Before we fall in love with Rand Paul, how about his foreign policy?

His father, Ron Paul's policy of "Be nice to Iran and they will be nice to us" sounds too low-information to be taken seriously. Perhaps that is why so many on the left liked Paul Sr. and that alone makes him seem too Bill Ayers-ish for me. TW

 

Rand Paul’s confused foreign policy speech  "I do not believe Rand Paul is anti-Israel or subscribes to the conspiracy theories of his father. But this was a naive and, in some ways, silly speech. It is not going to help him in his quest to attain political acceptability as a presidential candidate."

But on the other hand; Rand Paul’s foreign policy speech: No to isolationism, no to neoconservatism, yes to containment
"But distinguishing himself from GOP hawks is only half the goal here; the other half, as is often true lately, is distinguishing himself from his pop. Which explains why the speech begins with an indictment of radical Islam, including this pointed comment:" Paul here makes too much of McCain's jest that we stay in Iraq for 100 years. That's something Obama would do.

Jennifer Rubin: Time for hawks to wake up  "They now face a Rand Paul problem because they did not construct a sound, reasonable national security policy that would endure over time. In short, they lost the public and now they are panicked that Paul may win the party and the country over."
Emphasis in the original.

Rand Paul is no Ron Paul, and he'll go to Israel to prove it "Support for Israel’s right to exist doesn’t stop at rhetorical backing for its right to defend itself but would necessitate a recalibration of much of Paul’s foreign policy. Would he support or even involve America in a strike against Iranian nuclear facilities? Would he militarily defend Israel if it was attacked? If the answer is “yes” to either question, then Rand Paul will find himself to be a man without a movement."

Rand Paul’s Foreign Policy  "As long as he opposes the hawks in the party on any one thing, whether it is on foreign aid or military spending or something else, they will continue to distrust him. "

Two photos added: 76 Years Since the Hindenburg Disaster

An aerial view of the wreckage of the Hindenburg airship near the hangar at the Naval Air station in Lakehurst, New Jersey, on May 7, 1937.

The Hindenburg’s Interior: Passenger Decks

Passenger cabin

The Atlantic  (From 2012)   "Last Sunday, May 6, marked the 75th anniversary of the 1937 Hindenburg disaster. The massive German airship caught fire while attempting to land near Lakehurst, New Jersey, killing 35 people aboard, plus one ground crew member. Of the 97 passengers and crew members on board, 62 managed to survive. The horrifying incident was captured by reporters and photographers and replayed on radio broadcasts, in newsprint, and on newsreels. News of the disaster led to a public loss of confidence in airship travel, ending an era. The 245 m (803 f) Hindenburg used flammable hydrogen for lift, which incinerated the airship in a massive fireball, but the actual cause of the initial fire remains unknown. Gathered here are images of the Hindenburg's first successful year of transatlantic travel, and of its tragic ending 75 years ago. 

(Also, be sure to see Recovered Letters Reveal the Lost History of the Hindenburg on Atlantic Video.) [34 photos]"

Hat tip to Walt Stier, Santa Maria, CA

The Atlantic

The crash site today

 411mania

Google

Many more posts on history, culture, politics and media at the Tunnel Wall blog

The Cruz-Feinstein kerfuffle

Cruz and Feinstein in blow up over the Second Amendment
Liberals "accuse you of trying to trap them, or, as in the case of Senator Diane Feinstein who was asked a question by Senator Ted Cruz about applying her interpretation of the Second Amendment to the First Amendment, they whine about being lectured, or as Nancy Pelosi dismissively said when asked if the individual Obamacare mandate was constitutional replied "Are you serious?"

Here's the transcript. 

The GOP Could Learn A Lot From Ted Cruz

Legal Insurrection: Ann Coulter makes that point about DiFi’s response to Ted Cruz, which we featured yesterday  "... Offended should not be an acceptable answer. 
"But, Offended is accepted as an answer virtually everywhere, particularly on campuses, unless the person offended is a religious Christian, in which case Offended is both the goal of the question and one of the few instances in which Offended is not an acceptable answer."
 

Dianne Feinstein: “I Felt Patronized” By Ted Cruz…  Video

 Dianne Feinstein is the Sixth-Grade Poster Child for Incompetency   "Instead of answering Sen. Cruz’s questions, Feinstein threw out several red herrings. A red herring is a logical fallacy that misleads or detracts from the actual issue. When you don’t like the way a cross examination is going, employ the red herring to dodge the question."
 

Ted Cruz At CPAC: “God Bless Bloggers,” Toasts Andrew Breitbart…

What can we contribute to St Patrick's Day?

The Unspoken Ghosts of Irish-Americans
"Ireland had no defense forces until about 1913, so its people were captured and enslaved by many nations over the years. They endured more oppression than American blacks and suffered living conditions not unlike Jews of the Holocaust. But harboring grudges against ghosts of heritages past was not a mainstay for Irish Americans*. They had more important things to do. We know so little of our Irish’s torturous past because of their impressive will to live beyond victimization rather than living in it. America’s Irish are prime examples of sheer determination turning adversity into stepping stones of a better life."
*Apparently they had no Farrakhans or Rev. Wrights.
But I digress:
 "Throughout the 1600-1700s the Irish settled in Early American colonies and by the 1860s they were among America’s greatest Civil War heroes, renowned for their bravery and leadership. Their competence, patriotic enthusiasm and ingrained confidence in overcoming obstacles helped to diminish some of the religious bigotry against them in a predominantly Protestant America. Of this Civil War Irish History writes:

“There is perhaps no other ethnic group so closely identified with the Civil War years and the immediate aftermath of the war as Irish Americans.  Read more...

We posted this in the Tunnel Wall one year ago and felt it ought to have an encore: The Irish Brigade at Gettysburg

This painting by Don Troiani is titled New York’s Bravest. It is courtesy of 

www.historicalimagebank.com. 

Despite Cuts, Schumer Gets Marine Corps Band to Play at St. Patrick’s Day Parade  "Forget the sequester. If you're Chuck Schumer, there are ways around it. Consider the recent example of a U.S. Marine Corps band cancelling its scheduled performance at a St. Patrick's Day parade due to the "sequester"--and Chuck Schumer's successful "push" for the band to come anyway."

Obama’s Second Term Troubles Have Begun

http://terrellaftermath.com/

Obama’s Second Term Troubles Have Begun  "In the aftermath of President Obama’s now-obvious-to-all sequester overreach–in which he first predicted the end of the world as we know it, then backed away from those claims once the cuts went into effect, then attempted to inflict maximum pain on the American people, and is now blaming the Secret Service for the stupid and unnecessary decision to shut down White House tours–something is changing."

 

The Obama Quagmire; Column: How Chuck Hagel and the sequester stalled the president’s agenda  "Bwack! Lame Duckery is Calling: It may be very lonely when the half-mil donors run out of money." Lucianne

Obama: Our Out-of-Control Debt Is ‘Sustainable’ for the Next Decade
"Even given his pathetic opponent, Obama’s ridiculous assertion might have buried him electorally if he had uttered it during the presidential campaign. Assuming he really believes it, he should have. Instead, as has so often been the case, he chose to mislead the American people. “Progressives” have known for decades that they can’t win elections if they tell us what they really believe."

Obama Administration's Transparency: "Pretty Weak"  "Appearing at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) might cause some controversy. Would Cause of Action be as hard on a Democrat as on a Republican? "It's hard to speculate on what would happen if someone else was in office," Hutchins said. "[But] what we found is that the current state of transparency is pretty weak." "