"The “war crime” outcry is simply another collaboration between America’s enemies, the media, and the Democrat Party."

 "Iran is attempting to set the stage for such accusations by placing human shields around their power plants, but international law is clear about this: the results of such actions are on them."  J.R. Dunn

Donald Trump, War Criminal? - J.R. Dunn  

"Over the last couple of days, we’ve been hearing that, once the Dems take the midterms, they’ll immediately start preparations to try Donald Trump for war crimes in Iran. The loudest voice here – as is usually the case – is James Carville (actually, what he said was more like “We gone git that-theah Donal’ Trump for woah crimes roun’ heah.”), but he hasn’t been alone.

"Is there any truth to this? What they’re referring to, it seems, is President Trump’s announcement that he intends to target infrastructure, particularly power generation and bridges, in the next round of air strikes if the Iranian government refuses to come to terms.

"On the face of it, there’s nothing to this. Both power stations and transportation infrastructure are legitimate targets of war and always have been. Both – along with most other infrastructure targets – are used by belligerents to carry out military actions. Energy generation is obviously useful in powering military equipment and installations. Roads and bridges are used to transport supplies and shift military forces. Which, ipso facto, makes them legitimate targets. That they’re also used for civilian purposes doesn’t change things." . . .

Trump Obliterated CNN for Peddling Fake News About the Iran Ceasefire

. . . "There was a ten-point plan and an accompanying statement from Tehran about the deal that CNN ran with, but it turned out to be fake news. The president and his staff roasted them for it:"

No one can believe that Fake News CNN put out a knowingly false and dangerous statement pretending it came from the upper levels of the Iranian Government. It didn’t! It was totally made up and posted, as a headline, for purpose of, perhaps, inflaming a very delicate situation. It was a new, trouble making site from Nigeria, and CNN just got caught cheating - A very dangerous thing to do! . . .

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) calls for President Trump to be ousted from office

. . . "Memo to Ilhan: Trump is trying to achieve America’s goals, one of which is seeing to it that Iran can’t launch nuclear weapons at America or her protectorates. He is simultaneously trying to alleviate the staggering amount of fraud, deception, and theft of taxpayer dollars that you yourself have worked so hard to engender and protect.

"And he is defending Americans against a pseudo-religion that advocates converting, enslaving, or killing “infidels,” meaning anyone and everyone that doesn’t wholeheartedly believe in and support a “religion” founded by a 50-year-old guy who married a 6-year-old, but waited until his “wife” was 9-years-old before consummating the marriage.

"Also, he didn’t marry his brother.

"Who is nuts? Who is immoral?

"You should be prosecuted, sentenced … and deported. Praise be to Allah."

 

Art of the Deal that Reset the World

Doug Ross @ Journal  

"Let’s do a quick recap for the folks in the cheap seats. The Panicans said it was reckless. Wrong. They said it would start a war. Wrong. They said there was no plan. Wrong. They said Trump was in over his head. Spectacularly wrong. At some point, being wrong this consistently stops being a mistake and starts being a lifestyle." . . . 

"On April 7, 2026, a ceasefire with Iran went into effect — and somewhere, an entire army of blue-check foreign policy experts quietly deleted their “This is how World War III starts” threads. While the Panicans were hyperventilating into their New Yorker tote bags, Trump was running the same playbook he’s used since the ‘80s. Pressure, escalation, leverage, deal. It wasn’t a secret. He literally wrote a book about it. But reading is hard when you’re too busy doom-scrolling and writing “we’re all gonna die” in a group chat full of people who think The View is news. The ceasefire is real. The Strait is reopening. And the Panicans owe everyone an apology they’ll never give — because admitting they were wrong would require a level of self-awareness they haven’t unlocked yet.

"Trump has been running this same move since before most of these pundits had Twitter accounts, and they still fell for it. Every. Single. Time. He did it with China on trade — “Oh no, tariffs will destroy us!” Deal. He did it with North Korea — “He’s going to nuke Guam!” Summit. He did it with the USMCA — “NAFTA is sacred!” Signed. And now Iran — “He’s a madman, this is catastrophic!” Ceasefire. At this point, falling for the panic is like being the guy who gets Charlie Brown’d by the football for the 40th time and still blames the football. The Panicans had months to recognize the pattern. A toddler with a memory could’ve called this. But instead, they spent every night on cable news looking directly into a camera and being wrong with absolute confidence. That takes talent. The wrong kind — but talent nonetheless." . . .

