. . . "Fiorina said that while Hillary Clinton has said some “wonderful things” as Secretary of State, “it’s also true that as Secretary of State she took women’s rights and human rights off the table for discussion with China. It’s also true as Secretary of State that she called Bashar al-Assad a positive reformer. It’s also true that in 2011, when she was Secretary of State, she said that Iraq was a free, stable, sovereign nation. And now we have a nation falling apart, Iranian influence growing, ISIS growing. It’s true that she said that she could reset our Russia — our relationship with Russia and Vladimir Putin is on the march. So, I think all of those things I just named go fundamentally to what is her track record.”
"After host Andrea Mitchell stated, “You could also argue that a lot of Republicans in the White House and in Congress supported those policies –” Fiorina responded, “absolutely, that’s right. And by the way, every single Republican candidate has been asked about their vote for the war in Iraq. The one person who’s not been asked that question, because she won’t answer the question is Hillary Clinton. One person who was on the job in 2011, when Iraq started to fall apart, was not the Republican nominees or — candidates for president, it’s Hillary Clinton. she hasn’t been asked yet. What would she do now in Iraq?”
"Fiorina then outlined her ISIS strategy, saying, “I would do very specific things. First, instead of having a Camp David conference to talk our Arab allies into a bad deal with Iran, I would have had a Camp David conference to talk with our Arab allies about how we can support them to fight ISIS." . . .
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
I think I’ll miss you most of all
Patriot Retort
"It’s a sad, sad day.
"Marie Harf is leaving her post as State Department Spokesperson.
"She’s being “promoted.” Which is Obamaspeak for “getting her the hell out of the spotlight because she makes us look like idiots.”
"Well, gee, scarecrow. I think I’ll miss you most of all.
"We’ve had some good times with Marie, haven’t we?
"Ah, yes.
"Who will forget mild-mannered Marie Harf revealing herself as Employment Woman?" . . .
The Iraq War Question: A Suggestion to Republican Candidates
Before saying exactly what the Democrats want to hear, Republicans might consider whether the decision itself to make war was the actual blunder.
Peter Nichols
Peter Nichols
Is it really wise to concede effectively that the Democrats have been right since they switched from supporting the 2002 Use of Military Force Authorization to “Bush lied, kids died”? Do Republican candidates not thereby set up Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy argument? The Republicans now admit that they led us into an awful blunder, the full consequences of which we are only just seeing, and yet they want another chance to conduct the nation’s foreign policy! Are you, the American people, going to give it to them?
Coulter: RAMOS CAN STAY, BUT MATT LAUER HAS TO GO UPDATED!
UPDATED: "Offensive": Libraries Nationwide Did This To Ann Coulter's Book!
Updated Sat, May 30th Notice the word "Offensive" in the library catalog.
"Ann Coulter is back, more fearless than ever. In Adios, America
she touches the third rail in American politics, attacking the
immigration issue head-on and flying in the face of La Raza, the
Democrats, a media determined to cover up immigrants’ crimes, churches
that get paid by the government for their “charity,” and greedy
Republican businessmen and campaign consultants—all of whom are
profiting handsomely from mass immigration that’s tearing the country
apart. Applying her trademark biting humor to the disaster that is U.S.
immigration policy, Coulter proves that immigration is the most
important issue facing America today."
Ann Coulter
. . . "Only Mexican-born Jorge Ramos would interview me on his Fusion network. Yay, Jorge!
"After a spellbinding interview, Ramos ended by asking this excellent question -- which I had suggested myself for all authors, most of whom write very boring books, harming the marketability of my own books: "Is there anything in your book that isn't already generally known?"
"My soon-to-be-released book, "Adios, America! The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole," is jam-packed with facts you didn't already know. Don't even think of using it as a coaster, like those other books.
"These are just a few:
Summing up with this:
-- In 1980, Reagan won the biggest electoral landslide in history against an incumbent president, Jimmy Carter. Without the last 40 years of immigration, in 2012, Mitt Romney would have won a bigger landslide than Reagan did. He got more of the "Reagan coalition" than Reagan did.
