Trump: Calif. May Lose Funds Over Trans Women in Sports

NEWSMAX   

"President Donald Trump threatened to withhold federal funding from California over transgender women competing in women's sports in a post on his Truth Social account Tuesday."

"California, under the leadership of Radical Left Democrat Gavin Newscum, continues to ILLEGALLY allow 'MEN TO PLAY IN WOMEN'S SPORTS.' This week a transitioned Male athlete, at a major event, won 'everything,' and is now qualified to compete in the 'State Finals' next weekend," Trump wrote.

"As a Male, he was a less than average competitor. As a Female, this transitioned person is practically unbeatable. THIS IS NOT FAIR, AND TOTALLY DEMEANING TO WOMEN AND GIRLS. Please be hereby advised that large-scale Federal Funding will be held back, maybe permanently, if the Executive Order on this subject matter is not adhered to," Trump continued. The Governor, himself, said it is 'UNFAIR.' I will speak to him today to find out which way he wants to go??? In the meantime, I am ordering local authorities, if necessary, to not allow the transitioned person to compete in the State Finals. This is a totally ridiculous situation!!!"

"According to the New York Post, Trump appeared to be referencing AB Hernandez, a transgender athlete, who recently won the women's long jump and triple jump during a state Interscholastic Federation Southern Section Masters meet.Hernandez is set to compete in the CIF state championships in Fresno this weekend, the New York Post reported.

"The White House is withholding federal education dollars from Maine over its refusal to ban transgender students from competing in girls' sports.

"California receives about $16.3 billion in federal education funding each year, the LA Times reported."

Victor Davis Hanson: DEI Enthusiasts Allowed the Free Palestine Movement to Get This Far

The Daily Signal

@ThomasHarrison-   Victor Davis Hanson, I will take issue with some you said about when this began. I believe that the 2020 summer of Love was the breeding ground for all this hat[e]ful nonsense. Police stations overrun, and occupied. People murdered, property destroyed, and not too many people were held accountable for their actions.

Tapper’s Book Condemns Journalists In More Ways Than One

 Issues & Insights

"So, what we have, by their own admission, are “mainstream” news types who will dance to whatever tune their masters in the Democratic Party play, no matter how much damage it does to their own reputations."

What consequences personalities on MSNBC and CNN need to have:

"The reaction to Jake Tapper’s and Alex Thompson’s book about how the White House “hid” Joe Biden’s mental decline has been brutal – and fittingly so. But their book inadvertently reveals something even worse about today’s corporate journalists.

"Tapper and Thompson would have us believe that they were shocked! shocked! to discover that Biden was suffering serious and worsening mental infirmities while president, because the White House had so expertly hidden them. And that it was only through their intrepid reporting that the truth can now be told.

"This is laughable on its face.

"The stories the authors recount were all known by journalists all along. How else could they have churned out a book in a matter of months after Biden left office? Every story in that book, every one, was known to White House reporters who diligently refused to report them at the time. That includes “revelations” in the book such as that:A small, tight-knit group in former President Joe Biden’s inner circle was running the White House like a ‘politburo,’ and they were the ‘ultimate decision-makers’ as Biden’s health and cognitive function continued to decline.

"Tapper himself was one of the worst offenders. Just watch any of the long and damning collection of clips circulating on social media, like the one below, showing Tapper parroting White House talking points."

"What’s amazing about it all is that even as they were covering for Biden, reporters knew the public wasn’t buying their spin. Polls consistently showed that vast majorities of the public were concerned about Biden’s mental infirmities. Our latest I&I/TIPP poll, which we will report on Wednesday, finds that by a stunning 2-to-1 margin, Americans agree that the media covered up former Biden’s mental infirmities." . . .

Here are the ‘politburo’ members who were really running the Biden White House, according to ‘Original Sin’ authors

I have to think they have been the same members of the "Free, free Palestine" group. How can one not? 

Cisgender and Latinx Democrats Agree: Ditch the Wokespeak

 The American Spectator; Some Democrats finally realize why they are losing.

“This is another stupid word, ‘Oligarch,’” James Carville said on his podcast. “Who in the f— knows what an oligarch is? . . ." 

Experts Now Recommend Changing Your Gender Fluid Every 3 Months Or 3,000 TikTok Posts

. . ."Our panel of experts discovered that many in the LGBTQ+ community who identify as gender-fluid started to become increasingly "cisgender" after about 3 months or after burning through about 3,000 TikTok posts," said Professor of Gender studies at Yale University, Dr. Fifi Fishman. "They really need to watch for the warning signs that their gender fluids are starting to become stagnant and sludge-like."  . . .Babylon Bee, of course.

"Do you know that you are a cis-male?” comedian Norm Macdonald asked a flummoxed Stephen Merchant, the co-creator of The Office, nine years ago. Macdonald explained of the peculiar “cis” prefix: “It’s a way of marginalizing a normal person.”

