Tuesday, January 5, 2016

The Case for Civil Disobedience in Oregon

 Hammond Family
"What if the government viciously and unjustly prosecuted a rancher family so as to drive them from their land?"
NRO  "Watching the news yesterday, a person could be forgiven for thinking that a small group of Americans had literally lost their minds. Militias are marching through Oregon on behalf of convicted arsonists? A small band of armed men has taken over a federal building? The story practically writes itself. 

"Or does it? Deranged militiamen spoiling for a fight against the federal government make for good copy, but what if they’re right? What if the government viciously and unjustly prosecuted a rancher family so as to drive them from their land? Then protest, including civil disobedience, would be not just understandable but moral, and maybe even necessary. 

"Ignore for a moment the #OregonUnderAttack hashtag — a rallying cry for leftists accusing the protesters of terrorism — and the liberal media’s self-satisfied cackling. Read the court documents in the case that triggered the protest, and the accounts of sympathetic ranchers. What emerges is a picture of a federal agency that will use any means necessary, including abusing federal anti-terrorism statutes, to increase government landholdings." . . .

Full Story About What’s Going on In Oregon – “Militia” Take Over Malheur National Wildlife Refuge In Protest to Hammond Family Persecution…

"Grab a Cup of Coffee – Because This is Soup-to-Nuts.

"Many people will awaken today to the news of approximately 100 to 150 armed militia taking control of a closed Wildlife Park Headquarters, and not know the full back-story – so here it is:" . . .


Sympathy for jailed ranchers, anger at occupiers in Oregon town


Ammon Bundy and his militia members are holding up in  Malheur National Wildlife refuge building to protest the prosecution of two ranchers 
Ammon Bundy and his militia members are holding up in  Malheur National 
Wildlife refuge building to protest the prosecution of two ranchers 

No comments: