Thursday, December 6, 2018

Classy Bush Funeral Reminds Us of Just How Awful the McCain Family Is

Breitbart Politics
What a disgrace, and every decent person knew at the time it was a disgrace. But through their act of common courtesy, humanity, dignity, and modesty, the Bush family once again reminded us of who they really are and who the McCains really are.


"Whatever you might think of the Bush dynasty’s legacy, no one can ever accuse the family of not showing class and decency.

"And their sterling example of this, while saying goodbye to their beloved patriarch, has also served as an important reminder of just how awful the McCain family is.

"Remember when Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) died?
"How could you forget?
"The funeral lasted longer than the first season of Cop Rock — something like nine episodes.
"McCain died on a Saturday, and his funeral services did not come to an end until the following Sunday, but only after it had toured three different cities. George H.W. Bush died on Friday and his services will end on Thursday. Both men were legitimate war heroes, but only one was a U.S. president.
"Although illuminating, that is the least of it.
"President Bush’s funeral has been lovely, classy, unifying, and loving. There have been no cheap snubs, no axe grinding from the grave.
"The Bush family’s simple and decent act of burying the hatchet with President Trump, their patriotic act of making the president (and by extension his supporters) feel welcome and honored at these services, that is true patriotism, and that is what American democracy is supposed to be about.
. . . And then there were the so-called eulogies, most of which were reprehensible acts of narcissistic exploitation. On one hand, you had eulogies being used as score-settling tirades against Trump and his supporters, and on the other you had those like Meghan McCain — the deceased’s own child, for God’s sake — using her eulogy to up her media profile, to create a YouTube moment, to reassure the same hideous media that personally destroyed her father during his 2008 presidential run, that she is one of them.  . . .

40 Years Of Climate Hysteria Summed Up with a Single Tweet

The Federalist Papers



. . . "The United States was being railroaded in the Paris Climate Agreement but Trump, who has employed an “America First” foreign policy, pulled us out of the deal in June. The president said he would consider reentering the agreement if the terms were renegotiated, but the remaining parties have not made an effort to do so.
“ 'As President, I can put no other consideration before the wellbeing of American citizens. The Paris Climate Accord is simply the latest example of Washington entering into an agreement that disadvantages the United States to the exclusive benefit of other countries, leaving American workers — who I love — and taxpayers to absorb the cost in terms of lost jobs, lower wages, shuttered factories, and vastly diminished economic production,” he said at the time.
"And despite the “sky is falling” rhetoric of this set of researchers, another set last week predicted that a mini Ice Age was coming, and it could reverse the damage from supposed global warming, the UK Express reported:
Earth could be plunged into a mini Ice Age in the next few decades, but there is good news – it could override the damage done by global warming.By 2030 comes about, the temperatures on Earth could be so low that the River Thames freezes over during winter, much like in the last little ice age which spanned from the 13th to 17th century.Maths professor Valentina Zharkova at Northumbria University said the Ice Age could help offset the damage of global warming.She said: “I hope global warning will be overridden by this effect, giving humankind and the Earth 30 years to sort out our pollution.”She added any global warming damage that is undone will be instantly reversed again when the next solar maximum begins in the 2050s.
"That is probably because the Earth has been warming and cooling for thousands of years — long before humans and their machines came on the scene.
"Humans would be much better off not overestimating our place in the world and assuming what we do, or don’t do, can affect the Earth." . . .

The Perpetual Presidency

Victor Davis Hanson
Obama believes that all of Trump’s successes are due to Obama, and all of Trump’s setbacks are his own.


"Former president Barack Obama recently continued his series of public broadsides against his successor, President Donald Trump.
. . . 
"Still, after 22 months, no one knows what the final verdict will be on the Trump administration. So it seems wise to wait until Trump’s four-year term is over before weighing in on his legacy or lack of one.
"By the same token, the frenetic Obama should take a deep breath, stop arguing the past, and allow history to adjudicate his own eight-year economic and foreign-policy record.
"Given that Obama was a strong progressive while Trump surprisingly has proven to be a hard-right conservative, their presidencies offer a sort of laboratory of contrasting worldviews.
"History will decide whether a more managed or more deregulated economy works best. We will learn whether a focus on traditional energy sources is preferable to an emphasis on subsidized green energy.
"In recent times, Republican ex-presidents — Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, and George W. Bush — left the limelight at the end of their tenures. They kept silent about their successors, and they allowed history to be the judge of their relative successes or failures. Reagan and the younger Bush often were ensconced on their ranches in out-of-the-way places. Obama would do well to buy a ranch, too.
"In contrast, progressive ex-presidents such as Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Obama saw the presidency as a never-ending story. Politics were a 24/7, 360-degree, all-encompassing experience. All envisioned their retirements as opportunities to relitigate their administrations and to politick the present in hopes that future kindred presidencies would be progressive and would continue their own agendas.
"Carter frequently warned that the Reagan defense buildup and tough stance toward the Soviet Union were dangerous and would lead to an existential confrontation.
"Clinton became a fierce critic of the Iraq War as his wife Hillary prepared to enter the 2008 presidential race as an anti-Bush candidate.
"Obama still seeks to convince the country that Trump is “unfit” to be president." . . .

