Friday, July 8, 2016

What does Obama blame? Guns, not BLM

OBAMA SUGGESTS 'POWERFUL WEAPONS' PROMPTED DALLAS
President Obama speaks from Warsaw, shortly after exiting Air Force One.
"President Obama from Warsaw on Friday weighed in on the fatal shootings of five police officers and wounding of seven more, as well as of two civilians, by saying the attack was inexcusable, unjustified and tragic – but then suggested easy access to weapons was at least partly to blame.
"He first expressed outrage and condolences.
Then comes his usual: “. . . Anybody involved will be held accountable.”

He weighed in on the shooting of Alton Sterling on Friday night before the Dallas shooting.

He did so in his usual style before the blood was dry and before the facts were in.  "Obama spoke in his characteristic style on such occasions. He lectured; he condescended; he assumed facts not in evidence; he rode his racial hobby horse. If anyone thought the moment might call for something in the way of reconciliation, he would have been well advised to look elsewhere." . . . 
"Obama also demonstrated his traditionally poor timing. Within hours of his statement in Warsaw five police officers were murdered and seven others shot by snipers in Dallas. We pray for those who are still struggling for their lives this morning.

"From Warsaw Obama has now given a formulaic statement on the events in Dallas. “We still don’t know all the facts,” Obama noted. I can’t find this statement on the White House site. The Dallas Morning News reports on it here." . . .
No comment as yet from Mr. Obama that the suspects hate white people and want to kill them  "Dallas police chief David Brown told reporters at a press conference that the suspect who engaged authorities in a standoff before being killed by a robot that blew up a bomb built by the sniper "hated white people" and wanted to kill more white officers."
. . . 
"The real fear is that cops across America might become even more trigger-happy.  Well trained policemen won't let this attack alter their approach.  Unfortunately, there are many policemen across America who are not well trained and may take a more aggressive attitude toward blacks.

Drudge links on the Dallas shooting

I hope we have heard the last of complaints over the "militarized" police.

The names of the five officers killed during an ambush Thursday night are starting to be released. Some worked for DART and some worked for the Dallas Police Department. Eleven total were shot.


SICK: ‘BLACK LIVES MATTER’ SUPPORTERS CELEBRATE MURDER OF DALLAS COPS

SICK: 'Black Lives Matter' Supporters Celebrate Murder of Dallas Cops



Getting Downtown Will Be Difficult, Says Dallas Mayor  "Police are still conducting sweeps of the downtown area. Many parts of Dallas are now off-limits. The city put out a traffic map to help drivers better understand which blocks are completely closed to the public, and how cars are being diverted around the downtown scene."
(Image via City of Dallas, Dallas Police Dept.)

Thursday, July 7, 2016

Comey: A theory, by Charles Krauthammer

"Why did he do it? FBI Director James Comey spent 14 minutes laying out an unassailable case for prosecuting Hillary Clinton for the mishandling of classified material. Then at literally the last minute, he recommended against prosecution.
"This is baffling. Under the statute (18 U.S.C. section 793(f)), it’s a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or “through gross negligence.” The evidence, as outlined by Comey, is overwhelming." 
. . . 
"And with no guarantee that the prosecution would succeed, moreover. Imagine that scenario: You knock out of the race the most likely next president — and she ultimately gets acquitted! Imagine how Comey goes down in history under those circumstances.
"I admit I’m giving Comey the benefit of the doubt. But the best way I can reconcile his reputation for integrity with the grating illogic of his Clinton decision is by presuming that he didn’t want to make history.
"I don’t endorse his decision. (Nor did I Roberts’.) But I think I understand it." . . .
Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

For Any ‘Reasonable’ Prosecutor, Damage to National Security Would Outweigh ‘Extremely Careless’ Hillary’s (Largely Irrelevant) Intent

636033344608235771-COMEY.jpg
greenvilleonline
Andy McCarthy   "After masterfully marshaling facts that showed Hillary Clinton was grossly negligent in mishandling the nation’s defense secrets – i.e., after demonstrating that she was patently indictable for a felony violation of federal law – Federal Bureau of Investigation. Director James Comey recommended against prosecution. His rationale is even more difficult to justify on close examination than it appeared at first blush.

"Director Comey contends that “no reasonable prosecutor” would bring a case due to the former Secretary of State’s purportedly benign intent. In point of fact, her intent – besides being very far from benign – is largely irrelevant: the criminal statute at issue, Section 793(f) of the federal penal code, merely requires proof that the defendant was grossly negligent – or, as Comey put it, “extremely careless.”
. . .
"Bottom line: Mrs. Clinton’s prosecution would be entirely consistent with Congress’s aim to protect national security by criminalizing grossly negligent mishandling of classified information. And it certainly appears that Mrs. Clinton’s actions were profoundly damaging. To a reasonable prosecutor, that would matter. A lot."

