Roberts to Lead Delegation of Six Supreme Court Justices at Obama Address

Chief Justice Roberts

 Bloomberg   "Kathy Arberg, the Supreme Court’s spokeswoman, said six of the nine justices plan to go tonight. Though she wouldn’t provide the names, Justice Samuel Alito is in Hawaii and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas previously all but ruled out attending."

Justice Alito's "YOU LIE" Moment Youtube video via Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion

Justice Alito Skips Town ahead of 2011 SOTU "Concerned Women for America President Wendy Wright said she is not surprised by Alito’s scheduled absence. “I think everyone knew [he would be absent] from the moment Obama unfairly criticized the justices,” she said.
"Wright said that Obama acted in an uncivil manner when he attacked the justices in front of Congress in a way, she said, that incited hostility towards them. She also asserted that Obama verbally attacked the justices with “falsehoods.”"....

"Wright said Obama’s actions were grossly inappropriate. His actions were made worse by the fact that the justices are bound by protocols from responding to the address."....

"Since the last address, many justices had been critical of the atmosphere in Congress during the address. Despite his absence last year, Justice Antonin Scalia told the Federalist Society that the address had become a “juvenile spectacle.”  (Emphasis added with great relish.)
"Clarence Thomas told The Associated Press that there are a lot of things that happened behind the scenes. He described catcalls, whooping and hollering, and under-the-breath comments.
"The justices said this was especially true during last year's remarks, when there were plenty of clapping and laughter. Roberts called that night a “political pep rally.”"
Democrats turn funerals into pep rallies, why not the State of the Union?

Obama's Crushing Failure in the Middle East: the Fall of Lebanon to Islam

Lebanon's Hezbollah leader Nasrallah

Atlas Shrugs  "The influence of the United States in the Middle East is declining while that of Iran is rising. That’s the meaning of events in Lebanon, where Hizballah has in essence thrown Prime Minister Saad Hariri from office and is about to choose his successor. Under Lebanon’s constitution, the prime minister must be a Sunni. But Najib Mikati, the Hizballah designee, is a Sunni who will owe his office not to support in the Sunni community but to Hizballah’s decision to make him PM. Hizballah now has the votes in parliament to put him in, and of course to throw him out should he cross them."

Civility demonstrated by Congress

Pat Oliphant, Washington Post

The Terrorist Target

http://townhall.com/cartoons/bobgorrell

Budget ax-man Rep. Paul Ryan is Senate Democrats' new villain

The Hill  "Senate Democrats are pouncing on Rep. Paul Ryan’s (R-Wis.) role in delivering the Republican response to the State of the Union address to make the case that Republicans are intent on destroying Social Security and Medicare.

"Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), the master political strategist for Senate Democrats, wants to turn Ryan into a bogeyman that voters think about whenever they hear about a Republican proposal to cut federal spending."

Lebanon now a terrorist state

Blackfive  "There was little enough control, well OK basically none over Hezbollah previously, but now the Iranian proxy will almost certainly ramp up all their bad projects.
"They have completely rebuilt and over-re-armed all of their armed enclaves near the Israeli border. The only way the UN observers could have been more helpful to this process was if they had actually unloaded the trucks full of rockets and other weaponry rolling in from Syria instead of just standing by and watching them roll in." 

From DEBKAfile: Iran rounds off grab for Lebanon with figurehead prime minister  "Although the Obama administration pledged its support for Saad Hariri in his struggle against Hizballah, Tehran and Damascus, and Friday, Jan. 21, the USS Strike Force with 6,000 marines and sailors aboard moved into place opposite Lebanese shores, not a single marine has landed in Beirut to save the day.
"Tehran was not impressed by the American show of strength. Two days later, the Islamic Republic dared the US, Israel and Egypt to do their worst by provocatively announcing the dispatch of an Iranian war fleet to the Red Sea, Suez Canal and Mediterranean."

Lebanon on the Brink  "The Hezbollah leader, in his first public comments since toppling the government, mocked America’s empty promises of support. He publicly warned Hariri that the West had promptly turned on its former ally, the recently toppled leader of Tunisia, by denying him sanctuary."  This is a foreign policy based on liberal policies. Pacifists will get innocent people killed.

