God Help The USA and Israel

nicedeb 

"I created the above photoshop, last year when Obama’s animus towards Israel first started revealing itself through his policies.....
You need only read the recent headlines (but do click and read some of these) from Commentary’s blog to get a flavor of the disdain, and disappointment from Jewish quarters to Obama’s treatment of Israel:
(These links are active in the actual article.)

Bibi’s Predicament

On Obama’s Behavior Toward Israel

What Did You Do?

Obama’s Humiliation of Israel May Only Be Getting Started

No Denying White House Animus Toward Israel

Nile Gardiner: Barack Obama’s humiliation of Israel is a disgrace (From March, 2011, but reposted in the UK Telegraph blog today. We post it now because of Obama's arrogant claim that he has been the president most supportive of Israel.)  "Benjamin Netanyahu was left to stew in a White House meeting room for over an hour after President Barack Obama abruptly walked out of tense talks to have supper with his family, it emerged on Thursday. The snub marked a fresh low in US-Israeli relations and appeared designed to show Mr Netanyahu how low his stock had fallen in Washington after he refused to back down in a row over Jewish construction in east Jerusalem.
"… (Mr. Obama) immediately presented Mr Netanyahu with a list of 13 demands designed both to the end the feud with his administration and to build Palestinian confidence ahead of the resumption of peace talks. Key among those demands was a previously-made call to halt all new settlement construction in east Jerusalem.
"When the Israeli prime minister stalled, Mr Obama rose from his seat declaring: "I'm going to the residential wing to have dinner with Michelle and the girls." As he left, Mr Netanyahu was told to consider the error of his ways. "I'm still around," Mr Obama is quoted by Israel's Yediot Ahronot newspaper as having said. "Let me know if there is anything new."
"This is no way to treat America’s closest ally in the Middle East, and a true friend of the United States. I very much doubt that even third world tyrants would be received in such a rude fashion by the president. In fact, they would probably be warmly welcomed by the Obama White House as part of its “engagement” strategy, while the leaders of Britain and Israel are frequently met with arrogant disdain."
I'd say pretty much the way Bill Ayers or Rev. Wright would have handled things. Perhaps Obama can name his two teleprompters "Bill" and "Rev".

      Video from David Horowitz Freedom Center

Update: Secretary of Defense Panetta Shows How the Obama Administration Is Selling Out Israel…and US Interests  By Barry Rubin:  "In a major address on U.S. Middle East policy to the Brookings Institution U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta gave us a clear picture of the Obama administration’s view of the region. When taken along with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s recent speech on the same subject, we now know the following regarding Obama’s policy:
It is dangerously and absurdly wrong. This administration totally and completely, dangerously and disastrously for U.S. interests misunderstands the Middle East. They are 180 degrees off course, that is heading in the opposite direction of safety."

Charlie Brown goes to the Republican debates

Jimmy Kimmel may have found a way to liven up the GOP debates with the help of Peanuts.
From Wake up, Black America!
"I haven't been keeping up with the almost weekly GOP Presidential debates for a reason. These debates are simply planned events in order to have the GOP candidates destroy one another prior thus making it easier for Obama Also, the answers and positions of the candidates have been known for several months now. Right now, It's like watching an endless television rerun with no fresh new episode in sight. Be that as it may, Comedian Jimmy Kimmel of ABC Jimmy Kimmel Live put together a very funny skit involving the GOP candidates and the Peanuts Thanksgiving. I'm not sure what Jimmy's political leanings are, but even I couldn't help not to laugh at this."

Dead Movement Walking: Top Six Signs the Left And Mainstream Media Have Hung Occupy Out to Dry

Big Journalism  "A few weeks ago in Denver I had the opportunity for some up close and personal time with the Occupy movement, and what I saw was about what you would expect. These are marginal and marginally intelligent people who have grown up conditioned by public educators and the welfare state to believe that they’re something special and entitled to the good life just because they’re special and entitled to the good life. And they’ve also been brainwashed to believe that if America doesn’t acknowledge their specialness and if, indeed, they’re not enjoying the good life, the problem must be a corrupt America."

You've heard the term,"useful idiots"?  Now see them in person:

The Daily Show
Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

How can democrats fail to see the difference between the quality of this crowd and that of the TEA Party? They don't. The left is made up of liars and demagogues who seek only power and the Occupiers are merely those who vote for people such as Pelosi, Kucinich, Sanders, Waters and Obama, et. al. 