-- If Romney had won 71 percent of the Hispanic vote, he still would have lost. If he'd gotten just 4 percent more of the white vote, he would have won.
"Adios, America!
In bookstores next Monday, June 1."
Updated Sat, May 30th Notice the word "Offensive" in the library catalog.
"Ann Coulter is back, more fearless than ever. In Adios, America
she touches the third rail in American politics, attacking the
immigration issue head-on and flying in the face of La Raza, the
Democrats, a media determined to cover up immigrants’ crimes, churches
that get paid by the government for their “charity,” and greedy
Republican businessmen and campaign consultants—all of whom are
profiting handsomely from mass immigration that’s tearing the country
apart. Applying her trademark biting humor to the disaster that is U.S.
immigration policy, Coulter proves that immigration is the most
important issue facing America today." Coming June 1st
. . . "Only Mexican-born Jorge Ramos would interview me on his Fusion network. Yay, Jorge!
"After a spellbinding interview, Ramos ended by asking this excellent question -- which I had suggested myself for all authors, most of whom write very boring books, harming the marketability of my own books: "Is there anything in your book that isn't already generally known?"
"My soon-to-be-released book, "Adios, America! The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole," is jam-packed with facts you didn't already know. Don't even think of using it as a coaster, like those other books.
"These are just a few:
-- Teddy Kennedy's 1965 Immigration Act was expressly designed to change the demographics of our country to be poorer and more inclined to vote Democratic.
-- It worked! Post-1970 immigrants vote 8-2 for the Democrats.
-- Citing this dramatic shift in the Democratic Party's fortunes, Democratic consultant Patrick Reddy called the 1965 Immigration Act "the Kennedy family's greatest gift to the Democratic Party."
-- Immigrants admitted before 1970 made more money, bought more houses and were more educated than Americans. The post-Kennedy immigrants are astronomically less-educated, poorer and more likely to be on welfare than the native population.. . .
-- With no welfare state to support them, about a third of pre-1965 Act immigrants returned to the places they came from. British and Jewish immigrants were the least likely to go home -- less than 10 percent did.
-- Although America is admitting more immigrants, they are coming from fewer countries than they did before 1970. On liberals' own terms, the country is becoming less "diverse," but a lot poorer and a lot more Latin.
-- America has already taken in one-fourth of Mexico's entire population.
-- In 1970, there were almost no Nigerian immigrants in the United States. Our country is now home to more Nigerians than any country in the world except Nigeria.
-- America takes more immigrants from Nigeria than from England.
Summing up with this:
-- In 1980, Reagan won the biggest electoral landslide in history against an incumbent president, Jimmy Carter. Without the last 40 years of immigration, in 2012, Mitt Romney would have won a bigger landslide than Reagan did. He got more of the "Reagan coalition" than Reagan did.
-- If Romney had won 71 percent of the Hispanic vote, he still would have lost. If he'd gotten just 4 percent more of the white vote, he would have won.
"Adios, America!
In bookstores next Monday, June 1."
White House Hits Back at Appeals Court After Immigration Ruling
Time "The Obama Administration said it is weighing its options in the wake of an appeals court ruling that kept a block on the president’s executive action on immigration.
"On Tuesday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to lift an injunction of the president’s action to grant millions of undocumented immigrants temporary reprieve from deportation.
Texas and twenty-five other states are suing the Obama administration over the president’s immigration plan, and a federal judge in Texas blocked the action temporarily in February." . . .
Fifth Circuit Upholds Injunction Against Obama’s Executive Amnesty
. . . "A three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit today issued a split decision upholding the Texas judge’s injunction preventing Obama’s executive amnesty program from moving forward. The opinion itself upheld the injunction on fairly arcane (to non-lawyers) legal and procedural grounds; i.e., it did not decide or offer an opinion as to whether the Obama Administrations program was likely unlawful or not. Rather, it invalidated the program because the Administration failed to pass the program through the (mostly pro forma) “notice and comment” rulemaking process as governed by the Administrative Procedures Act – which essentially requires Federal agencies to post proposed new rules in the Federal Register, solicit comment from the public, and ultimately submit a regulatory impact statement and explanation of their decisionmaking procss with the final rule. Once an administrative rule has jumped through these hoops, it is very difficult to get it overturned." . . .