Targeting the whole of the Lebanese state – where will the U.S. stand in next war against Hezbollah?  "The recent French decision to supply helicopter-borne anti-tank missiles to the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) took on a level of importance far greater than it would have even just a year ago as an increasing number of Israeli military thinkers no longer see a meaningful distinction between it and Hezbollah."...."In the 2006 war, Israeli tanks were subjected to dozens of Hezbollah attacks with the latest Russian-made anti-armor missiles. How much more potent will the threat be when the French missiles and launchers are mounted on the LAF's helicopter fleet?"  The Hill  via JINSA

http://www.mideasttruth.com/cartoons.html

Obama's State of the Conflict address

Bosch Fawstin

Haaretz, Israel  "This time around, a State of the Union address that skips over the state of "our" conflict would be seen as an evasion, a way of avoiding dealing with an American and international interest. Says who? Barack Obama. "

Haaretz supports a two-state solution, which seems to me to be a disaster in the making for Israel. (If I were inclined to believe in disasters-in-the-making with regard to Israel's continued existence.)

Hat tip to Watching America

(Updated) The Obama Code/ What to listen for in the president's State of the Union address.

Fred Barnes First, “competitiveness” then:  "The president also wants to “win the future,” as he put it in a 4-minute video he sent last week to followers from his 2008 campaign. Who takes the lead in achieving this? Not the private economy unleashed by tax cuts and deregulation. Free markets and free individuals can’t be trusted with this task. The government must be in charge."

What Obama Will Not Say at the SOTU  "It is, indeed quite a list. Hat tip to Top Conservative Blogs. Here is a small sample:

--That his party's polities overseeing Fannie and Freddie were, in fact, the core problem in the housing crisis. That government-ordered housing for all is a massive failure.

-- That government takeovers of private companies are problematic, to the tune of socialistic.

-- That his policies punish private companies and American workers by using phony scare tactics to stop and prevent us from becoming more energy independent.

What to Look for Tonight Via Taegan Goddard's Political Wire

In case Mr. Obama mentions alternative energy tonight...

Rich Terrell at http://terrellaftermath.com/

Obama's State of the Union and U.S. Foreign Policy

STRATFOR  Obama "will likely mention foreign issues and is undoubtedly devoting significant time to them, but the decision not to focus on foreign affairs in his State of the Union address gives the impression that the global situation is under control. Indeed, the Republican focus on domestic matters projects the same sense. Both sides create the danger that the public will be unprepared for some of the international crises that are already quite heated. We have discussed these issues in detail, but it is useful to step back and look at the state of the world for a moment."

Obama’s State of the Union Address: Top Five Commitments for a Free, Secure, and Prosperous America "The President’s approach has proven to be far short of what is needed to keep the nation safe, free, and prosperous. It is time for a new doctrine—and new priorities. Here are the top five that should be in the President’s speech."

Morning Bell: State of Denial "President Obama’s speech will describe his “five pillars” for ensuring America’s competitiveness and economic growth. He must be hoping that the American people already forgot about his first “five pillars” of economic growth that he unveiled at Georgetown University in April 2009. The President’s present pillar panel is pretty much the same as the old one. “Deficit reduction” and “investments” in education are completely unchanged. “New Investments in Renewable Energy” has been repackaged to the more centrist-friendly “New Investments in Infrastructure.” Out are ..."

Watch the Leopard Change His Spots  "Now ask yourself: if the Democrats had won the November 2010 elections, would any of this be happening? Do you really believe Obama has changed his philosophy? Do you think he would be talking and acting this way if he had other choices? Do you really believe the Dems would be talking ‘civility' and ‘let's all sit together during the State speech' if they had won in November?"

A Bipartisan Night to Remember? "In all of Thomas Sowell's prophetic work, one simple quote is among my favorites, "Most people on the left do not oppose freedom. They are just in favor of all sorts of things that are incompatible with freedom." In that vein, Republicans don't so much oppose bipartisanship. They just fall prey to all sorts of things that aren't actually bipartisan."

http://townhall.com/cartoons/chipbok