Wednesday, March 6, 2024

Former Border Patrol chief claims Biden WH punished him for critical 'feedback': 'I chose to retire instead'

 Fox News

Former USBP Chief Rodney Scott said Biden's trip to the border Thursday was 'for the cameras'


"The former chief of the United States Border Patrol made a bombshell claim Thursday that he was essentially punished for offering "feedback" to the Biden administration that was critical of how it was operating its border control responsibilities.

"Former USBP Chief Rodney Scott observed live coverage of President Biden meeting with current USBP Chief Jason Owens and Rio Grande Valley (RGV) Sector Chief Gloria Chavez near Brownsville, Texas, and described it as a "photo-op" for the president to appear engaged against the migrant crisis.

"[I]t's for the cameras... I hate to get political, but I believe the reason that the Biden administration is down there is if he got that briefing in the White House, there'd be no cameras. There'd be no show," Scott said on "The Story."

"But they know what it takes to secure the border.  We handed them the most secure border in the history of the United States and and a roadmap to keep it that way and make it even better, [yet] through 94 executive actions, President Biden completely destroyed border security."

EX-ICE CHIEF SCOFFS AT HOCHUL'S SUDDEN OUTRAGE OVER VIOLENT MIGRANTS: ‘POLITICAL COVER’

The Remmys Journalism Nominations: Racist Parking, Joy Reid Barking, and a Slate Gun 'Expert' LARPing

 Brad Slager – RedState

Honoring inept "journalism" everywhere. TD

"In recognizing the dregs of press unprofessionalism, journalistic sloth, and generally deserved media mockery, we have created "The Golden Remington Awards," a nod to the olden days when hard-scrabble hacks committed actual journalism and hammered out dispatches on those hefty wordsmith devices. With an eye to that past of muckraking reporting and shoe leather investigation, we acknowledge those who fail today in an audacious fashion.

"These are the inauspicious nominations, in several categories, for this year’s Remmys. 
"Distinguished Explanatory Reporting   Joy Reid - MSNBC

"Get ready, as we already have a leader in the clubhouse for a year-end trophy. On her private video channel, MSNBC’s primetime pontificating pundit wanted to address the recent passage of a bill in Alabama granting protections for frozen embryos created for in-vitro fertilization. Ms. Reid is, by all appearances, aggravated by this and she goes off on a rant for the ages that departs from Normal-ville immediately and reaches Crazy Town in record time. A flow chart is needed to see the various topics she manages to connect in this unhinged delivery.

  • She begins being deeply bothered with protecting IVF embryos

  • Then she asks why Alabama wants more children

  • Then she brings up slavery because pregnancies meant more property

  • This leads to the state wanting children for slave labor

  • And this is said to be done to displace immigrants from that labor

  • Next, it becomes a plot for the Great Replacement Theory

  • And finally, it means there’s a “need” to make more white women have kids, a la “The Handmaid’s Tale”.

"Utter amazement. Her being bothered by more kids is never explained, how she jumps to slavery is her own magic at play, then declaring the state will use kids for labor ignores the illegality - ditto for slavery in general - and then we see she is NOT bothered by immigrants performing what she declared to be slave labor. How she gets to women being forced to carry these embryos is a complete wonder." . . . 




Joe Biden Is First Incumbent President to Lose a Primary in 44 Years

 Newsweek (msn.com)    "Joe Biden lost the American Samoa Democratic primary to little-known candidate Jason Palmer, becoming the first incumbent president to lose a primary since Jimmy Carter in 1980.

"Palmer's surprising victory tarnished an otherwise perfect night for Biden, during which he scored a string of primary wins across the U.S.

"The Context

"Biden and Donald Trump secured a wave of victories on Super Tuesday with each now the overwhelming favorite to win their respective parties' 2024 presidential nominations, setting up a rematch of the 2020 contest. However each candidate lost one primary, with Trump suffering a surprise Vermont defeat to former South Carolina governor Nikki Haley, in addition to Biden's American Samoa loss." . . .

