How Feminists React To Muslim Vs Conservative Beliefs On Women

Tiffiny Ruegner   "What a grand idea!!!! NOT! The Huffington Post decided to “celebrate” Muslim Women’s Day with a hashtag #MuslimWomensDay. It didn’t go quite how they expected.

"The funny part is that the recent ‘Day Without Women’ was organized by a Palestinian terrorist who has now been forced to leave the country for lying on her VISA application. She was responsible for the deaths of two Israeli students. Even the Washington Examiner reported that the 69 year-old Palestinian activist was convicted in the 1969 supermarket bombing in Israel that killed two Hebrew University students. Another woman who helped organize the Women’s March, Linda Sarsour, was accused of Islamic Terrorist links.

Ironically, the left aligns themselves with Muslims who oppress women, gays and anyone who disagrees with their religion. Now Huffpo is dealing with having to learn the reality of the Muslim religion that is definitely NOT supportive of feminism or any women’s rights. Ironically, the right has been the leader of women’s rights for over a hundred years. The suffrage movement was a Republican led movement… but of course the left doesn’t want you to know about that. Check out the hilarity on twitter:" . . .

Tweet: "More women fly military jets in Israel than can drive a car in Saudi Arabia. That's what #muslimwomensday means to me pic.twitter.com/9ftbqoySbR"


Hat tip to Chicks On The Right

Democrats Ask Teachers To Destroy Books Written By ‘Climate Deniers’

Daily Caller

"Three senior House Democrats asked U.S. teachers Monday to destroy a book written by climate scientists challenging the environmentalist view of global warming.

"The Democrats were responding to a campaign by the conservative Heartland Institute copies of the 2015 book, “Why Climate Scientists Disagree About Global Warming” to about 200,000 science teachers. Democratic Reps. Bobby Scott of the Committee on Education, Raúl M. Grijalva of the Committee on Natural Resources, and Eddie Bernice Johnson of the Committee on Science, Space and Technology all issued a statement telling teachers to trash the book.

“'Public school classrooms are no place for anti-science propaganda, and I encourage every teacher to toss these materials in the recycling bin,” Scott said. “If the Heartland Institute and other climate deniers want to push a false agenda on global warming, our nation’s schools are an inappropriate place to drive that agenda.”

"The book’s three authors all hold doctorates and taught climate or related science at the university level. The book was written by former Arizona State University climatologist Dr. Craig D. Idso, James Cook University marine geology and paleontology professor Robert M. Carter, and University of Virginia environmental scientist Dr. Fred Singer." . . .  Read more.

Ten companies pull ads from O’Reilly show

xfoor

"Ten companies are pulling advertisements from Bill O’Reilly‘s primetime cable program on Fox News following a Saturday report that the host paid $13 million to five women who accused him over the years of sexual harassment. 

"Hyundai, BMW of North America, Untuckit, Constant Contact, Ainsworth Pet Nutrition, GSK pharmaceuticals, Allstate and Sanofi consumer healthcare have said they are pulling their commercials from “The O’Reilly Factor,” NBC News and The New York Times reported Tuesday.

"Global asset management firm T. Rowe Price also joined the list, while Mercedes-Benz announced on Monday that it was pulling its ads from the 8 p.m. ET program.

"O’Reilly, who has been the top-rated host in cable news for 15 consecutive years, was the subject of a front-page New York Times article this weekend that detailed sexual harassment claims by five women that resulted in $13 million in payouts from the network and O’Reilly.

"Hyundai said it made the decision to no longer advertise on the show due to “recent and disturbing allegations,” according to the New York Times.

"BMW North America based its decision “in light of the recent New York Times investigation.' ” . . .

Strategic Debate in Gorsuch Battle: Use Filibuster Now or Later?

NY Times

"The first possibility is that the showdown over abolishing the filibuster rule takes place now. If so, its framing will be Democrats’ general anger at Mr. Trump as well as their specific outrage over what they consider the theft of a Supreme Court seat by Republicans’ refusal to give a hearing last year to President Barack Obama’s nominee, Judge Merrick B. Garland, to fill the vacancy created by Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in February 2016. 

"The substantive stakes now are relatively low: Judge Gorsuch appears to be very conservative, but so was Justice Scalia. Confirming Judge Gorsuch would merely preserve the ideological status quo on the closely divided Supreme Court. Should the confirmation move ahead, all 52 Republican senators will probably stick together, bolstered by a few Democrats from conservative-leaning states. Those are enough votes to easily clear the way for confirming Judge Gorsuch — and all future nominees — by a simple majority.

