“TACO Trump” Is Terrible Messaging

 

“TACO Trump” Is Terrible Messaging

"The latest substitute for real resistance shows that the Democratic Party still refuses to learn."

. . . "Notice that Schumer is attacking Trump from the right on Iran, suggesting that Trump is not being tough enough and is letting a “terrorist” government “get away with everything.” This is the sort of criticism that Republicans hit Democrats with: soft on terrorists. It’s one of the criticisms I wish Democrats would stop making, because it doesn’t make any sense. It’s good that Trump isn’t taking a hard line on Iran. It’s a relief, because it means we’re less likely to end up in a catastrophic war. Instead of supporting Israel’s view that Iran should just be attacked instead of negotiated with, the Trump administration is trying to come to some sort of agreement with Iran. There will be enough Republicans critical of such an agreement; we don’t need Democrats joining the chorus by saying that Trump is folding or “chickening out” of a war with Iran! I’m reminded of the way, in his first term, some Democrats suggested Trump was soft on North Korea when he opted for diplomacy over threats of force. (Schumer himself called this “one of the worst few days in American foreign policy.”) They were wrong. It was good when Trump showed an openness to negotiations. It does not help when the party that should be for diplomacy over military aggression criticizes Trump for being insufficiently aggressive." . . .  More...

Both Victor Davis Hanson and Ben Shapiro have important insights

 Andrea Widburg - American Thinker  "Whether discussing certain European nations and Canada or the rot developing in the Republican party here at home, both wise men are worth listening to."

The part that most interests me started with Hanson pointing out that, since Iran admitted it was two weeks away from nuclear payloads and since the mid-range missile attack on Diego Garcia, we now know that every European capital is vulnerable to Iran’s nuclear blackmail. In a sane world, it’s every bit as much in Europe’s interest as it is in America’s and Israel’s to destroy Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.

"I should say up front that I’m a huge fan of both Victor Davis Hanson and Ben Shapiro. I sincerely hope that neither ever goes to the dark side the way Tucker Carlson has. Given that both men come from a place of unswerving principles (their values haven’t changed in decades), I have faith that they won’t be following wherever the clicks lead. This matters because I want to share with you some fascinating things that both said in recent interviews.

"Victor Davis Hanson, on his own show, and Ben Shapiro, in an interview with Peter Robinson, offered their takes on two very pressing issues today. Hanson discussed the fact that Europe is no longer an American ally, and (speaking of Tucker Carlson) Shapiro discussed the growing rot within the Republican party.

"I’ll start with Hanson. He points out what we’ve all noticed: many of Europe’s most powerful nations are takers, not givers. Since WWI, we’ve repeatedly pulled these nations’ irons out of the fire, only for them to spit (condescendingly) into America’s face once they felt safe again. The same holds true for Canada. That’s simply not sustainable, and Trump seems to be on the verge of explicitly changing the terms of this dysfunctional relationship.". . 

. . . "From now on, it’s strategic alliances, not old alliances. Currently, we have a strong strategic alliance with Israel, because we share an enemy. Technically, so does Europe, but it’s decided to throw its lot in with the enemy, rather than fight back." . . .

 More...

Ghost Murmur: The Classified Sensor That Found a Lost Airman in Iran; And the leaker who helped the Iranians looking for him

Doug Ross- Substack   Yet it is permitted to publish this?

"Last weekend, the U.S. military pulled off one of the most dramatic rescue missions in recent memory — plucking a downed weapons officer out of hostile Iranian territory after he spent 36 hours hiding in a mountain crack with nothing but a handgun. But the wildest part wasn’t the firefight, the SEAL teams, or the two transport planes that got stuck in the mud and had to be blown up. It was a classified CIA gadget called “Ghost Murmur” — a quantum-diamond sensor that reportedly detected the airman’s heartbeat from the air"Physicists around the world are now asking the same question: is that even possible?"