. . . "Now here’s where it gets really fun — because the ceasefire isn’t just a Middle East story, and the Panicans have no idea what’s coming next. The Strait of Hormuz is reopening, which means twenty percent of the world’s oil is no longer held hostage by a regime that doesn’t exist anymore. Whoops. Russia and Ukraine are getting dragged toward a real negotiation because the U.S. just showed the entire planet what happens when it actually commits. China is looking at Taiwan and doing math it doesn’t like. And across the Middle East, countries that couldn’t agree on what day it was are suddenly standing in a line together (remember “The Board of Peace”?). Meanwhile, the “experts” who said none of this was possible are now pivoting to “well, anyone could have done this” — which is hilarious, because they had eight years under Obama and four under Biden to try, and the best they managed was pallets of cash, a nuclear-armed terror state and a participation trophy. Phase 2 is the homecoming: immigration, housing, AI, infrastructure, space. The adults are back at the table. The Panicans can take a seat — preferably in the back, where we can’t hear them." . . .More...

Larry Kudlow: Once again President Trump outwits the defeatist Democrats

"One of the many faults with today’s Democratic party is they don’t know how to win. They are defeatists. They find themselves on the wrong side of all kinds of 80-20 issues, like open borders, defending illegal criminals, waste, fraud, and abuse corruption, tax hikes, and men in women’s locker rooms. Now, here they go once again badmouthing President Trump’s tremendous victory in Operation Epic Fury, that absolutely crushed Iran in only 38 days. These defeatist Democrats now want to limit the commander in chief’s foreign policy powers, at almost exactly the moment where Mr. Trump, and our mighty military, and American patriots everywhere have scored a tremendous victory.

"Is the war over? I think it basically is. There may be more hostilities, but we’re on the one-yard line. Let’s wait and see. Mr. Trump will never cut a bad deal. He has opened the Strait of Hormuz to take the pressure off energy prices. And he’s keeping all the American military forces in place in the Middle East, just to make sure a badly defeated Iran makes a peace deal. They may misbehave, and more bombing will occur. If they don’t agree to turning over the enriched uranium to America, then more bombing may be necessary. Ditto for their missile programs. Ditto if they keep bombing our Gulf allies." . . .

Trump Confounds Critics Again; Trump threatens devastation, then pivots to diplomacy.

 The American Spectator | USA News and Politics

"As in most wars, there is likely no perfect solution. But, Cohen writes, the war “is not the catastrophe that some make it out to be, nor is the United States stuck in a quagmire.” Iran’s threat to the region has been scaled-back. Any solution — military or negotiated — is likely to be temporary — that is the way international relations usually work" 

"President Donald Trump has once again confounded his many critics by agreeing to a two-week ceasefire in the war against Iran, after threatening to bomb Iran back to the Stone Age and end a civilization.

"On the right, former Trump supporter and former congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene said that Trump had gone “insane.” Andrew Day in The American Conservative suggested that Trump might use nuclear weapons against Iran. Bruce Fein characterized Trump’s attacks on Iran as “unconstitutional” and “criminal.” Steven Simon in Responsible Statecraft accused Trump of threatening genocide in Iran. (RELATED: The Real Risk to Trump’s Coalition Over Iran)

"On the left, Sen. Chuck Schumer said Trump resembled “an unhinged madman.” Sen. Bernie Sanders called Trump “dangerous and mentally unbalanced.” Representative Ro Khanna accused Trump of “threatening war crimes.” Charlie Savage in the New York Times called Trump’s threats “self-incriminating statements” for a future war crimes trial. Some critics have suggested invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office. 

"Trump’s threat was to bomb Iran’s infrastructure — bridges, desalination plants, power plants. These are the kinds of targets that were routinely bombed during World War II, yet Trump’s critics claim that deliberately striking them would be a war crime. All of those targets affect Iran’s ability to make war. Judged by this standard, Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman were war criminals — after all, they oversaw and countenanced the deliberate bombing of civilians in Germany and Japan. (RELATED: Trump: A Real Commander-in-Chief)

Trump Confounds Critics Again | . . . 

. . . "Writing in Foreign Policy, hardly a MAGA journal, Rand strategic analyst Raphael Cohen takes a more balanced and less unhinged view of the progress of the Iran war than Trump’s many critics. Cohen writes that the Iran war is not a “debacle,” rather it is a “dilemma” like all wars. Operationally, he writes, the war is going reasonably well, noting that the U.S. and Israel “have made significant progress toward achieving [their] objectives” of destroying Iran’s missiles and missile industry, destroying Iran’s navy, degrading Iran’s proxy network, and further degrading Iran’s ability to obtain a nuclear weapon. Diplomatically, the Gulf states have sided with the U.S. and Israel against Iran." . . . More...