Don't stretch the meaning of 'genocide' | Natasha Hausdorff

 Infidel Bloggers

Natasha Hausdorff - Wikipedia

. . ."On 2 October 2023 Hausdorff opined that because Israel's opponents had noted that warfare and terror attacks had not achieved their goal of eliminating Israel, they had taken a different approach to attack Israel.^[21] She called this approach "lawfare," meaning the abuse of the law for political means.^[21] She is of the opinion that many of the cases brought against Israel before international bodies such as the International Criminal Court (ICC), the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) are based on falsehoods and the manipulation of international law.^[21] She said that even if such a case is not successful, those bringing it benefit in public relations , as they generate negative media attention about Israel.^[21] She believes as well that lawfare creates "pseudo international law that operates on a double standard concerning the Jewish state."^[21]"

. . .Blood libels

[edit]

"On 27 October 2023 Hausdorff said that the underlying cause of the shift in world opinion against Israel as the war against Hamas carried on was that people attributed an evil intent to Israel, irrespective of any evidence against it, which was reminiscent of "some of the worst attributes of the antisemitic blood libels of old. They are here in an updated form."^{[22]" . . .}

Who is Natasha Hausdorff? The barrister battling for Israel - The Jewish Chronicle

“ 'The country doesn’t have the written constitution that was envisaged at its declaration of independence because immediately thereafter it had to fight a war of survival, and people have been talking about reforming the system for decades."

The Dems’ Thanksgiving Story Deserves To Be Known

 

Ann Coulter  . . ."It’s also becoming more evident that leftists are complete frauds, as in the Hitler was a socialist podcast that discussed the fact that collectivism has always been a top-down imposition from the far-left ruling class upon the people, whether they want it or not. Usually not. Because most people with a fair amount of common sense know that the ridiculous concepts of collectivism can never work.  Thus, the left’s incessant reliance on lies and deception, keeping those at bay keeps the leftist away.

The left is falling apart because it's tied to a failed ideology — collectivism — in its many forms and variations.  It’s also based on many big lies — in this case, that the Democrats are the “party of the people” and that they are the agents of change — a dead end if there ever were one.

"It’s our job to help the party in its quest for self-destruction and finally be rid of the scourge of collectivism, then everyone will be happy."

The Democrat party is disintegrating, warns the New York Times—so let's speed up the process   . . ."It’s also becoming more evident that leftists are complete frauds, as in the Hitler was a socialist podcast that discussed the fact that collectivism has always been a top-down imposition from the far-left ruling class upon the people, whether they want it or not. Usually not. Because most people with a fair amount of common sense know that the ridiculous concepts of collectivism can never work.  Thus, the left’s incessant reliance on lies and deception, keeping those at bay keeps the leftist away.

"The left is falling apart because it's tied to a failed ideology — collectivism — in its many forms and variations.  It’s also based on many big lies — in this case, that the Democrats are the “party of the people” and that they are the agents of change — a dead end if there ever were one.

"It’s our job to help the party in its quest for self-destruction and finally be rid of the scourge of collectivism, then everyone will be happy."

MAGA Scares-a the Crapola Outa the Mullahs: Iran Caves, Calls Off Israeli Attacks, Promises to Be Good

Scott Pinsker 

" One of Donald Trump’s greatest strengths is his knowledge and appreciation of leverage. He knows how to use it against others, and he knows what it feels like when it’s wielded against him."  . . .

"Just a few months ago, everything was different. Remember?

"Iran was on the warpath. Awash with petro-dollars (and just plain dollars, courtesy of the Biden administration), the Iranian mullahs were clearly the ascending power in their region. Meanwhile, Israel was ravaged by terrorist invaders; their one-proud intelligence services and military were exposed as inadequate. The Iranian proxy militaries surrounding the Jewish homeland (as well as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and more) kept a gun pointed at their enemies’ heads. This was the New World Order in the Middle East.  

"America’s allies were on their heels.

"Iran thundered in apocalyptic prose: Israel will be destroyed! Death to America! Destroy the infidels! Kill the Jews! The future is ours!

"General Ali Fadavi, the deputy commander of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps, smugly told the media, “Iran’s response to the Zionist aggression is definite. We are capable of destroying all that the Zionists possess with one operation.”

"At least, Fadavi felt that way on October 31, when he issued that statement. Since then, America had a pretty big presidential election. (You might’ve heard about it.) But if you haven’t, here’s the highlight: The crazy, scary Orange Man is back in the saddle.

"And suddenly, Iran’s singing a dramatically different tune." . . .

Hillary Clinton Sparks Social Media Buzz Over 2028 Presidential Run After Event Announcement

What would be worse: her as President or having to see her as a loser, nightly and for years on TV, bitterly narrating how she was cheated out of an office she "rightfully owned"? TD

RTM 

 “There are rumors swirling that Hillary Clinton is making plans to run for president in 2028. Eighty one isn’t bad for POTUS right? Biden just turned 82. We like our presidents in Depends,” wrote another.

"Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has ignited speculation about a potential 2028 presidential bid as she is scheduled to speak at an upcoming event.

"The former first lady is set to join her husband, former President Bill Clinton, at the 20th anniversary celebration of the Clinton Presidential Center on Dec. 7 in Little Rock, Arkansas, according to the Daily Mail. The center houses the William J. Clinton Presidential Library and Museum ["and Massage Parlor": (Rush Limbaugh)].“The Clintons will share reflections on the noble and important work of public service – from securing peace, prosperity, and progress during the Clinton administration to uplifting millions of people through the work of the Clinton Foundation,” a press release for the event read.

"It also emphasized how the couple is “empowering the next generation of leaders through the Clinton School, and deepening the understanding of the work of the Clinton Administration through the work of the Clinton Presidential Library & Museum.”

The news of the event, which quickly circulated online, has reignited discussions about Clinton’s political future. It received mixed reactions from political observers and the public. Supporters view it as a sign of her enduring commitment to public service, while critics question the viability of another Clinton presidential campaign."

Why it could happen:

The Feminization of American Politics  . . ."Most women will not massively mobilize for a femininized candidate, and this aversion rests a near universal hard-wired preference for masculine traits such as strength, resolve, decisiveness, willingness to take risk, competitiveness, and similar male leadership attributes. Caring and compassion are not in the President’s job description. Moreover, as Heather Mac Donald put it, “Feminism was zero-sum: it championed females by tearing males down.” Not a savvy election strategy. Recall that Hillary Clinton could not ride the “sisterhood” issue to victory. To be sure, these “male” qualities are not strictly biological -- think Margaret Thatcher -- but most people, regardless of sex, know that “male traits” are vital for national survival. Alexander the Great put it succinctly: “I am not afraid of any army of lions led by a sheep; I am afraid of an army of sheep led by a lion.”  We'll see what Michelle O has to say.

Todd Schowalter Productions.

Are You Ready for…Hillary 2028?   . . ."There is likely to be a host of contenders for the Democrat nomination, each vying with the others to show how much madness, socialism, and authoritarianism he, she, or xe can promise to the American people (and the world, since the Dems so desperately want every last person on the planet to be able to vote in our elections). And some observers believe that one formidable rival to Kamala is already emerging. It’s the stuff of dreams, it’s the stuff of nightmares: are you ready for Hillary 2028?" . . .