"But the dynamics could play out differently in a second situation: Judge Gorsuch is confirmed, but the filibuster rule survives. If Mr. Trump then gets to nominate a successor to a moderate or liberal justice, the substantive stakes would be much higher." . . .

UPDATED: Prepare to Be Shocked: Mike Pence Is Christian Husband with Morals

What a disgusting display!

By Caleb Parke at Todd Starnes  "Behold, America, our vice president is a Christian husband with morals and values.

"The Washington Post did an in-depth look into Mike Pence's marriage with his wife, Karen Pence, his "prayer warrior," and "gut check and shield."

"What could've read as a puff piece about the Second Lady, ended up being a stealthy hit piece.

"The WaPo author, @AshleyRParker, tweeted out the article with this synopsis: "Mike Pence never dines alone w a woman not his wife, nor does he attends events w alcohol, w/o her by his side."

"So the crux of the article about Karen Pence was actually about Mike Pence? Yeah.

"After some pretty vile attacks from other "verified" journalists on Twitter (which I will spare you from), @AshleyRParker, tweets this: "In 1991, Karen Pence wrote a letter to the editor, outlining her views against homosexuality."

"Then she shares this conclusion about her article: "The whole point of the profile is that she is highly influential w her husband (incl on social issues)..."

"So this piece was essentially written to solidify the notion that Pence is anti-gay, backwards, and out of the mainstream.

"Aren't you glad we have journalists like @AshleyRParker to inform us how a good Christian couple serving our nation is actually colluding, or possibly canoodling, in backrooms, hiding their bigoted, backwards views.

"This article should be a newsflash everywhere for journalists all across America to befriend Christians and try to get to know them instead of vindictively attacking them in ink.

"Most Americans would be happy to know that our current vice president honors his marriage to his wife. We've had endless amounts of politicians on both sides of the aisle fail in this category.

"It's easy to criticize and tear down, but this one is especially rich.

"The family unit is the most basic unit and building block of society, from the union of Adam of Eve, until today, marriage has been a bedrock of society.

"Through strong marriages, future generations are given the most optimal upbringing. That's not a modern-day revelation, we've known this since the beginning of civilization, and societies and religions have tried to alter marriage to no avail.

"Science and Judeo-Christian values back this up, and this doesn't make it homophobic. It's just the way it is.

"When honoring marriage becomes a bad thing, we all lose.

"But maybe the author was just trying to reaffirm the time-tested truth: "behind every great man is a great woman.' " . . .

UPDATE:   Don’t You Dare Place Your Marriage Above Your Politics

"Place your wife in a station above all other women at your own peril"

Do Pence’s rules to avoid temptation to commit adultery

trammel women’s rights? | Opinion http://bit.ly/2n7S5oB 

. . . "The Atlantic dug in further and learned Pence routinely turned down cocktail invites from men just as frequently, but that doesn’t make sexy outrage bait.

The Hill article gives more context on how the Pences were thinking about this, at least back in 2002. Pence told the paper he often refused dinner or cocktail invitations from male colleagues, too: “It’s about building a zone around your marriage,” he said. “I don’t think it’s a predatory town, but I think you can inadvertently send the wrong message by being in [certain] situations.”

The 2002 article notes that Pence arrived in Congress a half decade after the 1994 “Republican revolution,” when Newt Gingrich was the speaker of the House. Several congressional marriages, including Gingrich’s, encountered difficulty that year. Pence seemed wary of this. “I’ve lost more elections than I’ve won,” he said. “I’ve seen friends lose their families. I’d rather lose an election.” He even said he gets fingers wagged in his face by concerned Indianans. “Little old ladies come and say, ‘Honey, whatever you need to do, keep your family together,’” he told The Hill.

Get Back in the Kitchen and Bake Me Another Petition!

“I’ve never seen a bunch of poor, oppressed feminists board a leaky boat in Miami in order to paddle their way to freedom in Castro Cuba. But I do have a few friends in South Florida who escaped from communism. They still have their boats. We’d be proud to give these Marxist feminists a lift to Havana any time.”

