Jack Hellner . . . "For the last 25 years, Presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama have been toyed with by North Korea while the North Koreans continually built up their nuclear weapons, and the media go to the very people who let this happen for analysis on Trump."
. . .
"When has appeasement ever worked?
"Obama, Hillary, and Kerry, surrounded by experts (lifers), came up with the "smart" foreign policy of leading from behind, and we got policies that:
Had us pulling all of our troops out of Iraq, which allowed ISIS and Iran to build up their power in the region.
- Had us pull out of our commitment to put missile defense in Poland and the Czech Republic which certainly pleased Putin.
- Had a gun-running operation to Mexico where we lost track of the guns.
- Had us watching North Korea as it expanded its weaponry – but we kept telling them to stop. (It is a good thing we didn't use rough language on Rocket Man, because then he would have really gotten dangerous.)
- Had us watch as Putin invaded Crimea and Ukraine, and our smart policy-makers told him to stop, but we wouldn't even give Ukraine defensive weapons, even though we are obligated to defend that nation.
- Had our president promise Putin we would be more flexible if he was re-elected.
- Had us leave our diplomats vulnerable to attack in Libya, and then pretended a video was responsible in order to protect the political power of Obama.
- Had us allowing NATO countries to pay less than their treaty obligations.
- Had us kowtowing to the U.N.
- Had us negotiate secretly with Iran, the biggest sponsor of terrorism in the world; give them hundreds of billions of dollars; and even pay them ransom. They lied throughout the process and then signed a deal with the devil to pretend the world was now safer. Now we have Iran, which continues to sponsor terrorism and continues to threaten death to America with more money, which continues to build more weapons. The Iranians are also helping Assad in Syria. Thank goodness for the "experts" Obama surrounded himself with to get this "smart" policy!
- Had the U.S allowing the terrorist group Hezb'allah to have a drug-running operation to appease the tyrants in Iran.
- Had Obama's wife respond with a "Bring Back Our Girls" hashtag when 276 girls were kidnapped in Nigeria by terrorists.
- Had us saying climate change is more dangerous than terrorism. Some even told us the crisis caused by Syrian and other refugees escaping was because of a potential couple-of-degrees rise in temperature rather than because tyrants were killing and raping them.
- Had the president draw a red line in Syria over chemical weapons use and, when Syria used chemical weapons, essentially did nothing. He and Kerry did pretend Assad got rid of all his chemical weapons.
- Had us sign the Paris Climate Accord, which would have cost trillions and slowed down the U.S. and world economies to pretend that government officials could adjust temperatures downward by one degree forever. Does that sound smart or true?
- Had the State Department spending taxpayer money to interfere in Israel's election. Why didn't the media do an investigation of that if collusion in elections is so dangerous? Where was Adam Schiff?
- Had the president and agencies under his control refusing to enforce immigration laws Congress passed in violation of their oath of office and the Constitution.
- Had a purported 17 out of 17 intelligence agencies blame Russians for the DNC computer hack, without ever examining the computer. Is it smart to claim that you can analyze a computer based on a piece of paper from someone else?
"Not once do I remember the media caring about any of the above disastrous and dangerous policies. But now I am supposed to believe that things are more dangerous because Trump doesn't know what he is doing?" . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment