Beware leftist tears

Legal Insurrection

Rachel's tender tears  "Is there a more tender age than that of a child in the womb?

"Rachel Maddow's tears aside, expressions of outrage over government provisioning for displaced children entering the U.S. illegally portray such children as a means to an end rather than ends in and of themselves.  If Maddow and her like-minded minions are teary-eyed over images of children being ripped from the loving arms of their parents, then one would expect her to be cut to the heart by the ripping of children from their mother's wombs. Alas, her passions are selectively silent on the issue of the slaughter of innocents.

"Bible-thumping by the likes of failed candidate Hillary Clinton likewise reveal the true trajectory of this brewed up brouhaha.  Were Mrs. Clinton to remain consistent with the teachings of her progressive pals, then invoking the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth would be, at best, on par with any other philosopher at hand (e.g., Peter Singer, perhaps).  If all moral teaching is relative to the culture from which it arises, then why would Mrs. Clinton seek to impose a dusty ethics prevalent in first-century Galilee upon a situation occurring in Central America some twenty centuries hence?" . . .

Fox News Host: Rep. Elijah Cummings Would ‘Rather Cry on Television’ Than Fix Immigration  . . . "Trish Regan said that Democrats don’t really want to fix the problem:

“They do not want to, because they would much rather cry on television like Elijah Cummings did. They would rather show, in some cases, fake photos… They would rather play this out on a very emotional level because you’re appealing, in the Democrats’ mind, to people’s hearts, and nobody wants to see children separated from their parents. But at the same time, it plays to a hatred they can gin up as we go into ’18 for Donald Trump.”