NRO contributor Victor Davis Hanson is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and the author, most recently, of The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict Was Fought and Won.

Ballot-harvesting, not just for California anymore...

What it shows is that statehouses are important because they set election laws.  If the state is run by Democrats, rest assured they will take every advantage to secure absolute power.  What's needed now is a concerted Republican counterattack, not to secure absolute power, as the Democrats have done, but to secure free and fair elections from a willing electorate.
See the source image

Monica Showalter "California looks like a lost cause for Republicans, given how Democrats clinched the midterm with a series of new laws.  Maybe no big deal, given that California has been a solid blue state for something like 20 years.  But are Americans aware of the potential for California vote-rigging to come to their states, making them so blue that no conservative will ever be able to win an election?
"A California political operative, Edward Ring, writing in American Greatness, lays out the coming spectacle:
Come to California to see what's going to roll out across America in time to guarantee a progressive landslide in 2020.  It may be perfectly legal.  But it's so rigged it would make Boss Tweed blush. ...
The way they did this was to pass laws designed to rig the system.
Three laws in particular combined to stack the deck against Republicans.  First came the Motor Voter law.  This meant that as soon as any California resident acquired or renewed his driver's license or state ID, he would be registered to vote automatically.  Second, the state legislature authorized counties automatically to send absentee ballots to voters, even if they had not requested those ballots.  Third, the rules governing ballot custody were changed so that anyone could turn in absentee ballots, not just the actual voter.
The opportunities presented by these three laws were fully exploited by Democrats.
"Ring warns that Democratic legislatures in states that went all blue in the last midterm – Democrats picked up six new houses and several governorships – were watching California very closely.  They want what California has and are likely to pass the three laws California did to seal their permanent power entrenchment: Motor Voter laws that register voters whether they like it or not, absentee ballots mailed to voters whether they like it or not, and ballot-harvesting with no chain of custody by absolutely anyone." . . .

More overwhelming silliness from the left

‘Whiteness’ Forum Denounces The Christian Cartoon ‘Veggietales’ As Racist

“The Christian cartoon ‘VeggieTales’ is racist because the villains are vegetables of color,” The College Fix reports the forum as saying."

Not a good time to be a children's cartoon character.

'Rudolph' Actor Responds To Critics Calling Iconic Film Bigoted, Sexist
"Last week, the Huffington Post went all Huffington Post and bemoaned the Christmas classic "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" as "seriously problematic," allegedly perpetuating bigotry, sexism, and discrimination.
"As one can imagine, sane people from all walks of life were pretty flabbergasted and frankly annoyed with the needless complaining from the Social Justice far-Left. This includes actress Corrine Conley, who voiced the doll in the original 1964 children's movie." 
More succinctly put, a user wrote: "Oh for heaven’s sake, #LightenUp!"

True, the Democrats and major media want to try to make it look like it is out of character for Trump to act with common decency and respect. Yet when McCain show no class by banning the president from his funeral, they have no problem with it. Democrats and the media are disgusting in their actions and could lead to real trouble in this country if they continue and their brand of hatred spreads. From the comments
MSNBC Panel: Trump Probably Thought Bush Funeral Was All About Him Even Though It Wasn’t, but It Was A Rebuke Of Him  . . . ". Even when it’s not about Trump, they’ll find a way to make it about their obsession. They make money for making it be about Trump so even when it isn’t they can’t stop.

