Limbaugh warns: “I don’t think you have any idea what’s coming.”

http://lucianne.com/

WND  "That’s the warning issued Monday by talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh, as he foresees an intensified threat to President Trump and his administration the moment Democrats officially take control of the U.S. House in January.

“I don’t think you have the slightest idea what’s coming next January and on after that, after the Democrat Congress is sworn in, the Democrat House, I don’t think anybody has any idea,” Limbaugh said.

"While Limbaugh is expecting a variety of investigations of Trump, he says what’s disturbing is that members of the president’s own party will hop on board in a calculated effort to oust him.

“I’m just warning you that there are more Republicans than you know that are gonna eagerly join Democrat efforts. There’s all kinds of Republicans on every one of these committees,” he explained.

“ 'You’re gonna find a whole lot of Republicans signing on to what the Democrats do, because most of the people in that town despise Trump, despise the fact that he won, have not been able to get over it, have not been able to accept the election results [of] 2016. They’re waiting with bated breath on the Mueller report. They can’t wait. They’re so excited.”

"Regarding the final report from special counsel Robert Mueller on alleged collusion with Russia, Limbaugh expects it to be written in damaging fashion to Trump, irrespective of any truth.

“ 'He can write a report making Trump look like the biggest doofus that ever walked the Earth,” Limbaugh noted. “He can write a report making Trump look like the most dumb, vulnerable, naive president we’ve ever had. He can write a report saying the election of Donald Trump and the Trump campaign opened the door for the Russians to have whatever they wanted in the United States. Yeah. All he has to do is write a report that says something like that. With no evidence. Just make it a character reference report on Trump with any kind of allusions here.”

"He said right now there are some 20 leaders in Congress who “are going to be devoted to doing nothing but getting rid of Donald Trump. Not by way of impeachment, by the way. They’re going to try to do it by forcing every Republican in the Congress, House and Senate, that they can to abandon Trump.

“ 'They are going to try to establish circumstances where some senator, some member of Congress is going to one day have to make a fateful trip to the White House to tell President Trump that he’s lost all support and that he’s got two choices: He can either resign or undergo the impeachment process. That’s what they did with [President] Nixon.” Read more

‘The Enemy of the People’

I don’t particularly like the term “the enemy of the people.” I don’t take it very seriously. Nietzsche was right that we are hard-wired to exaggerate when speaking about what ails us. That goes double for political discourse. . . .

Andrew C. McCarthy

"Criticism of the media by a president is not necessarily a bad thing"

"Depending on your perspective, one of President Trump’s real talents, or one of his most baleful traits, is his knack for the zinger label, pinned on a political or institutional foe. “Crooked Hillary,” “Lyin’ Ted,” “The “The Swamp” — the labels often stick . . . and sting.

"In commentary about the media that is sometimes withering and sometimes unhinged, the president uses the term “the enemy of the people.” The epithet has gotten under the skin of many journalists. Some of them worry aloud about being targeted for retribution, a concern that is overwrought as applied to Trump partisans generally, but that cannot be dismissed out of hand — Cesar Sayoc’s attempted pipe-bomb rampage against Trump critics, like James Hodgkinson’s gunfire spree against Republican congressmen, reminds us that no one has the market cornered on evil and dementia. 

"But who exactly is “the enemy of the people”? Trump maintains that he is not referring to the entire press, only to “fake news” coverage by mainstream-media outlets. Is such line-drawing appropriate? Even if the public at large may validly make such distinctions, should they be drawn by a president of the United States, or does that specter imperil constitutional free-press protections? 

"The Pretense of Objectivity"
"Before Trump zapped our politics with his lightning rod, it was a commonplace in conservative circles to complain about that most pernicious practice of the political press: the pretense of objectivity. No, we did not begrudge the New York Times and Washington Post their editorial pages, nor resent opinion pieces and programs clearly advertised as such. Our objection was to patently biased news coverage that was presented as if it were dispassionate, just-the-facts-ma’am reporting. The bias is seen and unseen, but pervasive. It is found in the reporting itself. It is intimated in the description of sources (e.g., conservatives always described as “conservative”; left-wing sources — the ACLU, SPLC, CAIR, etc. — described as civilrights groups with no partisan agenda). Most important, it is concealed in editorial decisions about what does not, camouflaged by the thread that gets emphasis and the “lede” that gets buried." . . . Full article

What You Should Know about the Socialist Causes of Venezuela’s Crisis

What on earth is wrong with the American education system that it has produced a generation of socialists such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the people who vote for her?

The American Interest  "The current Venezuela has been kidnapped by enemies of the West,” says Jorge Jraissati, a Venezuelan activist who fled the crisis-engulfed country to come to America. He’s now a student at Florida Atlantic University, but continues to advocate for free market capitalism and individual freedoms in his home country. “I still remember the moment I decided to take action and fight for political change in Venezuela. I was sixteen at the time.” Today, Jorge is twenty-two and still fighting for the brighter future Venezuela deserves by speaking about his experiences to students across America.
"Once an oil-rich, prosperous nation, Jorge told me how Venezuela descended into utter chaos after former dictator Hugo Chavez was elected. “Economically, the government has heavily regulated the private sector with currency controls, price caps, and widespread expropriations and nationalizations.”
"The country now faces an undeniable humanitarian and political catastrophe. In 2017, each Venezuelan lost an average of twenty-four pounds in weight due to a lack of food and skyrocketing inflation. To purchase basic household items like milk and eggs, Venezuelans must carry around thousands of bolivars—encouraging the continued growth of the nation’s dangerous black market. Indeed, the International Monetary Fund reports that inflation rates in Venezuela are set to top one million in 2018.
"Even so, socialist sympathisers of Venezuela continue to falsely portray dictators Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro as “heroes” and champions of the working class. But Western left-wing activists and politicians who support Bolivarian socialism—such as Jeremy Corbyn —only worsen the perilous situation that innocent Venezuelans face while fighting for their country’s freedom.' . . .

