"But again, my beef isn't with Clinton. It's with the Democratic Party proper, which has long been cynically peddling this very message in direct and subtle ways to alienate minority voters from the Republican Party, whose policies are manifestly more conducive to their economic well-being. . . . look at the racially charged statements Obama sprinkled throughout his terms in office."
Chaim MorgolesSnowflake's Safe Space & Buttercup Ranch |
David Limbaugh "Hillary Clinton's abhorrent remarks in Mumbai, India, last week warrant our attention because, like it or not, they represent the thinking of a large swath of the modern Democratic Party.
"But my aim is not to highlight Clinton's never-ending catalog of excuses for losing the presidential election, except to note that rather than blame everyone and everything but herself, she should apologize for stealing the nomination. If she hadn't done that, she wouldn't have to blame anyone.
"She should also have to answer for FISA-gate, but I don't want to waste space demonstrating Clinton's unfitness for office -- because I have little fear she'll run again, and Democrats surely aren't crazy enough to indulge her if she tries.
"Instead, let's review her disgraceful tirade in Mumbai, in which she blamed Americans' racism and misogyny for her election loss.
" 'We do not do well with white men, and we don't do well with married white women," said Clinton. "And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should."
"Hold the phone. Do you see the rich irony here? "Hear me roar" Hillary is impugning the independence and courage of women -- the very people she is pretending to defend against our misogyny? Seeing as she is maligning men, wouldn't it be prudent not to insult the other half of the human race at the same time? I know few men who don't have a higher opinion of women than this female liberal icon is displaying here." . . .