How can Justice be blind? How can America be great?

Hillary No Charges

No Blind Justice
comicallyincorrect
Not So Blind Justice  "The Obama regime has ripped the blindfold from Lady Justice and allowed Hillary to live above the law. Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2016."


How Comey Wrote Trump’s Acceptance Speech  . . . "The final minute of his articulate and compelling account of the methods and results of the Bureau’s investigation, cut the legs out from under his image as the lone remaining role model for high-profile fidelity to duty, honor and country in federal government service.
"The clock struck thirteen, and we gasped as Comey became the bookend to the fall of General David Petraeus.
"It hurt us to watch, on both occasions. But we needed to see it, remember it, and learn from it.
"American can’t be great until its government becomes honest.
"That’s what Trump needs to say – in one way or another." . . .

North Korea Says Obama Placing Sanctions On Kim Jong Un Tantamount To Declaring War…

Weasel Zippers

obama-kim-jong-un_3149395b

"There can only be one Dear Leader.
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — North Korea says U.S. sanctions on leader Kim Jong Un and other top officials for human rights abuses are tantamount to declaring war.
The country's Foreign Ministry issued a statement Thursday carried by the official Korean Central News Agency saying the announcement of sanctions on Kim and 10 other officials was "peppered with lies and fabrications."
North Korea has already been sanctioned heavily because of its nuclear weapons program. However, Wednesday's sanctions mark the first time Kim has been personally targeted, and the first time that any North Korean official has been blacklisted by the U.S. Treasury in connection with reports of rights abuses.
Has Obama finally grown a pair? Or is he hoping to pass this mess on to the next president? I consider this president's character to be that sort.

Rep Trey Gowdy rips into FBI Director James Comey on Hillary Clinton's 'intent'

CNBC  


"A House panel grilled FBI Director James Comey two days after he recommended against prosecuting former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for an email server scandal. In the hearing, South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy questioned Comey on the definition of intent and how Clinton could possibly evade punishment.
"The exchange grew heated at times, with comments like this one from Gowdy: "You and I both know intent is really difficult to prove. Very rarely do defendants announce 'On this date I intend to break this criminal code section. Just to put everyone on notice, I am going to break the law on this date.'"
"Here's a full transcript of the exchange:

Speaker Ryan Formally Requests That Hillary Clinton Be Denied Classified Briefings During Campaign

PJ Media   "Speaker of the House Paul Ryan has sent a letter to Director of National Intelligence  James Clapper requesting Hillary Clinton be denied classified information and briefings she would receive as the Democratic nominee for president, ABC News is reporting.

" 'There is no legal requirement for your to provide Secretary Clinton with classified information, and it would send the wrong signal to all those charged with safeguarding our nation's secrets if you choose to provide her access to this information despite the FBI's findings," Ryan wrote in a letter to Clapper obtained by ABC News. "I firmly believe this is necessary to reassure the public that our nation's secrets are secure.' "


While I respect the professionals at the FBI, this announcement defies explanation. No one should be above the law.


Green Party hopeful Jill Stein: Hillary Clinton should be prosecuted

Watch Hillary become the radical green candidate.

From Sept 2015:


CNN  "Likely Green Party nominee Jill Stein on Wednesday ridiculed Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server while secretary of state, saying in a written statement that "all the elements necessary to prove a felony violation were found by the FBI investigation."

"The investigation concluded Tuesday with anannouncement from Director James Comey, who described Clinton's handling of classified information while the nation's top diplomat as "extremely careless" but recommended no charges against her.
    " 'His statement undermined the defenses Clinton put forward, stating the FBI found 110 emails on Clinton's server that were classified at the time they were sent or received; eight contained information classified at the highest level, 'top secret,' at the time they were sent," Stein's statement noted. "That stands in direct contradiction to Clinton's repeated insistence she never sent or received any classified emails."

    More commentary on the Clinton, um, pardon. Includes article by Judge Andrew Napolitano. UPDATED

    Are there any Clinton supporters who feel shame over Hillary? Any?
    Certainly not Rep. Elijah Cummings.

    Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

    FBI Resignations: Where Are They?  . . . "A common training item in the military is the subject of ethics.  I would venture the FBI trains on this topic too.  For 14 years I was trained, or I trained others, to know the difference between a legal order and an illegal order.  And part of any good ethics review is integrity.  Knowing the difference between right and wrong and the importance of having strong moral principles.  These are universal values at the FBI.
    "Integrity also comes into play when you see a wrong.
    "After basic training -- still a Private (E-1) -- I stood outside my platoon sergeant’s office at parade-rest waiting to meet him and join the platoon.  I waited there a half-hour while he finished his coffee.  A yellowed mimeographed copy of a copy was taped to the lime-green hallway wall.  It was the only thing I could read from where I stood, so I read it over and over again.  I remember every word after 30+ years.  It said:
    If you see something wrong and don’t do anything, you’ve just set a new standard.
    . . . "As many as 150 FBI agents face the same large, yet simple, decision.  (I think they should have already made the decision over a year ago.)  Did any of them see anything wrong Tuesday when Director Comey ignored his oath and put his career before the FBI?  Because if they did, and because no resignations have been reported, each agent on this case who went back to work today has set a new standard." . . .

