Saturday, February 24, 2018

Schools Aren't Made Safer by Removing Police or Curbing Searches

See the source image

From the Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs
 Removing Police or Curbing Searches

by ALADS Board of Directors
There have been many solutions offered for the tragedies of school shootings in the past days, and surely many more will be generated in the days to come. However, among the ideas that should be swiftly rejected are those that seek to remove police from campus and ban safety measures such as metal detectors or random searches.

Yet, incredible as it seems, such are the demands of radical groups such as Black Lives Matter (BLM) who are demanding random searches be ended at city schools. Their effort is just the beginning of an undertaking that BLM describes as "abolishing policing in our schools." In the radical view of members of this movement, "policing is a derivative of slave catching" and ending random school searches is the beginning of the eventual removal of police officers from schools.

While one might dismiss these as nothing more than comments from extremist groups, it is incredibly disturbing to learn that the Los Angeles City Schools teacher's union (UTLA) has joined as a co-sponsor for a Black Lives Matter rally that will call for such extremist demands. 

The union posted a flyer for the event on its website that boasted in its headline the rally was "a fight to end random searches and criminalization" at city schools. While UTLA leaders have since attempted to distance themselves from the radical demands of BLM to remove police from city schools, they refused a request by Gil Gamez, president of the LA School Police Officers Association for a letter in support of school police. 

The 410 sworn police officers and 101 non-sworn school safety officers who make up the LAUSD school police department do an incredible job protecting the students of the schools they serve, ensuring campuses have a safe learning environment and providing positive role models for students. Just this past month, school police officers swiftly responded to a shooting at Sal Castro Middle School, locking down the school, tending to the wounded students and arresting the shooter. Since the Florida shootingtragedy where seventeen people died, schools in Los Angeles have had seven school shooting threats.

While some people are concerned with random searches on school campuses, a LAUSD survey last year found that 78 percent of parents polled agreed that random searches should be conducted at their child's school, while less than half of students surveyed felt the same way.

While activist groups and others may grab headlines with rallies and marches, they clearly do not have the backing of the parents of children who attend our local schools. In fact, following the shooting at Sal Castro, parents at the school vocally demanded that metal detectors needed to be installed to complement random searches. 

Action Needed 

In addition to the common-sense requests of parents for additional resources at schools, there are other steps that can be taken to increase the likelihood that authorities are alerted to and can respond to those who would threaten our schools. In California, there is presently no uniform method for alerting authorities of school threats or even knowing which school or police departments should be alerted. However, there is an in-place model that can be easily adopted in California.

In the wake of the Columbine High School massacre in 1999, Colorado authorities acted on recommendations to prevent, interdict and respond to potential school shootings. In particular, they created a state-wide program called "Safe2Tell," which allows students and parents to anonymously report potential threats. Since the program was implemented, it has averaged 3,000 tips a year, with suicide threats or reports of bullying being the leading tips that are phoned in.

The State Legislature should pass legislation that creates a model such as Colorado's, which allows any tip to be made to a state-wide central hotline and then directed to the appropriate local authority or school to handle in an expeditious manner. The cost of this program would likely be minimal and the potential benefits enormous. 

When citizens have the means and authorities are alerted to potential threats they can move rapidly to intervene. We saw this most recently when Los Angeles County deputies from the Norwalk Station responded to a call from a school security guard at El Camino High School in Whittier. The guard advised the responding deputies he had heard a student make verbal threats that he was, "going to shoot up the school sometime in the next three weeks." The deputies conducted a thorough investigation, determined there were weapons available to the named student and wrote and executed a search warrant. The search warrant yielded AR-15 rifles and nearly 100 high capacity magazines. Deputies confiscated the weapons and arrested the juvenile suspect who had threatened to commit a school shooting. Deputies also arrested the owner of the weapons, the juvenile's 28-year-old older brother, on felony charges.

Whatever responses California devises in the wake of the most recent school tragedy, the changes BLM and other radical groups want--removing any police presence from local schools--should not be among them. The best way to prevent future school tragedies is to have a statewide system to alert authorities of school threats and to encourage cooperation with local police and school police, not ban them from campus.

The Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs (ALADS) represents more than 7,900 Los Angeles County deputy sheriffs and district attorney investigators. Like our Facebook page www.facebook.com/aladsonline 
Hat tip to Harley Standlee; Placerville, CA 
Of course, murdering police officers has long been encouraged by activists with the Black Lives Matter cult, with the support of the activist Left.

Friday, February 23, 2018

7 Terrible Liberal Gun Control Arguments … And How To Beat Them

Kurt Schlichter


"I argue for a living. I often deal with hacks, liars, and agenda-driven fanatics. But never in a quarter century of being in court rooms have I faced such a blizzard of constitutional illiteracy, technical ignorance, flabby reasoning, and outright lies as I have dealing with people who think our Second Amendment rights are up for debate. 

"Our rights are not up for debate. But, as a courtesy, because talking is the way a free people should endeavor to solve problems, we should debate them anyway. Rational discussion beats the alternative – many of us are vets who saw the alternative overseas – even if the other side prefers emotional blackmail using articulate infants to bum rush their anti-civil rights policies. So, here are seven (it could have been 50) of the most annoying – and dishonest – arguments you will hear, and how you can fight them." . . .  Full article

Dana Loesch Reveals More Evidence CNN's Town Hall Was 'Scripted' To Be Pro-Gun Control

Also this: CNN Anchor Dares Dana Loesch to Repeat Claim that Media 'Love' Mass Shootings   . . . "In her CPAC speech Thursday, Loesch also excoriated CNN for its gun control town hall on Wednesday, where attendees booed her and called her a "murderer" for her gun rights activism in the wake of last week's carnage at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. CNN was the "malicious" party, Loesch said, for letting those accusations stand."

Daily Wire

National Rifle Association spokesperson Dana Loesch answers a question while sitting next to Broward Sheriff Scott Israel, left, during a CNN town hall meeting on Wednesday, Feb. 21, 2018, at the BB&T Center, in Sunrise, Fla.
. . . "In an interview with The Federalist Radio Hour Podcast Thursday, NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch revealed more details suggesting CNN deliberately orchestrated the town hall to stir up anti-gun and anti-NRA emotions, including neglecting to give Loesch any context for the event, protecting pro-gun control speaker Sen. Bill Nelson, and allowing angry activists to accuse Loesch of being a "murderer" and call for violence against her.
"Loesch stressed that she was given no prior information about what she was walking into. "I had nothing in advance," Loesch told the Federalist. "I didn’t know how the setup was going to be. I didn’t know it was going to be in a giant arena where it was 360 all the way around. I had no clue."
"Prior to her appearance, CNN appears to have taken steps to ramp up the crowd's emotions.
"They had music that was playing," said Loesch. "They had montages that they were flashing across the screen. They had a number of speakers from the school and from the community. They had the sheriff go up and speak. He mentioned special interest groups, referring to the membership of the NRA. Then they brought the politicians out . . . and that was the first hour."
"After all the buildup, CNN had Loesch enter as if she were "a boxer" or in the "WWE."
" 'After all of this was already happening, after emotions were already running high, and after CNN put everyone together and cranked up, really trying to wind people up even more," she said. "I had no questions in advance. It was even weird the way they had us walk out because it was like entering like you were a boxer or like WWE. You were walking up to the stage and they had music playing. You had to walk in aisles with all these people screaming and you had to walk toward the stage."
"At one moment, the moderator, Jake Tapper, gave Nelson an out, telling him he didn't have to answer what appeared to be an unscripted question. Though he stepped in to protect Nelson, no such protection was offered Loesch throughout the night." . . .

On that CNN "townhall" lynch mob; "So thanks a lot for adding to our discourse, CNN."

FL Shooting Survivor Ariana Klein: Networks Don't Want Us To Give Our Real Opinions, "Want Us To Further Their Agendas"



. . . "The whole point of the town hall meeting was to hear the kids and hear what we had to say," she said.
Her father, prefacing that he is a Republican and a gun owner, said he was approached by a CNN producer on Thursday, the day after the school shooting, and felt they "were looking for people who were willing to espouse a certain narrative." 
"The producer insinuated to me they were looking for people who were willing to espouse a certain narrative which was taking a tragedy and turning it into a policy debate and I read that as being a gun control debate," Klein said.
"Unfortunately, I think a lot of the people talking about gun control don't understand what they're talking about," he added. . . .
National Review: Gun Politics, Twitterized


Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel (left) and syndicated talk-show
host Dana Loesch at CNN’s town hall meeting, February 21, 2018.
. . . "But here’s my worry: In our increasingly Twitterized nation, that relatively simple concept — “I disagree with the idea, but I understand it” — seems to be an increasingly endangered thought process. Political insults, of course, are nothing new. But just last week, New York Times columnist David Brooks earned widespread scorn and evisceration for a rather mild column suggesting that all Americans, including law-abiding gun owners, are worthy of respect. Yikes."

CNN’s Insane Anti-Gun Townhall Will Only Help The NRA
. . . "So thanks a lot for adding to our discourse, CNN. You’re now no different than SKDKnickerbocker when it comes to being a promotional vehicle for anti-gun views, and you’ve given gun owners every reason to believe reformers are coming for every gun they have. Great job, everyone."

CNN’s Shameful Town Hall  . . . "More immediately, events like the CNN town hall go a long way in convincing gun owners that gun-control advocates do have a desire to confiscate their weapons. The advocates can’t confiscate weapons right now, so they support whatever feasible incremental steps are available to inch further toward that goal. We don’t know how this plays out in the long run. In the short run, though, it does nothing to stop the next school shooting."

Colton Haab Vs. CNN  "On Wednesday night CNN took up the 2018 children’s crusade that is intended to produce gun control where previously there has only been left-wing frustration. After the event, RealClear Politics posted local television video of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School student Colton Haab. I wrote about it here yesterday morning." . . .
"The Washington Post’s Erik Wemple explains: it’s a CNN non-scandal."

The Yelling of the Lambs  "For all of those who are angry about the Parkland attack and those before it, and who insist that the experiences of the newly minted child-activists for rescinding the Second Amendment require us to do what they demand, ask yourselves: do I want a society where my rights are determined by the raw and manipulated emotions of my accusers?  Do I want my rights decided by what children feel?  It is self-evident to rational people that anger, especially misinformed anger, is not a basis for good policy.  However, it is all that progressives can offer." . . .  




Armed police are guarding the home of the deputy who resigned over his lack of action in the Parkland school shooting

Business Insider

Screen Shot 2018 02 22 at 4.21.40 PM

. . . "Deputies from the Palm Beach County Sheriff's office are guarding the home of the school resource officer who was stationed at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School after his family requested the protection, according to multiple news reports on Thursday.
"Local Fox affiliate WSVN said it sent a reporter to the Boynton Beach, Florida, home of Broward County Sheriff's deputy Scot Peterson for an interview when the reporter was met with six deputies "standing guard outside."
"Peterson's family is believed to have asked for the protection, according to NBC affiliate WPTV reporter Andrew Lofholm.
"Peterson resigned from his post at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School following the shooting at the campus in which 17 people died. He was later criticized after an internal investigation found he never entered the building where the shooting occurred.
" 'I am devastated," Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel said at a news conference. "Sick to my stomach. He never went in."
"Peterson, who was armed and in uniform at the time, reportedly did "nothing" and remained outside of the building for at least four minutes during the incident, according to Israel." . . .  Hat tip: Weasel Zip.
“Parkland deputy "believed he did a good job calling in the location, setting up the perimeter and calling in the description [of the suspect],”  . . .“ 'We have to act, even if that means risking our lives to save many many more lives. I would demand that from our union members,” the union official told the Post." . . . 
I'm sure pictures and info on this deputy can be found, but I want to be no part of a lynch mob along the lines of CNN's by posting them.

