White Liberals Think Black Voters Are Too Stupid To Get Voter ID

 The Federalist 

 " ‘It’s infuriating. It’s like they think a whole demographic of our country can’t figure out how to get an ID,’ said Wisconsin’s Will Martin."

"Elite white liberals think black voters are helpless, incompetent, and stupid. They don’t think too highly of married women and rural Americans, either. Or poor people and Native Americans and the disabled for that matter. 

"That condescension was on full display again this week as all but one House Democrat voted against a bill that would require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote and a photo ID at the polls. The measure passed on a party-line vote.

"Why would the “Party of the People” be so vehemently opposed to a proposal overwhelmingly supported by the people — black people, brown people, white people, male and female people, even people who identify as Democrats? 

" 'Because the SAVE America Act, as the bill is dubbed (and its antecedent, the SAVE Act) is a modern-day “Jim Crow” bill, according to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.   

“While the specific policies may have changed since the days of the Jim Crow South, the goal of the SAVE Act is the same: disenfranchising American citizens and making it harder for eligible people to vote, particularly low income Americans and people of color,” the New York Democrat said this week on the Senate floor. Think about that. legislation requiring voter ID is tantamount to the “separate but equal,” segregated South, according to representatives from the party that brought America the Jim Crow era.

"Democrat allies like the group Reproductive Freedom For All, the abortion industry lobby formerly known as NARAL Pro-Choice America, echoed the party’s race-baiting talking points. " . . . More... 

Olympic Athletes Fail at Their One Job; We’ve failed to teach patriotism to the athletes representing us.

 The American Spectator | USA News and Politics

"Representing this country proudly is the only job American Olympic athletes have — and they’re failing at it."

Added by TD

. . . "In our modern world, the Olympics strike as something of an anomaly: This isn’t the kind of event where everyone gets participation awards and goes home mildly annoyed that competition amounts to nothing these days. This isn’t some kind of global “kumbaya” where we erase our differences.

"No, this is where men and women patriotically do their best to represent the rest of us well (and to prove that all that money we sank into their training was worth it). The Olympic field is one where skill and expertise are rewarded; where countries are celebrated and patriotism is praised while the whole world watches.

"This is good old-fashioned competition and good old-fashioned national pride — sights you don’t see on the global stage every day.

"Of course, that’s not the world most of these athletes grew up in. Sure, they’ve been competitive (they wouldn’t be in Milan otherwise), but they’ve also spent their entire lives being indoctrinated in an ideology that believes national pride is a vice we should have all outgrown. Need proof? Newsweek has a list of all the U.S. athletes who have used their five minutes of fame to lambast their president.

"For instance, Rich Ruohonen, a lawyer turned athlete, told journalists in Milan that he believes there are constitutional issues with the way the federal government is trying to enforce its immigration law in his home state of Minnesota.

"Hunter Hess expressed his “mixed emotions” when it comes to representing the U.S. at the Olympics: “There’s obviously a lot going on that I’m not the biggest fan of, and I think a lot of people aren’t,” he said during a press conference. “I think for me it’s more I’m representing my, like, friends and family back home, the people that represented before me. All the things that I believe are good about the U.S. I just think if it aligns with my moral values, I feel like I’m representing it.” 

"President Donald Trump responded by [sadly] calling Hess a “real Loser.”

"Then there’s Amber Glenn, a figure skater and self-identified pansexual, who decided to use her newfound platform to publicly criticize the treatment the LGBTQ “community” has experienced under the Trump administration." . . .  More...

Aubrey Harris is a graduate of Hillsdale College (2023), the former Intercollegiate Studies Institute fellow at The American Spectator and current columnist. She writes Spectator P.M. Newsletter for American Spectator subscribers where she rambles on current events, historical topics, and life in general. When she isn’t writing, Aubrey enjoys long runs, solving rock climbs, and rattling windows with the 32-foot pipes on the organ.

The Growing Liberal Backlash Against Newsom

 Ellie Gardey Holmes  

"For now, it seems that he is losing the progressives — in spite of his extremely progressive record."

