Eating their own: Jasmine Crockett goes after Democrat party for considering ‘safest white boy’ for next presidential election

Yet Biden from the start made a faux issue of "white supremacy". 

 Olivia Murray 

How dare the Democrats consider a candidate that’s the “safest” bet. Politics isn’t about pushing an agenda, it’s about foisting unlikable and awful politicians onto your voting base, then crying racism or misogyny over the subsequent failures. 

Can it be? Yes! The Nazi salute!

" Jasmine Crockett, the Texas congresswoman who reliably and routinely beclowns herself every single time she opens her mouth, is now going after her own party because as she asserts, they’re considering running the “safest white boy” in 2028 as their next presidential candidate.

"What would she prefer? The opposite? A problematic black woman? News flash Crockett, y’all just did that, and it was the biggest beating you Democrats have had at the ballot box in more than forty years—since Ronald Reagan, and that was lifetimes ago!

"She doesn’t like “safe” and “white,” so is “dangerous” and “black” better? Sounds like her ideal candidate would be George Floyd, or O.J. Simpson. Too bad for her, they’re both six feet under.

"Here’s what Crockett said:" 

Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett says that the major donors in the Democrat Party want to go out and find the “safest white boy we can find” to represent them in 2028. She is the gift that keeps on giving & relishes the spotlight. pic.twitter.com/Z3NTqnEtV7

— Bobby (@BobbyWilson1004) May 11, 2025

. . ."'How dare the Democrats consider a candidate that’s the “safest” bet. Politics isn’t about pushing an agenda, it’s about foisting unlikable and awful politicians onto your voting base, then crying racism or misogyny over the subsequent failures." . . . 

The Democrat-Media Codependency; Their deeply dysfunctional relationship is destroying the credibility of both.

The American Spectator  

"They just revise their fabrications to fit the needs of the moment. This is why most Americans disregard virtually everything the Democrats and the corporate media tell them." . . .

"If the 2024 election told us nothing else, it confirmed that the voters aren’t nearly as credulous as the Democrats and the corporate media believe them to be. Indeed, according to a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center six weeks prior to the election, only 22 percent of American adults believed news organizations deal fairly with all sides. Ironically, considering that the news coverage of the Trump administration has been overwhelmingly negative, the primary beneficiaries of this brazenly biased reporting appear to have been President Donald Trump and the Republican Party.

"Despite questionable polls that purport to show President Trump and the GOP falling out of favor with the voters, both enjoy higher favorability ratings than the Democrats. According to RealClearPolitics, Trump currently stands at 45.4 percent. This does suggest that there has been some erosion, but it isn’t particularly alarming when compared with the abysmal ratings endured by prominent Democrats. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, for example, languishes at 28.0 percent. Likewise, the GOP’s favorability rating seems inauspicious at 42.2 percent until it is compared to the Democratic Party’s anemic 33.8 percent rating.

"Far more important than such ephemeral polling, however, is the increasing tendency of voters to support the GOP — at the federal and state level. In addition to controlling the White House and Congress, the Republicans also enjoy governing trifectas in 23 states according to Ballotpedia. The Democrats hold trifectas in 15 states. As recently as 2010, the GOP held only 9 state trifectas and the Democrats held 16. Can this reversal of fortune really be attributed to voter distrust of the corporate media? Megan McArdle says yes in the Washington Post and leftist political scientist Yascha Mounk offers the same answer in a Substack essay:

Democracies depend on having a few widely trusted news outlets that can objectively inform the public about current affairs. The trust which citizens have traditionally placed in these outlets was premised on a belief that their journalists are at least striving to present events in an even-handed manner … The aspiration of many journalists to save democracy has not just proven counterproductive because it drove a big part of their readership away from mainstream outlets. It has also deprived Democrats of key facts they would have needed to make good strategic decisions.

"This last point cannot be overemphasized. When “main stream” journalists decided it was more important to save democracy from the depredations of Donald Trump than to provide factual reporting to voters, they weren’t doing the Democrats any favors. The most obvious example involves their futile attempt to hide former President Biden’s accelerating cognitive decline. When the Wall Street Journal raised the issue they were attacked by the usual media suspects. CNN, for example, pompously declared, “The Wall Street Journal owes its readers — and the public — better.” At MSNBC’s “MaddowBlog,” editor Steve Benen wrote:

I’ve never spoken to the incumbent president … That said, I know that (a) members of Congress from both parties who’ve interacted with him have praised his sharpness; (b) Biden’s recent work on Ukraine, border policies, and the Middle East suggest he’s tackling and implementing an expansive and ambitious agenda at the White House; (c) questions about Donald Trump’s mental stability seem far more salient right now; and (d) some GOP officials might want the public to believe the worst about Biden and his age, but I’m not inclined to take Kevin McCarthy’s and Mike Johnson’s word for it.

 "This is precisely the kind of “reporting” that does real damage to Democrats and the credibility of corporate media. The Journal’s article was published on June 4, 2024 — more than three weeks before Biden self-destructed in his debate with Donald Trump." . . .

Labor Department Admits Hundreds of Thousands of Biden Jobs Were Fake

 EJ Antoni, Ph.D.  

"For example, economic rhetoric couldn’t paper over the reality that credit-card debt exploded to well over $1.2 trillion from Americans being unable to make ends meet in the Biden economy. Trump was elected to fix our finances, which were much worse than Biden’s cronies would ever admit." 

patcrosscartoons

"The Biden administration claimed to have added almost 400,000 jobs from July through September of last year, but new data released this week suggest none of those jobs ever existed. Despite constantly gaslighting by the mainstream media, Americans knew the economy was in poor shape and these latest numbers prove it.

"Month after month, the government bean-counters under former-president Biden published overly optimistic estimates for everything from job growth to the size of the economy, only to have those numbers routinely—and quietly—revised down later.

"Every month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) produces estimates for the number of nonfarm payrolls in the country, as well as revisions for the last two months’ estimates. Under Biden, these revisions were abnormal in magnitude and direction, being revised down with unusual frequency.

"While these monthly job reports are compiled from a survey of over 600,000 businesses, of which fewer than 200,000 are surveyed each month. But the BLS also publishes much more comprehensive quarterly data called Business Employment Dynamics (BED) that come from a census of over 12 million businesses—that’s over 17 times the sample size of the monthly job reports’ survey.

"This more accurate dataset was just released by the BLS for the third quarter of last year, which ran from the start of July through the end of September. In stark contrast to the monthly job reports showing an increase of 399,000 jobs during the third quarter, these new numbers show a decline of 1,000 private-sector jobs." . . .

. . ."And the downward revisions to Biden-era jobs data are set to continue. From March through June of last year, the economy supposedly added 398,000 nonfarm payrolls, according to the monthly job reports, yet the BED data show a net loss of 163,000 private-sector jobs for that period.

"Instead of adding almost 800,000 jobs during the middle of last year, the economy likely shed more than 160,000 of them. The next annual benchmark will probably be a (retroactive) reduction of jobs under Biden that exceeds this year’s large downward revision." . . .

The left seems to want Trump and Jews dead and evil to thrive

 Hilariously DESTROYING Rachel Maddow While Defending Trump On Live TV

  

Who’s To Blame For The Left’s ‘Assassination Culture’?  "A university report published last month shows that more than half of those who identify as being left of center on the political spectrum believe assassinating President Donald Trump would be justified. This didn’t come about organically. It’s the product of a vicious campaign waged by the Democratic Party-mainstream media axis.

"According to a Rutgers Social Perception Lab-Network Contagion Research Institute brief, 55.2% of Americans on the left “reported that if someone murdered Donald Trump, they would be at least somewhat justified.” Overall, 38.5% hold the same belief.

"Trump, who has survived a pair of assassination attempts (one of which was celebrated), is not the only legitimate target, say many Americans. The data show that nearly half, 48.6%, say murdering Elon Musk would be justified.

"It turns out that there has also been a shocking show of support for Luigi Mangione, who has been charged with murdering UnitedHealth Chief Executive Officer Brian Thompson. In addition, Mangione has a health care ballot initiative named after him in California.

"It’s an effort to dehumanize him, which is a tacit approval for violent behavior. To this end, various playactors, politicians, and grifters have: 

• Wanted to punch Trump in the face (Robert DeNiro)
• Wished they could “take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him” (Joe Biden)
• Wondered when “was the last time an actor assassinated a president” (Johnny Depp)
• Asked “where is John Wilkes Booth when you need him?” (actress Carole Cook),
• Said the “donor class” is “still going to have go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump” (Rick Wilson, Lincoln Project),
• “Thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House” (Madonna)
• Felt inspired to “go and take out Trump tonight” (Rep. Maxine Waters)
• Wished publicly that “somebody would kill Donald Trump” (academic and New York Times columnist John McWhorter)
• Hoped that “maybe Donald Trump will go away. Maybe he’ll go to jail. Maybe he will die” (former Biden press secretary and current MSNBC misinformer Jen Psaki)

Pope Leo XIV’s Brother Sparks Outrage Over Vulgar Nancy Pelosi Posts and Illegal Immigration Stance

Pope Leo better move as far left as he can after this. Every great leader has a Billy Carter in the family. TD

RTM  

“These f***ing liberals crying about tariffs is just unreal,” he wrote. “Do they not know that there is a thing called video? Just listen to what this drunk c*** has to say in the mid-90’s long before her husband had Grindr dates.”

 "A wave of controversy has emerged following the election of the first American pope, after resurfaced social media posts by his older brother revealed harsh political commentary and vulgar criticisms of top Democrats and liberal policies.

"Louis Prevost, the older brother of newly-elected Pope Leo XIV, has gained attention for his outspoken posts on Facebook, where he regularly expresses support for President Donald Trump and shares inflammatory rhetoric about prominent political figures. 

"His recent posts have included crude remarks about Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and critiques of former President Joe Biden’s supporters.

"In one April 5 repost, Louis shared a 1996 video of Pelosi speaking about tariffs.

“These f***ing liberals crying about tariffs is just unreal,” he wrote. “Do they not know that there is a thing called video? Just listen to what this drunk c*** has to say in the mid-90’s long before her husband had Grindr dates." 