Let's see the Trump Dossier unravel


McCain aide took the Fifth Amendment on role in Steele dossier  "More threads are unraveling in what may be the biggest political scandal in history: the use of intelligence agencies to spy on a rival-party presidential campaign and then unseat a duly elected president.  The blowback from the Steele dossier, the multi-million-dollar operation of the Hillary campaign and the DNC, may reach all the way to Trump-haters in the GOP.
"The Steele dossier scandal's tentacles are reaching all the way to Trumpophobic John McCain, via a close associate of his.  The longtime aide to Senator McCain who flew to England to get a copy of the Steele dossier and speed it along to the FBI in 2016 has clammed up and asserted his right to avoid self-incrimination.
"Catherine Herridge reports for Fox News:" . . .
. . . David J. Kramer, who is a central player in how the unverified Trump dossier made its way to the FBI in late 2016, testified before the committee in December in a closed-door session, indicating he had information about the dossier's sources.  A subpoena was issued for mid-January, as first reported by The Washington Examiner.
The law enforcement source confirmed, however, that Kramer did not appear and has exercised his Fifth Amendment rights.
Kramer pictured here with Tim Kaine
 

The attacks on the NRA are going to backfire big-time

Silvio Canto, Jr.  "The other night, CNN promoted a debate about gun control that ended up being an ongoing attack on the NRA, the organization representing those of us who believe that school shootings are a lot more complicated than just talking about guns.
"Will it be effective, or will it backfire?
"Let me introduce you to Conor Lamb, a Democrat:
Democrat Connor Lamb is holding firm in his belief that Congress doesn't need to pass stricter gun control laws following the school shooting in Florida, insisting the best way to deter these kinds of horrific events is to enforce the laws on the books.
The stance puts Mr. Lamb in line with President Trump and the candidate's Republican rival Rick Saccone in the special congressional race here in western Pennsylvania, which is doubling as the first electoral test of post-Florida gun politics.
"Mr. Lamb is a sensible man.  He probably remembers what happened to V.P. Gore in 2000.  Back then, V.P. Gore tried to compete with Bill Bradley during the Democrat primaries over gun control.  It came back to haunt him when he ran against Governor Bush.  It was probably one of the reasons he did not carry Tennessee or Arkansas.  It did not help him in the rural areas in Ohio, either.
"This is why it would make a lot more sense for President Trump and Congress to focus on two sensible objectives: securing the schools and making sure there is background information in background checks.
"What we saw last night on CNN won't move the ball forward, but it will probably increase the NRA's intensity in 2018."

FL Shooting Survivor Colton Haab: CNN Told Me I Needed To "Stick To The Script"; Entire Town Hall Scripted

Real Clear Politics

JROTC Cadet Who Survived Shooting: CNN Producer Refused To Let Me Ask About Arming Teachers  . . . “ 'What they had actually done was wrote out a question for me,” he said.
"On a previous interview Haab did with CNN, he shared his thoughts on arming teachers and allowing those who are willing to carry on campus. Haab said he absolutely thought that CNN producers rewrote questions for his classmates who participated in the event.
“ 'It was a little piece of paper cut out. And I know for a fact that nobody cut their own paper out and wrote their own question. Especially when they were all based off the same topic. So, to me, it from right there it showed this isn’t correct. Why do they all have the same size piece of paper with a short little question on it?”
"Haab said it was because of this that he decided not to attend the event. “To me it was a total waste of my time, honestly.' ” . . .

Dana Loesch: Here’s The Real Story Of What Happened At CNN’s Garbage Town Hall

As Loesch and her security detail walked toward the stage, audience members shouted at her phrases like, “murderer,” “child killer,” and “burn her.” Jake Tapper, CNN’s chief washington correspondent and anchor of “The Lead,” was the event moderator.

