Madeline Leesman“Transgender” influencer and activist Dylan Mulvaney, the person at the center of the Bud Light controversy, recently landed a brand deal promoting a women’s fragrance.
"Mulvaney is the face of Jean Paul Gaultier’s new women’s perfume, “Divine.” He traveled to Morocco to shoot the advertising campaign for the product.
Beyond Parody
"Time and time again, Mulvaney has robbed
women of opportunities. This is ...latest one.
“Transgender” influencer and activist Dylan Mulvaney, the person at the center of the Bud Light controversy, recently landed a brand deal promoting a women’s fragrance.
"Mulvaney is the face of Jean Paul Gaultier’s new women’s perfume, “Divine.” He traveled to Morocco to shoot the advertising campaign for the product." . . .
"doll[slang] (noun): a specific kind of beautiful trans woman. The term emerged from drag and ballroom culture, but it is sometimes used by people outside that community. Inn online culture, “doll” is often used in apposition to the slur “hon,” as a doll/hon binary hierarchy of attractive/ugly or good/bad trans women." . . .
Rodriguez does not appear to be a radical Muslim. He is someone who has been radicalized in America by radical left groups that believe that killing Jews makes them ethical people.
"On Wednesday afternoon, Yaron Lischinsky was trying, as always, to fight lies.
"On social media he could be found pushing back against just one of the many big lies spread every day about the Jewish state.
"Specifically he was commenting on the UN Report which garnered headlines around the world.
"This was a completely lying, untrue report from one Tom Fletcher (UN under-secretary-general for humanitarian affairs) that 14,000 Gazan babies were likely to die in the next 48 hours unless aid reached them.
Mr. Fletcher’s claim ignored every reality on the ground
That reality includes the fact that when aid trucks — including UN aid trucks — enter Gaza they tend to be hijacked by Hamas, who then use the aid for their terrorists or sell it at a hiked-up rate to the Gazan citizens it is meant for.
“Reputable” news organizations like the BBC spread the lie around the world.
For days they have been ramping up their coverage of Gaza. Always on a mission — a mission to claim that Gaza above any other story on earth needed to be the subject of media and international pressure.
The Jewish state was committing a “genocide” many of these outlets claimed.
On Wednesday the UN retracted its own report, but not until they had sent that brutal, brutal lie all over the world.
"This was a completely lying, untrue report from one Tom Fletcher (UN under-secretary-general for humanitarian affairs) that 14,000 Gazan babies were likely to die in the next 48 hours unless aid reached them.
"Mr. Fletcher’s claim ignored every reality on the ground.That reality includes the fact that when aid trucks — including UN aid trucks — enter Gaza they tend to be hijacked by Hamas, who then use the aid for their terrorists or sell it at a hiked-up rate to the Gazan citizens it is meant for.
“ 'Reputable” news organizations like the BBC spread the lie around the world.
"For days they have been ramping up their coverage of Gaza. Always on a mission — a mission to claim that Gaza above any other story on earth needed to be the subject of media and international pressure.
"The Jewish state was committing a “genocide” many of these outlets claimed.
"On Wednesday the UN retracted its own report, but not until they had sent that brutal, brutal lie all over the world." . . .
Darren Linvill, co-director of the Media Forensics Hub at Clemson University, told NPR that it's not surprising that a video showing a world leader in such a position would go viral — or that it would be used to promote a certain agenda.
"In today's digital environment, I think it is not a question of whether it goes viral, it's to what ends people want to use that video for," he said. In this case, Macron — and other disinformation experts — say Russia is seizing the moment to try to make him look weak.
Doctrine of Hamas | Wilson Center"Since its creation in December 1987, Hamas has invoked militant interpretations of Islam to spearhead a Sunni extremist movement committed to destroying Israel. Hamas distanced itself from the longstanding Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)—an umbrella organization for disparate Palestinian factions that ranged from Marxist to secular nationalists—by propagating resistance in the religious context of jihad, or a holy struggle and martyrdom. “Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes,” Hamas said in its firststatementin the late 1980s. Predominantly Shiite Iran has armed, trained and funded Hamas since the late 1980s largely due to its opposition to Israel and Islamic ideology.
"Hamas is an Arabic acronym for the Islamic Resistance Movement. It has called on members of the other two Abrahamic faiths—Judaism and Christianity—to accept Islamic rule in the Middle East. “It is the duty of the followers of other religions to stop disputing the sovereignty of Islam in this region, because the day these followers should take over there will be nothing but carnage, displacement and terror,” it decreed. Hamas also rejected any prospect of peace or coexistence with the state of Israel. “Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors. The Palestinian people know better than to consent to having their future, rights and fate toyed with.” . . .
"Western cultural norms are not global norms. We need policy makers to wake up and recognize this -- and to do so fast. It is time for a significant shift in U.S. immigration policy, and for the U.S. government to act against anyone promoting murderous leftist ideology on university campuses."
"In a brief return to Britain, I was concerned to see that London has undergone a dramatic demographic change. The city of my birth is visibly more Muslim than it was even four years ago. On the Tube, I saw more hijabs than baseball caps. The Muslim niqab -- with its full face covering -- is no longer rare.
"For decades, Brits have not been allowed to question the wisdom of importing large numbers of people into a western society who do not share western values. (Brits who do so on social media risk going to prison). Instead, there was a lazy assumption that Muslim immigrants would eventually integrate. Rather than culturally converge, many Muslims living in Britain have culturally diverged.
"Forty three percent of British Muslims now want “the introduction of Sharia law.” Support for Sharia was even stronger among Muslims in London (49%), where Muslims now make up 15 percent of the population. More British Muslims fought for ISIS than currently serve in the British army.
"The United States has long been a melting pot, with a wonderful history of people from all over the world moving to America and becoming American. As an immigrant myself, I love the idea of people moving to America in order to become American. And becoming an American is about a lot more than getting a U.S. passport.
"Western cultural norms are not global norms. We need policy makers to wake up and recognize this -- and to do so fast. It is time for a significant shift in U.S. immigration policy, and for the U.S. government to act against anyone promoting murderous leftist ideology on university campuses." . . .
Learn to call for death to America and Israel in a Middle Eastern voice. TD
. . ."Meanwhile death threats against President Trump continue to accumulate. Moreover, multiple members of his Cabinet have been the victims of death threats, bomb threats, and swatting — often before being confirmed by the Senate. This has been incited by Democrat “leaders” such as Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.)" . . .
"President Trump’s return to the White House and his populist agenda constitute an existential threat to a Democratic Party so unpopular with its own voters that it is in danger of going the way of the Whigs. Several recent polls have revealed that only about 1 in 3 Democrats are optimistic about the future of their party. In response to this crisis, their leaders have reverted to their longstanding tradition of inciting political violence. James Comey claims he is “nonaligned” politically, yet his now notorious “8647” Instagram post was all too typical of Democrat calls for the President’s assassination.
"If the Democrats were at all sincere when they insist that violence has no place in America, they wouldn’t use so much graphic imagery. Former President Biden told donors, a mere five days before Donald Trump was shot in Pennsylvania, “It’s time to put Trump in a bullseye.” Biden later provided a semi-coherent rationale for using those words during an NBC interview, but the irresponsible rhetoric has never stopped. As recently as three weeks ago, for example, the Democratic governor of Illinois issued a thinly veiled call for violent protests which included this admonition: “These Republicans cannot know a moment of peace.”
"This is perfectly consistent with the rhetoric that has been deployed against Trump by Democrats and “Never-Trumpers” since he entered presidential politics in 2015. In October of that year Rick Wilson, a co-founder of the Lincoln Project, appeared on MSNBC and offered this wisdom: “They’re still going to have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump.” Even after the first attempt on Trump’s life, former Biden staffer Kate Bedingfield opined on CNN that Democrats should “turn their fire on Donald Trump.” The connection between such imagery and the assassination attempts was not lost on the voters per an NBC poll:" . . .
" Most importantly, a pluralist agenda doesn’t treat voters as angry mobs to be mobilized but as civic equals to be empowered."
"In their quest to win back working-class voters and compete in battleground states, many Democrats have convinced themselves that the best way to beat Trumpism is to copy it — at least on economics. The new playbook is built around economic populism: tariffs, industrial policy, big government checks, and a willingness to bash corporations, billionaires, and free markets in the same breath. But while this might make for good focus group fodder, it’s a long-term loser — for the Democratic Party, and for American democracy.
"MAGA populism isn’t just about economic pain; it’s about channeling that pain into resentment, isolation and authoritarian politics. When Democrats try to meet that energy with their own brand of populism — whether from the progressive left or the blue-collar center — they validate the frame that all of America’s problems are caused by “them” — elites, foreigners, corporations or coastal urbanites. This style of politics undermines democratic institutions, reduces trust in pluralistic compromise and feeds a dangerous cycle of permanent grievance.
"Instead of competing with President Trump on who can rage louder against the machine, Democrats should offer an alternative vision rooted in civic renewal, economic dignity and democratic accountability. That means rejecting both laissez-faire complacency and populist demagoguery.
"There is a third way — and it’s not centrism for its own sake. It’s pluralism: the idea that the best way to rebuild trust in American democracy is not by consolidating power, but by decentralizing it; not by punishing “bad guys,” but by empowering citizens; not by demonizing markets, but by making them work better for everyone.
"A pluralist economic agenda would emphasize regional development over Beltway industrial policy deals. It would strengthen local entrepreneurship and cooperative ownership instead of doubling down on megaproject subsidies. It would treat tax reform as a civic obligation, not a populist weapon. And it would champion economic inclusion — especially for those left behind — without scapegoating those who succeed." . . .
"Access to Biden was so tightly managed that only a chosen few could even speak to him. So when Americans voted for Biden, they were really voting for his staff.
The unelected team ran the show while Biden stayed out of the spotlight."
"Former President Joe Biden’s administration faced intense scrutiny last week following the simultaneous release of devastating health news and explosive allegations about his presidency’s inner workings.
"Biden received a diagnosis of advanced prostate cancer that had metastasized to his bones, a condition that medical experts typically consider terminal.
"The diagnosis drew widespread sympathy, including supportive comments from President Donald Trump.
"The health revelation coincided with the publication of “Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,” a book that presents damaging allegations about Biden’s capacity to serve as president.
"The book’s co-authors, Axios reporter Alex Thompson and CNN’s Jake Tapper, made startling claims about who actually controlled the Biden administration during his presidency.
"Thompson revealed that a small group of individuals, referred to within the administration as “the Politburo,” effectively ran the White House operations.
"The term “Politburo” traditionally describes the policy-making class of communist states." . . .