"At least that amounts to the intent. The result of such terms marginalizes the speaker, at least when in mixed company. Self-marginalization does not work in politics. Some Democrats only recently learned this.

"Cisgender, Latinx, pregnant person, undocumented worker, equity, oligarch, and intersectionality amount to but a few of the buzzwords and buzzphrases used by Democrats more to announce themselves better than everyone else than to win a majority of everyone else over. This clique races not for votes but to see who can use the most characters, and know what each one stands for, in their version of LGBTQIA2S+.

" 'I’m empathetic and sympathetic to a child trying to figure out their pronoun,” Rahm Emmanuel told the Wall Street Journal in an interview, “but it doesn’t trump the fact that the rest of the class doesn’t know what a pronoun is.” (RELATED: Democrats’ ‘Trans’ Intransigence)

"Other Democrats also grasp the futility of all this for a political party. They are speaking out — all at the same time and saying the same thing because Democrats do it like that — against the wisdom of herdspeak jargon for a 50-plus-one endeavor.

"  'Some words are just too Ivy League-tested terms,” Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona told the Washington Post. “I’m going to piss some people off by saying this, but ‘social equity’ — why do we say that? Why don’t we say, ‘We want you to have an even chance’?”...

More of what you expect from MSNBC

Notice how Alex Witt sets up Crockett for the statement "MSDNC" wants from her. TD

Crockett: We Will Investigate Trump, Family When Dems Take House Back 

"Crockett said, “Well, Alex, I’m glad you asked." . . .

 "Representative Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) said Sunday on MSNBC’s “Alex Witt Reports” that the Democratic Party will take the majority in the 2026 midterms and investigate President Donald Trump and his family.

Witt said, “I’m curious if the Democrats take over after the midterms next year, the House and or Senate, do you think they’re going to push for investigations into Trump’s family and the whole crypto acquisitions that he has getting?”

Crockett said, “Well, Alex, I’m glad you asked. Listen, so long as we end up taking the House, which I fully anticipate that we will do, and we are going to work hard to obviously help our senate colleagues as well, then as someone who serves on the Oversight  Committee and hopes to lead the Oversight Committee, I can guarantee you that we will do what we are supposed to do as constitutionally sworn members of the House, which means that we will conduct oversight.”

She continued, “That means that we will investigate. We will look at whether or not this president himself has violated the Emoluments Clause as it relates to say such things as getting a $400 million plane from the Qataris. We also will make sure that we’re looking into all these business deals that they have going on. I mean, think about it this way, Alex. they were going after Hunter because he sat on a board. Think about how much money they are raking, raking in, whether we’re talking about the next golf resort that they’re setting up in Qatar or whether we’re talking about them leveling Gaza, as they’ve talked about and talked about how it would be great beachfront property, whether we’re talking about this crypto scam, the scam that people didn’t even want to walk into and show their faces.”" . . .

‘I’m Not Happy’: President Trump Lays Out ‘Downfall of Russia’ Warning to Putin

 Breitbart 

 Appearing to imply Putin had perhaps suffered some sort of mental break, he said “I don’t know what the hell happened to Putin… something happened to this guy, and I don’t like it” and separately in a later statement “He has gone absolutely CRAZY!”.

Rich Terrell

"U.S. President Donald Trump is firefighting the Ukraine War he said in comments where he expressed his anger towards the actions of Russian President Vladimir Putin for undermining peace talks with rocket attacks on Ukrainian citizens.

"Vladimir Putin’s apparent mission to capture the whole of Ukraine will lead to the “downfall of Russia”, U.S. President Trump has warned while also cautioning President Volodymyr Zelensky to consider keeping his own counsel more often, noting his outbursts have developed the habit of causing “problems” for Ukraine.

"President Trump spoke with evident anger, if not even disgust, as he returned to the White House from the West Point Military Academy on Sunday evening after being prompted for an “update” on the Ukraine war. He said on the airfield tarmac: “Yeah I’ll give you an update, I’m not happy with what Putin’s doing, he’s killing a lot of people.”

Harvard Case Judge Is Obama Appointee Who Oversaw Race Bias Suit

 Next Democrat elected President will likely place her on the Supreme Court.

https://rofcbybroc.com/

Federal Judge Upholds Harvard’s Race-Based Admission Criteria  

. . ."The case has been set for oral arguments on July 21 before US District Court Judge Allison Burroughs, an Obama appointee, who previously ruled in favor of Harvard’s racially motivated admissions policies. Judge Burroughs’ decision was subsequently overruled by the Supreme Court." . . .

Harvard Case Judge Is Obama Appointee Who Oversaw Race Bias Suit   "The judge overseeing Harvard University’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over threats to slash funding has a track record of ruling in favor of the Ivy League school.

"That background makes US District Judge Allison Burroughs a prime candidate to join other members of the judiciary who have drawn Donald Trump’s ire after she was assigned to the lawsuit Monday. She was appointed to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014 after a career as a federal prosecutor and private lawyer." . . .