"The Facebook account, based in Port Charlotte, Florida, also contains other posts critical of Democratic voters and progressive ideology. 

"In one 2023 repost, he mocked Biden’s approval rating." . . .

This should help Leo: "Some conservative commentators have already expressed disappointment in the pontiff’s political leanings. 

"Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon called him the “worst pick for MAGA Catholics” and labeled him the “anti-Trump pope,” according to the Daily Mail." . . .

Just in: Adam Schiff calls for impeachment of the Pope. Joe Biden, through clenched teeth agrees. Jimmy Fallon, weeping, apologized for "humanizing" Leo. The world awaits hearing from "The View" on this. TD

The Downfall Of 60 Minutes And The Biggest Media Scandal You’ve Never Heard Of

 The Federalist  

"Supposedly, Redstone has also expressed a desire to settle Donald Trump’s case against 60 Minutes over allegations they deceptively edited their interview with Kamala Harris last fall."

. . . "Though the Times is loathe to discuss it, there’s also lots of speculation that . . . "Redstone, an observant Jew, was less than thrilled when 60 Minutes recently ran an offensively stupid segment where veteran reporter Leslie Stahl asked a freed Israeli hostage if his Hamas captors starved him unintentionally because Hamas ran out of food. It’s well established that Hamas steals and hoards all the food and aid coming into Gaza, and it beggars belief that anyone, let alone someone who gets paid millions by a news network, would think a terrorist organization deserves the benefit of the doubt. And further, that layers of producers and editors would put this on the air.

"There may be some truth to any or all of these accusations about what’s motivating Paramount and Redstone, but if Paramount is attempting to politicize 60 Minutes‘ reporting, at least they’re trying to make a buck out of it. Bill Owens spent 26 years at 60 Minutes, eventually presiding over a news operation that has willfully corrupted itself to the point where its bias has turned the show into a laughingstock. In at least one instance that I am familiar with, Owens played a pivotal role in a gross journalistic failing at 60 Minutes that ultimately helped a Democratic presidential candidate evade responsibility for an international incident that got Americans killed.

Cloud of Scandal

"Since Owens joined 60 Minutes, it’s hard to know where to begin cataloging the embarrassments. Its recent defense of Hamas and its refusal to follow past precedent and release an unedited transcript of the show’s interview with Kamala Harris, who is unable to answer basic questions in ways that aren’t insultingly inane, for fear of damaging her electoral chances were just par for the course." . . .

DOJ to investigate Texas Muslim-led development as antisemitic and anti-Christian

I see the place becoming a great, big Ivy League campus; Judenrein. In 1960, I experienced this in Toulon, France where we were told the area, then called "The Sullies" was a Muslin no-go zone with shore patrol guarding the entrance streets. Apparently non-Muslims tend to be killed in that area and those trendy Palestinian scarves are not knife-resistant. TD

Angie Orellana Hernandez

Cornyn wrote to the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division on April 11 requesting an additional investigation into the project that he said was an "exclusive religious settlement" governed by "Islamic principles."

"Texas Republicans claim the development would impose Islamic law on residents"

"The Justice Department will investigate whether a planned real estate development around one of North Texas's largest mosques violates federal law, Sen. John Cornyn (R) said Friday after weeks of calling the project antisemitic and anti-Christian.

"Attacks over the development outside Dallas have been amplified by Cornyn, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R), Gov. Greg Abbott and right-wing bloggers who baselessly claim it would create a Muslim-only community and impose Islamic law on residents.

"Leaders for the East Plano Islamic Center, the mosque that is backing the project dubbed EPIC City, have repeatedly denied the accusations and called the attacks on their planned development Islamophobic. If built, EPIC City would span about 400 acres and create housing, day care facilities, medical clinics and schools, according to marketing material.

" 'I am grateful to Attorney General Bondi and the Department of Justice for hearing my concerns and opening an investigation," Cornyn said in a statement. "Religious discrimination and Sharia Law have no place in the Lone Star State. Any violations of federal law must be swiftly prosecuted, and I know under the Trump administration, they will be."

"Dan Cogdell, an attorney for EPIC City, said the development would cooperate with the federal investigation, noting that the Muslim community behind the project had nothing to hide.

" 'From day one, their intention was to comply completely and wholeheartedly with the law," said Cogdell, who defended Paxton during the Republican firebrand's 2023 impeachment trial. "And they've just been vilified, assailed and attacked."

"Cogdell added, "What is crazy to me is how far we haven't come since 9/11. The words 'mosque,' 'Islam,' 'Muslim' in the year of our Lord 2025 are still such a triggering event."

"The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment.

"EPIC City was announced about a year ago, according to its social media pages. Developers said they would use empty land in Josephine, Texas, northeast of Dallas, to build a "vibrant, multigenerational, and inclusive master planned community."

"As EPIC City was selling shares and building out its plans, none of which featured materials that required residents to be Muslim, an uproar by conservatives overshadowed the project. Cogdell said the first incidents came from right-wing accounts on X, which caught the attention of senior Republican leaders in Texas." . . .