Now THIS is insurrection

 

America’s Destruction and the Ghosts of Revolutions Past - Vince Coyner . . . "As we watch powerlessly as our great cities devolve into crime-infested dystopian nightmares; George Soros-impelled DAs and prosecutors smile as they demonstrate their two-tiered legal system; the federal government actively subverts efforts to secure the border; cities cut services to citizens and veterans to give illegals billions; schools and hospitals and states empower the brainwashing and butchering of children; and the Uniparty in Washington runs up trillion dollar deficits and sends tens of billions to Ukraine, we begin to recognize what Bezmenov called Normalization.

"A decade ago, Americans of most stripes would have understood that this was a disaster in the making. But now we’re told that all of it is not only normal, but you’re a racist, homophobic, transphobic white nationalist if you disagree with any of it.

"The outcome in November will decide which path we take. The thing to remember when we walk into those voting booths is that Bezmenov and Xi had a place to escape to for freedom: America. We don’t have that luxury. Vote accordingly."

Wasserman Schultz Planning to Resurrect Bill to Ban Trump from Ballot for Insurrection  . . ."Furthermore, Representative Cory Mills (R-FL) provided a comment on the aspect of the resurrection of the legislation.

“ 'I’m still curious: when was there an insurrection? I think that the recent 9-0 unanimous decision by SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) very clearly stated that it wasn’t going to be an insurrection just by its overall ruling to make sure to prove that it was unconstitutional,” said Rep. Mills. “If it was a 14th Amendment issue where they’re trying to say that you can be disqualified which hasn’t happened since 1868 was the last time someone was disqualified. And prior to that, I think it was those who were Confederate soldiers who actually did lead an armed insurrection – armed being the key phrase here.

“Again, I think that they’re trying to run a rabbit hole that’s going to go nowhere. And it’s just for messaging because they realize how bad 2024’s election is going to turn out for the Biden administration, for the Senate which we’re going to reclaim, and also for holding the House. So, they’re still trying to run on the 2020, 2022 talking points because they have nothing new. But the SCOTUS 9-0 unanimous decision I think should put a nail in the coffin for him,” said Rep. Mills.

"Finally, the Florida Republican answered whether Democrats will once again look at packing the high court.

“ 'There’s absolutely no doubt that they will do this." . . . 

If Wasserman Schultz and Raskin’s bill receives considerable Democratic support, it is highly unlikely that Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) would consider it for a vote on the House Floor.


If He’s Lost His Wits, Joe Must Call It Quits

  Issues & Insights (issuesinsights.com)  "It’s become a political cliché to recall how Virginia’s Sen. William Scott, declared the Senate’s dumbest member by a D.C. rag, called a news conference to deny the charge – thus proving it.

"Until Thursday night.

"That’s when President Joe Biden – confirmed by a special counsel to be a man of “diminished faculties in advancing age” who in interviews couldn’t drudge up when he was veep, when his son died, who his political friends and foes were or his past policy positions – convened a nationally televised presser to refresh the relevance of Scott’s storied screwup.

"Say you ain’t slow, Joe. 

"The daft Delawarean’s angry retort to a cutting kickoff quotation from the counsel’s report: “I’m well-meaning, and I’m an elderly man, and I know what the hell I’m doing.”

"As if. The hastily called gaggle dissolved in seconds into a crazed, chaotic, feverish, free-for-all feeding frenzy with the octogenarian as the hapless, helpless red meat. 

"The commander in chief’s inability to command the room was the second clue that everything alleged about his mental mush was gospel truth – agreeing to hold the presser being the first.

All multiplied exponentially by his customary combination of tetched and testy demeanor, unsteady steps, groggy gaze, and, of course, foggy flubs – hanging a reference Egypt’s Abdel Fattah El-Sisi as Mexico’s president onto his recent resurrections of dearly departed foreign leaders.

"Ladies and Gentlemen: This. Is. Not. Hard.