The Consequences of #MeToo for Women: 'Gender Segregation'  
. . . "On Wall Street, many men have adopted Vice President Mike Pence's sage advice: avoid having dinner alone with any woman not your wife. There are other changes in behavior with female co-workers as well: don't sit next to them on flights, book hotel rooms on separate floors, and avoid one-on-one meetings.
"And never close your office door when meeting with a female.
"It's not just Wall Street, of course. The changes are affecting businesses nationwide in every industry." . . . 
“The virgin birth story is about an all-knowing, all-powerful deity impregnating a human teen. There is no definition of consent that would include that scenario. Happy Holidays,” Sprankle said.
Professor stated: Virgin Mary didn’t give consent 
"A Minnesota professor suggested in a series of tweets that the Virgin Mary did not consent to the conception of Jesus Christ and suggested that God may have acted in a “predatory" manner." . . .
This guy really had to reach to come up with this theory. TD

. . . "The Creepy Line" makes a compelling case that a small number of people at a few Silicon Valley companies have tremendous power to do creepy things.
. . . "But a new documentary, "The Creepy Line, " argues that companies like Google and Facebook lean left and have power they shouldn't have. The title "Creepy Line" refers to a comment by former Google chairman Eric Schmidt, who said when it comes to issues like privacy, Google policy "is to get right up to the creepy line but not cross it.' "  . . .

Bush funeral: Reconciliation and civility Update: Except for Hillary

I have to admit appreciating Michelle Obama's greeting of Trump. After watching so many divisive victimhood excerpts from her commencement addresses I did not picture her as this gracious. The Tunnel Dweller

Monica Showalter



"Update from Thomas Lifson:
In contrast to the politeness of everyone else, Hillary Clinton refused to acknowledge the arrival and greeting of President and Mrs. Trump as they joined the other presidents sitting in the front row of the George H.W. Bush funeral at the National Cathedral. President Trump leaned over his wife to shake hands with President and Mrs. Obama, who graciously reciprocated. Bill Clinton, sitting on the other side of Michelle Obama, did not reach out to shake hands, but at least looked in the direction of President Trump. But not Hillary Clinton.
The woman defeated by Donald Trump stared straight ahead, refusing to acknowledge the arrival of the president of the United States only a few feet away. Neither a glance nor a nod broke the frozen expression of anger on her visage.

"No foot-stomping Wellstone funeral, no bitter McCain funeral. The Bushes are keeping it classy, with class something they've always been known for, and it's nice to see that they haven't changed. Their bitter political spats with President Trump are not going to dirty this up. They want the event to really be about President Bush and no one else."

Attacking Sully

She then imposed the false narrative of a power struggle between a dominant master (who had Parkinson's and needed a service dog to help him function throughout his day) and a helpless creature conscripted into training and forced to help 41.

James Aaron Brown "Ruth Graham, in an article published at Slate, demonstrated one of the worst vices of American media. Specifically, she sought to provoke and entertain the audience she writes for by unnecessarily criticizing Sully H.W. Bush, the service dog to George Bush, the 41st president of the United [S]tates.
"As the photo of Sully resting in front of 41's casket reached into every American's home and phone, Ruth felt that her greatest contribution would be to point out that Sully was simply an employee and not a beloved family pet.  Furthermore, she sought to do what many in her camp might do: impose a postmodern and deconstructionist interpretation upon a photo.  She then imposed the false narrative of a power struggle between a dominant master (who had Parkinson's and needed a service dog to help him function throughout his day) and a helpless creature conscripted into training and forced to help 41.  Her rationale?  This is what Sully was trained to do as an employee." . . .
Why was Sully lying in front of the casket of 41?  According to Graham, "it's a bit demented to project soul-wrenching grief onto a dog's decision to lie down in front of a casket."  Well, if we use science, then we will take stock of previous observations and compare similar accounts of dogs with funerals.  We will then look at studies or seek out experts like Dr. Coren to see if there is any meaningful correlation.  If we don't apply our own confirmation bias, as it seems Graham did in her article, we will find that Sully is doing what many a child with the same cognitive abilities and what other dogs in Sully's situation do.
If our society's goal is to entertain ourselves with false criticism, Slate proves this point.  . . .

 Critics did not like Graham's tacky article. Was she assigned this article, or did Slate's editors just happen to like it?
Other opinion articles by Graham

The final flight of President G.H.W. Bush

Rich Terrell







George Herbert Walker Bush was a teenager when he became a Naval aviator during World War II. (Getty)



How could you not get a kick out of this piece of video? Remember the President vs broccoli?



American Thinker