Biggest lie? Terrorizing children with climate change scenarios

. . . All their tilting at windmills and solar panels are just silly pipe dreams.  America is never again going to be pre-industrial.  And CO2 is a life force, not a pollutant.  That is Science 101."

Patricia McCarthy  "Nancy Pelosi shamelessly accuses President Trump of "scaring the children" with talk of deporting illegal migrants who have committed crimes, received due process, and evaded deportation orders.  Pelosi is infamous for using children as pawns in her gutter politics.  Her party has been using migrant children as tools in their vicious game of border politics since the day Trump was elected. Up until then, they all claimed to favor border security.  That changed on a dime on November 8, 2016.  From that day forward, there have been no limits on how low they will go; children are absolutely indispensable in their plan to destroy Trump by any means available. 

"The hoax of man-caused climate change is one of their principal schemes to frighten the youngest among us into abject servants of the state.  So what if it destroys their hopes of a future, family or any comforts of home and freedom!  Those of us of a certain age have vague memories of air raid drills and duck and cover exercises in the fifties.  Most of our parents, however, did not use these events to instill fear in our hearts and minds.  Some did of course; they built bomb shelters and prepared for the worst, but in those days, the generation that had survived the Depression and WWII strived to protect the innocence of childhood for their progeny." . . . 

Severe language warning in this video, regrettably:

Dems Are Planning to Steal the 2020 Election

...Yet, vote harvesting is the most pernicious of the voting schemes; it allows partisans to go to someone’s home with a ballot, fill it out for them, and cast it in their stead.  Can you say, “voter intimidation?”  What could go wrong? Lowering the voting age to 16 and allowing felons and prisoners to vote are also aspirations. ...

William L. Gensert  "Democrats have an insurance policy for the 2020 Presidential election, and it has nothing to do with the eventual Democratic Party nominee.  The original policy was initiated by Obama, Comey, Brennan, McCabe, Hillary, and their ilk, bragged about by Strzok to his paramour, and paid for by the Democrat/media cabal.  The mephitic Mueller tried to cash it in, but the hero Marine got slapped down by Barr.

"It’s a plan to “win” the election by any means necessary, even by cheating if necessary.  Of its components, the “failsafe,” is most intriguing, if for no other reason than it is so devious, underhanded, clever, and inventive, that it’s surprising it comes from the same left which gave us the ridiculously ludicrous Steele dossier and Smollett hoax.

"October Surprise. 

"Notice how quickly E. Jean Carroll disappeared from the headlines?  Or, how the same media, which has a conniption fit when Trump asks for an extra scoop of ice cream, scarcely publicized her rape accusation, and then let the matter drop with nary a peep? Perhaps a sealed indictment of Donald Trump (New York has no statute of limitations for first-degree rape) is being processed as we speak, with the purpose of it being leaked just in time for the election."

Trump Administration Holding Immigrant Children in Cages-Mostly Truth! & Misleading!

Truth or Fiction

"Summary of eRumor:

"As part of its “zero tolerance” policy on illegal immigration, the Trump administration holds immigrant children in cages after separating them from their parents.

"The Truth:

"There are many questions about the Trump administration’s use of detention centers to hold immigrant children. One of the most potent claims has been that immigrant children are held in cages.
"Based on first-person accounts and historical records, chain-link enclosures similar to cages are used to separate children during processing at at least one U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) facility. It’s not clear how long children are held there for processing. However, that facility was in use in 2014, before Trump took office. Given that, we’re calling this one “mostly truth” and “misleading.' ” . . .

. . . "So, it’s true that at least one CBP processing facility uses fence-like enclosures. However, that facility was in use before Trump’s “zero tolerance” policy. And other CBP detention facilities are operated as licensed child care centers. Given all that, we’re calling this one “mostly truth” and “misleading.' ”

Obama officials rushed to explain photos from 2014 that went viral showing locked-up immigrant children — and Trump's facilities look the same

. . . "Several former Obama administration officials took to social media and news outlets last month to explain a gallery of years-old photos that showed immigrant children sleeping in shoddy conditions at a government-run holding facility in Arizona. 
"The images, which the Associated Press first published in 2014, resurfaced recently for reasons that remain unclear, and quickly prompted viral outrage on Twitter. One particularly disturbing image showed two children sleeping on mattresses on the floor inside what appeared to be a cage.
"A number of prominent liberals — and even a former Obama administration official — shared the photos, mistakenly believing they depicted the Trump administration's treatment of immigrant children who were forcibly separated from their parents." . . .