. . . "One thing is clear: the era of quantum sensing in military operations isn’t coming. It’s here. We just weren’t supposed to know about it yet." . . .  More...

. . . "If it truly detected a heartbeat at distance as described, it would be, as one physicist put it, “a breakthrough far beyond anything reported in the scientific literature.'”

 'What a Surprise' File: Latest Classified Leaker to Get Busted Is Just AWFL

. . . "AWFLs don't want to discuss a difference of opinion with you. They want you punished or dead and make no bones about it." . . .

🚨 BREAKING: The former SOCOM employee arrested for leaking classified secrets to “journalists” has been identified as Courtney Williams, a US Army veteran
Give her the MAXIMUM penalty.
Putting our troops’ lives at risk should be met HARSH punishments! pic.twitter.com/p9ochBMY9r

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) April 8, 2026

. . . "Until I hear that Courtney Williams from the Ft Bragg case is being specifically charged with the F-15 leak, I am going on the assumption that they are still on the hunt for that leaker, which to my mind is a far more egregious case because of its immediacy.

Lives hung in the balance because of that leak to a willing and malevolent media - AMERICAN lives.

And I'm sorry. That still means something to the rest of us, for all the hurt #feelingz and psychotic #MeMeMe spinning in the ether around us.

American lives and security take precedence over everything." . . .

The big loser in the spectacular Iran airmen rescue

. . . "The story of this Easter weekend should have been simple.  It should have stirred the best in us.  It should have made us stop and reflect.  It should have inspired awe.  Whether the cause of this leak was hubris, blind hatred of Trump, or the dehumanizing detachment of a virtual culture, it points to something deeply broken and worthy of serious reflection." . . .

Omar Demands Trump’s Removal While Iran Watches: “Invoke the 25th Amendment. Impeach. Remove” –

 MSNOW and Democrats will use this news around the clock. TD

The Federalist Papers

"Think about the timing. Iran’s government is watching every signal coming out of Washington right now. Every crack in American resolve is an asset to them. And Omar handed them one — gift-wrapped."

• Omar called the sitting president an “unhinged lunatic” — while U.S. forces are in an active standoff with Iran.
• She was removed from the House Foreign Affairs Committee for antisemitism — and still lectures on who’s fit to conduct foreign policy.
• Omar opposed the Soleimani strike. Opposed maximum pressure. Opposed the Iran Deal withdrawal. The pattern is 100%.
• A bipartisan House vote stripped her from the committee that oversees Iran policy.
• Tehran noticed. They always do.

"There’s a pattern here. It isn’t subtle.

"Every time Trump exercises American power against Iran — maximum pressure sanctions, the Soleimani strike, the current confrontation — the same Democrats line up to undermine him. Not after the fact. Not in quiet dissent. Publicly, loudly, at the exact moment adversaries are watching most closely.

"Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) delivered the latest installment Monday, calling the sitting president an “unhinged lunatic” and demanding his removal from office while the United States is in an active standoff with Tehran." . . . More...

America and Israel in the Just War Against the Iranian Mullahcracy 

. . . "I am not a military expert. I am not even a counterintelligence agent. I do not have the knowledge base to choose sides on this burning issue.

My gut tells me that President Trump has absolutely got to win this war--the one that Iran started 47 years ago. It is a Just War. It is not an "aggressive" war any more than Israel's war was against Hamas. These are both wars of self-defense.

Negotiations did not and will not work--not with fundamentalist fanatics who want to control the entire world and convert all its inhabitants to Islam. Appeasement (Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden) only delays the cost and the pain of fighting back, a cost that will only increase with time.

My gut tells me that Israel and the Jews may be fighting an existential war for their survival forever. The Jews always have. Yes, we've had merciful pauses, but no more than that. My gut tells me that radical political Islam must absolutely be defeated or the world as some of us have known it and as so many others yearn for it to be will be forever impossible."  Phyllis Chesler

Trump Administration Kills the Most Annoying Car Feature Obama Forced on Drivers

  RedState

Never mind that real-world fuel savings proved modest and inconsistent at best — many studies showed only marginal gains in typical driving, especially once frustrated owners simply turned the system off or dealt with the annoying restarts.

