Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Obama defends late-game foreign policy decisions

Stephen F. Hayes: Obama's Shameful Legacy  "There was a time, early in Barack Obama’s presidency, when it was considered outrageous to worry out loud that the new president might treat enemies better than allies, run down friends and elevate foes, show solidarity with anti-American leaders, maybe even release dangerous terrorists or sympathize with traitors. 

"And here we are. Obama has accommodated leaders hostile to America, like Vladimir Putin in Russia and Bashar al-Assad in Syria. He strengthened a rogue regime in Iran and boosted despotic leaders in Cuba. At the same time, he chastised and isolated Israel and abandoned friendly governments in places like Afghanistan and Ukraine. 

"He's freed from Guantanamo dozens of jihadists and high-ranking al Qaeda terrorists, including some who have promised to kill Americans upon their release, and he's done this even as U.S. men and women in uniform and in the intelligence community fight and die to protect us from the threat that these enemies represent. 

. . . "When Obama sought the return of Army sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, who had abandoned his unit in Afghanistan and had been taken captive by jihadists in Pakistan, he released five senior Taliban operatives, all deemed high-risk for a return to terror. Bergdahl's platoon-mates considered him a traitor; Obama's national security adviser portrayed him as a hero, "an American prisoner of war captured on the battlefield" who had served his country with "honor and distinction." 

"And on Tuesday, of course, Obama commuted the sentence of Chelsea Manning, who leaked hundreds of thousands of sensitive U.S. intelligence and diplomatic documents to WikiLeaks, causing irreparable harm to U.S. interests. The damage wasn't theoretical. According to an Associated Press article from the prosecution of Manning, the U.S. government argued in court, "al Qaeda leaders reveled in WikiLeaks' publication of reams of classified U.S. documents" and "al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden asked for and received from an associate the Afghanistan battlefield reports that WikiLeaks published." . . .

UK Daily Mail . . . "Obama upset the nation of Israel, and the president-elect, who accused him of putting up 'roadblocks' intended to hamper his administration, when he ordered his United Nation's ambassador to abstain from a vote on settlement building in Israel at a security council at the end of December." . . .

Political Cartoons by Robert Ariail

Well, he was mentored by a Communist as a youth, by his America-and-white-hating pastor Jeremiah Wright and was close to Bill Ayers, anti-war bomber.

Barry Takes a Knee


toon170119

Appointing Ben Rhodes to Holocaust Memorial Council is massive Obama middle finger of triumph

Legal Insurrection
"Rhodes engineered the public communications deception in support of the Iran nuke deal"
. . . "Who is Ben Rhodes?

"He’s the Obama communications operative who admitted to deceiving the American public and manipulating the media in support of the Iran Nuclear Deal. (He also ran the Benghazi disinformation campaign.)
David Gerstman wrote a devastating takedown of the deal and Rhode’s deception last May, Grand Deception: How Obama and Ben Rhodes Lied Us Into the Iran nuke deal. Read the whole thing.

"Part of Rhodes deception was to create the media narrative, and a media echo chamber, pushing the claim that negotiations were a byproduct of the rise of a moderate faction in Iran. It was a lie meant to suggest that the Iranians were moving away from their genocidal desire to destroy Israel and thus an agreement which legitimized and legalized Iran’s nuclear program was not a worry.
"In fact, we know that the nuke deal puts Iran on a certain path to be in a position to produce and deliver a nuclear weapon down the road, and that’s assuming Iran honors the deal. And that supposed rising moderate Iranian government is nowhere to be found. Flush with cash and renewed international business connections, the Mullahs are as violent as ever and increasingly throwing their military weight around in the region.
For Obama to appoint the man who deceived us into putting 6 million Israeli Jews in danger on the Holocaust Memorial Council is a big FU by Obama to critics of the Iran nuke deal." . . .
"Rhodes also coordinated Obama messaging to support the decision to abstain on UN Security Council Resolution 2334, VIDEO: Obama advisor Ben Rhodes says Israel wasn’t ambushed and brought UN Resolution on itself."

Is there a hidden logic behind Obama’s freeing of Chelsea Manning?

Mr. Lifson thinks this appears to be just one more act of spite from Obama toward President Trump.


Thomas Lifson  "A lot of people are puzzled over the motives behind President Obama freeing Chelsea Manning soon by commuting his sentence. Some posit that he is ingratiating himself with the sexual left. Others darkly suspect that he intends to hobble the ability of the United States to conduct espionage, signaling to other potential traitors that they can be pardoned by a future progressive president.

"But almost everyone agrees that this act will influence his legacy, as the Marc Rich pardon has helped define the Clinton legacy.
"But what if there is a plan that is not immediately obvious to most observers?
"Jack Armstrong just made a brilliant observation supporting the notion that something is up: Donald Trump has not yet tweeted about the subject. He adds:
"Don’t forget that Julian Assange has agreed to come back to the US and face trial if Manning were freed.
"Perhaps the Trump team has determined that Assange is sincere, and wants to come back and face a public trial, making transparency a cause for the jury to weigh.  Assange may be willing to face a prison term for the opportunity to make his trial a showcase, a historic case that ignites passion around the world. Especially if the precedent exists of progressive presidents pardoning leakers.
"This would hobble the intelligence-gathering and security operations of the Trump administration. 
"And irony of ironies, Obama gets the image of Mr. Transparency for his role in freeing Manning despite his broken promise to have the “most transparent administration in the history of America.”

If Obama had a son, would he look like Chelsea Manning?  "By now it is well known that Obama has commuted the sentence of "Chelsea" Manning, the transvestite traitor who released many classified military secrets and was sentenced to a long term in jail.  Obama seems to take a casual attitude toward the release of military information to our enemies.

"But Obama has shown much greater alarm regarding the released emails from the Democratic National Committee files, allegedly by Russian hackers, even though no national security secrets were revealed.  Why is that?  I think because Obama decides everything based on identity politics.  He doesn't look at the nature of the crime; he looks at who he thinks committed it and how virtuous that person's group is." . . .

What Kind of Snowflake Are You?

"Under the guise of protecting them, these whores of diversity earn a living turning impressionable students into ideological weapons." . . . 
Mike Adams

What Kind of Snowflake Are You?

"Campuses all across America are being overrun by hordes of snowflakes that are simply emotionally incapable of functioning in a free and open marketplace of ideas. Some people blame the public school system or even the parents who raised the little snowflakes. I disagree and have decided it is best to blame the universities themselves. I arrived at this conclusion last fall after speaking with one of the skinny blonde chicks that had just gone through freshman orientation here at UNC-We Are Constantly Offended. Please go grab a beer unless you are below the age of 21 (or if you are a Baptist currently in the presence of other Baptists). I have a story I would like to share." 

"The aforementioned skinny blonde chick enrolled at UNCW after being urged to do so by her father who is an avid reader of my column. When she attended freshman orientation, she encountered three very interesting events that go a long way toward explaining why chronically offended adolescents overrun our campuses. The events follow in no particular order of absurdity:" . . .