White House Attacks Fifth Circuit Judges, Says They ‘Chose To Misinterpret Law’ By Upholding Stay On Obama’s Executive Amnesty
"On Tuesday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to lift an injunction of the president’s action to grant millions of undocumented immigrants temporary reprieve from deportation.
Texas and twenty-five other states are suing the Obama administration over the president’s immigration plan, and a federal judge in Texas blocked the action temporarily in February." . . .
Fifth Circuit Upholds Injunction Against Obama’s Executive Amnesty
. . . "A three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit today issued a split decision upholding the Texas judge’s injunction preventing Obama’s executive amnesty program from moving forward. The opinion itself upheld the injunction on fairly arcane (to non-lawyers) legal and procedural grounds; i.e., it did not decide or offer an opinion as to whether the Obama Administrations program was likely unlawful or not. Rather, it invalidated the program because the Administration failed to pass the program through the (mostly pro forma) “notice and comment” rulemaking process as governed by the Administrative Procedures Act – which essentially requires Federal agencies to post proposed new rules in the Federal Register, solicit comment from the public, and ultimately submit a regulatory impact statement and explanation of their decisionmaking procss with the final rule. Once an administrative rule has jumped through these hoops, it is very difficult to get it overturned." . . .
White House Attacks Fifth Circuit Judges, Says They ‘Chose To Misinterpret Law’ By Upholding Stay On Obama’s Executive Amnesty
The Clintons do what Clintons must do. Do you want them doing it in the White House?
Just in: George Stephanopoulos Wife Cancels Book Tour Appearance After Husband’s Clinton Cash Donation
. . ."But others have pointed out that this should not surprise anyone due
to the decades-long ties that Stephanopoulos has to the Clintons. In
fact, it was revealed that Stephanopoulos had been a frequent participant in Clinton Foundation events, even over these last few years.
"The anchor’s wife did not say that her husband’s troubles caused her to cancel her appearance. Through her publicist she claimed that she only canceled the appearance to better fit her book’s release schedule.
Report: Clinton Foundation Donors got Weapons Deals While Hillary was at State
" An explosive new report from David Sirota and Andrew Perez of the International Business Times suggests that preferential treatment in weapon sales was given to Clinton Foundation donors while Hillary Clinton was serving in the state department:" . . .
"The Clinton Foundation is already under fire for undisclosed donations and has already cast a shadow on Hillary’s presidential campaign. Her refusal to face the press has only raised more questions.
"Tim Devaney of The Hill has more:" . . .
Of Course: Corrupt FIFA Has Corrupt Clinton Foundation Ties
"Well, who could have seen this coming?
"The anchor’s wife did not say that her husband’s troubles caused her to cancel her appearance. Through her publicist she claimed that she only canceled the appearance to better fit her book’s release schedule.
"The Clinton Foundation is already under fire for undisclosed donations and has already cast a shadow on Hillary’s presidential campaign. Her refusal to face the press has only raised more questions.
"Tim Devaney of The Hill has more:" . . .
Of Course: Corrupt FIFA Has Corrupt Clinton Foundation Ties
"Well, who could have seen this coming?
And just like that, another Clinton Foundation donor is in the news. The Clinton global charity has received between $50,000 and $100,000 from soccer’s governing body and has partnered with the Fédération Internationale de Football Association on several occasions, according to donor listings on the foundation’s website. . . .
"One is the head of an crime syndicate specializing in taking bribes.The other is FIFA president Seth Blatter"
News that FIFA officials have been arrested in Switzerland for operating a “racketeering conspiracy” (under US law) and for violating US anti-bribery law brings together in one delightful package two of my very favorite subjects: soccer and international jurisdiction!