"The Trump administration is eliminating Obama-era off-cycle credits that incentivized automakers to install automatic start-stop technology in vehicles, effectively killing what many drivers consider one of the most annoying features of newer models.

"EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin highlighted the victory on Wednesday — building on the February repeal of the 2009 Endangerment Finding — while sharing a Wall Street Journal article highlighting drivers celebrating 'the demise of the most hated feature in their cars.'

"Zeldin mocked the technology as an Obama administration climate zealot "participation trophy."

"The start/stop concept in vehicles is almost universally DESPISED. So, the Trump EPA has now REMOVED the ridiculous climate participation trophy the Obama Admin created to get this hated feature installed," he wrote on X. "The incentives for manufacturers to make your car die at every red light and stop sign have now been ELIMINATED!"

"The Journal reports that a significant percentage — 58 percent — of new gasoline non-hybrid cars had these universally despised systems installed by 2024." . . . 

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin:

The start/stop concept in vehicles is almost universally DESPISED. So, the Trump EPA has now REMOVED the ridiculous climate participation trophy the Obama Admin created to get this hated feature installed. The incentives for manufacturers to make your car die at every red light and stop sign have now been ELIMINATED!

Zeldin Zings Climate Fanatics, Says US Will No Longer Bend the Knee to 'Gloom and Doom' Crowd   . . . "One thing about science: it’s never settled; it’s a process, and since so many of the eco-warriors’ predictions have failed to materialize, you’d have to be an idiot not to debate some of their “unquestionable” allegations.

"Bring it, Zeldin. You’re right to question the Obama-Biden-Newsom era's ludicrous war on energy, and you’re right that much of Europe is committing suicide right before our eyes. I’m sure you’d make a great attorney general — but you seem to be kicking butt and taking names in the job you already have.

"Editor’s Note: Democrats have been waging war on our energy production for decades."

"The “war crime” outcry is simply another collaboration between America’s enemies, the media, and the Democrat Party."

 "Iran is attempting to set the stage for such accusations by placing human shields around their power plants, but international law is clear about this: the results of such actions are on them."  J.R. Dunn

Donald Trump, War Criminal? - J.R. Dunn  

"Over the last couple of days, we’ve been hearing that, once the Dems take the midterms, they’ll immediately start preparations to try Donald Trump for war crimes in Iran. The loudest voice here – as is usually the case – is James Carville (actually, what he said was more like “We gone git that-theah Donal’ Trump for woah crimes roun’ heah.”), but he hasn’t been alone.

"Is there any truth to this? What they’re referring to, it seems, is President Trump’s announcement that he intends to target infrastructure, particularly power generation and bridges, in the next round of air strikes if the Iranian government refuses to come to terms.

"On the face of it, there’s nothing to this. Both power stations and transportation infrastructure are legitimate targets of war and always have been. Both – along with most other infrastructure targets – are used by belligerents to carry out military actions. Energy generation is obviously useful in powering military equipment and installations. Roads and bridges are used to transport supplies and shift military forces. Which, ipso facto, makes them legitimate targets. That they’re also used for civilian purposes doesn’t change things." . . .

Trump Obliterated CNN for Peddling Fake News About the Iran Ceasefire

. . . "There was a ten-point plan and an accompanying statement from Tehran about the deal that CNN ran with, but it turned out to be fake news. The president and his staff roasted them for it:"

No one can believe that Fake News CNN put out a knowingly false and dangerous statement pretending it came from the upper levels of the Iranian Government. It didn’t! It was totally made up and posted, as a headline, for purpose of, perhaps, inflaming a very delicate situation. It was a new, trouble making site from Nigeria, and CNN just got caught cheating - A very dangerous thing to do! . . .

