Why Harris, Booker, and Klobuchar (nor hopefully any other Democrat) will never be President

But it is clear that not one of them feels any shame over their wholly unfair condemnation of Kavanaugh.  They are proud of their talent for the politics of personal destruction; Democrats invented it, perfected it.  People like Harris, Booker and Klobuchar have existed since the founding era and will always be with us, but they should be shunned for their amorality, their willingness to grind their opponents into dust.

Patricia McCarthy  "The calculated Russia hoax devised to bring down a presidential candidate, president-elect and then president, is the most serious and egregious political scandal in US history.  Second may be the Kavanaugh hearings.  So determined to not let Brett Kavanaugh be seated on the Supreme Court, the demented Left decided to invent an equally monstrous lie to prevent the confirmation of Trump's choice for the Justice to replace Anthony Kennedy. I think that every Democrat on that committee had to know that the accusations against Kavanaugh were false, that Blasey-Ford was a plant, a willing dupe in the Democrat scheme to destroy a good man for their political purposes.  The entire fiasco was so unspeakable that in a just world, all the perpetrators would be in prison for fraud, Diane Feinstein among them."
. . . 
. . . "There is little doubt that had Biden, Warren, O'Rourke, and the rest of the Democrat candidates been on that judiciary committee, they would have been equally vicious toward Kavanaugh.  They too would have relished devastating a good man for political purposes.  This emptiness of soul is why Harris, Booker and Klobuchar, will all lose.  They are a menace to America as is the rest of the left. "
Emphasis mine, TD

Ariel Dumas, a writer for CBS’s “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” declared that “Whatever happens, I’m just glad we ruined Brett Kavanaugh’s life.”

HuffPost and Senior Reporter Sued Over Kavanaugh Story  . . . "Evans insists that there were no sources to support that story and that HuffPo’s conduct was so egregious that it satisfies the higher standard of New York Times v. Sullivan. That standard requires a showing of “actual malice,” or either knowledge that a representation is actually false or reckless disregard of the truth of the representation." . . .  Jonathan Turley