Support Grows for Asian-American Students in Discrimination Lawsuit Against Harvard   . .  ." 'We strongly believe Harvard’s admissions policy, which is hyper-focused on race, is only a Band-Aid that conceals the root cause behind a lack of diversity on college campuses,” he said.

"Wu said statistical evidence presented at a three-week trial in October before U.S. District Court Judge Allison D. Burroughs shows that Harvard discriminates against Asian-Americans in rural areas." . . .

Back in 2019: Federal Judge Upholds Harvard’s Race-Based Admission Criteria   . . ."Burroughs acknowledged that Asian American applicants “would likely be admitted at a higher rate than white applicants if admissions decisions were made based solely on academic and extracurricular ratings.”

"Parts of the opinion seem inconclusive and speculative. For example, on the personal ratings, Burroughs states

“The disparity in personal ratings suggests that at least some admissions officers might have subconsciously provided tips in the personal rating, particularly to African American and Hispanic applicants to create an alignment between the profile ratings and the race-conscious overall ratings that they were assigning. It also possible, although unsupported by any direct evidence before the court, that part of the statistical disparity resulted from admissions officers’ implicit biases that disadvantaged Asian American applicants in the personal rating relative to white applicants, but advantaged Asian American over whites in the academic rating.”

"That seems like a judicial shrug on a critical allegation of discrimination." . . .

They lied. Time and time again. And now they want you to believe this.

Charlton Allen 

spectator.org

 "The same people who told you there is no crisis at the border—

—who said Trump was a Russian agent, a traitor, a puppet of Putin—

—who insisted the Steele dossier was verified intelligence—

—who screamed that Brett Kavanaugh was a teenage gang rapist—

—who swore that Jussie Smollett was lynched by MAGA country—

—who told you to “trust the experts” while locking your children out of school for two years— . . .

. . . So very much more here...

—who insisted James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and Peter Strzok were apolitical professionals—

—who call parents at school board meetings “domestic terrorists”—

—who mocked you for noticing inflation, fentanyl, gender confusion, foreign takeovers, and cultural collapse—

—who labeled you an extremist for wanting what your grandparents had:

"A border.

A country.

A future.

Those people—those same people—are now telling you there’s no genocide against white farmers in South Africa.

And if you question it?

You’re the problem."

Charlton Allen is an attorney and former chief executive officer and chief judicial officer of the North Carolina Industrial Commission. He is founder of the Madison Center for Law & Liberty, Inc., editor of The American Salient, and host of the Modern Federalist podcast

Evil: This Is How Staffers Planned to Run the Country If an Incoherent Biden Had Been Reelected

Bob Hoge; RedState

"Well, this person went on to say that when you’re voting for a president, you’re voting for the aides around him. But these aides were not even Senate-confirmed aides. These are White House aides. These were unelected people." . . . 

Donald Trump dodged a bullet in July ’24 when he turned his head ever so slightly and survived a sniper’s assassination attempt. 

America dodged a bullet when Joe Biden ended his reelection campaign in July of that same year. (We also dodged one when Kamala Harris lost the election in November, but that’s another story.)

Although RedState reported literally for years that Joe was a shell of his former self—and his former self wasn’t all that great to begin with—the Biden administration along with their corrupt cohorts in the mainstream media lied, spewed disinformation, and did everything in their power to conceal the truth from the American public.

Now it’s all coming out in the form of tell-all books, confessions from former aides, and even from leading cover-up enablers like CNN’s Jake Tapper. On Sunday, his co-author of the exposé “Original Sin,” Axios’ Alex Thompson, answered the burning question many of us wondered about all along: who would run the country if an obviously compromised Biden had somehow managed to win a second term?

Turns out the morality-free staffers had a frankly treasonous plot ready to enact: they’d just need to show “proof of life” once in a while. Appearing with "FOX News Sunday" host Shannon Bream, Thompson laid out their devious plan :

SHANNON BREAM: You quote a long-time Biden aide basically admitting he shouldn’t be running again. They said to you on page 85, ‘He just had to win, and then he could disappear for four years. He’d only have to show proof of life every once in a while. His aides could pick up the slack.’ Who would have been running the White House in a second Biden term?
 
ALEX THOMPSON: Well, this person went on to say that when you’re voting for a president, you’re voting for the aides around him. But these aides were not even Senate-confirmed aides. These are White House aides. These were unelected people. And one of the things that really I think comes out in our reporting here is that if you believe — and I think a lot of these people do sincerely believe that Donald Trump was and is an existential threat to democracy — you can rationalize anything, including sometimes doing undemocratic things, which I think is what this person is talking about.

They planned to use these "proof of life" moments to prop up the commander in chief, but actually run the country themselves. In other words, they were able to convince themselves to do evil in the name of "good."   This is sick stuff, folks . . .

"Watergate famously ended with lying conspirators jailed, reputations ruined, and careers destroyed. The same thing needs to happen here."