Bill Clinton Ran A ‘Pass-Through Company’, Avoiding Reporting Requirements For Hillary’s Campaign "They don’t call him Slick Willie for nothing."
Bill Clinton company shows complexity of family finances
The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to provide private details of the former president's finances on the record, said the entity was a "pass-through" company designed to channel payments to the former president.
Stop unfairly asking what Hillary Clinton accomplished as Secretary of State
Hot Air 
"The unfair treatment of Hillary Clinton, brought about simply because
the poor woman wants to be President, simply has to stop. All of these
pestering questions, one after another, are obviously signs of hatred
from people who are jealous of her many accomplishments. Or at least
that’s the current line of defense being taken by the Ready for Hillary
camp these days. But what were those accomplishments again? As Legal Insurrection points out, that’s an unfair question which is only being brought up by the aforementioned haters.
"There’s a video of the exchange available at the link and it’s pretty much what you’d expect. And for just a moment here I’ll play devil’s advocate and grant at least one portion of what Milligan was saying. It’s difficult to draw up a chart and point to the specific accomplishments of some cabinet members, with the State Department being a prime example. The job of the Secretary is designed to happen largely under the covers, and when they do make headlines it’s for arranging things which essentially lay the groundwork for the President to swoop in and finish the deal. The top diplomat can’t actually sign off on treaties or end wars… they can only grease the skids to make that happen.
"But with that said, powerful Secretaries of State leave their fingerprints on the process and their accomplishments – or lack thereof – are readily identified by historians. No matter how awful the Iran deal is, if it winds up going through and being signed, it will at least be considered an accomplishment of John Kerry. Madeleine Albright was credited with being a key figure in arranging the smooth transition of Hong Kong in 1997 and hammered out the specifics of numerous trade deals. We could begin a discussion on the contributions of Henry Kissinger here, but the article would quickly balloon to the size of an encyclopedia.
"Hillary Clinton finished a full term in the office and had nothing of substance to point to aside from boosting the previously sagging novelty RESET button manufacturing sector. (You’re welcome.) She burned enough jet fuel dashing around the world to balance the budget of Detroit, so it hardly seems “unfair” to ask her defenders to point to something… anything … that she has to show for it."
"The unfair treatment of Hillary Clinton, brought about simply because
the poor woman wants to be President, simply has to stop. All of these
pestering questions, one after another, are obviously signs of hatred
from people who are jealous of her many accomplishments. Or at least
that’s the current line of defense being taken by the Ready for Hillary
camp these days. But what were those accomplishments again? As Legal Insurrection points out, that’s an unfair question which is only being brought up by the aforementioned haters.
Expecting a Commander in Chief to have some kind of accomplishments that show their qualifications before getting hired for the job is reasonable, right? Maybe, just not if those accomplishments happened while serving has the head of the State Department, according to U.S. News and World Report’s Susan Milligan."Chris Matthews helpfully agreed with Ms. Milligan, noting that Barack Obama didn’t really have any serious accomplishments to point to when he was elected either. Point taken, sir.
On Hardball with Chris Matthews’ Milligan said the question posed to the Iowa Democratic panel was “unfair.”
“I think most people could not look at a Secretary of State and point to an accomplishment. Frankly, mostly what a Secretary of State does is keep something from becoming a massive crisis so, that in a way wasn’t a terribly fair question,” said Milligan.
"There’s a video of the exchange available at the link and it’s pretty much what you’d expect. And for just a moment here I’ll play devil’s advocate and grant at least one portion of what Milligan was saying. It’s difficult to draw up a chart and point to the specific accomplishments of some cabinet members, with the State Department being a prime example. The job of the Secretary is designed to happen largely under the covers, and when they do make headlines it’s for arranging things which essentially lay the groundwork for the President to swoop in and finish the deal. The top diplomat can’t actually sign off on treaties or end wars… they can only grease the skids to make that happen.
"But with that said, powerful Secretaries of State leave their fingerprints on the process and their accomplishments – or lack thereof – are readily identified by historians. No matter how awful the Iran deal is, if it winds up going through and being signed, it will at least be considered an accomplishment of John Kerry. Madeleine Albright was credited with being a key figure in arranging the smooth transition of Hong Kong in 1997 and hammered out the specifics of numerous trade deals. We could begin a discussion on the contributions of Henry Kissinger here, but the article would quickly balloon to the size of an encyclopedia.
"Hillary Clinton finished a full term in the office and had nothing of substance to point to aside from boosting the previously sagging novelty RESET button manufacturing sector. (You’re welcome.) She burned enough jet fuel dashing around the world to balance the budget of Detroit, so it hardly seems “unfair” to ask her defenders to point to something… anything … that she has to show for it."
Mr. President, the Fall of Ramadi Is Much More than a ‘Setback’
 |
| http://www.investors.com/editorial-cartoons/michael-ramirez/754249 |
NRO. . . "Administration officials, including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the president’s spokesman, have tried to minimize the May 17 fall of Ramadi as nothing more than a “setback.” But, having served in al-Anbar with the Marines, I recognize the loss of this key city for what it really is: a defeat of strategic consequence with potentially catastrophic implications for the future of Iraq."
"Other writers have rightly pointed to the symbolic importance of
Ramadi, where hundreds of U.S. troops were killed in a hard-fought
battle to recapture the city from insurgent forces nearly a decade ago.
But let’s set aside the symbolism and look at the hard facts about why
Ramadi matters today." . . .
Cold Comfort
"In his Memorial Day remarks, Barack Obama cited the special significance of the fact that it was the first such day in 14 years that the United States was not engaged in a major ground war. If by "not engaged" you mean ignoring the thousands of US troops still at risk in Afghanistan and Iraq, and your definition of "major" ground wars doesn't apply to head-lopping JV teams like ISIS.
"Still, by almost any definition the president seems to be ignoring a pretty major ground war right here at home. Over this holiday weekend, shootings in just two Democrat-controlled American cities racked up horrifying body counts which didn't appear on the presidential radar: in Chicago, 12 dead and 43 wounded. In Baltimore, 9 dead and 29 wounded.
"Unfortunately for the victims, none of them was shot by a police officer - which is why Al Sharpton isn't marching in the streets, the DOJ isn't launching any major investigations into lost civil rights (breathing doesn't count), and Barry isn't even bothering to tweet #BlackLivesMatter on his precious new Twitter account.
"The president has previously suggested that much of the violence plaguing our inner cities can be blamed on policing which is "oppressive" to minorities. Which is why he's been so vocal about pushing a new, "softer" look for police and their policies.
"Frankly, we think he should instead be pushing for softer sidewalks, since that's where so many bodies seem to be falling."
Related: In his Memorial Day remarks, Barack Obama cited the special significance of the fact that it was the first such day in 14 years that the United States was not engaged in a major ground war. If by "not engaged" you mean ignoring the thousands of US troops still at risk in Afghanistan and Iraq, and your definition of "major" ground wars doesn't apply to head-lopping JV teams like ISIS.
Still, by almost any definition the president seems to be ignoring a pretty major ground war right here at home. Over this holiday weekend, shootings in just two Democrat-controlled American cities racked up horrifying body counts which didn't appear on the presidential radar: in Chicago, 12 dead and 43 wounded. In Baltimore, 9 dead and 29 wounded.
Unfortunately for the victims, none of them was shot by a police officer - which is why Al Sharpton isn't marching in the streets, the DOJ isn't launching any major investigations into lost civil rights (breathing doesn't count), and Barry isn't even bothering to tweet #BlackLivesMatter on his precious new Twitter account.
The president has previously suggested that much of the violence plaguing our inner cities can be blamed on policing which is "oppressive" to minorities. Which is why he's been so vocal about pushing a new, "softer" look for police and their policies.
Frankly, we think he should instead be pushing for softer sidewalks, since that's where so many bodies seem to be falling.
Related: Flag-stomping fugitive Eric Sheppard threatens to kill police, whites and others in manifesto
" Almost a month later, Sheppard is still on the run. But that hasn't stopped him from threatening police, and all white people, including women and babies. A few days ago, Sheppard sent a rambling manifesto accompanied by a short video to the Valdosta Daily Times." . . .
"Still, by almost any definition the president seems to be ignoring a pretty major ground war right here at home. Over this holiday weekend, shootings in just two Democrat-controlled American cities racked up horrifying body counts which didn't appear on the presidential radar: in Chicago, 12 dead and 43 wounded. In Baltimore, 9 dead and 29 wounded.
"Unfortunately for the victims, none of them was shot by a police officer - which is why Al Sharpton isn't marching in the streets, the DOJ isn't launching any major investigations into lost civil rights (breathing doesn't count), and Barry isn't even bothering to tweet #BlackLivesMatter on his precious new Twitter account.
"The president has previously suggested that much of the violence plaguing our inner cities can be blamed on policing which is "oppressive" to minorities. Which is why he's been so vocal about pushing a new, "softer" look for police and their policies.
"Frankly, we think he should instead be pushing for softer sidewalks, since that's where so many bodies seem to be falling."
Related: In his Memorial Day remarks, Barack Obama cited the special significance of the fact that it was the first such day in 14 years that the United States was not engaged in a major ground war. If by "not engaged" you mean ignoring the thousands of US troops still at risk in Afghanistan and Iraq, and your definition of "major" ground wars doesn't apply to head-lopping JV teams like ISIS.
Still, by almost any definition the president seems to be ignoring a pretty major ground war right here at home. Over this holiday weekend, shootings in just two Democrat-controlled American cities racked up horrifying body counts which didn't appear on the presidential radar: in Chicago, 12 dead and 43 wounded. In Baltimore, 9 dead and 29 wounded.
Unfortunately for the victims, none of them was shot by a police officer - which is why Al Sharpton isn't marching in the streets, the DOJ isn't launching any major investigations into lost civil rights (breathing doesn't count), and Barry isn't even bothering to tweet #BlackLivesMatter on his precious new Twitter account.
The president has previously suggested that much of the violence plaguing our inner cities can be blamed on policing which is "oppressive" to minorities. Which is why he's been so vocal about pushing a new, "softer" look for police and their policies.
Frankly, we think he should instead be pushing for softer sidewalks, since that's where so many bodies seem to be falling.Related: Flag-stomping fugitive Eric Sheppard threatens to kill police, whites and others in manifesto
" Almost a month later, Sheppard is still on the run. But that hasn't stopped him from threatening police, and all white people, including women and babies. A few days ago, Sheppard sent a rambling manifesto accompanied by a short video to the Valdosta Daily Times." . . .
Baltimore Cop: Spike in Crime Due To Less Policing “Definitely a Result of the Indictment of the 6 Officers (Video)
“Welcome to President Obama’s 21st Century transformation of the institution of policing – and it’s been a disaster,” Clarke dead-panned. “Unnecessary black carnage is what we saw, this weekend, and that officer – one of Baltimore’s finest hit the nail right on the head.”
Nice Deb . . . "As is now become necessary in the Obama era – the whistle-blowing law enforcement officer had his face hidden, and voice disguised to protect himself from retaliation. In our new upside-down world, those who risk their lives every day to serve and protect us – must be hidden in shame.
"The incognito cop explained why the city was seeing a spike in its crime rate: “After the protests it seemed like the citizens would appreciate a lack of a police presence, and that’s exactly what they’re getting. No proactive policing, right now.”
"Hannity asked the officer if police in Baltimore are “afraid to do their job.”
“'When you go out on the street, you trust that your command staff and those you work with will support you. The point is – the tip of the spear needs the most assurance that your department, your citizens, mayor and city council will have your back.”
"The implication being, these cops feel like they’ve been left out to dry.
"Hannity asked pointedly if the lack of policing was “a direct result of the indictment of the six police officers.” . . .