"Your correspondent needn’t elaborate on a crystal-clear conclusion the electorate has already long ago reached – including 54% of Democrats.

"If he’s lost his wits, Sleepy Joe must quit." . . .

UN Report: “sexual violence occurred during the 7 October attacks in multiple locations … including rape and gang rape”

 Legal Insurrection (legalinsurrection.com)

Even the United Nations, which is extremely hostile to Israel, now admits to the mass sexual abuse by Palestinians on October 7 and beyond: “With respect to hostages, the mission team found clear and convincing information that some have been subjected to various forms of conflict-related sexual violence including rape and sexualized torture and sexualized cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and it also has reasonable grounds to believe that such violence may be ongoing.” 


. . ."Gaza ‘civilians’ joined Hamas in committing Oct. 7 atrocities, UN team admits

"The UN team acknowledged that Gaza ‘civilians’ joined Palestinian terrorists in committing horrific atrocities on Israelis. Those who breached the “Gaza perimeter fence at multiple points” on October 7 included Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorists “other armed elements and armed and unarmed civilians,” the report said.

"The Hamas-led attackers also had “detailed prior knowledge of the targets selected,” the UN found, suggesting large-scale involvement of Gazans with Israeli work-permits. (View the 23-page UN document here.)

"The Associated Press reported the UN finding:

The U.N. envoy focusing on sexual violence in conflict said in a new report Monday that there are “reasonable grounds” to believe Hamas committed rape, “sexualized torture,” and other cruel and inhumane treatment of women during its surprise attack in southern Israel on Oct. 7.

There are also “reasonable grounds to believe that such violence may be ongoing,” said Pramila Patten, who visited Israel and the West Bank from Jan. 29 to Feb. 14 with a nine-member technical team.

Based on first-hand accounts of released hostages, she said the team “found clear and convincing information” that some women and children during their captivity were subjected to the same conflict-related sexual violence including rape and “sexualized torture.”

Based on the information it gathered, Patten said, “there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred during the 7 October attacks in multiple locations across Gaza periphery, including rape and gang rape, in at least three locations.” (…)

Across various locations, she said, the team found “that several fully naked or partially naked bodies from the waist down were recovered – mostly women – with hands tied and shot multiple times, often in the head.”

While this is circumstantial, she said the pattern of undressing and restraining victims “may be indicative of some forms of sexual violence.” . . .   

Speaking of the "innocent citizens of Gaza", recall Hamas showing large-screen videos made by the cameras on the Hamas fighters and hearing cheers at each incident shown on the screen. TD

Tuesday, March 5, 2024

Details and accounts of Oct 6th massacre

"After Hamas fighters attacked Israel’s Kfar Aza kibbutz, Uri Rousso died trying to protect his community. His wife Dafna and their three daughters hid in a safe room for 18 hours, not knowing if he was alive. She shares their story with WSJ."

"Neta Portal was shot six times by Hamas gunmen who broke into her home in the Jewish community of Kfar Aza. "She has told the BBC how she escaped with the help of her father, a plain-clothes police officer who she had not spoken to for six years. "She has also revealed details of the atrocities she witnessed in Kfar Aza."
     

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is planning to spend a $100 million war chest taking out Democrats who are viciously anti-Israel.


. . ."Such an effort underscores the growing divisions within the Democratic Party over the conflict in the Middle East, with various constituencies, including young people and American Muslims, increasingly dropping their support for Joe Biden (and in some cases, the party altogether) over its lukewarm support for Israel. 

"A poll conducted by Reuters last month found that 56 percent of identified Democrats said they would be less willing to support a candidate who voted in favor of military assistance for Israel. 

"The problem facing Biden was exemplified last week when over 100,000 people voted "uncommitted" in the party's Michigan primary. If these people do not turn out for Biden in November as a form of protest, it could hand the state and its electoral votes back to Donald Trump." . . . 