Mike Adams

"Dear UNC President Spellings: I am writing today to express my disgust with you over recent remarks you made about me to a “progressive” newspaper reporter. As you will recall, some feminists had started a petition, which was seeking my termination from employment in the UNC system. In order to bolster their case, they included a number of remarks I had made on social media, which they deemed to be “sexist.” When the reporter asked you about the petition, you characterized my views as both “abhorrent” and as “hate speech.” I am writing today to provide a rebuttal to your comments, which I view as both abhorrent and hateful. Please allow me to back up my claims with evidence. 

"Put simply, Margaret, it was both hateful and abhorrent for you to characterize my views in such a negative manner based on just a few out­of­context quotes. Had you exercised more self­control than the unhinged feminists calling for my termination, you could have made a better judgment about the nature of my speech based on a larger sample. Today, I write to provide a few other samples of my speech upon which you could have made a more informed assessment. Although inspired by many, these quotes are all my own: " . . .

The left: defending freedom of speech for decades

Image by Miguel Guanipa

Susan Rice is in the spotlight today

Today in American Thinker alone is a wealth of commentary on the Susan Rice involvement.

Claim: Susan Rice directed spy agencies to create ‘detailed spread sheets’ involving Trump  "Joseph diGenova is a former US Attorney and a man of impeccable honor. I don’t believe he would put out a false story, ala Susan Rice. The intrepid Richard Pollock of The Daily Caller reports:" . . .

Benghazi Liar Susan Rice's Treachery Continues "Call it the tale of two National Security Advisers, Michael Flynn and Susan Rice. As much as Flynn has taken fire as being an architect of unspecified "collusion" with the Russians, Susan Rice has been like the iceberg that sank the Titanic -- barely visible above water but dangerous enough to threaten the Trump administration’s ship of state.

"As reported by Circa News, Rice, while serving as Obama’s National Security Adviser, requested the unmasking of the names of Team Trump officials mentioned in the so-called “incidental” surveillance  of the Trump transition team:" . . .

Will Susan Rice be a ‘stand-up guy’ or the ‘fall guy’? . . . "Sooner or later, the Obama fan is going to get hit. The reality that an incumbent president used the national security surveillance apparatus to spy on his political enemies is so stinky that it cannot be brushed aside even with the mainstream media’s full court press pushing other narratives.

"At some moment the Obamas, Valerie Jarrett, Susan Rice, and a few others will be gathered in the library (that’s my guess) of Obama mansion in DC, and they will play out their own version of the immortal scene created by Dashiell Hammett of a gang (all of whom have dirty hands)  finding their fall guy."  Thomas Lifson

Major media spiked scoops on Susan Rice’s role in unmasking Trump’s team

. . . "Sitting on a scoop like this only seems explainable by a desire to protect Obama & Co. They are propagandists that manage the flow of news for political objectives. The reporters may not be the ones who made the decisions here.

"And the rest of the MSM is ignoring the story.  As if that will make it go away.

"There is a bonfire underway, as the remaining shreds of MSM credibility ignite. 

"Update: Clarice Feldman writes from Washington, DC:

WaPo finally covers Rice story--page A 12 hidden in a story about yesterday's Spicer presser. Big front page stories are about a trip made after the election by a Blackstone guy to the ME and a sob story about a non-citizen Mexican with 10 kids who got a big sentence from a Texas jury for voting illegally."

Here’s Michelle’s RACE OBSESSED Thesis From Princeton . . .

 . . .  "Written In An ‘UNKNOWN LANGUAGE’"

She and her husband infected the nation with their anger to the detriment of racial harmony for the foreseeable future. Wasn't knowledge of Obama's pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright sufficient to warn America what was coming? The Tunnel Dweller.

Clash Daily  "Brace yourselves. This one’s a going to be bit rough.

"Michelle Obama wrote her Bachelor of Arts thesis on ‘Blackness’ at Princeton.

"No, we’re not making that up.

"The actual title is, ‘Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community’."

Michelle Obama's racial obsession is traceable to her semi-illiterate thesis on being black at Princeton, which Christopher Hitchens once noted "wasn't written in any known language."
What a devastating indictment Michelle's thesis is—of her, and of Princeton:bit.ly/ObamaThesis.

. . . " And here we see why things were so race-based under her husband’s Presidency:". .  

 

The Unmasking of Innocents: Top Obama Adviser Sought Names of Trump Associates in Intel

Bloomberg

"White House lawyers last month learned that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

"The pattern of Rice's requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government's policy on "unmasking" the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally. Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like "U.S. Person One.' " . . .

