Heritage "National standards—in any subject—are bad policy. They are unlikely to result in high standards but rather the standardization of learning. They would also result in the standardization of mediocrity, because the rigor and content of national standards would tend to align with the mean among states, weakening states with higher quality standards such as Massachusetts, California, and Virginia. But perhaps worst of all, national standards would further diminish parental authority in education. The federal government would gain more power over education as a result, which would come at the expense of parents and local communities."
Texas Social Studies Standards Promote the Blessings of Liberty "(In fact, in the 1990s, the federal government tried to create history standards. They ended up being so anti-American, however, that they were unanimously rejected.)
"While some liberal media outlets were prompted to call Texas’s standards “propaganda,” the outcome was in fact a strong set of social studies standards that emphasize the American founding, highlight the role of free-market enterprise in American economic success, and institute “Celebrate Freedom Week.”"
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Trump vs the City of New York
Murdock repeated suggestions he made in an article in The American Spectator that Trump should sue James over comments she made in 2018 whil...
https://spectator.org/
-
Power Line Minnesota Majority has set up a web site called We Want Voter ID , which currently features a video of a League of Women Vote...
-
ATLANTIC MONTHLY from 1996: " Ogletree pushed Wallace. Didn't Jennings have some higher duty to do something other than just ro...
-
American Greatness How the Clinton Administration’s 9/11 coverup is disturbingly similar to the Biden Administration’s lies about his Afgh...
No comments:
Post a Comment