EXCLUSIVE: Clinton Administration Invited The Chinese Army Into Sensitive U.S. Military Biodefense Centers

It was during the Clinton Administration that the “scientific chain migration” of CCP and PLA scientists began, which has led to massive infiltration of U.S. research programs and, no doubt, has contributed to China’s biowarfare program.

 By: Col. Lawrence Sellin (Ret.) and Anna Chen| CCNS  "The deeper we dig, the worse it gets.

"The infiltration of critical Department of Defense and related civilian research programs by Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and People’s Liberation Army (PLA) scientists began in the 1990s.

"The infestation is now extensive.

"Some returned to China with the most advanced knowledge and techniques, but many are still in the United States funded by U.S. taxpayers.

"This column was originally published at The Gateway Pundit

The following is only the tip of the iceberg.

"Some of those invited into U.S. military facilities, like Liang-Ming Liu and Dai-Zhi Peng were clearly identified as PLA officers, other CCP scientists and PLA officers hid their backgrounds.

"But no one in the Clinton Administration bothered to check."  . . .   More here...

Biden Declares War On America

 By Charles "Sam" Faddis

"Joe Biden entered the Oval Office with no mandate of any kind.  The Senate is deadlocked.  Democrats in the House hold a razor-thin majority.  Joe himself is widely considered by many Americans to be an illegitimate President who took power based on widespread electoral fraud.  

Under these circumstances one might normally anticipate four years of standing pat, playing it safe and steering toward the middle.  These, however, are not normal times.   Biden’s administration is under the control of zealots and insurrectionists bent on transforming America and making revolutionary change.  What you have seen to date, radical as it has been, has been only the beginning.

Joe and his comrades are declaring war – on America.

The White House has now unveiled something called the National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism.  It purports to be some sort of national-level assessment of the threat posed and a prescription for how to deal with that threat.  That is a lie.  This is not a document that was “cross-walked” across the Intelligence Community and federal law enforcement agencies.  It does not represent the sage, unbiased assessment of career professionals.

"This is a document crafted at the senior levels of this administration by political appointees to serve political purposes.  Its manifest intent is to label the political opponents of this regime as enemies of the state so that the power of the state can be used to crush them.  There is no ambiguity about that purpose.  It drips from every page.

"For well over a year we watched our cities burn, our police precincts sacked, and law enforcement personnel assaulted and murdered.  The same expressly Marxist groups that perpetrated these crimes and transformed great American cities like Portland, Minneapolis, and Seattle into war zones continue to march, demand revolution, and an end to the republic.". . . 

Massachusetts Police Standoff With Heavily Armed Men Ends In 11 Arrests…

 Weasel Zippers  CNN report is quoted which calls for other sources.

Breitbart: 11 Armed Suspects Arrested Following 9-Hour Armed Standoff on Mass. Highway

"Massachusetts State Police arrested 11 people on Saturday who allegedly claimed to be members of a group known as the “Rise of the Moors.” The arrests followed an hours-long standoff with the armed members on Interstate 95 near Wakefield, Massachusetts, after suspects reportedly said they don’t “recognize our laws.”

"Early Saturday morning, the Mass State Police Twitter account posted a series of tweets regarding a standoff with multiple armed suspects in two vehicles in I-95." . . .

. . . "The members of the group reportedly refused to comply with orders to put down their weapons and other verbal orders. The people told the officers they do not “recognize our laws,” police said, according to the AP report.

The colonel said the men told the officer they were members of the “Rise of the Moors...” group and were headed to Maine from Rhode Island for “training.” The men reportedly refused to put down their weapons and several members took off into the woods, the report states.

“You can imagine, 11 armed individuals standing armed with long guns slung on an interstate highway at 2 in the morning certainly raises concerns, and is certainly not consistent with the firearms laws that we have here in Massachusetts,” the state police commander said."...

About the Rise of the Moors

Who is the Rise of the Moors militia group that stopped traffic on the highway in Wakefield?

Exposed: "The Washington Post’s attempt to smear me and my work on critical race theory fails spectacularly.

 Christopher F. Rufo  "The fight over critical race theory has consumed American media. Conservatives have rallied against an ideology that seeks to divide the country into the racial categories of “oppressor” and “oppressed.” Liberals have defended it as a “lens” for understanding vague buzzwords like “systemic racism” and “racial equity.”

"I’ve been on the front lines of this battle. My investigative reporting has exposed critical race theory in American education, with disturbing firsthand reports about public schools forcing eight-year-olds to deconstruct their racial identities, telling white teachers that they must undergo “antiracist therapy,” and encouraging white parents to become “white traitors” and advocate for “white abolition.” These stories have reached millions of readers and helped spark a grassroots movement against critical race theory among parents in school districts across the country.

