Snowden Eviscerates Hillary In Just Two Sentences

Daily Caller  "It only took two sentences for Edward Snowden to eviscerate Hillary Clinton over her use of a private email server Wednesday morning.

"Clinton has repeatedly criticized Snowden for leaking classified NSA documents. (RELATED: Snowden: Sanders’ Comments On Me Are ‘Refreshing’)

Edward SnowdenVerified account‏@Snowden

Break classification rules for the public's benefit, and you could be exiled. Do it for personal benefit, and you could be President.

• RETWEETS18,305
• LIKES21,867
• 

7:30 AM - 1 Jun 2016

 Read more.

The Facts Keep Undermining Hillary’s E-mail Tales

"It’s outrageous that she might emerge unscathed even so."

National Review . . . "Before we go on, let’s revisit Clinton’s words from August 26, 2015. Back then, she declared that, “I did not send classified material and I did not receive any material that was marked or designated classified, which is the way you know whether something is.” 

"This was a classic Clintonian defense, resting as it did on a largely irrelevant straw man – if she did not receive information “marked” or “designated” classified, and such designations are “the way you know” something is classified, then she never knowingly mishandled classified information. Yet as I (and many others) have pointed out before, Clinton’s actual legal obligation was to safeguard marked and unmarked classified information, and to fulfill that obligation she would necessarily have to know the classification of everything she handled, whether it was marked or not." . . .

This is behavior that would get members of the armed forces discharged and very possibly thrown in prison. But because it is, supposedly, rampant within our most important cabinet agencies, Clinton may well get off scot-free and become the next president of the United States. Lady Justice weeps.

 "Newly released State Department emails help reveal how a major Clinton Foundation donor was placed on a sensitive government intelligence advisory board even though he had no obvious experience in the field..."
" '... a decision that appeared to baffle the department’s professional staff," ABC News reports." . . .

Muhammad Ali’s Funeral: Political Event for the Left

S. Noble   "Ali’s funeral was a political event for leftists. The same people who trashed Nancy Reagan after her death and ignored and/or reviled Margaret Thatcher are the same people who glorify dead Marxists like Nelson Mandela and use Ali’s funeral to further their leftist agenda.

"Ali is to be admired for many things but this funeral today wasn’t solely about admiration for him. For some, it was about all the leftist ideals they could squeeze into the ceremony.

"The only reason Obama missed it is because today was his daughter’s high school graduation.

"Valerie Jarrett played the race card over and over.

“He’d have everything stripped from him, his titles, his standing, his money, his passion. Very nearly his freedom. But Ali still chose America. I imagine he knew that only here in this country could he win it all back. So he chose to help perfect a union where a descendent of slaves could become the king of the world. And in the process, in the process, LEPD some dignity to all of us. Maids, porters, students and elderly bathroom attendant and help inspire a young, mixed kid with a funny name to have the audacity to believe he could be anything, even the president of the United States!”

. . . 

More on Jarrett here: Wicked Valerie Jarrett Uses Ali Funeral to Diss America
Shades of the Wellstone memorial!

Radical Rabbi At Muhammad Ali’s Funeral Attacks Israel, Declares A Winner In Presidential Election   . . . “We Will Not Tolerate Anyone Putting Down Muslims”…

Rabbi Turns Ali Service Into Political Pep Rally, Denounces ‘Racist Police,’ Says ‘1 Percent’ Must ‘Share Their Wealth’

Can you believe the GOP soft-pedals all this on Hillary?

Daily Caller: ‘People Really Go To Jail For Breaking This Law’: Clinton Email Scandal May Have Finally Crossed The Line
. . . “ 'Discussions with Intelligence Community officials have revealed that Ms. Clinton’s ‘unclassified’ emails included Holy Grail items of American espionage such as the true names of Central Intelligence Agency intelligence officers serving overseas under cover,” wrote Schindler." . . .

Obama has Hillary's back in a big way  "White House press secretary Josh Earnest insisted that President Obama's endorsement of Hillary Clinton will not "sway" the ongoing FBI investigation into Clinton.

"The statement came after Obama released a video endorsing Clinton for president of the United States.

"Later this afternoon, according to the White House, Obama is meeting with the attorney general. The meeting is "closed press." . . .

"Earnest made the statement in response to questioning from Fox News' James Rosen.The topic of Obama's closed door meeting with Lynch has not been made public. "

Dreamin' with freedomsback

Some Clinton emails dealt with Pakistan drone strikes  "The FBI has made some emails received by Hillary Clinton over a less secure system that dealt with drone strikes in Pakistan a key part of their criminal investigation, according to the Wall Street Journal.

"Occasionally, diplomats in Pakistan and Afghanistan would send the State Department emails over a non-secure server in order to expedite a decision on whether to go ahead with a proposed drone strike.  Clinton or one of her aides would then forward the email using her private, unsecured server. "

Anyway, back to that judge...

One can be appalled by Donald Trump but understand why the House speaker would support him.

"First, dare to say that the people aren’t always right. Surely Republicans admit the possibility. Or do they believe the people chose rightly in electing Obama? Twice.  . . .The people’s will deserves respect, not necessarily affirmation."

Charles Krauthammer

"The morning after, the nation awakes asking: What have we done?

"Both parties seem intent on throwing the election away. The Democrats, running against a man with highest-ever negatives, are poised to nominate a candidate with second-highest-ever negatives. Hillary Clinton started with every possible advantage — money, experience, name recognition, residual goodwill from her husband’s successful 1990s — yet could not put away until this week an obscure, fringy, socialist backbencher in a country uniquely allergic to socialism.

"Bernie Sanders did have one advantage. He had something to say. She had nuthin’. Her Tuesday victory speech was a pudding without a theme for a campaign without a cause. After 14 months, she still can’t get past the famous question asked of Ted Kennedy in 1979: Why do you want to be president?

"So whom do the Republicans put up? They had 17 candidates. Any of a dozen could have taken down the near-fatally weak Clinton, unloved, untrusted, living under the shadow of an FBI investigation." . . .

Legacy time for Obama

From the king of photosnark, Rich Terrell at TerrellAfterMath