    Political Cartoons by Ken Catalino
    Comey has created a new defense for national security defendants
    "It’s already being called “the Hillary Defense.”  Tim Johnson and Marisa Taylor of McClatchy report:
    The FBI recommendation not to prosecute Hillary Clinton and her staff on charges of mishandling classified information will give those accused of flouting national security rules a new line of defense even as it highlights a dual standard in how senior government officials are treated, several experts said Wednesday. (snip)
    “I intend to use the Hillary defense,” said Sean M. Bigley, a lawyer whose firm handles dozens of cases a year involving national security clearances. “I really question how any agency can say someone is a security risk if the president of the United States did something similar.”
    He added, “We’ve had people lose 20-year careers for doing less than what she did.” . . .
    Andrew P. Napolitano:  The Department of Political Justice


    Illustration on Hillary Clinton's immunity to the rule of law by Alexander Hunter/The Washington Times

    . . . "Thus, in the past two years, the Department of Justice has prosecuted a young sailor for sending a single selfie to his girlfriend that inadvertently showed a submarine sonar screen in its background. It also prosecuted a Marine lieutenant who sent his military superiors a single email about the presence of al Qaeda operatives dressed as local police in a U.S. encampment in Afghanistan — but who inadvertently used his Gmail account rather than his secure government account.

    "And it famously prosecuted Gen. David Petraeus for sharing paper copies of his daily calendar in his guarded home with a military colleague also in the home — someone who had a secret security clearance herself — because the calendar inadvertently included secret matters in the pages underneath the calendar.
    Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez
    "Yet earlier this week, FBI Director James Comey — knowing that his bosses in the Department of Justice would accept his legal conclusions about Mrs. Clinton’s failure to keep state secrets secure because they had removed themselves from independently judging the FBI’s work — told the public that whereas the inadvertence of the above defendants was sufficient to justify their prosecutions, somehow Mrs. Clinton’s repeated recklessness was not.
    "It is obvious that a different standard is being applied to Mrs. Clinton than was applied to Gen. Petraeus and the others." . . .

    Political Cartoons by Bob Gorrell

    Cartoons added by TD.


    Have you heard of this man's Bidenesque gaffes?  
    6 of Don Lemon’s Worst TV Gaffes

    Number six gets the award: 
    "6. And of course, that time he told a rape victim she could've easily shut down the alleged rape by biting Bill Cosby's penis."

    The Most Conservative And Most Liberal Cities In America

    Forbes   Read the list and see if there are any surprises among the most liberal.

    Feature-Image-The-Most-Conservative-And-Most-Liberal-Cities-In-America

    "New York City may be less liberal than you thought.
    "At least according to The Economist, which pulled data from an MIT study on how city governments reflect their constituents’ politics to produce a ranking of cities with populations of over 250,000. AsThe Economist asked (quite British-ly), “Would people expect Washington, DC, to come second, ahead of Seattle (where it is legal to smoke pot) or the Democratic stronghold of Boston?”
    "As several articles have pointed out, though, the real takeaway was first called out by the PEW Research Center and then elaborated on by Vox: the most conservative cities are skewed toward being more liberal than one might expect. The how-much-wood-could-a-woodchuck-chuck way to say this is: the most conservative cities are not as conservative as the most liberal cities are liberal. Click through our gallery to see the ten most liberal and ten most conservative cities in America."

    Coulter: "MY VP PREDICTION: TRUMP'S FIRST MISTAKE"

    Political Cartoons by Bob Gorrell

    Ann Coulter  "My vice presidential prediction is: Trump is about to make his first mistake. I knew this would happen as soon as he hired campaign consultants, rather than relying on his gut. If these campaign consultants were any good, their first piece of advice to Trump would be, "Fire us immediately!" 

    "Trump's advisers are undoubtedly telling him he's got the "outsider" image covered. He needs someone with experience in Washington -- as if presidents don't have staffs -- an elected Republican official with solid standing in the GOP, preferably a sitting senator or governor, who will give the ticket gravitas and heft. 

    "This is completely wrong. Trump isn't a standard-issue GOP, trying to balance the ticket to get his party into power. He's starting a new party! He's just blown up the old GOP. Instead of a party for, by and of globalist plutocrats, the new Trumpian party is a party of Americans for America. 

    "How is Trump going to find a decent running mate from among the Republicans who have gotten ahead under the old model of sucking up to donors and lobbyists?" . . .