Monday, November 11, 2019

Tulsi vs Clinton

GABBARD V. CLINTON, CONTINUED  "Earlier today, a lawyer representing Tulsi Gabbard wrote to Hillary Clinton accusing her of defaming Gabbard by calling her a Russian asset and demanding a retraction:
A letter from the Gabbard campaign’s legal counsel insisted that Gabbard is not a Russian asset, and that Clinton knew the statement was untrue when she said it.
"It is almost impossible for a public official like Tulsi Gabbard to win a defamation case under existing law, but Clinton’s claim was so ridiculous that Tulsi might have a shot." . . .
Confronted with blowback over her deranged accusation, Clinton tried to back off by claiming that she meant Tulsi was a Republican, not a Russian, asset. That wasn’t what she said, of course, and the Gabbard campaign is having none of it: . . .
Emphasis mine in order to show how a "congenital liar" responds to faux pas like this. TD 


1 comment:

bart simpsonson said...

HilLIARy is SOOOOO used to the corrupt ex-mainstream mediafux exalting her every utterance that she has lost any ability she MAY have ever had of presenting a cogent point. And so she never presents a cogent point. Because she does not have to. It's the old "So when did you stop beating your wife question.