Saturday, September 12, 2015

American intelligence pros begin a revolt against this administration

Somewhat like NY cops did when they turned their backs on Mayor DeBlasio?

Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked

50 Spies Say ISIS Intel Is Cooked

It’s being called a ‘revolt’ by intelligence pros who are paid to give their honest assessment of the ISIS war—but are instead seeing their reports turned into happy talk.

"More than 50 intelligence analysts working out of the U.S. military’s Central Command have formally complained that their reports on
ISIS and al Qaeda’s branch in Syria were being inappropriately altered by senior officials, The Daily Beast has learned.

"The complaints spurred the Pentagon’s inspector general to open an investigation into the alleged manipulation of intelligence. The fact that so many people complained suggests there are deep-rooted, systemic problems in how the U.S. military
command charged with the war against the self-proclaimed Islamic State assesses intelligence.

“ 'The cancer was within the senior level of the intelligence command,” one defense official said.
Two senior analysts at CENTCOM signed a written complaint sent to the Defense Department inspector general in July alleging that the reports, some of which were briefed to President Obama, portrayed the terror groups as weaker than the analysts believe they are. The reports were changed by CENTCOM higher-ups to adhere to the administration’s public line that the U.S. is winning the battle against ISIS and al Nusra, al Qaeda’s branch in Syria, the analysts claim." . . .

Blackfive reports:  Shaded Intelligence? Shocked, Shocked I Am   "It is damning that fifty (or more) analysts are going on record.  A small group might have political reasons of their own to cause a problem (and that has happened before).  For such a large group to be willing to go public raises serious questions of competence and intent on those higher in the chain.  At this point, whether any "shading" that may or may not have been done was done to make things more palatable for the President, or more, needs a full and thorough investigation."

No comments: