Dems Celebrating Charlie Kirk’s Murder Spark Historic Party-Switching Wave to GOP

And stop calling the killer a "shooter". He is and will forever be the "murderer". TD

 PJ Media

  Kirk's murder was meant to silence conservative voices through intimidation and violence. Instead, it's created a political martyrdom that's energizing the right while exposing the left's tolerance for political violence when it serves their purposes.

"The assassination of Charlie Kirk has become a defining moment in American politics, and not just because of the tragedy itself. When Tyler Robinson gunned down Kirk last week at Utah Valley University, he didn’t just take a life; he exposed a shocking reality: Some on the left celebrated the attack. That reaction has now triggered what’s being called the “Charlie Kirk effect,” a historic wave of Democrats abandoning their party and joining the GOP.

"The numbers tell the story better than any pundit could. According to a report from The New York Post, across states like Florida and New Mexico, voter registration offices are reporting unprecedented surges in people switching from Democrat to Republican. These are Americans who watched the left's reaction to Kirk's murder and decided they'd seen enough.

“ 'I’m switching parties to protest. I understand that the right also has certain character flaws, but it doesn’t culminate in sympathy for political violence,” said Sheilfer Zepeda, a 31-year-old avocado farmer and software entrepreneur from California, reacting to Democrats celebrating the assassination. “Attempted assassinations of presidential candidates, public executions of healthcare CEOs and political influencers seems to be in line with what leftists want.”

"Zepeda further analyzed his old party. “After all, in revolutionary socialist doctrine, political violence is necessary and justified, which is why we see so many people trying to intellectualize these assassinations in the first place. I just simply cannot align with the direction things are going in.”

"Christopher Elton, a restaurant manager from Bucks County, Pa., said Kirk’s death “definitely encouraged” him to register as a Republican last week.

“ 'There’s more peace on the right compared to the left. And I’m almost embarrassed for voting left in my life,” he said. “I was always more of a policy voter than party affiliated. I slowly moved toward faith and religion and Jesus, and learned a lot through Charlie Kirk. He wasn’t argumentative. He brought you facts. If he was wrong, he’d be the first one to say it.” . . .

Shocking And Rare Footage Of WW1 On Film

Real History

"To be able to encompass such a broad spectrum of detail within less than an hour is an accomplishment. Included within is background to the lead up of the war developing, detail about how, when and where chemical weapons were first used. And a lot more detail about how the persistent Middle East tensions were cast during the First World War. In my opinion, this video would be ideal learning material for anyone who knows little about the so called “Great War”

Both side do not do it; lets keep it that way!

‘Remember That’: Greg Gutfeld Decodes Obama, Cohost ‘Both Sides’ Argument After Charlie Kirk’s Murder 

. . . "These are news anchors, these are politicians, these are college professors that are actually legitimizing this and saying it over and over again, these are why this is different," Gutfeld said of calling people on the right Nazis and fascists." . . .

Obama Implies Trump to Blame for Charlie Kirk Assassination: ‘Extreme Views Were Not in My White House’   . . . "He mourned Kirk’s death, saying it was “horrific,” but made sure to recite an (inaccurate) laundry list of Kirk’s more controversial statements, including a false claim that Kirk claimed black women were stupid.

"Obama then said that Trump wanted to use Kirk’s assassination as “a rationale for trying to silence discussion around who we are as a country and what direction we should go.” He then claimed that when he had been in the White House, “those extreme views were not in my White House. I wasn’t embracing them. I wasn’t empowering them. I wasn’t putting the weight of the United States government behind extremist views.”

"In fact, it was Obama who inaugurated an era of division and extremism. On the campaign trail in 2008, he encouraged his supporters to confront friends and neighbors, and “argue with them, get in their face.' ” . . .  On the campaign trail in 2008, he encouraged his supporters to confront friends and neighbors, and “argue with them, get in their face.”

Obama Couldn't Help but Take Vile Swipe at Trump in New Comments on Charlie Kirk's Assassination   . . . "Obama also found the temerity to insist that, while there are fringe elements on both sides of the political aisle, he never pushed divisive rhetoric during his time in the White House.

" 'But I will say that — those extreme views were not in my White House," he said. "I wasn't embracing them. I wasn't empowering them. I wasn't putting the weight of the United States government behind extremist views."

" 'When we have the weight of the United States government behind extremist views, we've got a problem."

"The absolute balls it takes to say that when we've spent the past decade hearing Obama, Biden, Kamala Harris, Tim Walz, and on and on refer to Trump supporters - half the nation - as "fascists" or "Nazis" or an "existential threat" to the country is mind-numbing.

"Obama was one of the most divisive presidents in this country's history. He quite literally used the death of Trayvon Martin as a springboard to create a massive racial divide in this country during his presidency.

"As for calling political opponents "enemies"? Yeah, he did that too.