Toon added by TD

"As Gavin Newsom works to project inevitability as the Democratic frontrunner, progressives are coalescing behind a single conclusion: He is not their man. (RELATED: Newsom Practically Demands to Be the Democratic Candidate)

"Progressive California journalist and political adviser Gil Durán published an op-ed with the Guardian Tuesday harshly titled “Gavin Newsom’s likely presidential bid is built on broken promises.” He makes the case that the California governor has repeatedly failed to deliver on his progressive commitments. (RELATED: Gavin Newsom’s ‘Self-Puffery’ Gets Him in Trouble With David Axelrod)

"Durán portrays the governor as a man entirely motivated by his own ambitions for power who has lost any regard for working-class Americans. Newsom, says Durán, “mistakes theatrics for leadership.” Durán believes Newsom has been “wishy-washy” on pursuing progressive priorities on a number of issues, including public healthcare, homelessness, the death penalty, COVID control measures, and reparations for descendants of slaves, and has aligned himself too closely with his Big Tech billionaire friends.

" Like Trump, Newsom breaks promises, serves billionaire interests, and mistakes social media theatrics for leadership. Is that really what American voters will want in 2028?” said Durán. “Having watched Newsom for two decades, I don’t see why anyone thinks he’s it. He’s not even ‘strong and wrong’ — just highly ambitious, strategically dishonest, and blatantly opportunistic.” (RELATED: Gavin Newsom, ‘King of Fraud’)

"Worryingly for Newsom, Durán is far from alone, as progressives have increasingly spoken out against him. Many progressives now argue that Democrats should rally behind a different candidate, someone who is concerned with their priorities, not self-aggrandizement or appeasing establishment donors and the billionaire class.

"In an interview with Current Affairs last month, California Rep. Ro Khanna came out swinging against the governor of his state, calling Newsom a “cookie-cutter Democrat” and a “Clintonite.” He warned that if someone like Gavin Newsom were chosen as the Democratic nominee in 2028, “[W]e basically are going to see an even more ferocious right-wing populism come back in 2030 or 2032.” Khanna argued that what Democrats instead need is “an FDR-like realignment” and someone who, like him, takes on AIPAC, defense contractors, the Epstein class, and billionaires.

"California state Sen. Caroline Menjivar recently complained, like Durán, that Newsom’s focus on his national ambitions is causing him to turn away from his past progressive priorities" . . .More...

Gavin Newsom Wants to Be an Emperor; Ellie Gardey Holmes

Ellie Gardey Holmes is Reporter and Associate Editor at The American Spectator. She is the author of . She is a graduate of the University of Notre Dame, where she studied political science, philosophy, and journalism. Ellie has previously written for the Daily Caller, College Fix, and Irish Rover. She is originally from Michigan.

The Remaking of Alex Pretti: Imperfect Times Demand the Perfect Hero –

JONATHAN TURLEY  

The history of the American and French Revolutions shows that heroes can be discovered or created for political purposes. They can produce true tragedies when they are used to radicalize some and dehumanize others.

BP Daily

   "Below is my column in The Hill on the recent controversies over enhanced images of Alex Pretti and his shooting in Minnesota.

   "As seen throughout our history, Pretti has achieved mythic status — even having an ice cream invented after him by one of the founders of Ben & Jerry’s. Reality recedes when politics demand the perfect hero. 

"Here is the column: 

    “ 'Show me a hero, and I will write you a tragedy.”

   " That statement, from F. Scott Fitzgerald, has never been truer than with the posthumous treatment of Alex Pretti, killed in a confrontation with federal officers in Minneapolis. He has been called a “hero” and a “martyr” by the left as a rallying cry for protests around the country. In the process, many have “enhanced” both his story and his image. 

   "MS NOW has admitted that it used an AI-enhanced photo of Pretti that made him look more handsome. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) was criticized for bringing to the Senate floor an altered image, featuring a headless immigration agent, that made it look like officers executed a kneeling Pretti with a shot to the head. 

   " Pretti needs to be be inviolate to make the government seem vile in the eyes of the public. He is being described as the combination of Florence Nightingale and Crispus Attucks. 

   " A CNN panelist and co-host of “The View,” Ana Navarro, voiced the new orthodoxy that Pretti was the “perfect guy … the guy you’d want to date your daughter, the guy you want your son to grow up to be, a decent human being who was serving humanity.” She added that he was so perfect that “there is nothing that has been said about that man that isn’t wonderful. And so they can’t malign him.” 

   " The point is that any skepticism, let alone criticism, is no longer acceptable.

   "In fairness, Pretti was vilified before he was canonized. Many of us objected that the videotape evidence did not support the original description of Pretti’s conduct. Pretti did not threaten officers or approach them brandishing a weapon. 

