Sunday, December 21, 2025

Media shocked to learn 'global intifada' means killing people around the globe

 The Peoples Cube

"In the light of recent worldwide terror attacks targeting Jews, world media almost came to the brink of realizing that words mean things. Several major outlets were reportedly stunned to discover that "global intifada" means killing people around the globe – as opposed to just a description of youth activism. After months of thinking that "intifada" referred to interpretive dancing, the press faced the possibility that slogans sometimes function as instructions.

"Institutions of higher learning responded in their customary dialect: Harvard upgraded antisemitism from "unfounded concern" to "complex context," which is academia's way of admitting something exists while insisting it's rude to describe it. The new guidance encourages students to process hate as an ambience, like humidity.

"University officials issued statements condemning violence and urging students to avoid "harmful specificity," "jumping to adjectives," "noticing patterns," or "assigning motives" to motives. As one tenured professor noted, violence is bad, but clarity is worse: "Please do not name anything, describe anything, or connect anything to anything."

"NPR, always first to sanitize a noun, rebranded antisemitism as "community tensions," added somber piano music, and reminded listeners that the real danger is "escalation" – particularly the escalation of accurate description. Hate is regrettable; noticing it is polarizing.

"Cable anchors tried to square the circle: hate is wrong, but also "understandable" under certain editorial guidelines, especially when it arrives wearing ethnic clothing. To condemn evil is a slippery slope, because it might imply someone is responsible.

"A media panel then concluded "from the river to the sea" refers to peaceful nature hikes and inclusive trail access, since nothing says "peace" like a collection of euphemisms. By general consensus, chants are never what they say they are – until people get killed, at which point everyone acts shocked and demands we "come together" by not asking obvious questions.

"As for media consumers, their opinion could be summed up in one random street interview: "First they tell you it isn't happening. Then it happens. Then they tell you it's complicated. And finally they warn you not to notice the pattern, because pattern recognition is now a form of hate.' "

More on Epstein and his works

 Funny how there aren't any new Trump pictures in this dump, just oodles and oodles of fresh Clintons, along with assorted degenerate rock stars whom we already knew were degenerate.  "Bubba Clinton always had a soft spot for Jeffrey Epstein and whatever it was he was doing, and now a Friday-night document dump gives us the flavor of just how disgusting he was. According to the New York Post, which has a full panoply of coverage:" . . .

Broc Smith


. . . "In one photo, Clinton was seen swimming in a pool with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's sex trafficking accomplice and former girlfriend. 

"The president, who has also been featured in photographs released by House Democrats, has so far remained silent on the release.

"He has previously admitted to a friendship with the disgraced financier but has long maintained he severed ties before Epstein's sex crime conviction.

"Trump has not been accused of any illegal activity and when the White House was reached for comment, an automatic reply from spokeswoman Abigail Jackson was sent back.

"The lengthy statement said the Trump administration is 'transparent' on the Epstein issue and also hurled accusations at Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Stacey Plaskett, a non-voting member of the House of Representatives from the US Virgin Islands." . . .


UPDATE: Scott Jennings: ‘We should call it the Clinton files, not the Epstein files’   "Scott Jennings on the Epstein Files: Well, look, they've released how many documents tonight? 200,000 or more? 400? So, a good faith effort is being made to release files tonight… Regarding Bill Clinton, I'm sorry to tell you, the reason that Bill Clinton's picture is in the Epstein files is because this has always been a story about Bill Clinton and not Donald Trump. We should call it the Clinton files, not the Epstein files.”
“ 'That's what we're learning tonight. This is the Clinton files. This is the blowing up in the face of the Democrats over this. It's Bill Clinton — this is a story about Democrats and Bill Clinton, and it's always been that way.' ”

Brown shooter harbored grudge from 25 years ago ahead of shooting spree that killed three

 UK Daily Mail

'Mass shooters tend to see themselves as victims — victims of injustice... They want to punish people who they hold responsible for their misery.' 

"The suspect who allegedly killed two Brown University students and an MIT physicist in a multi-day shooting spree harbored a decades-old grudge over his own failed scientific career, investigators believe. 

Claudio Manuel Neves Valente, 48, was known in his youth in Portugal as a brilliant yet egotistical physicist who won national science competitions and dazzled with his intellect. 

But after graduating from Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Portugal's top scientific university, friends said Valente struggled when he moved to the US in 2000 for a new challenge, and found his studies at Brown University underwhelming. 

Those who knew Valente said he was an ego-maniac who believed the Ivy League college was beneath him, and dropped out after several months because he felt the classes were too easy. 

Scott Watson, a physics professor at Syracuse University who befriended Valente at Brown, told the Boston Globe that he remembered the alleged killer as a complicated, unhappy student. 

'He could be kind and gentle, though he often became frustrated — sometimes angry — about courses, professors, and living conditions,' Watson recalled. 

Another former associate at Brown, Kamran Diba, a professor at the University of Michigan Medical School, told the outlet Valente was a spiteful student, and said it was 'sad and upsetting the hate this person kept for so many years.'  . . .  More...

Christmas Is Not A Drag, Progressives

Victory Girls  

"Whatever the woke touches, it kills. We know this. But this “reimagining” of Christmas is about something so much more than that. It’s an illustration of how self-centered and egotistical, we as mortal humans on this spinning Earth, in this UNIVERSE, have become. God help shine a light on us all."