Normandy, 1944; then and now photos

6 Juin, 1944  Our previous emphases on Omaha Beach gave short shrift to the other landing sites. This should do a bit to fill in some of those gaps with photos. Click on some of the WW2 photos of a site and you will also see that location as it is today.  Don't you love stuff like that? TD

More here.  Here.  Go here for the search site.

Still deciding; here's a case for Mitt Romney

donkeyhotey

 Ramesh Ponnuru: Romney’s the One   "If Romney was to McCain’s right then, he is still. He’s to George W. Bush’s right, too. Bush never came out for the Medicare reform Romney has endorsed. Bush never said that Roe v. Wade should be overturned, either. Romney has. Romney’s long list of policy advisers includes people who are, within their fields, roughly in sync with the politics of the Bush administration or to its right; almost nobody is significantly to its left.

""If Mitt Romney becomes president, he will almost certainly be dealing with John Boehner as speaker of the House and Mitch McConnell as Senate majority leader. While they, too, have their conservative detractors, they are the most conservative congressional leaders Republicans have had in modern times, and they will exert a rightward influence on the Romney administration. If they send him legislation to repeal Obamacare, cut taxes, or reform entitlements, he will sign it where Obama would veto it. If at some other point in his presidency a liberal-run Congress sends him tax increases, he will veto them where Obama would sign. Compared with President Obama, a President Romney would do more to protect the defense budget.

Newt unwilling to say life begins at conception

Charles Krauthammer: Mitt vs. Newt; Republicans must choose between two significantly flawed frontrunners.  "My own view is that Republicans would have been better served by the candidacies of Mitch Daniels, Paul Ryan, or Chris Christie. Unfortunately, none is running. You play the hand you’re dealt. This is a weak Republican field with two significantly flawed frontrunners contesting an immensely important election. If Obama wins, he will take the country to a place from which it will not be able to return (which is precisely his own objective for a second term).
"Every conservative has thus to ask himself two questions: Who is more likely to prevent that second term? And who, if elected, is less likely to unpleasantly surprise?"

However: Bret Baier to Romney: Didn’t you used to have basically the same immigration position as Gingrich? "If he wants to attack Newt, he should be hitting him on the strange idea of using local community boards to decide legalization issues instead of a national standard to ensure that more liberal jurisdictions don’t become magnets for longtime illegals. Or maybe that’s the whole point of Newt’s plan, to get illegals to flee to blue areas for more forgiving treatment? Bottom line: There’s really no reason to strongly prefer one of them to the other on this issue." (video)

This is how you lower the oceans and make our enemies love us.

http://terrellaftermath.com/



Is he majestic or
 just asleep?



Obama Will Torpedo Tough Iran Sanctions  "Since the administration persuaded the Senate to water the amendment down by giving the president the power to waive enforcement of the law, the Iranians need not fear a swift shutdown of the oil income they get from transactions that are run through their Central Bank. With a six month waiting period before the measure goes into effect and with the president having the right to shelve the bill if he thinks it will hurt either the U.S. economy or that of its allies, it is unlikely the sanctions will ever go into effect."

In a related story, President Obama offered Czechoslovakia to Russia in return for their good will.

Obama Gives SEIU A $4B Christmas Present

Government Policy, Not Laziness, Responsible for Scaring Away Foreign Investors  "President Obama thinks we have been lazy in selling America. But his administration has been anything but lazy in making America a harder sell to foreign investors."

NLRB documents shed light on Boeing fight in South Carolina

McClatchy Washington Bureau  "Lawyers for the federal labor agency fighting Boeing’s new factory in North Charleston, N.C., repeatedly joked among themselves about the dispute and exchanged a political cartoon portraying S.C. Sen. Glenn McConnell as a crass-speaking confederate soldier, according to internal documents released Wednesday.
"The emails, memos and other documents from the National Labor Relations Board, which the agency provided in response to a Freedom of Information Act request, also portray Sen. Lindsey Graham’s behind-the-scenes efforts to prevent it from filing a complaint against Boeing."
....

http://floydreports.com/tag/nlrb/

"Rob Godfrey, a spokesman for S.C. Gov. Nikki Haley, said the NLRB employees’ jokes about the Boeing case didn’t amuse her."

“The NLRB is a disrespectful agency that apparently believes that the jobs and companies they are threatening is all fun and games,” Godfrey said. “They are wrong. These are real people, real jobs and real companies. This is not and has never been a laughing matter.”"

Everything this asinine administration does drags the American free enterprise system further into the trash.
 
Judicial Watch: NLRB Staffers Joke About Economy, Mock DeMint   "In an April 22 email, acting NLRB General Counsel Lafe Solomon wrote to the organization’s outgoing chairwoman, Wilma Liebman: “The article gave me a new idea. You go to geneva [Switzerland] and I get a job with airbus [French company]. We screwed up the us economy and now we can tackle europe.” "

Plea for financial help by someone in Africa

This came to me yesterday. I cannot believe this kind of stuff still goes around, but regrettably, it must be because it still works and Americans are still being fooled by obvious scams of this sort. This came from someone calling themselves "Mrs. Alice Aka" and their email address is cmd99510@pop28.odn.ne.jp.
This is the message, which I'm sure most of you have seen some variation of at other times:

Hello my dear,
How is your day!! hope you are having a great day!!. I am Mrs. Alice Aka, I'm 42 years old of age from North Africa, and presently I am residing in the refugee camp here in Accra Ghana (in Western Africa) as a result of the civil war in my country LIBYA now. My Late husband Aka Saad was the managing director and CEO of (an oil company) Arabian Gulf Oil Company.
The rebels attacked our house during the crisis and killed my husband,that is why I ran for my dear life with the help of the United Nation and Red Cross Charity Society i managed to make my way to this country Ghana where i am living now in the refugee camp as a refugee, my husband deposited the sum $40.5Million in a Security Company here in Ghana which i want invest abroad.
Should you be interested to help me receive the money and invest it for me
Kindly get back to me, your earliest response to this mail will be highly appreciated.
I await hearing from you soonest
sincerely yours

grinningplanet.com

Mrs. Alice Aka,

If you know those who are prone to being fooled by scams such as these, you may want to refer them to some of these links:

AARP .org/scams  "Have you ever been given a "great offer" or a "hot tip" on an investment? Such investments, while tempting, can be risky. Following these five tips can help you keep your money safe from scammers and aggressive sales people."

 Consumer Fraud Reporting  "If you have observed a scam or been the victim of a scam, spam or fraud and want to report it for enforcement, here is a list of where to report different types of scams in the US, UK, Canada and many other countries. In some cases there is more than one agency to contact.  Some scams fit into more than one category, also."

Latest Email Hoaxes - Current Internet Scams - Hoax-Slayer  You may want to bookmark this one because it covers a wide range of hoaxes. Here is the site for the FBI. (Or you could just email Eric Holder directly and he will jump right on it.)
"If you receive unsolicited e-mail offers or spam, you can forward the messages to the Federal Trade Commission at spam@uce.gov. (Which is where I sent this email)
"Below are some recent scams and warnings."  More....

Here are other links you may find helpful:
http://www.scambusters.org/email-scams.html
http://www.us-cert.gov/reading_room/emailscams_0905.pdf
http://www.emailscammers.com/
http://www.thereporteronline.net/atf.php?sid=27127  Fake Facebook scams discussed.
http://forum.cartoon-world.org/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=25703
Here is a source for your own research: Google search

I'm sure most of you would not be fooled by this, but do you have people you look after who are vulnerable and easily deceived by this sort of scheme? Hope this helps; it's a jungle out there.
The Tunnel Dweller

Huntsman’s Disqualifying Distortion About Vietnam; The candidate's remark at the last GOP debate refutes his reputation as a foreign policy maven.

PJ Media  "Perhaps as stunning as the Huntsman remark was the way CNN’s Wolf Blitzer and seven Republican candidates let it stand unchallenged, as if it were unassailable common knowledge. They should all know better, and speak up."
"As H.R. McMaster wrote in his 1997 book Dereliction of Duty, President Lyndon Johnson’s leadership of the war effort was characterized by marginalizing the Joint Chiefs of Staff, lying to Congress about troop levels, and pursuing Defense Secretary Robert McNamara’s tactic of “graduated pressure,” which treated military force as a communication tool rather than a way to achieve victory."....
....

donkeyhotey

"Huntsman’s ignorance, or distortion, of history, should disqualify him from consideration for the Republican nomination. His failure to gain traction after months of campaigning is a tribute to the good sense of the American people. Perhaps the triviality of his continued presence in the field explains why the moderator and the other candidates allowed his remark to pass without a probing question, or a much-deserved rebuke.

"But if Republicans hope to reverse the decades-long leftist narrative about this, and so many other topics, they can no longer allow such moments to pass.
"When we draw such erroneous lessons from history, we don’t merely diminish the service of fallen heroes, we put at greater risk those who wear the uniform today, and those whom they protect."
(Emphasis added)

NO! WE CAN'T!

http://terrellaftermath.com/

Obama 101; Few presidents have dashed so many illusions as Obama.