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) calls for President Trump to be ousted from office

. . . "Memo to Ilhan: Trump is trying to achieve America’s goals, one of which is seeing to it that Iran can’t launch nuclear weapons at America or her protectorates. He is simultaneously trying to alleviate the staggering amount of fraud, deception, and theft of taxpayer dollars that you yourself have worked so hard to engender and protect.

"And he is defending Americans against a pseudo-religion that advocates converting, enslaving, or killing “infidels,” meaning anyone and everyone that doesn’t wholeheartedly believe in and support a “religion” founded by a 50-year-old guy who married a 6-year-old, but waited until his “wife” was 9-years-old before consummating the marriage.

"Also, he didn’t marry his brother.

"Who is nuts? Who is immoral?

"You should be prosecuted, sentenced … and deported. Praise be to Allah."

 

Art of the Deal that Reset the World

Doug Ross @ Journal  

"Let’s do a quick recap for the folks in the cheap seats. The Panicans said it was reckless. Wrong. They said it would start a war. Wrong. They said there was no plan. Wrong. They said Trump was in over his head. Spectacularly wrong. At some point, being wrong this consistently stops being a mistake and starts being a lifestyle." . . . 

"On April 7, 2026, a ceasefire with Iran went into effect — and somewhere, an entire army of blue-check foreign policy experts quietly deleted their “This is how World War III starts” threads. While the Panicans were hyperventilating into their New Yorker tote bags, Trump was running the same playbook he’s used since the ‘80s. Pressure, escalation, leverage, deal. It wasn’t a secret. He literally wrote a book about it. But reading is hard when you’re too busy doom-scrolling and writing “we’re all gonna die” in a group chat full of people who think The View is news. The ceasefire is real. The Strait is reopening. And the Panicans owe everyone an apology they’ll never give — because admitting they were wrong would require a level of self-awareness they haven’t unlocked yet.

"Trump has been running this same move since before most of these pundits had Twitter accounts, and they still fell for it. Every. Single. Time. He did it with China on trade — “Oh no, tariffs will destroy us!” Deal. He did it with North Korea — “He’s going to nuke Guam!” Summit. He did it with the USMCA — “NAFTA is sacred!” Signed. And now Iran — “He’s a madman, this is catastrophic!” Ceasefire. At this point, falling for the panic is like being the guy who gets Charlie Brown’d by the football for the 40th time and still blames the football. The Panicans had months to recognize the pattern. A toddler with a memory could’ve called this. But instead, they spent every night on cable news looking directly into a camera and being wrong with absolute confidence. That takes talent. The wrong kind — but talent nonetheless." . . .

. . . "Now here’s where it gets really fun — because the ceasefire isn’t just a Middle East story, and the Panicans have no idea what’s coming next. The Strait of Hormuz is reopening, which means twenty percent of the world’s oil is no longer held hostage by a regime that doesn’t exist anymore. Whoops. Russia and Ukraine are getting dragged toward a real negotiation because the U.S. just showed the entire planet what happens when it actually commits. China is looking at Taiwan and doing math it doesn’t like. And across the Middle East, countries that couldn’t agree on what day it was are suddenly standing in a line together (remember “The Board of Peace”?). Meanwhile, the “experts” who said none of this was possible are now pivoting to “well, anyone could have done this” — which is hilarious, because they had eight years under Obama and four under Biden to try, and the best they managed was pallets of cash, a nuclear-armed terror state and a participation trophy. Phase 2 is the homecoming: immigration, housing, AI, infrastructure, space. The adults are back at the table. The Panicans can take a seat — preferably in the back, where we can’t hear them." . . .More...

