Monday, February 14, 2022

Now even Democrats call for Hillary Clinton to be investigated


 More Democrats want Hillary Clinton investigated amid bombshell report | Daily Mail Online   "A growing chorus of Democrats believe 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton should be questioned by special advisor John Durham for her alleged role in the Russian secret server scandal in a poll conducted before bombshell revelations that her team spied on Donald Trump's campaign.

"In a poll last month, 66 percent of Democrats wanted Clinton questioned, a whopping 22 percentage points higher than how many in her party demanded a probe last October, according to TechnoMetrica Institute of Policy and Politics (TIPP) research. 

"The amount of Republicans demanding answers is also swelling, rising to 91 percent in January from 80 percent last October.  Among the independent crowd, those wanting the former secretary of state probed rose to 74 percent from 65 percent.". . .

One comment to this post:
The contents of the allegations are not surprising. Clinton destroyed subpoenaed information, discussed classified information using a non-government insecure server in her basement, colluded with Russia to find dirt to undermine a presidential candidate, and then launched a smear campaign accusing Trump of doing what she had done. That's just a partial list of what happened during the campaign cycle. What IS surprising is that something is actually making it to court. I don't think a Clinton will actually have any consequences. They are part of the Democrat elite class.l, but the fact this is actually making it to a judge is amazing. Odds are it'll never actually go to trial. Even if it does, it'll go to a leftist DC judge (yes, I know leftist and DC judge is redundant) and it'll either be dismissed or a sure win for the Clinton campaign. Otherwise, she'll throw somebody under the bus and he'll end up with a lot of money or some awesome land...

“They were the ones that did Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller investigation. So the media, they don’t want to touch this, because they’re complicit in it. They don’t want to have to be called before a grand jury and have to say where they got the fake story, and why they continue to peddle it,” she added.

Ex-DNI told Durham there is 'enough evidence to indict MULTIPLE people' in the Trump-Russia probe | Daily Mail Online How the liberal media outlets that relentlessly pushed 'Russian collusion' smear have totally ignored Durham's revelation that Hillary SPIED on Trump

 DailyMail.com found no links or references to the latest revelations by Special Counsel John Durham in his probe into the origins of the Russia investigation on the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS. 

The story has even been picked up global news organizations, including The Times of London, but has seen little in comparison to the wall-to-wall coverage of the so-called 'dirty dossier' that turned out to be Democrat-funded opposition research used as a basis for the FBI to surveil Trump campaign aide Carter Page. 

JULIAN ASSANGE: Trump had no connection to Russia. When foreign companies, governments wanted a State Dept decision in their favor they donated to the Clinton Foundation

-

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)