Tuesday, May 26, 2015
I Won’t Applaud or Condemn Josh Duggar
So can Josh Duggar and other sexual offenders change? Absolutely they can, and many do. Also, not every sexual offender is the same, some are more prone to reoffend than others. The observed sexual recidivism rates of juveniles who commit sexual offenses range from about 7 percent to 13 percent after 59 months depending on which study you look at. Juvenile sex offenders tend to have lower recidivism rates than adult sex offenders as well. Statistically speaking, a relatively small percentage of juveniles who commit a sexual offense will sexually reoffend as adults. . .Shane Vander Hart
. . . "The first extreme I’ve seen are those who turn Josh Duggar into a hero of sorts because he confessed his sexual offenses, repented and turned his life over to Christ. Some have blindly defended the Duggar family as well which, in my opinion, is not appropriate. Instead of defending Josh Duggar, who himself said what he did was inexcusable, or Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar our focus should be on respecting Josh Duggar’s victims.
"The second extreme are those who desire to totally discount Josh Duggar’s repentance because he’s a sex offender. In the minds of some, sex offenders can never change. They also scoff at the forgiveness he was allegedly shown by his victims. Much of this vitriol has come from some on the left who love to point out the flaws of conservatives in general, and Christians in particular. What is alarming is how many Christians have jumped on this bandwagon.
"I want to offer four observations from the perspective of working with juvenile and adult sex offenders, as well as, juvenile victims of sexual abuse for a number of years.
"The first and most important observation
I want to make is if God can not save sexual offenders He can save no
one. It is mind-boggling to me when even some Christians doubt this.
If you have landed in this camp you need to repent because you are
embracing a false gospel. The Bible is abundantly clear. The Gospel
is the “power of God for salvation to everyone who believes,” (Romans 1:16 emphasis mine). There is no exception clause here.
"Ephesians 2 is a little more poignant.
We were all spiritually dead and separated from God and the fact any
one of us is saved is a miracle." . . .
Full article here. But this is his bottom line:. . . Third observation… It seems as though the victims have been lost in all of the hoopla surrounding Josh Duggar with both extremes. The simple fact is that the news and social media backlash is making these girls (at least four were family members, one was not) have to relive all of this again. Also juvenile victims are typically given privacy that has been denied the Duggar girls. Some have asked why the family didn’t go public with this years ago? Because juvenile victims and offenders are afforded privacy protections by law. This doesn’t change just because they became the center of a TV show later on.
I am not going to condemn Josh Duggar as many have done. From what I can see he is repentant and has changed his life. There is only one Judge who can decide the true fruit of his repentance and I am not Him. I also would not use the Duggars as a model under similar circumstances nor go as far to say Josh Duggar should not have resigned and the family should keep its show. Unlike most of their critics I say that from a restorative perspective, not a punitive one. It is time to let the Duggars, especially the victims, continue with the healing process away from the public eye.
Barack "Climate Change" Obama
Warning Signs
“America’s communities do not need to be protected from climate change. They need to be protected from the excesses of authoritarian presidents and bureaucrats.”
“ 'Woe to the land that’s governed by a child.” - Shakespeare, Richard III
"I have been wrestling for some kind of explanation why the President of the United States, Barack Obama, would continue to talk about climate change and urge the global transition from fossil fuels to wind, solar and bio-energy. I have concluded that he thinks everyone, not just Americans, are idiots.
"We know he lies about everything, but these two topics are clearly near and dear to his heart.
"My friend, Paul Driessen, is a policy analyst for the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, a free market think tank. Among the pundit class he’s ranked very high by his colleagues. Here’s what he has to say about climate change:
“ 'Earth climate always has changed, is always changing, and always will change—but not from fossil-fuel use. Solar fluctuations, deep ocean circulation patterns, and other powerful natural forces have driven climate change and weather events throughout Earth’s history and will continue to do so.”
“ 'President Obama’s hubris is breathtaking. He now thinks an army of regulators can control our planet’s temperature and climate by tweaking emissions of plant-fertilizing carbon dioxide, a mere 0.04% of the atmosphere.' ” . . . Full article here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)