Palestinian Authority Pledges Millions to Hamas Terrorists Who Participated in October 7 Massacre  

. . ."In light of this news, the stance taken by Netanyahu and others appears to be the most appropriate. Putting the PA in charge of Gaza might tamp down on some of the violent activities Hamas favors, but it will not solve the problem. There cannot be a peaceful solution as long as those in charge of the West Bank and Gaza Strip are bent on continuing violence against Israel. Unfortunately, this revelation is unlikely to get the Biden administration to rethink its plans for Gaza after the war is finally concluded." . . .

Biden Attacks Clarence Thomas in New Interview—but Accidentally Levels Himself

"Breaking" news: Joe Biden gave an interview to The New Yorker. As you might anticipate, it wasn't exactly hard-hitting and was more of an homage than it was a piece calling him out on any of the many questionable things that he's said. It even claimed that Biden had been "exonerated" by Special Counsel Robert Hur. No, sorry, not prosecuting because he's an "elderly man with a poor memory" is not "exonerated," it's simply choosing not to prosecute. 

Biden Attacks Clarence Thomas in New Interview—but Accidentally Levels Himself – RedState  . . ."But has Biden looked in the mirror? Seriously? Has he checked the millions that his family got from all kinds of foreign nationals? He should be the last one to talk about any such things. The hypocrisy is something to behold. 

"If he wants to talk about Thomas going on yachts, let's talk about the many vacations that he, Biden, has taken in the homes of rich donors from Nantucket to St. Croix. Or does he get a pass because of the "magical D" after his name? There have been questions about his stays in these homes and if he's paying fair market value by being there, but media and the left doesn't seem to care when it comes to Biden. The impeachment inquiry should be looking at things like this as well, since Biden is raising the question. 

RedState   . . ."What? "All major religions have signed on?" No, that's simply not factual, yet that's not even questioned in the article. That's a bizarre, demonstrable untruth. 

"The piece then mentions Thomas' concurring opinion in the Dobbs case. The author says he asked Biden if he thought the Justices would undo other rulings dealing with same-sex marriage and contraception. 

“I don’t think there’s a majority to go there,” he said, but added, “I think that a couple on the Court would go considerably further”—specifically “the guy who likes to spend a lot of time on yachts.”

“Thomas?” I asked.

Biden grinned.

"Once again, we see the guy who claims he's trying to protect "democracy" attack every principle that underpins our operation as a nation. It is completely improper for him to be attacking a justice. But he's doing that on the head of the Democrats, improperly trying to slime Thomas for some time in their efforts to run him out. It's disgusting, even including their lies about his wife and Jan. 6. Biden says this thinking it will appeal to the leftist base, with which he is in some trouble and which he needs desperately to come out for him in November. He grins, and he thinks it's funny. 

"But it also sounds like Biden forgot Thomas' name when he defines him this way. 

"Biden has a long history of going after Thomas. It was he who set off the "high-tech lynching" years ago, and the Democrats are trying it again. Thomas just decimated him. 

But, never fear, the interview is a puff piece meant to show Biden as able and ready to serve four more years. '

. . ."Biden was not anything but a lightweight during his decades in the Senate. He's a plagiarizer and a liar. He was a part of the Senate Democrats who turned Senate Judicial Committee hearings for Supreme Court nominees into a hate fest. It was in the days of Robert Bork and then the confirmation hearing for Clarence Thomas. Biden still has it out for Justice Thomas. He took the opportunity to take a stab at Thomas during the interview. Biden wants to convince voters that Thomas wants to take away access to birth control and other absurdities." . . . 

The True ‘Threat To Democracy’ Isn’t White Americans, It’s The Democrat Party

 The Federalist; (thefederalist.com)

These ‘journalists’ have their heads so far up their own keisters, they wouldn’t know the honest truth if it punched them in the face.

. . ."It’s hard to put into words just how delusional and dishonest the segment was — as in, every single word. These highfalutin “journalists” have their heads so far up their own keisters, they wouldn’t know the honest truth if it introduced itself by name and punched them in the face.

