Amil Imani
. . ." Zelensky’s silent exit, his delegation trailing behind, said it all: when you challenge Trump on his turf, you leave empty-handed. This wasn’t just a meeting—it was a reminder of why America chose him again, a leader who bends the world to his will, not the other way around."
"On February 28, 2025, the Oval Office echoed with the undeniable strength of President Donald Trump’s leadership as he participated in a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and demonstrated American resolve at its finest.
"What began as a discussion about a potential minerals deal and U.S. support for Ukraine’s conflict with Russia transformed into a defining moment of Trump’s presidency—a bold, unapologetic stand against perceived ingratitude and diplomatic overreach. Rather than being a misstep, this encounter became a masterclass in prioritizing America first, underscoring Trump’s unwavering commitment to his nation’s interests and his refusal to be dictated to by a foreign leader, even one steeped in wartime sympathy.
"The scene unfolded with Trump at the helm, his commanding presence evident as he sat beside Vice President J.D. Vance, a loyal partner in this high-stakes exchange. Zelensky, invited to discuss terms to offset billions in U.S. aid through Ukrainian mineral resources, arrived with a demeanor that quickly grated on his host.
"Trump, embodying the clarity of a seasoned negotiator, pointed out what he viewed as Zelensky’s failure to acknowledge America’s generosity—hundreds of millions in weapons, cash, and goodwill had flowed into Ukraine’s defense. “You’re not in a position to dictate,” Trump declared, his voice cutting through the room with the authority of a man who had weathered political storms and emerged stronger. Vance emphasized this point, questioning whether Zelensky had ever managed a simple “thank you,” a fair critique considering the scale of U.S. sacrifice.
"Zelensky, for his part, attempted to push back by waving photos of war-torn Ukraine and invoking Russia’s broken promises—a tired strategy that did little to sway Trump. His tone, laced with defiance, only intensified the President’s frustration. Here was a leader, Trump argued, gambling with “World War III” by rejecting reasonable peace terms with Russia, all while expecting American taxpayers to foot the bill indefinitely." . . .
Trump’s approach here was vintage: bold, brash, and rooted in a dealmaker’s instinct. He’s never hidden his disdain for leaders who take America’s support for granted, and this showdown was no exception. His offhand remark about Putin—”he’s gone through a hell of a lot with me”—wasn’t a concession but a flex, a nod to his ability to stare down any adversary, from Moscow to Kyiv. Battered by war and desperate for aid, Zelensky gambled on guilt-tripping Trump and lost. The photos and lectures landed like a feather against a freight train.
Monica Showalter Out in the 'hood, they're pretty impressed with how Trump dealt with Zelensky "President Trump cut his teeth in the tough world of New York real estate, dealing with mobsters, unions, and street toughs. He continuously negotiated advantageous deals with them as he built his successful business there because if he couldn't do that, they would have eaten him alive.
"That may explain why we are seeing responses like these from streetwise ghetto-savvy black people, who were pretty impressed with his performance with Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday, throwing him out of the White House when he started challenging and insulting them instead of signing the deal to end Ukraine's war that he had told them he would be coming to sign.
"Here is [one such in a] thread of responses:" . . .
Here's one:pic.twitter.com/7l2Lnk2Wvf