   " But he did disobey police orders and he did resist arrest. Indeed, eleven days earlier, he had spat at officers, damaged a police vehicle by kicking out its taillight, and again resisted officers. 

   " The remaking of Alex Pretti by both sides is strikingly familiar. On Tuesday, my book on the 250th anniversary of the American Revolution will be released. “Rage and the Republic” looks at both the American and French Revolutions to explore why one became the world’s oldest democracy and the other became a blood-soaked terror.". . .  More...

Epstein Revelations You Won’t Read In The New York Times

  Ann Coulter

  "Instead of locking up Epstein and putting an end to his sexual predations on young girls back in 2006, Krischer’s office treated the girls as if they were the ones on trial. Prosecutor Lanna Belohlavek accused the teens of prostitution, asking them, “You’re aware that you committed a crime?' ” 

"I don’t have a team of researchers like The New York Times to review the Epstein files, but I have flipped through them and found a couple things that you won’t read in the Times — and you definitely won’t see on MS-NOW.

"Criminal defense lawyer David Schoen sent an informative email to Epstein, saying no one would ever take the Russia investigation seriously because special counsel Robert Mueller had selected a legal team that was a “murderer’s row of the worst.”

"Schoen’s case-in-chief was Andrew Weissmann, frequent Times opinion writer (Title of actual column: “A Former Prosecutor on the ‘Incredibly Strong Case’ Against Trump”). He appears so frequently on MS-NOW, he has a cot and toothbrush under Lawrence O’Donnell’s desk.

"Weissmann, Schoen said, was known in the U.S. attorney’s office as “The Pathological liar,” because he “literally would withhold exculpatory evidence throughout the case.” When defense counsel complained, Weissman waited until the guy “went to the bathroom or lunch, stick the documents under other [papers] on his table, and tell the judge the lawyer had it all along.” He did this even in murder cases, which Schoen knew because, “his rats have come to me to admit their role in it.” If true, this is a Brady violation, about as bad as it gets."The Times has frequently discussed the rule, saying it ought to be “obvious,” to “prosecutors with any sense of fairness” that they have to “inform a defendant’s lawyer of evidence that could be favorable to the defendant’s case.” The paper complains about the “near complete lack of punishment for prosecutors who flout the rule.”

"Democrats are demanding that ICE agents be stripped of their qualified immunity? Federal prosecutors like Weissmann have absolute, blanket immunity for their actions.

"Schoen noted that Weissmann’s unsavory tactics “ruined” some of the biggest criminal cases ever tried. For example, he led the federal prosecution of Arthur Andersen LLP, a major player in the Enron scandal. But because of his extreme overreach on jury instructions (agreed to by the pliant judge) the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the conviction.

"In terms of Weissmann’s appearance of fairness, Schoen said Weissmann is a “Trump hater and Clinton sycophant.” . . .More...

Here's the GOP Rep Whose Lightning Round of Questioning Wrecked the Biden DOJ

Townhall

. . . "But let’s get to Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX), who used the opportunity to obliterate the Biden Justice Department for their years-long campaign of political retribution against their rivals. It was a lightning round that took a knife to the gut of the old Biden DOJ and their corruption:

GILL: “I’ve got a series of questions for you that we can get through pretty pretty quickly, I think.” 

“Can you tell me, is it true that the Biden-Harris DOJ raided President Trump’s home?” 

BONDI: “They did.” 

GILL: “Did the Biden Harris DOJ allow Jack Smith to spy on over a dozen Republican members of congress?” 

BONDI: “Absolutely.” 

GILL: “Did the Biden-Harris DOJ seize the phone of a sitting sitting Republican Congressman?” 

BONDI: “Yes.” 

GILL: “Did the Biden-Harris DOJ and Jack Smith pay at least $20,000 to confidential human sources to provide information on President Trump?” 

BONDI: “At least.” 

GILL: “Did the Biden-Harris DOJ and FBI fail to apprehend the suspect who placed pipe bombs near the capitol ahead of January 6th?” 

BONDI: “Yes.” 

GILL: “Did the Biden-Harris DOJ target parents as domestic terrorists?” 

BONDI: “Absolutely.” 

GILL: “Did the Biden-Harris DOJ target pro-life Catholics, going so far as to interview a priest and a choir director?” 

BONDI: “Yes.”    

Full article...