Saturday, October 25, 2025

Y’all, All Y’all, and the Quest for a Second-Person Plural Pronoun

My wife's family, coming from Arkansas roots, would use "Y'uns" for "Y'all" TD

Word Smarts  

"However you spell it, and however many people you’re referring to when you use it, “y’all” is a versatile and, some would say, better alternative to “you guys” or “you.' ”


"In the United States, “you guys” is one of the most commonly used second-person pronoun references, but “y’all” is all the rage. While “y’all” is still heard primarily in the Southern United States and nationwide in African American Vernacular English (AAVE), its usage has been on a dramatic rise since the late 20th century.

"The increasing popularity of “y’all” can be attributed to a variety of factors, including the mainstream use of AAVE in media, as well as the fact that “y’all” is a preferable gender-neutral alternative to “you guys.” “Y’all” also rolls off the tongue in a softer, warmer way than “you guys” or even “you all.” For instance, “You guys come back tomorrow” sounds clunky and even vaguely threatening, while “Y’all come back tomorrow” may be perceived as both friendlier and more inviting.

"The correct spelling places an apostrophe between the “y” and the “a,” as it’s a contraction of “you” and “all.” The pronoun got a nod from Dictionary.com in the summer of 2021 when it gave “y’all” its own entry, separate from “you-all.” The entry notes the word “now communicates an informal tone more than a regional identity, and one that has become popular among younger demographics for its inclusivity.” . . .  Much more here...

Why We Don’t Like The Democratic Party

And why many call it "Democrat" instead of "Democratic" as a means of disrespect. Historically the major party in the South of the Civil War and their secession. TD

 Issues & Insights  

"The revolution that the Democratic Party has been pressing for at least six decades would abolish capitalism and free markets, seize the means of production, destroy the nuclear family, erase Christianity and Judaism, defund law enforcement, reopen the borders, censor speech, pack the Supreme Court, ration energy and health care, overturn our civil order and uproot Western civilization."


"In response to last week’s editorial “None Dare Call It A Republic,” one reader said I&I prefers “the term republic over democracy because” we “like the Republican Party” and “don’t like the Democratic Party.” Therefore we refuse to use the word “Democratic” because it “sounds just like the word ‘democratic.’” We can’t say we like the Republican Party, but we can say we despise the Democratic Party. Read on and we’ll tell you why.
"First, though, take a look at the reader’s full comment, found here. He calls us ignorant, which is fine – he’s entitled to his opinion. But his statement reminds us quite a bit of the gibberish yakked up by Joe Biden in last year’s presidential debate, which was so incoherent that in one instance Donald Trump said “I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence. I don’t think he knows what he said either.”
"But we understand enough of what our dedicated reader said to feel that it would be helpful to explain why we don’t like the Democratic Party, and not just so readers will understand but also to make it clear just how dissolute that party is.
"We could start with its lust for big government and all that comes with it: steep taxes, cruel regulation, appalling violations of property rights and an imperious and ever-hungry administrative state.
"Or we could frame our argument in terms of civil society vs. political society, with the Democrats hard in favor of the latter, which is a serial violator of liberty.
"Instead we’ll focus on what the Democrats want over all: a revolution." . . . More...

"This is why the “big tent” Democratic Party attracts disparate groups, such as environmental activists, eager central planners, redistributionists, anti-gun scolds, antifa goons, COVID tyrants, neo-New Dealers, radical Islamists, militant transgender moms, pride cultists, race hustlers, criminal coddlers, infanticide advocates, male-hating feminists, DEI zealots, busybodies, nannies, groomers, dancing geriatrics and raging protesters who have no idea what they’re protesting."

Jasmine Crockett Has a DEVASTATING New Attack Against Trump (You'll Never Guess What It Is)

Jasmine Crockett Has a DEVASTATING New Attack Against Trump (You'll Never Guess What It Is) – Twitchy   "Jazzy must be taking lessons from Joy Reid. All racist, all the time, without a single positive thought in that racist mind."

"Democrats like Crockett have played it about 25 million too many times. It's not just old, it's Jurassic."


The author with Michelle Obama

 "Last winter, I checked in with a friend in Democratic politics. "Life is weird sometimes," she wrote back, and told me she was staying at Alexander Soros' Hamptons house. I made a joke about coming to visit her—growing up in a midwestern working-class family, I'd always enjoyed getting a glimpse into the lives of the rich and powerful. "Sorry, it's for people of color leaders only," she wrote back. "It would be odd if you were there."
"As a former Democratic fundraiser, you'd think I would be numb to this kind of discrimination, but the truth continues to pain me: The Democratic Party, once the champions of civil rights in response to real injustices, is now the primary driver of racial division in America today. Lee Atwater's Southern strategy pales in comparison to the modern DNC's approach. No organization is more systematically racist." . . .
. . . "The Democrats' long-term strategy is to stoke racial resentment to build their coalition and energize non-white voters. The rhetoric is designed to convince minorities that America is irredeemably, structurally racist, and only Democrats will look out for them." . . . 
. . . If Harris loses, prepare for a full-blown meltdown of epic proportions. They will seethe at the racist deplorables who again elected Trump, and they will refuse to acknowledge racial changes in support because it contradicts their ideology. They will blame misogyny for the Black and Latino men who switched sides. You will hear terms like "white adjacent" and "internalized oppression" trotted out to explain why people of color voted for Trump.
"Democrats have done so much damage. They infantilize Black and brown people, treating them as victims with no agency. Instructing whites to never correct a minority is textbook racism, implying they can't handle criticism.
"Unfortunately, individuals steeped in DEI will not change their minds lightly, and those who use it for social power will never change. The only way Democrats will learn is by losing elections repeatedly while hemorrhaging minority votes. Racial dealignment between parties could turn the page and open a more hopeful chapter in American politics."

