Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Taking It To The Streets
IBD "Media Bias: When Americans have to turn to the foreign press for truthful reports of the size of popular protests in Washington, it's time to wonder: Are we dominated by "state-run media"?"
SO ... NOW WE ALL KNOW THIS IS JUST ABOUT OBAMA'S RACE
By Neal Boortz "Last year, before the election, some of us predicted that if (or when) Barack Obama became president that this would happen. We said that every time his policies met with opposition the left would start screaming racism. So what happened when we said that this would happen? Well ... you guessed it. We were called racists..."
AND EVEN MORE IDIOTIC RACISM CLAIMS
By Neal Boortz "Don't you folks fret none about the people who live in Johnson's district. Remember .. Cynthia McKinney. They're used to being represented in Congress by race pimps and fools. They've perfected the practice of going to congressmen in neighboring districts for constituent services while their congressman parades around all day in clown makeup."
OH GOODIE .. .NOW WE'VE HEARD FROM JIMMY CARTER
Boortz "If you don't live in Atlanta you would really have no way of knowing that we view Carter as a highly visible crazy uncle who wanders around muttering to himself most of the time. We're glad you got to share in our pain on this one." Carter and MSNBC: they deserve each other.
More here: "Just when you thought Jimmy Carter could not disgrace the office he once held any further..."
House guidelines for Presidential put-downs
Politico "Especially useful: The section on how to properly insult the executive branch in the in the chamber."
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Health-Care Reform and the Constitution
WSJ By ANDREW P. NAPOLITANO "...I asked South Carolina Congressman James Clyburn...where in the Constitution it authorizes the federal government to regulate the delivery of health care. He replied: "There's nothing in the Constitution that says that the federal government has anything to do with most of the stuff we do." Then he shot back: "How about [you] show me where in the Constitution it prohibits the federal government from doing this?"
My, How the Tables Have Turned on Charlie Gibson
American Thinker "...After nervous laughter, [Charles Gibson] confessed that he had not even heard of the scandals, adding “Um. So, you’ve got me at a loss.” Then to prove just how out-of-touch he is Gibson made this snide remark: “Or maybe this is just one you leave to the cables.” One of the hosts immediately reminded Gibson of the massive taxpayer funding that is pumped into the ACORN racket and Gibson stumbled again."
Carter Claims There Is "Racist" Tone Against Obama
RealClearPolitics "In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former President Jimmy Carter said he has been extremely bothered by the heightened climate of racial and other hate speech since the election of President Barack Obama."
Bin Laden’s Reading List for Americans
NY Times Blog "In other words, whether or not Carter is right that most Americans have a distorted view of the conflict, his contribution is to offer a distortion of his own."
House votes to censure Wilson, 240-179; Update: 12 Dems vote no, seven Republicans vote yes
Hot Air "Even though the vote was largely partisan, there were a few departures from party loyalty. Seven Republicans voted to rebuke Wilson: Rep. Joseph Cao of Louisiana, Joanne Emerson of Missouri, Jeff Flake of Arizona, Walter Jones of North Carolina, Tom Petri of Wisconsin, Dana Rohrabacher of California and fellow South Carolinian Bob Inglis." Wait'll you see which Dems voted no.
Text of Rep. Joe Wilson resolution
Google.com "...Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the House of Representatives disapproves of the behavior of the Representative from South Carolina, Mr. Wilson, during the joint session of Congress held on September 9, 2009." Resolution passes 240-179
A New Declaration of Independence
By Andy McCarthy= "A federal appeals court is about to hear the government’s challenge to an astounding ruling in Washington last spring. Federal judge John Bates held that prisoners of war detained in Afghanistan have an American constitutional right to file a lawsuit in the American people’s courts to challenge their detention by the American people’s military during a war authorized by the American people’s representatives. The administration’s maneuver is designed to improve its litigation position by pandering to the appellate court: See, we can give the enemy more rights without a judge ordering us to do so!"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)