Thursday, January 22, 2026

California under Newsom; What would he do with the United States?

 Newsom’s Record . . . "Since taking office as governor, Newsom has proposed nearly $2 trillion of spending and signed more than 4000 bills into law. What has been the impact? Schools are still performing poorly, Newsom allowed government employee unions to keep schools closed longer than any other state and raided reserves to cover up spending that grew 50 percent faster than revenues, housing is less affordable, and CA’s unemployment rate is 29 percent higher than the US unemployment rate vs. 8 percent higher when he took office." . . .


40,000 people died on California roads. State leaders looked away  . . . "Gov. Gavin Newsom declined an interview request. Last year, he vetoed a bill that would have required technology that alerts drivers when they’re speeding.  

"The state DMV, which is under his authority, has wide latitude to take dangerous drivers off the road. But it routinely allows drivers with extreme histories of dangerous driving to continue to operate on our roadways, where many go on to kill. 

"Steve Gordon, whom Newsom chose to run the agency in 2019, won’t talk about it. He has declined or ignored CalMatters requests for an interview. 

The agency simply released a statement from him in March, after our first interview request, touting modernization efforts that reflect an “ongoing commitment to enhancing accountability and transparency while continually refining our processes to ensure California’s roads are safer for everyone.”

"Neither Newsom nor Gordon has announced any major changes since then.". . . 

Who to believe? The California exodus is a myth. Los Angeles Times or California population continues to shrink - CalMatters ?

Breaking Up California: A History of Many Attempts - California State Library. . . "There have been more attempts to divide California than anniversaries of its statehood in 1850. Some of the at least 220 attempts to break up California are chronicled here with a timeline, historic maps and documents, books and articles on the topic as well as videos on more recent efforts. There’s also a brief history of Spain and Mexico’s struggles to divide the vastness of the territory that would become California into manageable parts.

"Under Article IV, Section III of the United States Constitution, “no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.” The last state to successfully go through this process was West Virginia in 1863, which broke off from Virginia." . . .   Most recent here:

Relive The Civil Rights Era. Send In The Troops.

 Ann Coulter

"If Trump wants to be remembered by history as one of our greatest presidents, he should follow Eisenhower and JFK’s lead: Bring the troops home and send them to every sanctuary state in the union."

Conservative Political Cartoons

"In honor of Martin Luther King Jr. Day this week, every liberal made the totally original point that anti-ICE protesters in Minneapolis are walking in King’s footsteps! King protested — and they’re protesting. See? Same thing.
"In any liberal morality play, Democrats always get to be the shivering, oppressed black people, while Republicans have to play the part Bull Connor, Birmingham, Ala.’s racist commissioner of public safety.
"Except the facts are exactly the opposite. I’m sure you’re bored of hearing this, but Connor was a Democrat, as were all the politicians promising “massive resistance” to racial integration. Republicans were the ones forcing Democrats to abide by federal law, along with a few John Fetterman-style Democrats.
"But the biggest fraud the media are trying to push on America is their total erasure of the most heroic actions ever taken by U.S. presidents: Invoking the Insurrection Act and sending troops to the states to enforce federal law against recalcitrant Democratic governors and individual citizens.
"Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower, then John F. Kennedy, deployed the military to compel Democrats to stop violating federal law — as set forth in the Supreme Court decision, Brown v. Board of Education. In that case, the court found — for the first time — that the education of black and white children in “separate but equal” public schools violated the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
"You want an “insurrection”? The constitutional rights of nine black people in Arkansas were being violated! More precisely, the rights of all 400,000 black Arkansans were being violated.
"Today, the rights of all 340 million Americans to live in a law-based constitutional republic are being violated, and at least 77 million are ticked off about it.
"Eisenhower didn’t wait for federal agents to be hospitalized, hit with shovels, injured with projectiles, their vehicles vandalized, and streets blocked for weeks on end to send in federal troops. State officials and private citizens were acting as if federal law didn’t apply to them. That was enough" . . .   https://anncoulter.com/2026/01/22/relive-the-civil-rights-era-send-in-the-troops/

Gavin Newsom The KneePad Salesmen Finds A New Audience At Davos)

 Check Out Gavin Newsom’s Face As Interviewer Rattles Off Insult After Insult - AOL   

"Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom appeared uncomfortable on Wednesday while Semafor’s Ben Smith read through several insults against him." . . .

Broc Smith

"At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Smith read through several insults from President Donald Trump’s administration, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who referred to Newsom as “Patrick Bateman meets Sparkle Beach Ken.” Newsom called the constant online insults “very unbecoming,” but said that his office needed to call out Trump’s so-called “absurdity.”
" 'The Treasury Secretary described you as Patrick Bateman meets Sparkle Beach Ken,” Smith said. “The White House Communications Director called you Gavin Newscum and an official White House account, a federal government account, described you as a very online sexual slur that people here probably don’t want to hear at 8:30 in the morning … Is that kind of discourse from you, from them good for America?”
" 'No, it’s deeply unbecoming. Come on, of course it is. It’s not what we should be doing,” Newsom said. “But you’ve got to point out the absurdity, you’ve got to put a mirror up to this. This is madness.” 
"Bessent made the retort against Newsom on Wednesday after the California governor brought knee pads to the event so world leaders could bend the knee to Trump more easily. He accused Newsom of being economically illiterate and self-absorbed.
" 'Governor Newsom, who strikes me as Patrick Bateman meets Sparkle Beach Ken, may be the only Californian who knows less about economics than Kamala Harris,” Bessent said. “He’s here this week with his billionaire sugar daddy, Alex Soros, and Davos is a perfect place for a man who, when everyone else is on lockdown, when he was having people arrested for going to church.”
"White House Director of Communications Steven Cheung compared Newsom to a “petulant child who can’t control his emotions.” . . .

