Ann Coulter . . . "Indeed, after Bush's State of the Union address laying
out the case for war with Iraq, The New York Times complained that he
had given too many reasons: "Even the rationale for war seems to change
from day to day. Mr. Bush ticked off a litany of accusations against
Iraq in his State of the Union address ..." (New York Times, Feb. 2,
2003)
"Among the reasons we invaded Iraq were:
(1) Saddam had given shelter to terrorists who killed Americans. After 9/11, it was time for him to pay the price:
-- The mastermind of the Achille Lauro hijacking, Abu Abbas, who
murdered a wheelchair-bound American citizen, Leon Klinghoffer, then
forced the passengers to throw his body overboard, was living happily in
Iraq. (Captured by U.S. forces in Baghdad less than a month after our
invasion.)
-- The terrorist who orchestrated the murder of American
diplomat Laurence Foley in October 2002, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, also took
refuge in Saddam's Iraq. (Killed by U.S. forces in Iraq on June 7,
2006.)
-- The one terrorist behind the 1993 World Trade Center bombing
who got away, Abdul Rahman Yasin, fled to Iraq, where he was given money
and lived without fear of being extradited to the United States.
(Whereabouts unknown. Possibly being groomed for a prime-time show on
MSNBC.)
-- Czech intelligence reported that Mohammed Atta, 9/11
mastermind, met with Iraqi agents in Prague shortly before the attack.
(2) Saddam had attempted to assassinate a former president of the United
States. Liberals complained that it was a family feud because that
president happened to be Bush's father, but, again, he was also a FORMER
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. (Does being a relative of the president
make you fair game for assassination attempts?
Bill Clinton, please pick up the white courtesy phone.)
(3) Saddam not only had WMDs, he had used them -- far more
prodigiously than Syria's Bashar al-Assad did when Obama masterfully
backed down from his "red line" threat if Assad ever used chemical
weapons. (Assad's WMDs killed about a thousand civilians -- 350
according to French intelligence, which is a lot better than ours.
Saddam's WMDs killed an estimated 100,000 civilians. That's according to
everyone -- the United Nations, Human Rights Watch and Clinton-era
ambassador Peter Galbraith.)
(4) We needed to smash some Muslim strongman after the 9/11
attack, and Saddam was as good as any other -- at least as good as the
Taliban primitives who had allowed Osama bin Laden to pitch his tent in
their godforsaken country.
It worked: Moammar Gadhafi, terrified that Bush would attack
Libya next, invited U.N. inspectors in, gave up his WMDs, and paid the
families of his Lockerbie bombing victims $8 million apiece.
(5) Saddam had committed atrocities on a far greater scale than
our current bogeyman, ISIS. He tortured and murdered tens of thousands
of Iraqis -- removing their teeth with pliers, applying electric shocks
to men's genitals, drilling holes in their ankles and forcing them to
watch as their wives were raped -- as reported by USA Today, among
others. There was no risk that we were accidentally taking out the Arab
George Washington.
(6) Saddam was a dangerous and disruptive force in a crucial
oil-producing region of the world. We need oil. Why not go to war for
oil?
(7) The Iraqi people were a relatively sane, civilized and
educated populace with a monstrous ruler. Removing that leader would
provide a golden opportunity for an actual functioning Arab democracy --
an Arab Israel.
. . .
"Kelly asked Bush: "Knowing what we know now, would you have authorized the invasion?"
"The correct answer is:
Now that we know that a half-century of Teddy Kennedy's 1965
Immigration Act would result in a country where a man like Barack Obama
could be elected president, and then, purely out of antipathy to
America, would withdraw every last troop from Iraq, nullifying America's
victory and plunging the entire region into chaos, no, I would not
bother removing dangerous despots in order to make America safer.
Instead, I would dedicate myself to overturning our immigration
laws, ending the anchor-baby scam and building a triple-layer fence on
the border, so that some future Republican president could invade Iraq
without worrying about a foreign-elected president like Obama coming in
and giving it away.
Coulter's full article here.
All emphases added by TD