"Not only do the writers, who purport to be experts on Middle America, misunderstand everything about it. They also project Democrats’ nastiest and most conspicuous political impulses onto white, rural folks. It’s like the pot calling the kettle black — if the pot were actually white, racist, conspiratorial, anti-democratic, and violent.

“ 'We lay out the four-fold, interconnected threat that white, rural voters pose to the country,” Schaller said with a straight face to Mika Brzezinski. In the author’s telling, rural, white voters are every kind of -ist, -anti, and -phobic imaginable, including “racist, xenophobic, anti-immigrant, and anti-gay.” They’re also mega conspiracy theorists, Christian nationalists, and anti-democratic. And to top it all off, rural whites “excuse or justify violence as an acceptable alternative to peaceful public discourse.”

"It would be laughable if it weren’t so insulting — not only because it slanders good folks in flyover country, but because it also offends every viewer’s intelligence. We all see Democrats’ dirty tricks and aren’t fooled by a pseudointellectual book by two white guys hating on other white guys for disagreeing with their opinions. It’s pure projection.

"So let’s just see how Democrats measure up to their own “white rural rage” rubric." . . . 

1. Racist, Xenophobic, Anti-immigrant:  "Democrats don’t even try to hide their racism anymore, so this one’s easy. From President Joe Biden insisting you ain’t really black if you don’t share his opinions, to saying black people aren’t smart enough to succeed on merit or to procure a driver’s license, to discriminating against white people and Asians in hiring and higher education, to cheering segregation, to targeting nonwhites with abortion facilities, to ignoring black on black violence, and more, Democrats display their racial animus every day.

"For an increasing number, their hatred of Israel makes it hard to hide their xenophobia too. And while those in favor of open borders would claim to be pro-immigrant, they stop the moment illegal foreigners reach their communities.". . .

One finds it ironic in the extreme to see a video of a pro-Hamas youth calling Israelis "Nazis".


California Is About to Get Even Worse

 Power Line (powerlineblog.com)   

photos looters in LA stores - Search (bing.com)

"You might think that the leftists who run California would be worried about the rapid decline of that state, but no: they are doing all they can to accelerate it. In the Wall Street Journal, Heather Mac Donald outlines California’s latest descent into racialist madness:

What would happen if lawmakers reinvented the criminal-justice system to target “systemic racism” instead of crime? California is about to find out. Thanks to a 2020 law called the California Racial Justice Act, every felon serving time in the state’s prisons and jails can now retroactively challenge his conviction and sentencing on the ground of systemic bias.

To prevail, the incarcerated prisoner need not show that the police officers, prosecutors, judge or jurors in his case were motivated by racism or that his proceedings were unfair. If he can demonstrate that in the past, criminal suspects of his race were arrested, prosecuted or sentenced more often or more severely than members of other racial groups, he will be entitled to a new trial or sentence.

"We all know what this is about. Blacks are arrested, prosecuted and convicted more often than members of other races because they commit more crimes. Heather has some of the numbers for California:

In Los Angeles, blacks are 21 times as likely as whites to commit a violent crime, 36 times as likely to commit a robbery, and 57 times as likely to commit a homicide, according to police department data. Those data come from reports filed by victims and witnesses, who are themselves disproportionately black.

"Blacks over-offend to an appalling degree in other states, too. But liberals cling to the hoary myth that “disparities” in law enforcement can only be due to racial bias in criminal justice.

"The Racial Justice Act is turning California’ criminal justice system into a farce:

"You might think that the leftists who run California would be worried about the rapid decline of that state, but no: they are doing all they can to accelerate it. In the Wall Street Journal, Heather Mac Donald outlines California’s latest descent into racialist madness:

What would happen if lawmakers reinvented the criminal-justice system to target “systemic racism” instead of crime? California is about to find out. Thanks to a 2020 law called the California Racial Justice Act, every felon serving time in the state’s prisons and jails can now retroactively challenge his conviction and sentencing on the ground of systemic bias.