"Dana Loesch described on The Federalist Radio Hour podcast what happened behind the scenes of Wednesday’s CNN’s televised town hall event titled, “Stand Up: The Students of Stoneman Douglas Demand Action.” Loesch, representing the National Rifle Association as their national spokesperson, said she wasn’t informed until hours before of the event’s format or that students would be asking questions.
“ 'I had nothing in advance. I didn’t know how the setup was going to be. I didn’t know it was going to be in a giant arena where it was 360 all the way around. I had no clue,” she said. “But I wanted to go and represent the people that I was representing, and also because I’m a parent too…I have kids and my oldest child is just a couple of years younger than these students.”
"The audience had already filled the arena and the event had started two hours before the cameras were even turned on, Loesch said.
They had music that was playing. They had montages that they were flashing across the screen. They had a number of speakers from the school and from the community. They had the sheriff go up and speak. He mentioned special interest groups, referring to the membership of the NRA.Then they brought the politicians out…and that was the first hour. After all of this was already happening, after emotions were already running high, and after CNN put everyone together and cranked up, really trying to wind people up even more.I had no questions in advance. It was even weird the way they had us walk out because it was like entering like you were a boxer or like WWE. You were walking up to the stage and they had music playing. You had to walk in aisles with all these people screaming and you had to walk toward the stage. That’s how you entered.
. . .
Watch CNN’s Scripted Anti-Gun Town Hall Go Completely Off The Rails
. . . "The reaction of both Tapper and Nelson indicates that the scripted event went awry, as Tapper was clearly expecting an approved question for Nelson, not a premature rant aimed at a woman who had not even been brought on stage by the network yet.
"Colton Haab, one of the students who survived last week’s mass shooting in Parkland, Florida, told the media he chose not to attend the town hall, because CNN tried to give him written questions to ask at the event. Haab is a Junior ROTC enlistee who personally helped dozens of students stay safe during the shooting by moving them to a more secure classroom and setting up Kevlar screens to shield students from bullets." . . .

Thursday, February 22, 2018

A familiar pattern? Russian trolls on Twitter ‘rile’ Americans on gun violence

McClatchy


"An organization that monitors Russian trolling has spotted a peculiar similarity between certain types of social media postings that went up immediately after the Oct. 1 Las Vegas festival shootings and again after last week’s shootings at a school in Parkland, Fla.
"The pattern: A day after the tragedy, the trolls tweet on all sides of the gun control debate. A day later, they push conspiracy theories.
"It’s a formula designed to stir up emotions over mass violence and gun laws, and more broadly to foment anger and exasperation over the U.S. political system.
“ 'The purpose is to stoke tensions,” said Bret Schafer of the Alliance for Securing Democracy, which is financing researchers following 600 or so Twitter accounts suspected of being operated by Russian “trolls” — pro-Kremlin mouthpieces aiming to encourage discord in the United States." . . .

Armed deputy in Florida school shooting never tried to engage gunman

Washington Times  A Florida sheriff says the deputy who was on duty at a high school where 17 people were massacred waited outside the building for about four minutes without ever going in.Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel announced during a Thursday news conference that Deputy Scot Peterson resigned after being suspended without pay.Israel said he made the decision after reviewing video surveillance and interviewing witnesses, including the deputy himself. The sheriff says Peterson responded to the building where the shooting took place, took up a position outside a door and never went in.When asked what Peterson should have done, Israel said the deputy should have “went in, addressed the killer, killed the killer.”Authorities say 19-year-old Nikolas Cruz fatally shot 17 people at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland on Feb. 14.

Everything You Need to Know About Federal Background Checks

The Trace


A step-by-step guide to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, which vets anyone who attempts to buy a gun through a federally licensed firearms dealer.
      "In the United States, anybody who wants to buy a gun from a federally licensed firearms dealer (FFL) is subject to a background check. Since 1998, when the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, or NICS, went online, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has processed more than 273 million of them.

     "The overwhelming majority of gun background checks take just minutes to clear the would-be buyer. Only 2 percent result in a rejection because of a disqualifying record in the shopper’s personal history.


     "And then there are the people who slip through the cracks and obtain guns they should have been barred from possessing — sometimes with deadly consequences. The gunmen in the Sutherland Springs, Texas, church shootingCharleston, South Carolina, church massacre, and Virginia Tech rampage each had a history that banned them from owning firearms. Yet none were stopped, because of omissions and loopholes in the system.
     "It’s such cases that expose the hidden complexities of NICS, and the importance of each element functioning the way that it should.
     "Given the central role that background checks play in balancing individual Americans’ gun rights and our shared public safety, it’s worth investing a few minutes to understand how they work." . . .  Full article
"More than 2 million people have been blocked from buying a gun after failing federal background checks since 1998. But some reasons for denial are more common than others."
 . . . 8. Adjudicated Mental Health: 31,854
Disqualifying mental health records form the second-largest body of records held by the NICS Indices. Simply receiving a diagnosis of a severe mental illness like schizophrenia is not enough to bar an American from gun ownership  — a judge must legally declare a person mentally unfit to own a gun or involuntarily commit him or her to a mental institution.