We live in a world of trade-offs.” Indeed we do. So answer me this. There’s a science lab that’s burning down, and inside is a 10-year-old child, and next to him is a container full of 100 fertilized human embryos. You can save either the embryos or the child, but not both. What value do you put on life? Is it quantity alone? Or is it something else?"This is a common pro-choice hypothetical, which Bob has taken from Ellen Goodman without attribution. As a thought experiment, it tends to intimidate pro-lifers. However, it should not be intimidating at all because it rests on the faulty assumption that our value as humans is contingent upon the intuitive emotional reactions and moral judgments of other humans. Here is the argument in a nutshell: " . . .
Alyssa Milano Boasts About Her Past Abortions and the Joy They Brought Her
Pictured at right: I envision this being the last thing Milano's babies saw as they died. TD
These Hollywood people are endorsing Milano's stance.
"The letter signers vow to “do everything in our power to move our industry to a safer state for women if H.B. 481 becomes law.' ”
As a result, so many babies will endure the William Wallace death depicted in Braveheart.
No comments:
Post a Comment