To prevail, the incarcerated prisoner need not show that the police officers, prosecutors, judge or jurors in his case were motivated by racism or that his proceedings were unfair. If he can demonstrate that in the past, criminal suspects of his race were arrested, prosecuted or sentenced more often or more severely than members of other racial groups, he will be entitled to a new trial or sentence.

"We all know what this is about. Blacks are arrested, prosecuted and convicted more often than members of other races because they commit more crimes. Heather has some of the numbers for California:

In Los Angeles, blacks are 21 times as likely as whites to commit a violent crime, 36 times as likely to commit a robbery, and 57 times as likely to commit a homicide, according to police department data. Those data come from reports filed by victims and witnesses, who are themselves disproportionately black.

"Blacks over-offend to an appalling degree in other states, too. But liberals cling to the hoary myth that “disparities” in law enforcement can only be due to racial bias in criminal justice.

"The Racial Justice Act is turning California’s criminal justice system into a farce:" . .

HALLELUJAH: It Looks Like Another Soros DA in California Will Face a Recall Election – RedState


"It looks like another Soros DA in California will be facing a recall election. As we've been reporting, proponents of an effort to recall Alameda County's District Attorney, Pamela Price, have been gathering signatures for months to place a recall election on the ballot. On Monday those proponents turned in 123,387 signatures - 50,000 more than the 73,195 required."


"Since taking office, Price has implemented a policy that punishing crime is unfair to, um, people who commit crimes. Murder victim 23-month-old Jasper Wu died in November 2021 when crossfire between rival gangs on an Oakland freeway enveloped his parent’s car. Price refused to add special enhancements to the charges against the shooters, thus eliminating the possibility that if convicted the men could face life without parole in prison. Price went on record saying people were attempting to use the case to stir up racial division."

Court document alleges Fani Willis tried to tamper with a witness -

Thomas Lifson; American Thinker   "A fellow Georgia prosecutor has come forward after viewing the televised testimony in the Fani Willis disqualification hearing, alleging what amounts to witness tampering on the part of the DA in Atlanta. If the account is truthful, that would make Fani the dumbest prosecutor ever, apparently blissfully unaware that the rules apply to her, too.


"The New York Post reports:

A new witness could testify Fani Willis warned lover Nathan Wade’s former business partner to stay quiet about their affair, an explosive new court filing claims.

“They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us,” Willis is alleged to have warned Terrence Bradley in a September 2023 phone call. 

The call was overheard by Cobb County, Georgia, prosecutor Cindi Lee Yeager, according to court papers filed Monday by Trump co-defendant David Schafer.

"The actual court filing can be read in a series of tweets from Town Hall columnist Phil Halloway:" . . .

. . .Hearsay

"Objections will be heard that this proffered testimony would be hearsay. While the chief deputy district attorney from Cobb County Ms. Yaeger did hear the words themselves, the content of those words – the reported effort to shut up a witness -- is indeed hearsay. Such testimony could not be used to try DA Willis for witness tampering.

"However, while hearsay evidence cannot be used in court to convict of crimes, it can be used to impeach testimony. Via Justia Law:

Hearsay evidence is admissible for impeachment, though inadmissible for other purposes. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. v. Smalley, 127 Ga. App. 652, 194 S.E.2d 612 (1972) (decided under former Code 1933, § 38-301).

"Absent other evidence, Fani probably can skate on witness tampering criminal charges, but for the purposes of removing her from the case, the testimony would be devastating."

Michelle Obama FINALLY breaks her silence on whether she will be running for president in 2024 as disgruntled Democrats urge her to run instead of 81-year-old Biden |

  Daily Mail Online   "Michelle Obama has ruled herself out as a presidential candidate, putting to bed speculation that she would jump in at the last minute to give Democrats an alternative to aging Joe Biden

"The former first lady maintains a star power within Democratic politics, despite largely removing herself from the political scene in recent years. 

" 'As former First Lady Michelle Obama has expressed several times over the years, she will not be running for president,' said Crystal Carson, director of communications for her office, told NBC News.

" 'Mrs. Obama supports President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' re-election campaign.'