Victor Davis Hanson   "Israel, Britain, and Eastern Europe are not closer allies now than they were in 2008. Iran is still Iran — and may be even a more dangerous adversary after the failed Obama outreach. Putin’s Russia, despite “reset” (a word we no longer much hear), is still Putin’s Russia. China still despises the U.S., and feels in 2011 that it is in a far better position to act on its contempt than it was in 2009. North Korea never got the “hope and change” message. Europe is collapsing, reminding the world where the United States is headed if it does not change course. Outreach didn’t seem to do much for the Castro brothers, Hugo Chávez, or Daniel Ortega. We are helping Mexico to sue our own states, but that does not seem to persuade its leaders to keep their citizens home. Muslim Pakistan went from a duplicitous ally to a veritable enemy. The more we bragged about Turkey, the more we could feel it holds us in contempt. We hope that the Libyan rebels and the Cairo protesters are headed toward democracy, but we privately admit that they seem to have no more interest in establishing it than we have in promoting it. In other words, Professor Obama reminds future presidents that the world will transcend their rhetoric, their pretensions, and their heritage. Other nations always calibrate their relations with the United States either by their own perceived self-interest, or by centuries-old American values and power, or both."

The Cain Scrutiny

  My plan for Herman Cain to become president is this: He should resign the Republican Party and register as a Democrat, then run as a primary challenger to President Obama.
  His alleged conduct would no longer be an issue but a resume enhancement and eyes of women Democrats would shine with lust as Herman Cain walked into any venue.  Anyone questioning Cain would be called a pervert and all lawyers opposing him would be called "out of control" or "sexual deviants" by celebrity "strategists" such as James Carville (who would refer to the women accusers as "trailer trash").
  Democrats in Congress would never say, "it's not the truth of the charges but the seriousness of them that makes us pursue Mr. Cain". The press (ABC, CBS and any media outlet with the letters "NBC" in their name) would  produce all the boyfriends, lovers and every psychiatric report on these ladies while some men's magazine would do a photo spread on one of them.
  Cain would be forgiven every allegation, being called the "greatest president who ever sought office"and the CBC would dismiss it all as racism; Tavis Smiley and Maxine Waters would be on every TV set.
  His women accusers would be told by Cain to "put some ice on that" and then disappear from the public spotlight while Democrat women's groups would act as if not one thing ever happened. Gloria Allred would vanish until the next Republican scandal. Best of all for Cain every foreign policy misstatement he ever made would be ignored by the press while they turned on Republican candidates instead of him.
  Before publishing the above statement, it was scrutinized for poor logic and ridiculous reasoning. Finding none of that, I hit the "publish" button.
The Tunnel Dweller.

The ‘Cain Scrutiny’ Leads to a ‘Reassessment’  "Anyone watching Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain’s Wednesday morning address in the Cincinnati suburb of West Chester would have come away believing that the last thing on his mind is dropping out of the 2012 race.
"Alas, such is not the case. In both the post-speech press scrum (second video at link) and a two-segment interview with Fox News’s Neil Cavuto Wednesday afternoon, Cain made it very clear that a “reassessment” is indeed in progress, and that it will take at least several days to complete it."

Other, more important reasons to be wary of Cain  "He thought the Taliban was fighting for control of Libya. He didn’t know about the wet foot-dry foot policy on Cuban refugees. He didn’t understand the “right of return” and he said he would release all the terrorists in Gitmo for one captured American. He can’t give a straight, coherent answer on whether he’s pro-life or not. He said America needs a “leader, not a reader,” whatever that means. And though he says as president he would rely on the knowledge of others to make decisions, on his campaign he retains staff who blunder about contradicting themselves and who may have launched his campaign with illegal money."

Some Questions about the Cain Allegations  "Unlike some people, who think all the allegations against Herman Cain can be dismissed by referring to a “liberal media conspiracy,” I prefer to approach the issue more scrupulously. I was once enthusiastic about Cain but now find my support waning for the following reasons, none of which have to do with a “conspiracy” against him:"

  Once You Go Conservative Black, You Better Watch Your Back  "The liberal media is an old story, but it's still a big story when it comes to creating the impression of scandal out of thin air.
"Most people say, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." I say, "Where there's smoke around a conservative, there are journalists furiously rubbing two sticks together." "
So, even if all allegations are proven false, there are still those nagging foreign policy statements that rank down with Ron Paul saying we should be nice to the Iranians so they will be nice to us. Cain's ignorance is regrettable, Paul's is insidious.
Below are the cartoonist's takes; do you see a theme here?

i

More here, here, here, here. And these are from a conservative site; we haven't even touched the liberal ones because this would all be expected there. The only difference would be they would attack all Republicans in each cartoon.