That ballroom; the episode continues!


Former Biden Aide: Demolition of East Wing 'Probably Needed'  . . . " 'It's heartbreaking, and I'm sentimental about it and sad," LaRosa said. "At the same time, I think every first family, every president, should play a role in evolving the White House and updating it and modernizing it and sometimes expanding it."

"I don't think there's any question that a ballroom is probably needed," LaRosa continued. "But I understand the sadness around the East Wing because I feel it myself.' " . . .

The arrangement no doubt frosts the perennial Trump opposition, but when you think of how many other projects have burned time and billions, there may be something to be said for the Trump route.

Joy Reid goes on unhinged rant about Trump’s WH ballroom. She clearly didn’t do her homework.   "Fired MSNBC host Joy Reid went on an unhinged rant about President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom while getting basic facts wrong.

"Reid falsely asserted that the taxpayers are paying for the construction of the new White House ballroom, though Trump and donors are paying for it with their own private funds. She lamented that Americans will not receive their food stamps while the ballroom construction is entering its early stages." . . .

 . . . "High-profile Democrats have accused Trump of abusing his power by tearing down the East Wing. Among those include California Gov. Gavin Newsom, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren. Many prominent political figures have falsely accused Trump of using Americans’ taxpayer dollars to fund the ballroom." . . .

MSNBC owners support Ballroom: Comcast is one of the donors paying for White House ballroom   

. . . "Despite the contributions, the Trump administration has attacked Comcast-owned media outlets such as NBC and MSNBC for content he’s found objectionable.

"The 90,000-square-foot ballroom, to be named after Trump, could hold close to 1,000 people for state dinners and events, Time magazine reported.

The project is not without controversy." . . .

Is Comcast helping fund Trump's $250M ballroom? MSNBC's parent company among the list of donors to fund White House's controversial renovation

So, can we stop the whining? MSNBC clowns, you literally funded what you call the desecration of the People’s House, which was also a silly term.

Deputy AG Todd Blanche Warns California Dems to ‘Stand Down or Face Prosecution’ After Pelosi Threatens to Arrest ICE Agents

 Debra Heine


"Department of Justice Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Thursday warned top California Democrats to “stand down or face prosecution” after Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) threatened to have federal law enforcement agents operating in her district arrested.
" 'Pelosi stated in a press release Wednesday that San Francisco police may arrest federal agents if they are found violating state law during U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids. Blanche stated on Friday that any officer who lays a hand on federal law enforcement will be committing a crime.
" 'The former speaker issued the press release in reaction to “reports of a planned mass immigration raid” in the San Francisco area, and denounced the raids as an “appalling abuse of law enforcement power.”
"President Trump has since put on hold his decision to send 100 additional ICE and federal agents to San Francisco, giving the local government one more chance to tackle the city’s high crime problem.
“ 'It is important to note that California law protects communities and prevents federal agents from taking certain actions here that we have witnessed in other states,” Pelosi stated on her press release.
" ' 'While the President may enjoy absolute immunity courtesy of his rogue Supreme Court, those who operate under his orders do not. Our state and local authorities may arrest federal agents if they break California law—and if they are convicted, the President cannot pardon them,” she added.
" 'The 85-year-old concluded that San Francisco residents will “continue to stand with the patriotic immigrants who are the constant reinvigoration of America.”
" 'San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said in an interview that she had come up with the strategy after seeing federal agents allegedly “roughing up people in Los Angeles and Chicago,” according to the New York Times." . . .More...


Texas Dem Suggests She’ll Slash Republicans in the Throat If They Try to ‘Bully’ Her  . . . "She also said that her party’s lack of fight against the Trump administration is why Democrats are losing poor and black people. No, lady. That’s not it, because those voters already back the president. Yes, they’ve left Democrats—you got that part right—but they’re with us now.  

"They’re leaving your party because you don’t do anything except rage against Trump, and denigrate working people by accusing them of being dumb if you vote for anyone else." 

CNN host grills KJP over whether Biden ‘should be president right now’


Rebranding Failure: Broc Smith


CNN host grills KJP over whether Biden ‘should be president right now’ 
. . . “I mean, we’re talking 2023, 2024. Why didn’t you have concerns?” Keilar asked. “Why didn’t you raise them?”
" 'So I did not have any concerns. I saw him on a daily basis, Brianna,” Jean-Pierre said. “You know that. I saw him every day. I engaged with him every day.”
 "While Jean-Pierre acknowledged Biden “showed age,” she claimed he was “sharp.”
" 'This is a president that pushed his staff. This is a president that was on top of what the policies [were] that he cared about, that were important to the American people,” she said. “And let’s not forget, he also was leading a coalition, an international coalition when it came to something that we hadn’t seen in decades, when it came to the war in Ukraine. There was a lot going on.”
"As Jean-Pierre rambled on about what she claimed was Biden’s successful presidency and justified her defense of the former president’s mental acuity, Keilar cut her off to say she was not addressing her questions.
" 'Do you think he should be president right now? Do you think that he is capable right now of being president?” the CNN host asked. “Because that was what you were advocating for: someone who would be president in his current state until 2029.”“Yeah. I did not see anything that concerned me when he decided to run for president. I did not. This is someone that I saw every single day. Again, he was on top of the policies,” Jean-Pierre said. “He was sharp. He was someone that cared about what the outcome of the issues that were in front of the American people [were] and what we were doing. I’m speaking from my own personal opinion. "I’m speaking from what I saw on a day-to-day basis.” . . .More...

Joe Biden is Sharp as a Tack