Larry Kudlow: Once again President Trump outwits the defeatist Democrats

"One of the many faults with today’s Democratic party is they don’t know how to win. They are defeatists. They find themselves on the wrong side of all kinds of 80-20 issues, like open borders, defending illegal criminals, waste, fraud, and abuse corruption, tax hikes, and men in women’s locker rooms. Now, here they go once again badmouthing President Trump’s tremendous victory in Operation Epic Fury, that absolutely crushed Iran in only 38 days. These defeatist Democrats now want to limit the commander in chief’s foreign policy powers, at almost exactly the moment where Mr. Trump, and our mighty military, and American patriots everywhere have scored a tremendous victory.

"Is the war over? I think it basically is. There may be more hostilities, but we’re on the one-yard line. Let’s wait and see. Mr. Trump will never cut a bad deal. He has opened the Strait of Hormuz to take the pressure off energy prices. And he’s keeping all the American military forces in place in the Middle East, just to make sure a badly defeated Iran makes a peace deal. They may misbehave, and more bombing will occur. If they don’t agree to turning over the enriched uranium to America, then more bombing may be necessary. Ditto for their missile programs. Ditto if they keep bombing our Gulf allies." . . .

Trump Confounds Critics Again; Trump threatens devastation, then pivots to diplomacy.

 The American Spectator | USA News and Politics

"As in most wars, there is likely no perfect solution. But, Cohen writes, the war “is not the catastrophe that some make it out to be, nor is the United States stuck in a quagmire.” Iran’s threat to the region has been scaled-back. Any solution — military or negotiated — is likely to be temporary — that is the way international relations usually work" 

"President Donald Trump has once again confounded his many critics by agreeing to a two-week ceasefire in the war against Iran, after threatening to bomb Iran back to the Stone Age and end a civilization.

"On the right, former Trump supporter and former congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene said that Trump had gone “insane.” Andrew Day in The American Conservative suggested that Trump might use nuclear weapons against Iran. Bruce Fein characterized Trump’s attacks on Iran as “unconstitutional” and “criminal.” Steven Simon in Responsible Statecraft accused Trump of threatening genocide in Iran. (RELATED: The Real Risk to Trump’s Coalition Over Iran)

"On the left, Sen. Chuck Schumer said Trump resembled “an unhinged madman.” Sen. Bernie Sanders called Trump “dangerous and mentally unbalanced.” Representative Ro Khanna accused Trump of “threatening war crimes.” Charlie Savage in the New York Times called Trump’s threats “self-incriminating statements” for a future war crimes trial. Some critics have suggested invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office. 

"Trump’s threat was to bomb Iran’s infrastructure — bridges, desalination plants, power plants. These are the kinds of targets that were routinely bombed during World War II, yet Trump’s critics claim that deliberately striking them would be a war crime. All of those targets affect Iran’s ability to make war. Judged by this standard, Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman were war criminals — after all, they oversaw and countenanced the deliberate bombing of civilians in Germany and Japan. (RELATED: Trump: A Real Commander-in-Chief)

Trump Confounds Critics Again | . . . 

. . . "Writing in Foreign Policy, hardly a MAGA journal, Rand strategic analyst Raphael Cohen takes a more balanced and less unhinged view of the progress of the Iran war than Trump’s many critics. Cohen writes that the Iran war is not a “debacle,” rather it is a “dilemma” like all wars. Operationally, he writes, the war is going reasonably well, noting that the U.S. and Israel “have made significant progress toward achieving [their] objectives” of destroying Iran’s missiles and missile industry, destroying Iran’s navy, degrading Iran’s proxy network, and further degrading Iran’s ability to obtain a nuclear weapon. Diplomatically, the Gulf states have sided with the U.S. and Israel against Iran." . . . More...

Iranian villagers protect downed U.S. airman, while lefty Europeans root for his capture

  Monica Showalter

 "There are reports that the downed F-15 pilot in Iran was sheltered by heroic villagers in Yasuj’s Kakan region before US Special Forces arrived. 20 of those villagers have been kidnapped by the regime for aiding the American pilot."

