Figures don't lie: Democrats do

Ann Coulter   "The theory is that a new president is stuck with the budget of his predecessor, so the entire 2009 fiscal year should be attributed to Bush. 
"But Obama didn't come in and live with the budget Bush had approved. He immediately signed off on enormous spending programs that had been specifically rejected by Bush. This included a $410 billion spending bill that Bush had refused to sign before he left office. Obama signed it on March 10, 2009. Bush had been chopping brush in Texas for two months at that point." 
....
"But all those errors pale in comparison to Nutting's counting Obama's nine-month spending binge as Bush's spending. 
"If liberals will attribute Obama's trillion-dollar stimulus bill to Bush, what won't they do?"