The Antifa Press

Photosnark by Rich Terrell

Don Surber  "Conservatives following the media's coverage of the caravan in Mexico are getting a flashback from the media's coverage of the Antifa attack on Israel. The terrorists and criminals use women as human shields.
"The Washington Post offered a yellow journalism headline: "These children are barefoot. In diapers. Choking on tear gas."
"What kind of mother endangers her toddlers like this? She is wicked.
"The coverage of what the New York Times called "a peaceful protest gone wrong" is sappy.
"Paragraph Three of another Washington Post story encapsulated the third-world press coverage that shrouds the story.
"Linked through a third party, the story said, "What had begun Sunday morning as a migrant protest of the slow pace of the U.S. asylum claims process devolved into a chaotic scramble in which hundreds made their way to the border hoping to cross onto U.S. soil. To block that from happening, and as some threw rocks and bottles, Customs and Border Protection officers took the rare step of firing tear gas into Mexico as well as closing all legal vehicle and foot traffic to the San Ysidro border crossing, which U.S. officials say normally has about 100,000 visitors per day."
"This is the same press that took an unverified rumor of one person calling a congressman the N-word to brand the millions of Tea Party members as racist.
"But "some" people (500 according to BBC) throwing projectiles at American officials somehow doesn't represent the "protesters," who apparently are all babies in diapers and their mothers." . . .

The caravan’s organizers also pushed women and children to the front of the clash,

Border Patrol agents revealed in interviews that the migrants storming the U.S.-Mexico border over the weekend were using women and children as human shields as they launched rocks at agents.  . . . "Judd explained that the situation at the border yesterday was “unprecedented” and that migrants had never tried before to rush a port of entry. The Border Patrol veteran explained that illegal immigrants often abandon woman and children while being chased by authorities, knowing that they will hinder officers while they abscond. " . . . 

Remember when Obama used tear gas on these people in 2013?  
(Copyright © 2018, The San Diego Union-Tribune)

Tear gas used once a month at border under Obama. No complaints here.

Ocasio-Cortez trivializes Holocaust by comparing Jewish refugees from Hitler to Central Americans

The under-educated Ms. Ocasio-Cortez is another exhibit of the encroaching third-world status America is morphing into. Not just Obama was a third-world leader, but the wretched quality of many we choose as leaders, people with no regard for the Constitution nor America's crucial role among nations. TD

Thomas Lifson  "It is by now abundantly clear that the youngest person ever elected to Congress is an ingenue ignoramus, serenely unaware of the depths of her obliviousness. For someone who grew up in New York City – oops, make that Westchester County (but it’s a suburb, so kinda counts) -- to compare fleeing systematic extermination in the Holocaust to people seeking more lucrative employment and better welfare benefits in this country is obscene. It trivializes the Holocaust, period. 
"Yet, glamour girl Ocasio-Cortez did exactly that in a tweet yesterday:

"I don’t recall Jews fleeing Hitler announcing they would violate our borders if not accorded entry on demand. And I certainly don’t recall  Jews storming the border, throwing rocks at our Border Patrol.

"But these differences, as important as they are, pale beside the comparison of the Holocaust to economic deprivation.

"The Anti-Defamation League, before it became a shill for Democrats, used to criticize those who compared the Holocaust to lesser perils.  So far, there is nothing on the ADL website concerning Ocasio-Cortez’s trivialization of it."

Alexandria, this was what a real holocaust looked like:

And this:

Post-Midterm Meltdowns

Conrad Black

"Not even a week had elapsed after the midterm elections before there were eruptions of foolishness in Washington and abroad that do not augur well for an improved climate of relations in domestic or international affairs.

"CNN has sued the president and his entourage for revoking Jim Acosta’s White House press pass. This is the perfect illustration of the presumptuousness of the fake news press. This description “fake news” was furnished by the president when CNN took the Steele dossier public and asked the president if he had participated in a festival of urination by a group of prostitutes in a Moscow hotel room because the Obamas had slept there. In those early days of the administration, Wolf Blitzer claimed immense enterprise by CNN to unearth the dossier (that the Democratic National Committee, which paid for it, was shopping desperately to the media). CNN elaborately portrayed this now infamous hack-job as the work of an eminent retired British espionage official.

"After Acosta attempted to filibuster the president’s post-midterm press conference and engage him in debate, the revocation of Acosta’s pass was an appropriate measure. CNN has many other accredited representatives and could nominate a replacement, but the network’s media director, Brian Stelter, a foaming-at-the-mouth Trump-hater, instead has sued the president.

"A moron—and presumably any lawyer the cable network consulted—could see that there is no statutory basis to a presidential press conference." . . .