 AI generated fake  image shows pilot captured by Iranians

"It's an upside-down world when Iranian villagers seek to protect U.S. servicemen from Iran's mullah regime, while our purported European allies root for his capture.

That really happened with the recent incident regarding a downed U.S. airman whose case for rescue was made that much more dangerous by a leaker on the U.S. side, who alerted the Iranian goons of his presence on Iranian soil and got them hunting for him.

But the news was not all bad. Something unexpected happened -- in a spontaneous gesture, the Iranian villagers rushed in to protect him from capture by the Revolutionary Guard goons who were looking for him to capture. It was not without risk -- some may die as a result with angry mullah goons now looking for them. But it was the price of freedom, a price they were willing to pay." . . .More...

Iranian villagers protect downed U.S. airman, while lefty Europeans root for his capture - A CROOKED PATH

"I just hope the brave Iranian villagers get some kind of recognition from the U.S. when in the end, they are liberated, while the Europeans learn the hard way about wishing ill on an ally."  Remember Vichy France: a Puppet Government or a Willing Nazi Collaborator?

"It’s an upside-down world when Iranian villagers seek to protect U.S. servicemen from Iran’s mullah regime, while our purported European allies root for his capture.

"That really happened with the recent incident regarding a downed U.S. airman whose case for rescue was made that much more dangerous by a leaker on the U.S. side, who alerted the Iranian goons of his presence on Iranian soil and got them hunting for him.

"But the news was not all bad. Something unexpected happened — in a spontaneous gesture, the Iranian villagers rushed in to protect him from capture by the Revolutionary Guard goons who were looking for him to capture. It was not without risk — some may die as a result with angry mullah goons now looking for them. But it was the price of freedom, a price they were willing to pay." . . . More ...

Democrats pitch Eric Swalwell over the side in California governor's race, with sex harassment allegations rolling out of the woodwork

 Monica Showalter

"The thing about all these Eric Swalwell revelations is that ALL of them were known for years. But the media worked with the Democrat establishment to keep them quiet as long as Swalwell was useful." Councilwoman Vickie Paladino

"When Democrats want to get rid of someone, they wheel out the women with sexual harassment allegations. Apparently, so many of them do it it's become part of a playbook for ridding the party of liabilities, often about other matters."

"It happened to Elliott Spitzer.

"It took down Andrew Cuomo.

"Now, it's Eric Swalwell's turn.

"According to the Daily Caller:

A Democratic activist says she is working with multiple women preparing to come forward with sexual harassment allegations against California Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell.

 

Cheyenne Hunt — a lawyer, one-time congressional candidate and executive director of Gen-Z for Change — revealed that she has been working with an unspecified number of women set to accuse Swalwell in multiple X posts early Monday morning. Swalwell is currently a leading candidate in the crowded race to succeed Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom.

 

“I got involved because the first victim who approached me is a close friend, but when I saw that there were others who’s experiences fit the same pattern of manipulation and abuse of power, I knew I couldn’t stay silent,” Hunt wrote in her X thread. She specified that the allegations concern “DMs [direct messages] and Snapchat messages” and range “from uncomfortable comments to potentially criminal conduct.”

"Well, ahem. Seems a lot of this was already known, but the press and the political establishment covered for him. That enabled him to do it again and again, shielded not just by the press and the abundant non-disclosure agreements he forced complainants to sign, but by the entire Democrat power establishment, which kept all the secrets. The Daily Caller report said 'dozens.'

"How much were the taxpayers forced to shell out for the silence of these dozens in the lawsuits that inevitably followed? We know that Congress has been forced to shell out $18 million in claims of this nature. Did the cash come from Swalwell campaign funds or did the kind of money corporations pay for 'consulting' pay them off? And are Swalwell's financial problems a function of these payouts to all these female accusers? Was Swalwell the worst of them? Questions abound." . . .More...

Senate GOP Needs New Leadership

John Thune’s leadership is turning a Republican majority into a graveyard for President Trump’s agenda.

