Bill Maher Finally Speaks Out AGAINST Gavin Newsom On Live TV

Agenda Insight  Comments to this video included.   "Bill Maher takes California Governor Gavin Newsom to task live on TV in a moment that’s got everyone talking. Maher challenges Newsom on key issues like homelessness, taxes, and the state’s ongoing struggles — sparking a heated and honest exchange.

"Watch the full clip and see why this conversation is making headlines across the country.

"Newsom refused to listen. Everything Maher said fell on deaf ears. If this man Newsom EVER becomes President, America will become one big California, with absolutely no apologies from Newsom. You've been warned.

"Roads in Los Angeles (at least) are crap, broken tar, ruts from the heat and constant 18 wheeler traffic. The movies lie, they only shoot on the the more rare 'good' roads. The stuff we drive on every day is absolute garbage, an obstacle course. Thats why people drive SUVs, bigger tires and suspensions that deaden the hammering cars take from these roads. Yet Cal Trans has a $16 BILLION annual budget... theft?

Trump plans a billion-dollar lawsuit against the liars at the BBC who interfered with OUR election.

Don Surber; Substack 

"BBC sounds just like AP, NYT, WaPO and every TV network in America except Fox when it comes to these biases. In the Telegraph report, the Beeb checks all the current boxes of fanatical liberalism."

"The British call the BBC the Beeb, which makes sense only if Beeb is the plural of boob. The broadcaster—paid in large part through a licensing fee, which is a property tax on television sets in England—doctored President Trump’s speech to a quarter million supporters on the National Mall on January 6, 2021. BBC edited his speech to make it sound like he was inciting a riot at the Capitol . . .

. . . "The New York Times headlined its version of the story, “BBC says Trump threatened to sue over how a program edited his speech.”

"Bad headline, but Paragraphs 5 and 6 were devastating:

The hourlong documentary—titled “Trump: A Second Chance?”—was broadcast as part of the BBC’s Panorama series days before the 2024 U.S. presidential election. It spliced together three quotes from two sections of the 2021 speech, delivered almost an hour apart, into what appeared to be one quote in which Trump urged supporters to march with him and “fight like hell.” Among the parts cut out was a section where Trump said he wanted supporters to demonstrate peacefully.

In a resignation letter to staff, [Tim Davie, drector general of the BBC] said: “There have been some mistakes made and as director general I have to take ultimate responsibility.”

This was not an honest mistake. This was dishonest reporting by charlatans who wanted to meddle in an American election.

The New York Times reported:

A highly critical letter, written by a former external adviser to the BBC board, Michael Prescott, said that a documentary called “Trump: A Second Chance?,” broadcast before the presidential election last year, at one point spliced together footage from comments that Mr. Trump made about 50 minutes apart. In his speech on Jan. 6 to supporters in Washington as Congress was certifying the results that showed Joseph R. Biden Jr. had won the election, Mr. Trump said, “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women, and we’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them.”

But the documentary, produced as part of the BBC’s long-running Panorama series, cut that together with a previous sentence in which the president said, “I’ll be there with you,” and with a much later quote from his speech. The edited version suggested that he had said: “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol … and I’ll be there with you … and we fight. We fight like hell.”

The documentary is no longer available to watch on the BBC’s online player. Samir Shah, the BBC’s chairman, said in a letter Monday that complaints about the editing of the clips had been discussed by the standards committee in January and May, and that the points raised in the review had been relayed to the Panorama team.

“With hindsight, it would have been better to take more formal action,” he wrote. He added: “We accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologize for that error of judgment.”

Hindsight? . . .