. . . "But there’s another argument against actions and events like Geller’s that needs dismantling. This is the received wisdom that we should avoid criticizing Islamic doctrine or Mohammed because it will alienate moderate Muslims who otherwise would help us against the so-called “extremist” jihadists.
"Geraldo Rivera on Fox News invoked this rationale in his hysterical attack on Geller for “spewing her hatred and making us all look like the intolerant jerks they are saying we are in the Middle East and elsewhere.” In other words, most Muslims dislike the jihadis, who have “hijacked” and “distorted” their faith, and want to support our efforts against them. But they are put off by our “insults” of Mohammed and our “intolerance” of the wonderful “religion of peace,” all of which serve to “recruit” new jihadists. Even Bill O’Reilly and Laura Ingraham skirted this notion, advising against making any image of Mohammed, and thus in effect ratifying the legitimacy of the shari’a law against any representation of Mohammed, good or bad." . . .
. . .
"Recently our historically challenged president whined about the Crusades
and the Inquisition, with nary a word about the centuries of Muslim
invasion, occupation, colonization, and brutal suppression in Christian
Spain, Sicily, the Balkans, and Greece."
. . . " Are “moderate” Muslims “alienated” by [Russia's and China's] behavior and rushing to join the jihad against them?
The obvious answer is no, for the simple reason that Russia and China
are contemptuous of such juvenile psychological blackmail, pursue their
national interests without regard for criticism by the “Muslim
community,” and respond with brutal force to violent attacks.