"Some would suggest Obama was so divisive during his presidency that it actually led to Mr. Trump's shocking victory over Hillary Clinton in 2016. The divisiveness, relentless weaponization of government, and the violent threats from his party under Biden's reign helped bring us Trump 2.0.

"Here again, Obama demonstrates that divisiveness, suggesting the violent rhetoric is equal on both sides of the political spectrum (it isn't) and taking an unnecessary swipe at both Trump and Kirk, two victims of targeted political violence." . . .

Israel's Largest Ground Invasion of Gaza City Has Begun?

AI Telly

. . . "The Israeli ground invasion of Gaza City represents a marked departure from previous offensives in both its ambition and execution. "Unlike past operations that primarily aimed to weaken Hamas’s military capabilities or target specific infrastructure, this campaign is openly focused on the complete seizure and control of Gaza City. "Israeli officials objective is not only to defeat the Militant over the entire city, both above and Below Ground vast network of Tunnels signaling a New strategic shift toward full occupation of Gaza. "What sets this offensive apart is also its unparalleled scale. Israel has mobilized between 60,000 and 80,000 reservists, the largest deployment in the history of the Gaza conflict. "This massive troop buildup indicates plans for a sustained, intensive campaign over an extended period, contrasting sharply with previous incursions, which involved fewer ground forces and were generally shorter in duration. "The attack is characterized by the systematic destruction of urban areas, with entire residential blocks being demolished in a block-by-block fashion. This demolition is carried out using advanced methods, including remote-controlled, explosive-laden vehicles "The way they work is that soldiers control these vehicles remotely, steering them into specific buildings, tunnels, or other targets associated with militants. "Once the vehicle reaches its designated spot, the operator remotely detonates the explosives carried on board. "This controlled explosion causes significant destruction to the target area, such as collapsing buildings or tunnels, without putting soldiers at risk in close-quarters combat or demolition operations." . . . More...

Charlie's death reveals media's worst UPDATED

 Don Surber  

Stuff the free speech argument. None of Kimmel’s supporters seem bothered that Charlie Kirk did not lose his job over free speech. He lost his life.

"Originally, today’s newsletter was supposed to be about cartoonist Chip Boks crewing up with his political cartoon about the assassination of Charlie Kirk. My goodness you don’t depict a man having his head blown off.

"I will get to that later in the newsletter, but Jimmy Kimmel had to make an ass of himself by mocking the reaction of MAGA and President Trump to Charlie’s death.

"How bad was it, Donnie?

"It was so bad that ABC yanked him from the air immediately. 

The New York Times reported:

“ABC Pulls Jimmy Kimmel Off Air for Charlie Kirk Comments”

ABC announced on Wednesday evening that it was pulling Jimmy Kimmel’s late night show “indefinitely” after criticism of comments he made on Monday about the motives of the man who is accused of fatally shooting the conservative activist Charlie Kirk last week.

Brendan Carr, the Federal Communications Commission chair, sharply criticized Mr. Kimmel’s comments on a podcast earlier on Wednesday.

Nexstar, an owner of many local stations throughout the United States, said shortly before ABC’s announcement that it was pre-empting episodes of Jimmy Kimmel Live! for the “foreseeable future.”

“Nexstar strongly objects to recent comments made by Mr. Kimmel concerning the killing of Charlie Kirk and will replace the show with other programming in its ABC-affiliated markets,” the company said.

 "Who in the hell slams the victim of an assassin and his supporters?" . . .

As for Jimmy Kimmel, if Steven Colbert was losing $40 million a season with the top rated ABC-CBS-NBC late night show, how much money was Kimmel losing? Sounds like a good excuse to pull the plug on an unwatched and unwatchable show.

We live in a society where ghouls like Jimmy Kimmel celebrate the murder of someone whose opinions don’t match the left’s—unaware that the left changes its opinions on a whim. It took about 3 years to go from mocking the “It’s Ma’am” guy at GameSpot to outlawing the misgendering of trannies.

Kimmel can say what he wants, just not on ABC anymore.

Two polls today.

 Bye Bye Jimmy

  . . . "Jimmy Kimmel, Tucker Carlson, and other journalists and entertainers serve at their employer's pleasure. If their words or behavior conflict with their employer's views and positions, they can be fired.

"When a conservative is fired, the media say they deserved it. When a liberal is fired, it’s a constitutional crisis, a blatant violation of the First Amendment, and a “threat to democracy.”

"I call it fair play or karma. President Trump didn’t hold back when posting on his Truth Social account: " . . . 

The decision to take Kimmel off the air came from the top at Disney. 

"Bob Iger, the company’s C.E.O., and Dana Walden, its television chief, made the call, according to The Times. Disney’s relations with important affiliate owners were reportedly a factor: The Wall Street Journal adds that Nexstar’s announcement weighed on executives’ deliberations. (NYT)"

Is This the Most Vile Reaction to Kimmel Getting Pulled Off Air?  

"Responding to Sinclair's statement about their decision on X, Olbermann told them to "Burn in hell...Alongside Charlie Kirk'."