The American Spectator | USA News and Politics  

"It’s becoming increasingly obvious that, despite a 53-47 Republican majority, the U.S. Senate is a graveyard for President Trump’s agenda. This is largely the fault of Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), who has never been a strong supporter of the President. Despite this, most Republicans hoped that Thune would work to advance Trump’s priorities, particularly after his decisive 2024 victory provided the momentum for the GOP to retake the Senate. But Thune’s refusal to get the SAVE America Act passed and his surrender to the Democrats on DHS funding — without additional money for ICE or CPB — dashed any hope that this man has the right stuff to be Senate Majority Leader.

"President Trump and House Republicans have tried to be patient with Thune’s inertia, but that is over with. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who has done everything in his power to work with the Majority Leader on the SAVE America Act, sent a clear signal to him during a Fox News interview with Kayleigh McEnany on Saturday: “If you don’t want to fight fires, don’t become a firefighter. If you don’t want to take grueling votes at difficult hours and sometimes have to work longer than you want to, then maybe you shouldn’t become a United States Senator.” Also on Fox News, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) was far more explicit about how Senator Thune should be dealt with:" . . .

"As Senator Mike Lee wrote Friday, “The Senate GOP has exactly two options if it wants to avoid drifting into irrelevance and a stunning loss in November: (1) Keep the filibuster and 60-vote cloture rule fully intact, but stand ready to overcome Senate Democrats’ unprecedented pattern of obstruction by aggressively enforcing the ‘talking filibuster,’ a move that would require senators to work longer, harder hours and take fewer recesses, but lead to more thoughtful, careful deliberation in the legislative process, OR (2) Nuke the filibuster.”

Obviously, the leadership in the Senate — and that’s on both sides of the aisle — has a real disgust for this President and House leadership because they didn’t even have the guts to call speaker Mike Johnson and let him know what happened … The stereotype of Congress is, and it’s well deserved, is that we pass stuff in the dark of night because we don’t have any guts, and that’s clearly what’s shown in the Senate leadership. I think they need to get some new leadership over there, in my opinion.  More...

Pam Bondi Is Gone—Because Working On It Wasn’t Enough -

 Victory Girls Blog  

"Maybe Bondi was stuck in an untenable position for what the job entailed, but her biggest problem, one government watchdog says, was her inability to run a tenacious prosecution operation that would send a clear message to the leftist lawfare crowd. – The Federalist"

"Pam Bondi is out, and the reason isn’t hard to figure out. The job called for action, and what people saw didn’t match the moment. Voters sent Donald Trump back to Washington with a very specific expectation: stop talking and start moving.

"That didn’t happen. Now the focus turns to what comes next, and more importantly, who will do the job the way people expected.

"Donald Trump handled the firing the Washington way. He offered kind words, gave a respectful sendoff, and kept things calm on the surface. He praised Pam Bondi on the way out. But that doesn’t change what drove this decision. Results. Or more accurately, the lack of them.

"For months, there was a growing sense that the Department of Justice wasn’t moving with urgency. The tone felt cautious, at best, and the pace was slow. In a role like Attorney General, that stands out quickly. And in Pam’s case, it most certainly did." . . .

. . . "Look at past Attorneys General. Agree with them or not, they acted.

"Eric Holder pushed forward aggressively on the priorities of the Obama administration. Loretta Lynch continued in that same direction. Under Merrick Garland, the DOJ moved decisively on January 6-related prosecutions.

"You can debate those decisions all day long. People do. But the one thing you can’t say is that nothing happened.

"That’s the difference. The DOJ was being used to push left-leaning priorities that worked against conservative policies.

"For now, the role lands in Todd Blanche’s lap as Acting Attorney General, taking over the Department of Justice while the bigger question of a permanent replacement is still up in the air." . . .

"If You’re Looking for a Fighter, Start Here  If the goal is to put someone in that role who won’t sit back and wait, some names come to mind. One of them is Jeanine Pirro.