PHOTOS: Are Immigrant Children Being Held in Cages at Border?
About some cage photos: . . . “They were taken by Ross D. Franklin, a photographer from The Associated Press, at a centre run by the Customs and Border Protection Agency in Nogales, Ariz,” reported Globelnews.ca. Trump also tweeted in late May about the 2014 photos, writing, “Democrats mistakenly tweet 2014 pictures from Obama’s term showing children from the Border in steel cages. They thought it was recent pictures in order to make us look bad, but backfires. Dems must agree to Wall and new Border Protection for good of country…Bipartisan Bill!”

Who you gonna believe: Netflix or the evidence?

"But instead of learning a somber lesson from their parents, paying the price and emerging better men, they have learned a much different lesson from our media: It doesn’t matter what you do to another human being; cry “racism,” and you will be rewarded with untold riches and celebrity."

Ann Coulter  "Last week, we reviewed the evidence of “innocence” of the “Central Park 5” presented in the court of Hollywood.
"This week, we’ll review the evidence of their guilt — presented in courts of law and ruled on by actual judges and juries.
"The five accused rapists — Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray, Raymond Santana, Yusef Salaam and Kharey Wise — were duly convicted of the 1989 Central Park rape, as well as other assaults in the park that night; “exonerated” 13 years later; and, more than a decade after that, paid $40 million by the city of New York to “settle” a malicious prosecution case within months of Bill de Blasio becoming mayor, despite city lawyers’ confidence that they would win at trial.
"To his credit, Mayor Michael Bloomberg refused to give the “exonerated” convicts a dime.
"Today, they are civil rights heroes to Hollywood airheads and others completely unfamiliar with the facts of the case.
"Here is just some of the evidence against them." . . .   
Full article here with disturbing accounts.

Matias Reyes is a serial rapist who admitted in 2002 to raping Tricia Meili in 1989, over a decade after the Central Park Five, a group of black and hispanic teenage boys, were convicted for the crime. "When Reyes came forward, the Central Park Five were fully exonerated. They were given a $41 million settlement from the City of New York for their wrongful conviction.

"Reyes decided to come forward after he met Korey Wise in prison. Wise was one of the Central Park Five, and the only one of the group who was tried and convicted as an adult for the crime." . . .

Think another pallet of cash will cool things down with Iran?

Rich Terrell

Iran threatens to shoot down more US aircraft, say reports "Iran bragged about its “collection” of U.S. drones and said it’s prepared to add to that collection by shooting down more U.S. aircraft, according to Iranian media.
“ 'We possess a collection of US drones which is a proof that US has violated Iran’s airspace and shows that they don’t want to respect the international law,” the Commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force, Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh told Iran’s Islamic Republic News Agency reporters on Saturday, as Iran’s Mehr News Agency reported.
“ 'If such aggression is repeated, we will add other US [military] products to complete this collection,” he added, according to Mehr." . . .

What role did John Kerry play in Iran’s attacks on foreign tankers and the downing of an American surveillance drone?  . . . "These actions, taken together, reflect an emboldened, empowered Iran — a country that cannot possibly withstand a full-on assault by the United States. Did Kerry tell the Iranians some things — about U.S. capabilities, about the Trump administration, about things that would or could force POTUS Trump to reconsider any retaliatory strikes — so their government could remain intact and compete its nuclear work?

"Given his history of Logan Act violations and recent discussions with this rogue regime, following by Iran’s challenging behavior, it would behoove the president to have his attorney general, William Barr, impanel a grand jury, then haul Kerry in front of it and ask him, under oath and penalty of perjury, just what it was he and his Iranian buddies talked about." . . .

Trump’s Iran Policy Upstages Obama Disaster "Democrats so wanted President Donald Trump to blast Iran. I think many Americans believe that the shooting down of our drone by Iran was a setup. Democrats hoped Trump would overreact and blast Iran into next week. But he sniffed out the ruse, and instead provided a measured response."

U.S. Holds All the Cards in the Showdown with Iran by Victor Davis Hanson:  . . . "The Iranian theocrats despise the Trump administration. They yearn for the good old days of the Obama administration, when the U.S. agreed to a nuclear deal that all but guaranteed future Iranian nuclear proliferation, ignored Iranian terrorism and sent hundreds of millions of dollars in shakedown payments to the Iranian regime." . . .
"Iran believed that the Obama administration saw it as a valuable Shiite counterweight to Israel and the traditionally American-allied Sunni monarchies in the Gulf region. Tehran assumes that an even more left-wing American administration would also endorse Iran-friendly policies, and so it is fishing for ways to see that happen in 2020 with a Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, or Joe Biden presidency.
"Desperate Iranian officials have already met secretly with former secretary of state John Kerry and openly with Senator Diane Feinstein, likely to commiserate over Trump’s cancellation of the nuclear deal and to find ways to revive the Obama-era agreement after Trump leaves office." . . .