"They have also made me a target for the Left. In recent months, outlets including the New York Times, New Republic, MSNBC, CNN, and The Atlantic have attacked me on television and in print. No doubt the Washington Post believed that its 3,000-word exposé would undermine my reporting and cast me as a right-wing villain. The Post dispatched two reporters, Laura Meckler and Josh Dawsey, and spent three weeks preparing a hit piece that accused me of various intellectual crimes.

"There was just one problem: the Post piece rested on a bed of untruths. Meckler and Dawsey fabricated the timeline of events surrounding my involvement with President Trump’s executive order on critical race theory; botched a direct quotation from me about my work; erroneously claimed that a diversity lesson at a Cupertino, California elementary school never happened; and insisted that my reporting about the Treasury Department’s diversity programs was false."  . . .More....

From the Comments; Daniel Kennedy: • "The excellence of Rufo's arguments are validated by the nature of his detractors. In other words, if they are against him I am for him. Not to mention his superior logic and veracity."

Joe Biden's thought processes considered

 Al Jazeera: In Pictures: Americans celebrate Joe Biden victory Joe's loved in the Middle East and by their kindred spirits, the Democrats.

Further evidence (if you need it) of Biden’s increasing dementia  "Those of Joe Biden’s public behaviors that align with classic dementia symptoms are escalating. In the past few days, he strongly exhibited two symptoms: A type of belligerence that’s a cover-up for confusion and memory loss and a paranoid fear of those in charge of him.

"I used to spend a lot of time in the company of doctors. What always fascinated me were the tales they told of dealing with patients with early-stage dementia. The most interesting point they made was that elderly people, so as not to lose face or admit their own fears, are superb at deflecting the questions aimed at assessing their cognitive skills and memory.

"For example, one of the most common questions is “Who’s the president of the United States?” Rather than admitting that they don’t remember, people in early-stage dementia will get defensive or otherwise deflect. They might say, “That is incredibly insulting that you’d ask me that question,” picking a fight to distract from their memory loss. Others might go for flattery: “I can’t believe that a young man like you doesn’t know who’s president. That’s just a silly question to ask me.”

"Biden perfectly illustrated that type of angry, defensive, deflecting behavior when reporters on Friday asked him about Afghanistan: . . ."

Poll Explores What's on Everyone's Mind: Is Joe Biden Really Running the Show?  . . . "When asked "Do you believe President Biden is fully executing the duties of his office," a majority, at 56.5 percent said "No, others are directing policy and agenda," while 36.4 percent said "Yes, he is directing all policy and agenda.". . . 

Donald Trump Border Visit: Joe Biden Either ‘Incompetent’ or Actually Wants Open Borders

ICE Agents And Sheriffs Say Biden Is Preventing Arrest And Deportation Of Dangerous Criminals

The Biden Administration’s domestic terrorism strategy threatens to criminalize conservative speech and thought.

 The American Mind  

But when asked to specify how it will interpret “extremism,” the government has demurred. If the government fails to restrict its actions to countering violent offenders, the post-January 6 strategy will feed the impression that the Biden administration is simply using counterterrorism as a political cudgel.

 . . . "The National Security Council document, entitled the National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism, notes that “domestic terrorism can take many forms, inspired by a wide range of violent ideologies.” It emphasizes that “the definition of domestic terrorism in our law makes no distinction based on political views—left, right, or center—and neither should we.” And the document thus pledges “to confront domestic terrorism regardless of the particular ideology that motivates individuals to violence.”

"Despite these assurances, nobody on the political Right genuinely believes that the National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism will be implemented in an “ideologically neutral manner” as the Biden administration promises.

"When it comes to political neutrality, the National Strategy has already gotten off to an inauspicious start. As everyone knows, the immediate impetus for the counterterrorism review was the January 6 unrest at the Capitol. Democrats have been smart to draw maximum attention to this tragic day and interpret it through the prism of “terrorism,” because we know from the political science literature on terrorism that terrorist activity tends to backfire politically on the perpetrators by eroding popular support and strengthening the executive to crush dissent.

"To help depict the events of January 6 as terrorism, Democrats and their anti-Trump media allies have repeatedly promoted the misimpression that the perpetrators killed somebody. The New York Times reported on January 8 that Capitol officer Brian Sicknick died in the melee from getting “struck with a fire extinguisher.” This account of his death was then cited in House Democrats’ February trial memorandum to impeach former President Trump." . . .