"But do liberals seriously believe citizens are doing the rioting? (Undoubtedly, antifa is there, but those future-suicide cases would show up at a forest fire to throw gasoline on the flames.)"
"Great news! We finally know how to get liberals to oppose riots. Just say, This is helping Trump!
"Almost immediately after the mostly peaceful protesters (who are mostly Mexican illegal aliens) took to the streets of Los Angeles to engage in Latin American-style protests -- throwing rocks, burning cars, waving Mexican flags, etc. -- the media begged the rioters to stop. (Who knew there was something left to burn in LA?)
"But since Donald Trump won the 2024 presidential election (mostly on the issue of immigration), Democrats have been trying to turn over a new leaf by pretending to be normal. With the illegal alien riots driving public support for mass deportations from 60% to about 90%, the media are in major damage control mode.
"The New York Times editorialized, "protesters will do nothing to further their cause if they resort to violence." (During Gay Pride Month, no less!) This is a new position for the Times. Throughout the BLM terror, the paper never quibbled with the smashing, the looting, the burning, the maiming, the killing.
"Similarly, a much-praised (by MSNBC) article in The Atlantic hectored the once-beloved rioters: "Don't give [Trump] the pretext he wants." The advice continued: "As unsatisfying as it may be for some citizens to hear, the last thing anyone should do is take to the streets of Los Angeles and try to confront the military or any of California's law-enforcement authorities." ("Citizens" is a nice touch.)
"Is this because attacking federal law enforcement officers would be wrong? No, of course not. It's because illegal alien riots are exactly what Trump wants! He wants "people walking around taking selfies in gas clouds, waving Mexican flags, holding up traffic, and burning cars."
"After a gratuitous insult -- Trump "is resolutely ignorant" -- The Atlantic credits him with "picking the right fights." Sure, Trump could have sent ICE agents to Fargo, North Dakota, but instead, he's "zeroing in on California," the wily scamp.
"Why would ICE agents go to California to arrest illegals? I think it might be because that's where the illegals are." . . .
The illegals are in California, Newsom is in California, and gated, secure liberals are there also. TD