Raymond Ibrahim "Collectively punishing dhimmis — non-Muslims who refused to convert after their lands were seized by Muslims, and who are treated as "second-class" infidels — for the crimes of the individual is standard under Islam. In this instance, dhimmis are forbidden from striking — let alone killing — Muslims, even if the latter perpetrate the conflict. Prior to the fight that killed him, the Muslim in question had, through the help of radical Salafis, burned down the Christian's home and was threatening him over a property dispute. Still, non-Muslims are forbidden to raise their hands to Muslims, even in self defense." |
| Atlas Shrugs |
....
"Bold as that seems, "wherever they can reach them" simply means that it is the Islamic world's accessible, vulnerable non-Muslims — Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus — not their Western counterparts, who will continue to be targeted, even as the West looks the other way."Video: Muslim Police and Hundreds of Students Burn Down Church Screaming 'Allahu Akbar' and 'Jihad!'"More than 30 police officers were deployed to destroy the church, but in the face of protests from local Christians, they held back from demolishing the rest of the building. In the end, Christians were left weeping."
As usual, problems installing Flash prevent my imbedding the video here.
3 comments:
That picture is first of all, insulting..and inaccurate.
Bill Clinton was bombing the Middle East and using our puppets over there to do what we will.
During which, the CIA knew that these very same actions was going to become blowback that later was known as 9/11.
The CIA created the term called blowback.
Blowback: unintended consequences caused by foreign intervention.
So exactly which statements in the blog post are you refuting?
Post a Comment