The "Warmth of collectivism"

Zohran Mamdani pushes NYC tax hike on the rich -- in blow to fellow Democrat Kathy Hochul's budget plan | New York Post

"It’s not enough for Mam.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani brushed off Gov. Kathy Hochul’s state budget proposal that came with a pledge not to hike income taxes — saying Wednesday he’s going to push for an increase anyway.

It’s the latest move by Mamdani to pull Hochul to the left to align with him and his liberal supporters’ goal of soaking wealthy New Yorkers to raise billions to pay for a freebie-filled agenda that includes free bus fares." . . .


 Individual Liberty In The Crucible Of History: 5. The Road to Collectivism 

. . . "The destitute succumbed easily to the explana­tion that they were victims of op­pression. Some men may be hon­estly convinced that they know what is best for all of us; at any rate, collectivism offered a mode for reformers and planners men caught in the grip of a compelling yision to use government to em­body their ideas in law and prac­tice. By these and other paths did Americans gather upon the road to collectivism.

"Historically, however, the shift to collectivism was made in the following manner. Men organized themselves in interest groups for the pursuit of common goals. They included such groupings as farmer alliances, labor unions, business associations, and professional or­ganizations. These organizations frequently sought privileged status at law, and to bring the force of government to bear upon Americans to make them accede to their demands. When they suc­ceeded, they contested with one another for superior position, and preyed upon both unorganized in­dividuals and other groups as well. This neofeudal system (strangely enough, many “liber­als” called it progress where labor unions were concerned) created a situation rife for the United States government to step in and “adjust” these demands in the public interest. This last is the face that collectivism presents in our day." . . .



'Squad' Dems join GOP to advance contempt resolutions against Clintons in Epstein probe

 

Rich Terrell

'Squad' Dems join GOP to advance contempt resolutions against Clintons in Epstein probe     . . . "The House Oversight Committee voted to refer former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for chamber-wide votes on criminal contempt of Congress charges with the help of multiple Democrats, including two members of the far-left Squad, for defying subpoenas related to the panel's Jeffrey Epstein probe." . . .
"The Democrats who voted to advance Bill Clinton's resolution were: Reps. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., Summer Lee, D-Pa., Stephen Lynch, D-Mass. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., Emily Randall, D-Wash., Lateefah Simon, D-Calif., Melanie Stansbury, D-N.M., and Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich." . . .

Jonathan Turley: January 22, 2026: Democrats Join Republicans in Voting the Clintons in Contempt of Congress  . . . "Yesterday, a curious thing happened in a House Committee. Bill and Hillary Clinton were actually held accountable for flouting the law — at least as a preliminary matter. In the House Oversight Committee, Democrats joined Republicans in approving contempt resolutions against the two political figures after they refused to appear to answer questions about their connections to Jeffrey Epstein.

" The House panel voted 34-8 to advance the resolution on Bill Clinton to a floor vote. It voted 28-15 to advance a resolution on Hillary Clinton.

"As previously discussed, the Clintons adopted a position that was devoid of any cognizable legal defense. It was simple hubris, telling Congress that they did not want to appear to be saying that congressional subpoenas are discretionary for them.

"From the Whitewater case to the Lewinsky matter to the email scandal, the Clintons have always escaped accountability for their actions. Courts can find perjury and prosecutors can find classified material without a criminal charge. Evidence can suddenly surface after investigations, or thousands of emails can be destroyed without any repercussions.

"After that history, it is little surprise that the Clintons would believe that they, unlike other Americans, can choose whether to comply with a subpoena. After standing in flagrant contempt, the Clintons only reaffirmed the sense of entitlement by offering to allow an interview in New York without a transcript. There would be no “what the meaning of ‘is’ is” moments." . . .

Has Minnesota become California?

Stand With Riley Gaines | Facebook "DISQUALIFIED: Trans State Rep. Leigh Finke refused to condemn a mob storming a church during worship —she justified it and said it must continue."

Minnesota now.

"That alone should disqualify her from public office.
Calling mobs invading churches “non-violent resistance” doesn’t change reality.
It’s intimidation.
It’s harassment.
This isn’t activism — it’s abuse of power.
When lawmakers cheer on mobs targeting houses of worship, they are no longer serving the public. They are threatening it.
She should be formally investigated.
She should be publicly censured.
And if laws were violated, she should be held legally accountable — just like anyone else would be.
No one is above the Constitution.
Not activists.
Not mobs.
And not state representatives.
If this is allowed to stand, it sets a dangerous precedent:
political disagreement becomes permission to invade churches.
That cannot be normalized.
Hold her accountable."

Minnesota as we knew it:


. . . "Of the 262 soldiers who answered Hancock’s call, the 1st Minnesota suffered 70 killed and 145 wounded or missing. According to legendary Civil War historian James McPherson, “This casualty rate of 82 percent of those engaged was the highest of the war for any Union regiment in a single action.” Colonel Colvill and his men knew that they were being asked to sacrifice themselves, yet without hesitation, they went forward. The overwhelming sacrifices made by the men of the 1st Minnesota and so many others on July 2 were not in vain. Their efforts allowed the Army of the Potomac to ultimately prevail at the Battle of Gettysburg, and in a larger sense, helped to save the nation." . . .