 "Liberals, at any point in time, will do all they can to erase and blaspheme a Christian holiday. So, it’s no surprise to us, that they want to make the nativity scene and Christmas all about them.

"In fact, “churches” in Colorado and Washington State (I know, you’re shocked), are hosting drag-themed nativity events this holiday season. Foothills Unitarian Church in Fort Collins, CO, claims “love unites us all”. Alongside their “Tiny Christmas” event for kids 5 and under, their holiday craft nights, their chili and caroling supper, they also hosted an event this weekend entitled “A Drag Christmas Spectacular”. You guessed it. The nativity story…but in DRAG." (Emphasis in the original)

Get ready for the ultimate festive extravaganza with ‘A Drag Christmas Spectacular,’ where magical Queers will slay their way to Bethlehem. But this year, they are not alone!

Dive into the ultimate holiday celebration of queer joy, courage, and unapologetic pride with A Drag Christmas Spectacular! Fast becoming an annual tradition – this year’s performance promises even more humor, heart, and glitter!

Showcasing Colorado’s top drag and queer talent in a 90+ minute whirlwind of theater, drag, and a reimagined Christmas story that only the boldest could dream up.”-adragchristmas.com.    More...

The Rise of Radical Islam & Western Societies .

 The West Doesn't Understand Extreme Islamism 

"John speaks with Islam scholars Dr. Mark Durie and Dr. Richard Shumack to explore the complex relationship between Islam and Western culture, drawing a contrast between Muhammad’s leadership, shaped by military endeavors, and Jesus’s Gospel of peace. They discuss how Islam’s foundational texts—the Quran and Hadiths—emphasise submission and sacred struggle, which stands in tension with Western values like freedom and the rule of law. A lack of theological literacy in the West obscures the roots of current challenges, including Hamas’ extremism and rising anti-Semitism.  "The dialogue examines broader differences, contrasting Islam’s historical pursuit of authority with the West’s vitality, rooted in principles of love and rational inquiry. Dr. Durie and Dr. Shumack observe that Islam's narratives of victimhood and a rejection of modernity hinders progress, while Christianity’s call to "love your enemies" fosters resilience and growth. "Dr Mark Durie is a pastor and academic. He writes and speaks on a wide range of topics which include the connection between faith and culture, freedom of religion, the persecution of religious minorities, and the origin and history of Islam. A graduate of the Australian National University and the Australian College of Theology, he has held visiting appointments at the University of Leiden, MIT, UCLA, UC Santa Cruz, and Stanford and also held a variety of positions during the 1980’s and 1990’s at Melbourne University. He was elected a Fellow of the Australian Academy of the Humanities in 1992 for his work in linguistics. He is the author of Double Minded and The Third Choice.
"Dr Richard Shumack is a philosopher of religion specialising in Muslim and Christian belief. He teaches regularly on ministry in Muslim contexts in Australian colleges, universities, churches and schools. He is the author of Jesus Through Muslim Eyes and Witnessing to Western Muslims." . . .

The Blogs: The Rise of Radical Islam & Western Societies . . . "But for all the daunting obstacles ahead, there is also reason for hope. The vast majority of people in Western societies, Muslim and non-Muslim alike, reject the poison of radicalism and hatred. They believe in the promise of liberty, democracy, and human rights, and are willing to work hard to build a future of greater opportunity and understanding for all. By reaffirming these universal values, by standing united against bigotry and extremism in all their forms, and by investing in the hard work of integration and community-building, Western societies can emerge stronger, more cohesive, and better equipped to face the challenges of a rapidly changing world. The stakes could not be higher, nor the urgency greater, for the fight against radical Islamism, anti-Semitism, and the forces of division is nothing less than a battle for the soul of Western civilization itself."

Are You Using ‘Begs the Question’ Wrong?

Word Smarts   “Begs the question” is a common phrase to introduce a follow-up question, but it’s technically incorrect. The mix-up is the result of a translation rooted in philosophy.

"You can now see why those who favor the philosophical version dislike the modern usage — the two are very different. However, in informal situations, using “begs the question” to mean something like “raises the question” is widely understood, and dictionaries  recognize it as valid. Nevertheless, this usage should be avoided in formal writing."



"Begs the question” doesn’t always mean what you think it does. It’s often used as a synonym for “raises the question,” but by formal standards, that’s not quite right. Consider this example: “Another major department store is closing its doors. This begs the question: Are shopping malls going extinct?” As you can see, the phrase often introduces a follow-up question, or, as Merriam-Webster puts it, it “elicits a question logically as a reaction or response.” However, this modern usage isn’t historically accurate.

"The phrase dates back to Aristotle’s principles of formal logic. It comes from the Latin petitio principii, meaning “assuming the original point.” “Begging the question” is the fallacy of assuming the conclusion is within your premises. In simpler terms, it’s when your argument already assumes the very thing it’s trying to prove. This results in a logically flawed circular argument.

"In the context of this philosophical argument, petitio principii was translated into English as “begging the question” during the 16th century, originally meaning “to pass over or ignore a question by assuming it to be established or settled.” It uses an archaic definition of “beg,” meaning “to take for granted the matter in dispute” or “to assume without proof.” 

"A more precise modern translation of petitio principii might be “assuming the original conclusion.” For example, “Wool sweaters are better than cotton sweaters because they contain more wool” begs the question, since it assumes what is already established (wool is better than cotton). A correct philosophical usage of “begs the question” would be: “The car commercial begs the question when it says the brand is superior because it sold more cars last year.” . . .