Unmasking Susan Rice and her NSC dead-enders

. . . "It's time to start investigating this arrogant abuse of power.  Comey has not stated whether he is investigating these people or not, and this is proper.  But with these dead-enders clearly threatening the Trump presidency, it's time to see a hard hand come out against these deep-staters who don't know when to leave office and who subscribe to the leftist situational ethics of "by any means necessary."  They are poison for our republic, and if they are not removed, they will destroy the Trump presidency."

Trump praises 'bombshell' report on 'unmasking and the crooked scheme against us' as fingers point to 'very senior' Obama administration official   . . . " 'Adam Housley did an incredible job with this information,' "Fox and Friends" co-host Brian Kilmeade said Monday

" 'We heard germs of it, that it was beginning to take root during Friday's show. But right after Friday’s show, we were able to get a perspective on basically what President Trump thought a month ago when he went out and tweeted on Saturday morning. Man, I guess on some level he saw some things that only somebody surveilling his administration would know.'

"Co-host Steve Doocy added that 'what Trump was saying is turning out to be true.'

"On Sunday, the president tweeted that the 'real story turns out to be SURVEILLANCE and LEAKING!'

" 'Find the leakers,' he added." . . .   Read more.

Not So Cool Hand Chuck

Power Line Blog  "Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell appeared on both FOX News Sunday and Meet the Press yesterday, mostly to address the prospective confirmation of Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. Senator McConnell spoke “with the calm confidence of a Christian holding four aces” (to borrow Walter Blair’s misquotation of Mark Twain). He vowed that Judge Gorsuch would be confirmed and that Democrats would dictate the manner of his confirmation.

"McConnell noted that no Supreme Court nominee had ever been the subject of a partisan filibuster. He harked back to the confirmation of Clarence Thomas with 52 votes in 1991. He observed that Chuck Schumer and the Democrats had pioneered the use of the filibuster to block judicial nominees during the first term of the second President Bush. He laughed at Chuck Todd as Todd badgered him about Merrick Garland. I thought Senator McConnell was fantastic (video below).

The left-wing Politics USA claimed McConnell "fell apart and could only nervously laugh " when asked about this by Chuck Todd. Here's the interview; tell me if that was fake news or not.

In this video, Obama debates with himself on late-term justice nominees such as Merrick Garland. He has a tell when he is irritated by a question, his reply begins with "Look. . . "

"In a development that’s likely to cause fits for President Barack Obama, the Senate Democrats’ next leader, Sen. Charles Schumer told an 2007 audience — on video — that he wanted to block any Supreme Court nominations for the last 18 months of President George W. Bush’s presidency. That’s seven months longer than the amount of time remaining to Obama’s presidency."

Would the LA Times claim Obama tried to steal steal Alito's seat when they nominated Kagan and Sotomayor for Justice after filibustering the choice of President Bush?

As a senator from Illinois, Obama and 23 other senators attempted to stage a filibuster to block a confirmation vote on Alito, one of former President George W. Bush’s picks to serve on the bench. The filibuster bid failed and Alito was confirmed.Conservatives have seized on Obama’s filibuster vote to accuse him of hypocrisy for criticizing Republicans for saying the next president, and not Obama, should nominate Scalia’s successor. 

With bad polls for Trump, bring back Kellyanne Conway

"It's time for Trump to be the Big Dog once again. The people demand nothing less."

Monica Showalter  . . . "This is such sad news, given the meritlessness of the Russia "narrative" and the obstinacy and willingness to keep the status quo over compromise of the House Freedom Caucus.  What's more, Andrew Malcolm reports that the recriminations that have emerged in the wake of these snake-pit hissings is threatening the entire GOP agenda.

"The good news is that Trump can recover.  How do we know this?  Because he has, and he knows how.  Back during the 2016 presidential campaign, when all sorts of negative stories came out, Trump fought them off with vigor and energy by taking his case to the people.  That helped quite a bit.  But even more helpful, he re-steered the narrative back to substance and the issues.  That was the doing of campaign manager Kellyanne Conway.

"She knew what would bring Trump back in the polls, and her victory on election night was the final vindication.  She's since been buried in the Trump White House somewhere and now needs to be brought out front and center, just as she had been before.  She knows how to steer the political white noise back to issues and to the substantial, which is what people care about, and leave the nesting vipers of the D.C. Swamp to eat each other.  For that, she should be given wide berth to get this job done. " . . .