Trump blasts ‘highly conflicted’ Obama-appointed judge James Boasberg for having been given four Trump cases

 

Mike Johnson faces impeachment dilemma over Judge James Boasberg 

"Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is facing a tricky path forward as President Trump and Elon Musk publicly — and persistently — push for the impeachment of the judge who directed flights carrying Venezuelan migrants to be turned around.

"Trump ignited a controversial campaign this week when he said U.S. District Judge James Boasberg — whom he dubbed a “troublemaker and agitator” — should be impeached, which Musk and other Republican lawmakers joined in on. Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) quickly heeded the president’s calls, introducing an article of impeachment against Boasberg that charges him with “abuse of power.”

"The push, to be sure, has virtually no chance of success, with a number of House moderates casting doubt on the idea, and a supermajority — 67 votes — needed to approve the effort in the Senate. At least 14 Democrats would have to join all Republicans in supporting conviction." . . .

Trump blasts ‘highly conflicted’ Obama-appointed judge James Boasberg after selecting another case involving his admin  "President Donald Trump blasted the “highly conflicted” district court judge he says is taking all the cases against the White House for himself while calling for an investigation into the “rigged system.”

"Trump argued that Obama-appointed DC District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg — who blocked Venezuelan deportation flights — isn’t following regulations set by the judicial branch as several senior Trump officials were sued for the Signal message leaks.

“How disgraceful is it that ‘Judge’ James Boasberg has just been given a fourth ‘Trump Case,’ something which is, statistically, IMPOSSIBLE,” the 47th president wrote on Truth Social." . . .

Cory Booker’s ‘pretty stunning biological feat’ was a pathetic charade

Andrea Widburg   

The Democrat party is, ultimately, a brutal party. Its goal is to force election outcomes, allowing it to attain one-party rule and, through that rule, to break the American constitutional republic and replace it with a heavy-handed leftist “paradise.”

"Democrats are rhapsodizing about the fact that the compellingly manly Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) spoke for 25 hours without a bathroom break. This manufactured drama tells us a lot about the dismal, theatrical, and ultimately empty state of the Democrat party.

"A few years ago, during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings, the fiercely masculine Booker called for the release of classified emails about Kavanaugh, a stance that entailed no risk to himself because his political base supported him and there would be no consequences. Nevertheless, Booker was so impressed with his “courage” that he claimed he was having an “I am Spartacus” moment, a reference to the classic 1960 movie." . . .

. . ."Those who survived, like my mother and my aunt, accomplished a “pretty stunning biological feat.” The virile Booker, who stood in an air-conditioned, indoor room, well-fed but a little bit hungry and thirsty, should not be celebrated for managing not to wet his pants. That he “cramped” a little does not impress me.

"The Democrat party is, ultimately, a brutal party. Its goal is to force election outcomes, allowing it to attain one-party rule and, through that rule, to break the American constitutional republic and replace it with a heavy-handed leftist “paradise.”

"In a TV age, Democrats quickly realized that showmanship was one of the ways to advance the cause. The transgender agenda—destroying children, upending reality, undermining America’s Biblical values—was hidden behind the whimsical sparkle of drag queens. George Floyd’s criminal history and drug death were overshadowed by the drama of Democrat politicians kneeling under the Capitol dome, attired in Kente cloth, the fabric of Africa’s biggest enslavers. These dramas have been successful.

"With this successful theater in mind, the defiantly macho Booker thought he could capitalize on it (despite his Spartacus fail) to elevate himself to a leadership position in the currently leaderless Democrat party. But for those of us who understand true strength, the display was both stupid and insulting." . . .