resources to weather COVID-19 than the majority of people in most developed nations.

Pelosi Called Out for Visit Promoting Tourism to Chinatown in Late February

Tony Branco

The look on Pelosi’s face is priceless when Wallace asks her about the visit to Chinatown:  "Nancy Pelosi joined Chris Wallace for what she thought would be a softball interview on ‘Fox News Sunday’ this morning. She was wrong. Wallace called her out for visiting Chinatown in San Francisco to promote tourism in late February.
"It’s obvious that Pelosi wants the Chinatown visit to be ignored by the media because she deleted the video of her visit from social media last week.
"The look on Pelosi’s face is priceless when Wallace asks her about the visit to Chinatown:
"Pelosi then gets to work lying with no pushback from Wallace. She tries to push the tired narrative that President Trump is racist:

"The problem is that President Trump rightly referred to the pandemic by the name of the Chinese city in which the virus originated…Wuhan Province. He NEVER encouraged discrimination against the Asian-American community. Nancy Pelosi is lying AGAIN…"

Priceless! President Trump tweeted out the video of Pelosi after she deleted it:

Adam Schiff’s Dirty Impeachment Tactics Coming to Light

Robyn Dolgin "Rep. Adam Schiff spent months launching secret impeachment hearings, never thinking his conduct would be called into question.

"He is now caught in the crosshairs of a formidable government agent, Mr. Brendan Carr, Federal Communication Commissioner. The impeachment may be over, but Mr. Carr is formally investigating Rep. Schiff for violating privacy laws -- more like obliterating ethical boundaries -- by setting up his own surveillance state to target the president’s allies.

"Carr is currently uncovering the diabolical nature of the congressman’s “surveillance state.” At the time, Schiff resorted to such desperate measures because he didn’t have much of an impeachment case: Therefore, he issued secret subpoenas to phone carriers hoping to mine the private data of his political opponents, or in effect ransacking their private lives.

"The objective was to obtain and publish the calls of Trump’s allies.

"Much to his delight, Schiff’s subpoenas to the phone carriers resulted in their turning over nearly 4,000 pages of confidential records, in the process violating their customers’ rights to data privacy.

"None of this has escaped the notice of the top gun at the FCC. Carr is proposing a $200 million fine against the phone carriers for failing to protect their customers who have a legitimate expectation of privacy." . . .

. . . "None of this appears of concern to members of the leftist media. Many view Schiff as “the most underestimated politician” California has ever produced, according to Greg Miller, correspondent for the Washington Post. Miller, and many of his colleagues, agree that Schiff “will leave a mark on history, exceeding nearly all contemporaries.”

"It would be unfair to Schiff to say that his impeachment efforts came to nothing. The congressman cemented his rock-star status for his “dazzling” speech at the opening of the hearings, according to Jeffrey Toobin, CNN news analyst." . . .

How long have we been seeing this strangeness in Biden?

Rich Terrell

How about Biden's strange behavior during the Ryan debate in 2012?  Has anything like it ever been seen before?

Castro and Maduro must envy Bernie now

Spectator

Mike Harris